Entry Requirements for U.S. Accreditation Hellenic American Union, Athens, Greece 12-14 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Understanding Middle States Expectations for Assessment
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
Southern Regional Education Board Cheryl Blanco, Vice President, Special Projects Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION IN THE UNITED STATES What International Education Professionals REALLY Need to Know Presenters: Ann M. Koenig, AACRAO, USA.
Welcome! Help yourself to some refreshments outside. Find your assigned seat with your seminar group. Look through the folder that is prepared for you.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Higher Education Accreditation: A Look at the USA and Japan David Werner Visiting Researcher Local Human Resources and Public Policy System, Open Research.
Faculty WASC Information Session January 18, 2011.
Accreditation: Evolution and New Challenges 2015 Accreditation Institute Constance M. Carroll, Ph.D. Chancellor San Diego Community College District 1.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.
2008 HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY ACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SELF- STUDY & EVALUATION TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D. Vice President, MSCHE.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Betsy M. McDowell, PhD, RN, CNE October 2012 SC Organization of Nurse Leaders 1.
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice from Federal Compliance to Accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Independent School Process Agency of Education State Board of Education Presentation March 25, 2014.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Preparing for THE Visit: the PA Role in the Institutional Accreditation Report and Visit Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D., Vice President Middle States Commission.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Accreditation of eLearning Degree by Prof.Dr.Srisakdi Charmonman.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
The Process of Accreditation
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Site Visit: Consultant Advice March 2008 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
The Infrastructure of Accreditation: The Department of Education and The Regional Accreditors ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA.
WASC Orientation and Discussion September 2, 2009 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Infrastructure of Accreditation:
WASC Self Study: A First Look
SACSCOC Reaffirmation 2016 Quality Enhancement Plan
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Reaccreditation and Illinois
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
Curriculum Committee Report
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
How do we safeguard quality in Higher Education?
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
NEASC Self –Study Appraisal.
Presentation transcript:

Entry Requirements for U.S. Accreditation Hellenic American Union, Athens, Greece October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA USA

Topics Types of U.S. Accreditation Purpose of Regional Accreditation How U.S. Accreditation Works Which Institutions are Eligible? May Institutions Abroad Receive U.S. Accreditation? The Candidacy Process Conclusion

Types of U.S. Accreditation Types of Accreditors –7 Regional Accreditors Middle States, New England, North Central, Northwest, Southern, Western (Community Colleges; Universities) Similar standards Examine entire institution –Specialized and Professional Specific programs within an institution –National Degree-granting & non-degree granting institutions across the U.S.

Types of Accreditation contd Non-governmental, non-profit –Accredit public, private non-profit & private for-profit institutions –Apply same standards to all Accreditors recognized by U.S. Department of Education –Enables students to receive federal grants and loans

Purpose of Regional Accreditation Assures public that an institution meets high standards Judgment by peers that the institution: –Has appropriate mission and goals –Achieves success –Uses assessment results to improve –Is appropriately organized and staffed –Meets MSCHE standards

Purpose of Regional Accreditation contd Accreditation helps: –Students choose an institution –Institutions accept transfer of credits –Employers judge quality of graduates U.S. accreditation attests to the quality of the education a U.S. institution offers in other countries

How U.S. Accreditation Works Requires extensive external reviews over a long period of time –Tailored to the unique nature of the institution Candidate institutions: –Receive timely advice about meeting standards Multiple visits from staff, consultants, and evaluators –Submit written reports twice each year Newly-accredited institutions: –Undergo a full evaluation after five years

Which Institutions are Eligible to Apply There are 10 requirements of affiliation (revised March 2009). For example, an institution must demonstrate that it: –Is licensed by its state or government –Grants postsecondary degrees –Has a clear mission –Is governed by a board of directors –Publishes catalogues with information for students –Devotes sufficient resources to its educational activities

May Institutions Abroad Receive U.S. Accreditation? MSCHE Pilot Project ( ) –To determine whether and how standards applied to institutions chartered abroad –Moratorium exists for new applicants, and project is being evaluated Regional accreditors policies vary: Some do not accredit institutions abroad Some are experimenting with a few Some do but have significant restrictions MSCHE seeks mutual agreements with quality assurance agencies abroad

Candidacy Process Application phase Candidate status Thorough review ensures public that no accredited institution is a degree mill Supports institution as it improves Sifts out unqualified applicants early

Candidacy contd Institution submits: –Application and Data Form –Written materials (e.g., charter, mission, governing board, etc.) Application and other fees apply MSCHE vice president assigned as liaison and visits institution

Achieving Candidate Status –Self-Analysis Document Institution analyzes itself with the standards Proposes plan for self-improvement Includes specific operational data Small team of peer evaluators visits the institution Commission reviews team report, institutions response to team report, and grants/denies Candidate Status Candidacy contd

During Candidacy: –Institution files semi-annual reports –Consultant visits twice each year –Commission authorizes institution to start the self-study process –Self-Study report produced in months –Evaluation team visits institution and reports to the Commission –Entire candidacy process must be completed within five years –If accreditation is granted, institution conducts another self-study in next five years Candidacy contd

Conclusion Accredited institutions reviewed: –Comprehensive review every 10 years –Interim report in the 5 th year Commission may require other interim reports and team visits if issues emerge Problem areas are addressed early, before warning or loss of accreditation are necessary Evaluation and support during candidacy assures public confidence in the quality of institutions in the candidacy process