PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations Part II MSCHE 2009 Annual Conference Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
Assessing Your Organization: Gauging Your Land Trusts Progress Maryland Land Conservation Conference 2009 Sylvia Bates, Land Trust Alliance Beki Howey,
EVALUATOR ORIENTATION Serving on Off-Site and On-Site Committees OVERVIEW.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
The Application for Renewal Accreditation: Electronic Submissions.
David S. Adegboye, PhD Professor of Biology Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs & SACS Liaison University Professional Conference August 18,
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Middle States Periodic Review Report Campus View SUNY Cortland PRR Committee SUNY Cortland Cortland, New York.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
Medical School Preparation for LCME Accreditation The University Toledo College of Medicine August 24, 2011 Barbara Barzansky, PhD, MHPE LCME Secretary,
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Surviving Reaffirmation: Two TSTC Approaches to Compliance & the QEP Texas Association for Institutional.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Working Group Training Compiling Evidence for a Successful Chapter LaMont Rouse, Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
Middle States Accreditation – update at Town Hall, 2/19/2014 Middle States Accreditation: Update at Town Hall Meeting February 19, 2014.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Segment 6: Provider Communication California ICD-10 Site Visit Training segments to assist the State of California with the ICD-10 Implementation June.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
Northwest Accreditation. Sandra Elman Visit ( ) General Recommendations  pages maximum  3 major themes for all chapters (standards) Descriptive.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
S AM H OUSTON S TATE U NIVERSITY O FFICE OF I NSTITUTIONAL E FFECTIVENESS A DMINISTRATIVE P ROGRAM R EVIEW.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Self-Study Instrument for Early Childhood Centers EDITION
Building the Future of Housing with the External Review
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Sam Houston State University
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Sam Houston State University
Curriculum Committee Orientation
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland

Agenda Cindys Top 5 Periodic Review Tips The painless way to a successful periodic review report. Cindys Top 5 Periodic Review Tips Questions

Top 5 Periodic Review Tops Select the right chair and steering committee members early in the process. Select the writer and editor for your report and involve them from the beginning. Make the Handbook for Periodic Review Reports your new best friend.

Top 5 Periodic Review Tops Develop a detailed outline for each section of the report, based on information presented in the Handbook. Mind the timeline, deadlines, and report length.

Periodic Review - General Considerations Not a mini self-study, yet is a significant component of the accreditation cycle. Middle States definition of a PRR - a retrospective, current, and prospective analysis of an institution. Emphasis on brevity, yet completeness, in a 50-page report. Report should be useful to the institution, not just a response to Middle States.

Leading the Periodic Review Process PRR Chair – Chair of the self-study steering committee? Someone else? – AACC chose the self-study chair Steering Committee – New group? Team that led the self-study? Existing institutional team? – AACC chose a new group, with representation from all segments of the institutions community, and included the needed expertise.

Preparing for Periodic Review Handbook for Periodic Review Reports will become your best friend. Attend PRR training session sponsored by Middle States. Attend sessions such as this one at Middle States conferences. Start months prior to the due date – AACCs steering committee began meeting in October 2007 for a PRR due in June 2009.

Organize Who will collect information needed for the report? – AACC - Steering Committee divided into teams. – Chair wrote charge for each group, based on the outline in the PRR Handbook. Who will write and edit the report? – AACC Steering Committee Chair wrote report and did some editing. – Editing done by at least one other steering committee member and an administrator in the area covered by the section.

Organize What materials will be collected to support the content of the report? – Some items listed in the Handbook must be included. – At AACC, those collecting information for the PRR and the Chair identified other items. Chair prepared a timeline – Stick to it!

Publicize the PRR Process AACC did this in several ways: – Presentations at College Orientation and constituency group meetings. – Regular updates at college leadership team meetings. – Regular reports to executive leadership at meetings and by . – Intranet site for PRR materials. – College wide announcements at key points.

Report Contents Outline of content provided by Middle States in the Handbook. Content of the PRR is much more prescribed than a self-study. 50 pages, not including appendices, exhibits, and other supporting materials. Be sure to include items specifically mentioned in the Handbook.

Six Sections of the PRR 1.Executive Summary – Write it last 2.Response to recommendations in the self- study and the visiting team reports. – Good starting point - most recommendations should have been addressed by this time. – AACC created a grid, listing person responsible for and status of each, updating when necessary.

Six Sections of the PRR 3.Major challenges and opportunities facing the institution. – Enlisted assistance of AACCs Institute for the Future and sought input from entire college community. 4.Enrollment trends and projections / Finance trends and projections. – AACC involved finance and enrollment development staff in developing this section.

Six Sections of the PRR 5.Assessment efforts – institutional and student learning assessment. – AACC faculty compiled student LOA information and collected many examples for the exhibits. – Institutional research staff provided information and data about institutional assessment efforts. 6.Linked institutional planning and budgeting processes. – AACC finance and planning staff contributed.

Draft of report posted to intranet for college-wide review and comment. – Open, on-ground sessions. – Comments accepted via web form, , snail mail. Set a deadline for making changes to report. Final updating and editing. Organizing materials for appendices. – Examples of assessing student learning are important. – Dont forget the items on the list of specific materials that Middle States wants included! After Writing the Report

Report Format All paper, all electronic, or a mix? Check with your Middle States liaison often, as report formats that are accepted by Middle States may change. Originally, the AACC report was to be all paper, but ended up as a mix of paper and electronic.

Report Format AACC produced a printed, spiral-bound report, exactly 50 pages in length, with 4 disks: – Disk 1 – the report hyperlinked to appendices. – Disk 2 – learning outcomes assessment exhibits. – Disk 3 – financial and strategic planning resources, as required and detailed in the Handbook. – Disk 4 – DVD of work produced by Communication Arts Technology students.

Success! Periodic Review Report sent to Middle States by June 1, where is it is read by 4 reviewers: – A Middle States staff member – Two external reviewers, a role similar to that of an on-site evaluator during a self-study visit – A finance associate, who examines financial documents submitted with the report.

Response – External Reviewers External reviewers respond by August 1. Prepare a confidential briefing to the Commission that includes recommendations regarding accreditation action, including any need for follow-up activities. Prepare a report to the institution that addresses findings.

Response – External Reviewers Report to the institution includes general comments on each section of the PRR and, as appropriate: – Suggestions - collegial advice. – Recommendations - address where improvement is needed to continue to meet standards. – Requirements – indicate that an institution does not comply with a standard and what is needed to come into compliance.

Response – Finance Associate Reviews overall financial health of the institution. Addresses areas where the institutional financial condition improved or worsened. Discusses any changes in assets and reserves. Addresses impact of any long-term debt on the institution. Identifies anything that is cause for concern.

The End of the PRR Process The Committee on Periodic Review, chaired by a Commission member, examines all materials and makes a recommendation to the Commission. Commission acts at its November meeting. Middle States staff notifies the institution of the Commissions action shortly thereafter.

Top 5 Periodic Review Tips Select the right chair and steering committee members early in the process. Select the writer and editor for your report and involve them from the beginning. Make the Handbook for Periodic Review Reports your new best friend.

Top 5 Periodic Review Tips Develop a detailed outline for each section of the report, based on information presented in the Handbook. Mind the timeline, deadlines, and report length.

Questions? Questions?