1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 27, 2005 Preparing your Implementation Plan.
Advertisements

TILE V, HISPANIC SERVING INSTITUTIONS Peter Fusscas Carolyn Proctor HACU'S 16 TH ANNUAL NATIONAL CAPITOL FORUM.
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Periodic Review Report Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Entry Requirements for U.S. Accreditation Hellenic American Union, Athens, Greece October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission.
Writing the Team Report Chairs and Evaluators Workshop.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Substantive Change Process
Substantive Change Policy – Response to the HEOA of 2008 Accreditation Provisions Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Barbara Samuel Loftus Vice President, MSCHE.
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Understanding Expectations for the Self Study from the HEOA 2008 Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Debra G. Klinman.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
Higher Education in a Changing Political and Economic Environment MSCHE Annual Conference December 13, 2011 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President.
Webinar on New Federal Regulations April 18, 2011 Ralph Wolff, President Senior College Commission, WASC Please join the audio portion of this webinar.
1 Student Assessment and Learning Outcomes Tess Kirsch Associate Director of Accreditation for Policy & Education American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Reporting and Disclosure Requirements - Module 1 Gainful Employment 1.
New Programs Module 3 Gainful Employment Final Rule.
Introduction to Training Modules Program Integrity Final Rule.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Addition Facts
Direct Assessment The Journey So Far
Workshop for Team Chairs and Evaluators
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
New Directions: Online Courses & the University of Californias A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions.
Presenter: Joseph McClary ARELLO Distance Education Manager Distance Education and ARELLO Certification Presented for the Connecticut Real Estate Instructors.
High School Diplomas and the Ability-to-Benefit Alternative Carney McCullough U.S. Department of Education 1.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities Robert K. Clark Cumberland County College Vineland, NJ.
Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process
Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Self-Study Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
SACS: Gatekeeper to the Flow of Federal Aid. UK’s Accrediting Body The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), Commission on Colleges, is.
2008 HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY ACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SELF- STUDY & EVALUATION TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D. Vice President, MSCHE.
Session 39 The Big Picture Linda Burkhardt Kevin Campbell.
Session FF-02 The Big Picture Michael Roberts Angela Smith U.S. Department of Education.
Institutional Eligibility Nautochia Webb U.S. Department of Education Training & Information Services Division.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Gainful Employment Disclosure Requirements, Correcting Data and Adding Programs Susan Bowder Cynthia Hammond U.S. Department of Education 1.
CEPA Programs – Accrediting Concerns Presenters: Dr. Deborah Loper, Assistant Vice President of Institutional Effectiveness at Colorado Mountain College.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Jessica Finkel and Cynthia Hammond | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Gainful Employment Disclosures Session 47.
CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Program Integrity Final Rule Gainful Employment. Lays the groundwork for future, substantial changes regarding gainful employment programs Establishes.
Keeping Our Libraries Vital and Our Sanity Intact When Experiencing Middle States Facilitator: Jacqui DaCosta Director of Library Services, Georgian Court.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
The Infrastructure of Accreditation: The Department of Education and The Regional Accreditors ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
The Infrastructure of Accreditation:
Welcome June 8, 2018.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Presentation transcript:

1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1

2 Overview Context and History Certification Statement HEOA 2008 Accreditation Provisions Implemented July 1, 2010 Substantive Change Issues HEOA 2008 Accreditation Provisions to be Implemented July 1, 2011 Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2

3 Context and History Accreditation developed and evolved to promote mission-centered, continuous quality improvement through peer evaluation. HEA 1965 (with subsequent re-authorizations, including 2008) named accreditors as gatekeepers for institutional access to federal funding. Various regulations have ensued. Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3

4 Context and History Today, while accreditors continue to focus on quality improvement, USDE sees the primary purpose of accreditation as safeguarding federal funds. Middle States Commission on Higher Education4

5 Certification Statement – Publications/Forms On-line An institution seeking initial accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation must affirm by completing this certification statement that it meets or continues to meet established MSCHE requirements of affiliation and federal requirements relating to Title IV program participation, including relevant requirements under the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 such as those on distance education and transfer of credit.

6 July 1, 2010 Provisions Distance Education Transfer of Credit Policy Middle States Commission on Higher Education 6

7 Distance Education – Instruction delivered via technology – Regular student/faculty interaction Correspondence Education – Instructional materials delivered, mail or – Student initiated interaction as needed Middle States Commission on Higher Education 7

8 Distance Education Programs MSCHE-approved Distance Education Programs – 50 percent or more of the programs credits are approved for electronic delivery – Approved via Substantive Change process – Listed on Statement of Accreditation Status – Designated reviewer added to evaluation teams – New distance education guidelines from MSCHE Middle States Commission on Higher Education 8

9 Student Identity Verification Policy Applies to Distance and Correspondence Education Courses and Programs Institutions document their processes through which student identity is verified – Secure username and password – Proctored exams – New technologies – Protection of student privacy – Notification of student fees at registration Evaluators review compliance Middle States Commission on Higher Education 9

10 Transfer of Credit Policy Publicly Disclosed Policy – Students and the public Identify Criteria for Transfer Decisions List Articulation Agreements Institutions certify compliance when submitting Self Study and PRR materials Evaluators review compliance Middle States Commission on Higher Education 10

11 Substantive Change Overview Definition of Substantive Change Prior Approval for Changes Required Relationship between Regional Accreditors and US Department of Education Middle States Commission on Higher Education

12 Substantive Change Categories Change in mission or objectives Change of legal status, control, or ownership Courses or programs representing a significant departure from existing offerings Programs at a new degree or credential level Change from clock to credit hours Substantial increase or decrease in the number of clock or credit hours awarded for successful completion of a program Middle States Commission on Higher Education 12

13 Substantive Change Categories Initiation or expansion of distance or correspondence education wherein 50% or more credits in a program offered through alternative delivery Establishment of a branch campus Establishment of domestic and international additional locations, including an additional location acquired from another institution, or established to provide a teach-out for students Middle States Commission on Higher Education 13

14 Substantive Change Categories Planned closure or relocation of additional location or branch campus, or a change in category Institutional closure requiring a teach-out plan Initiation of contractual agreement with 25% or more of an educational program provided by an unaccredited entity Middle States Commission on Higher Education

15 July 1, 2011 Provisions Final, In Progress, or Pending? State authorization Gainful employment Credit hours Middle States Commission on Higher Education 15

16 State Authorization States must authorize Title IV eligibility Accreditation may serve as proxy States must act on complaints ACE concerns submitted to US Department of Education, Middle States Commission on Higher Education 16

17 Gainful Employment (in progress*) educational program that prepares students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation New programs – USDE notification/approval – Need and wage analysis – How developed – Accreditation and State approval Disclose information on website, including – Graduation rates – Placement rates – Median loan debt Middle States Commission on Higher Education 17 *Final regulations in progress, to be implemented July 1, 2011, if finalized.

18 Credit Hours Unit of measurement of academic work Federal definition consistent with Carnegie Unit reasonable equivalencies -- verifiable student learning outcomes Accreditors evaluate reliability & accuracy Accreditors must address deficiencies, report systematic noncompliance to USDE ACE concerns submitted to USDE, Middle States Commission on Higher Education 18

19 HEOA 2008 Resources US Dept of Education Council for Higher Education Accreditation Middle States Commission on Higher Education Middle States Commission on Higher Education 19

20 Questions? Dear Colleague Letters – State Authorization – Credit Hour Middle States Commission on Higher Education 20