1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BY RAYMOND GREENLAW ARMSTRONG ATLANTIC STATE UNIVERSITY ABET-Accreditation Timeline.
Advertisements

R. Barbara Gitenstein October 6, Provide appropriate input on team Convene colleagues Organize work Articulate and focus on standards Focus on institutional.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Jerry McCarthy, ATS Teri Cannon, WASC.
New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC)
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
GME Internal Review Basics Heather A. Nichols Accreditation Manager Office of Graduate Medical Education.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
QEP BASICS.
2010 SACS-COC Annual Meeting December 6, 2010 CS-69 Administrative Program Review Assuring Quality in Administrative and Academic Support Units.
Support Services Review Support Services Review (SSR) is a representative, responsive form of assessment and self-evaluation to ensure continuous quality.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
WASC Report Board of Trustees February 2010 Diane Jonte-Pace Vice Provost Chair, Re-accreditation Self Study.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Budget, Legislative, and Accountability Update Continuing Education Leadership Institute March 23, 2015 Jennifer Haygood, EVP and Chief Financial Officer.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
Msubillings.edu/futureu PROVOST FORUM October 15, 2012 msubillings.edu/futureu.
May Priority 6 Review Team 6: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, A. Cohen, D. Cohen, M. DesVignes, M. Hong, D. Kinney, S. Maradian, J. Ireland,
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
Second Nature Strategic Framework Second Nature is the supporting organization of the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment Board.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Planning and Budget Committee March 13, Agenda Current Financial Position Original charge of this committee Sub-committee findings regarding Enrollment.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
1 Overview of Issues and Activities of the Planning Committee of Council Presented to University Council October 19, 2006.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
December 2010 Board of Trustees Overview of the New Accreditation, Accountability, and Assessment Committee Structure.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Academic Program Review Committee Report Faculty Senate meeting November 11, 2008.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Foundation of the Future A Process of Program Review and Prioritization Update provided by Sharon L. Vasquez, Provost Arosha Jayawickrema, VP of Finance.
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
10/10/2016 ISU Faculty Assembly: An Open Exchange with the Provost Dr. Laura Woodworth-Ney.
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Focused Midterm Report
IEPI Indicators Workshop
2016 GOVERNANCE GROUP UPDATE
Budget & Planning Calendar.
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation follow-up report
Steering Committee (SC) Mtg.
Presentation transcript:

1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American University of Rome MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE December 9, 2010 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2 OR STUFF HAPPENS!

3 Self-Study Closing Date Visit 6 Weeks – Update Letter To 3 Months - Addendum

4 5 MONTHS!!!! A LOT CAN HAPPEN IN 5 MONTHS

5 Things that can happen in 5 Months: Natural disaster Violence on Campus Your daughter elopes Unexpected presidential vacancy Change in ownership Faculty or staff union strikes Extreme change in financial environment

6 Case: The American University of Rome (AUR) Candidacy Visit – November 7-9, 2007 Granted Candidacy – March 2008 Self Study Closing Date – June 30, 2009 Accreditation Team Visit – December 2009 [Granted Accreditation – March 2010]

7 Self-Study Taking Place During Fiscal Crisis Embedded Culture of Planning-Assessment Budget Understanding of Core Values and Priorities

8 Goals To survive To revise Strategic and Financial Plans quickly and implement Demonstrate to MSCHE that AUR could weather this storm and come out even stronger

9 Obstacles After a year-and-a-half of downsizing, could we get everyone on board with more? Timing – Could the changes required be accomplished over the summer, approved by the Board of Trustees in the fall and incorporated into the addendum to the SS by mid-October so it could be sent to the Visiting Team six weeks prior to the visit?

10 Process Use the Planning-Assessment-Budget process already embedded as part of AURs culture of assessment developed over nearly a decade Focus on the core values of the University to preserve the best of what had been developed during an extended period of growth.

The JAC: Joint Advisory Committee on Planning and Budget The JAC considers the mission and goals of the institution and how these may be refined and better achieved. It links the assessment, planning and budget processes and unites the three main groups that make up AUR -- faculty, administration and students. Membership: President, ex officio (chair) Provost, ex officio Chief Financial Officer, ex officio Director of HR and Physical Plant, ex officio Director of Assessment and IR, ex officio Director of Student Life and Study Abroad ex officio Other Administration representatives (two) Faculty representatives (five) Student Government representative (one)

Functions of the JAC Receives and reviews all OA documentation for the institution; reviews the outcomes and performance measures of the previous years Strategic Plan; conducts a mid-year annual review of progress in achieving the institutional priorities identified in the current years Strategic Plan; reviews and updates the Strategic Plan including the mission and institutional goals; holds budget hearings during the budget forming process and recommends priorities consistent with the Strategic Plan; recommends budget allocations for the following year, based on outcomes assessment data and strategic planning decisions; reviews priority areas / projects to identify key elements necessary to meet institutional goals

13 Process FORM: Subcommittee [Strategic Task and Finish Force (STFF)] of JAC to rethink the fundamental model of the University. CHARGE: Prepare a framework for new Strategic and Financial Plans in light of the continuing effects of the global financial crisis, and especially the US recession, on AUR.

14 Process Membership of STFF: President Provost CFO Director of IT (also representing the staff union) Chair of Faculty Senate One other faculty member Meetings: Faculty, staff, students, full JAC

15 Process Meetings: Faculty Staff Students JAC

16 Result A new Framework for SP and FP adjusting to lower enrollment by reducing fixed costs of facilities, staffing, academic programs and faculty. A new Academic Plan featuring a more focused yet flexible curriculum, greater interdisciplinarity, and more efficient class scheduling

17