Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

Evaluator 102: An Introduction to Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Chairs & Evaluators Workshop: Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Entry Requirements for U.S. Accreditation Hellenic American Union, Athens, Greece October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations Part II MSCHE 2009 Annual Conference Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Substantive Change Process
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Tips and Strategies for Chairing a Successful Team Visit
MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2010 Debra G. Klinman Vice President, MSCHE.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Follow-Up Reports Linda Suskie Website:
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
The Application for Renewal Accreditation: Electronic Submissions.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Leaders Meeting Friday, August 27, – 11:00AM 107 Main Building Jennifer Skaggs, Ph.D. SACS.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Compliance Certification Report Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building.
Assessment Annotations A Simple and (Almost) Painless Way to Document Assessment of Student Learning DREXEL UNIVERSITY Assessment Conference.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Introduce yourself Explain fire procedures etc.
What Does Middle States Want? Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia PA Web:
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
Making Applications: Research Plan, Curriculum Vitae, List of Publications etc. Prof. Kaisa Miettinen
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
NCLB Monitoring September 19, 2012 Webinar.
Eureka! Leadership LSTA Grant Opportunity Overview Stacey Aldrich November 18, 2009.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
CPD and the Institute for Learning November 2008.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Middle States Conference December 3, 2014
Entry into CIMA Membership – Practical Experience Requirements
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Entry into CIMA Membership – Practical Experience Requirements
Program Review Workshop
Writing the Institutional Report
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Presentation transcript:

Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko

What is the purpose of follow-up? To assure the Commission of ongoing compliance with Standards To assure the Commission of ongoing compliance with Standards To provide the Commission with evidence of coming back into compliance with Standards To provide the Commission with evidence of coming back into compliance with Standards

When is follow-up required? After Self-Study evaluation visit After Self-Study evaluation visit After Periodic Review Report After Periodic Review Report After previous follow-up report After previous follow-up report After evidence that institution may not meet requirements of affiliation or standards After evidence that institution may not meet requirements of affiliation or standards

Types of follow-up reports Progress reports (previously known as progress letters) Progress reports (previously known as progress letters) Monitoring reports (next presentation) Monitoring reports (next presentation) Supplemental reports (next presentation) Supplemental reports (next presentation)

Timing of reports Depends on seriousness of situation: can be as soon as within four months of Commission action Depends on seriousness of situation: can be as soon as within four months of Commission action Depends on amount of time that an institution can be expected to need to achieve results desired by Commission Depends on amount of time that an institution can be expected to need to achieve results desired by Commission Balance between time needed by institution, Commissions concern with compliance Balance between time needed by institution, Commissions concern with compliance

Timing of reports Due April 1, October 1, or December 1 OR March 1, September 1, or November 1 if a visit is to follow or a financial review is required Due April 1, October 1, or December 1 OR March 1, September 1, or November 1 if a visit is to follow or a financial review is required Due date is included in Commission action communicated in letter to president and included in Statement of Accreditation Status (on website) Due date is included in Commission action communicated in letter to president and included in Statement of Accreditation Status (on website)

Follow-up visits (discussed in next presentation) Commission liaison guidance visits (previously known as staff visits) Commission liaison guidance visits (previously known as staff visits) Small team visits Small team visits Substantive change visits to branch campuses and additional locations (addressed in separate guidelines) Substantive change visits to branch campuses and additional locations (addressed in separate guidelines)

Progress Reports …when an institution meets the Commissions standards…but the Commission needs assurance that the institution is carrying out activities that the institution has reported as planned or being implemented. --Guidelines, Follow- Up Reports and Visits (Draft) …when an institution meets the Commissions standards…but the Commission needs assurance that the institution is carrying out activities that the institution has reported as planned or being implemented. --Guidelines, Follow- Up Reports and Visits (Draft)

Length of progress reports No prescribed length No prescribed length Previous guidelines said usually no more than five pagesoften not enough, depending on the issue, but… Previous guidelines said usually no more than five pagesoften not enough, depending on the issue, but… A progress report addressing a solitary, limited issue, might only run a page or two plus supporting documentation. A progress report addressing a solitary, limited issue, might only run a page or two plus supporting documentation. Relatively short reports with well-organized appendices are generally the best approach: Brevity with substance Relatively short reports with well-organized appendices are generally the best approach: Brevity with substance

Format of progress reports Use template of title page provided on website, Use template of title page provided on website, Introduction: brief overview of institution, context on issue(s) addressed in report Introduction: brief overview of institution, context on issue(s) addressed in report Progress to date/current status: For each issue addressed: substantive summary, discussion, analysis of actions taken Progress to date/current status: For each issue addressed: substantive summary, discussion, analysis of actions taken If appropriate, details on next steps If appropriate, details on next steps

Format, continued Appendices/supporting documentation: Appendices/supporting documentation: Evidence supporting statements made in the report Evidence supporting statements made in the report e.g., if topic is planning, include copy of strategic (or other relevant) plan e.g., if topic is planning, include copy of strategic (or other relevant) plan if topic is assessment, see Assessing Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness: Understanding Middle States Expectation for information on documentation if topic is assessment, see Assessing Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness: Understanding Middle States Expectation for information on documentation

Format, continued Conclusion Conclusion –Brief summary and analysis of institutions progress and current status –Address each matter in the report –Keep conclusion evidence-based –Avoid unsubstantiated assertions

Report submittal May be submitted on paper or by May be submitted on paper or by If paper: four copies bound ONLY by staples or paper clamps (NO binders or folders) If paper: four copies bound ONLY by staples or paper clamps (NO binders or folders) –Send to Evaluation Services Office at the Commission If electronic: send as attachments to or to If electronic: send as attachments to or to Voluminous appendices may be burned onto CD or provided through clear links to online resources Voluminous appendices may be burned onto CD or provided through clear links to online resources

Remember! Institutions Statements of Accreditation Status, including most recent Commission actions, are always available through the Commission website, under Institutions Institutions Statements of Accreditation Status, including most recent Commission actions, are always available through the Commission website, under Institutions Refer to the Follow-up Reports and Visits guidelines when preparing your report Refer to the Follow-up Reports and Visits guidelines when preparing your report

Remember! Contact your Commission liaison with any questions Contact your Commission liaison with any questions

Questions? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????