Before You Write APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STEM RAYS Research STEMRAYS Program Evaluation (Peterfreund & Associates) Educational research (Allan and Kelly) After School Club science and engineering.
Advertisements

Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Daryl Lund Editor in Chief IFT Peer-Reviewed Journals And David Min The Ohio State University Scientific Editor JFS Food Chemistry and Toxicology and Chemical.
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
UNM CTSC Mentored Career Development Scholars Program 6-Month Progress Report Template (Years 3+) Name Title Department or College.
How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published
How to write a Research Grant? or How to get a grant rejected? Spencer Gibson Provincial Director, Research CancerCare Manitoba.
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Scientific Literature Tutorial
The Web of Writing USING REFLECTIVE WRITING AS A LITERACY STRATEGY.
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Writing a Grant: Focus on Mentored Awards J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine University of Washington, Seattle,
Good Research Questions. A paradigm consists of – a set of fundamental theoretical assumptions that the members of the scientific community accept as.
Basic Scientific Writing in English Lecture 3 Professor Ralph Kirby Faculty of Life Sciences Extension 7323 Room B322.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
How to get that first NIH grant
Mentoring is A Fine Balance
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
Brent Gloy, July 2008 Increasing the Odds of Publishing Academic Research 2008 AAEA Annual Meetings Grad Student Section Symposium Brent A. Gloy Cornell.
Getting published (during your PhD studies) Professor Jennifer Rowley Department of Information and Communications Manchester Metropolitan University.
How to get my paper published? Presented by: Nadia Rosenthal, Editor-in-Chief, Differentiation.
Section 2: Science as a Process
Tips for writing well and getting your work published Madhukar Pai, MD, PhD McGill University, Montreal Editorial board member: Lancet Infect Dis PLoS.
(TOPIC NAME) Scientific Writing. Importance Scientists communicate their findings to the scientific community by publishing their experimental results.
Writing A Research Grant Proposal AJG Abboud J. Ghalayini, Ph.D.
Course Timeline October 7 th : Project description October 14 th : Paperwork and Budget October 21 st : Successful Grant Writers (Project description due)
WRITING RESEARCH / TECHNICAL PAPERS Case Study. INTRODUCTION Research work is incomplete unless the results are disseminated to the wider community. Publishing.
“Knowing Revisited” And that’s how we can move toward really knowing something: Richard Feynman on the Scientific Method.
Assessment of MSc and PhD students E J Wood School of Biochemistry & Microbiology University of Leeds Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Grantsmanship – Hypothesis Generation and Testing H. F. Gilbert.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
What is Science? Science is a system of knowledge based on facts and principles.
Unit 1 Section 2 Scientific MEthods.
What do physical scientists study to learn about the world?
“I sometimes get an article to review that is outside my area of expertise” “Why was I asked to review this paper when it is clearly.
HOW TO WRITE A SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION Karl-Heinz Schwalbe You just sit down and start writing?
Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Grant writing Ken Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University.
Section 2 Scientific Methods Chapter 1 Bellringer Complete these two tasks: 1. Describe an advertisement that cites research results. 2. Answer this question:
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD CA STATE STANDARD 8.
The Scientific Method. Objectives Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor. Identify the steps that make up scientific methods.
Concept Note Development Course Rajshahi University, Dept of Statistics Day 3 June Facilitated by Dorothy Southern and Yushuf Sharker Programme.
Key Elements in Applying for a Clinical Research Grant Niloofar Afari, PhD Associate Professor University of CA, San Diego Director of Clinical Affairs.
REPORTING RESEARCH Chapter 14. First step is to write a research proposal and secure permission and/or funding Next steps after the proposal - Plan, Plan,
Science Fair.
Literature Search Perform a thorough literature review, even if it means having to understand several different areas. You don't want to find out after.
How to publish paper in journal. Step 1.Familiarize yourself with potential publications.
REPORTING AND PUBLISHING RESEARCH FINDINGS Matthew L. S. Gboku DDG/Research Coordinator Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute Presentation at the.
Research Word has a broad spectrum of meanings –“Research this topic on ….” –“Years of research has produced a new ….”
Section 1-2. Scientists use many skills to gather information. Most science skills use your 5 senses: seeing, hearing, touching, smelling and tasting.
Essential Questions What is biology? What are possible benefits of studying biology? What are the characteristics of living things? Introduction to Biology.
ESSS Bxl-IV March 2013 Great organisation ! Thanks to all involved ! Participation is the most important ! Motivation / courage /presentation skills Congratulations.
Publishing Papers Cari McCarty, Ph.D. Center for Child Health Behavior and Development Seattle Children’s Hospital.
Scientific Method A blueprint for experiment success.
How To Be A Constructive Reviewer Publish, Not Perish: How To Survive The Peer Review Process Experimental Biology 2010 Anaheim, CA Michael J. Ryan, Ph.D.
How to Become a Reviewer P. Kay Lund, PhD Sarah Graham Kenan Professor Cell Biology & Physiology Nutrition & Pediatrics Editor-in-Chief, American Journal.
Unit 1 The Science of Biology Part 1- What is Science?
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Aim : How do you conduct a presentation that will adequately help others to understand your research study? (article/project) Do Now: What do you know?Do.
MEDI6302 Session 1 Research Questions
Section 2: Science as a Process
Research Process Identify questions of interest & review literature
Science Fair Project Due:
Levels of Scientific Knowledge
Exercise #4: Cell Biology Research Paper
K R Investigator Research Question
The Nature of Science.
A blueprint for experiment success.
Presentation transcript:

Before You Write APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals

Benefits of Writing As important as doing the research –Share your results with the greater scientific community –Opportunity to think more clearly about the research Writing is a skill and improves with practice Critical for your success

Importance of Publications Critical to promotion –Final product of the research project –Help colleagues learn about your work AND you –Yardstick of productivity –Quality is as important as quantity Critical to funding –Grant applications –Grant progress reports –Grant renewal applications

Competing to Publish Competition among scientists to be published in journals is intense Cost of publication is high Rejection rates vary among journals

What Makes a Good Paper? Tells a good story Sound and testable hypothesis Good experimental design Understandable results Advances understanding of science Suggests areas for future investigation

A Clear Hypothesis Does it make a specific prediction? –What does it mean if you prove it? –What does it mean if you disprove it? Is it testable? Does it have a clear rationale? –Does it fit with what is already known? –Does it expand or change the existing paradigm? Does it explain what happens in a simple way?

Good Hypotheses? #1: We hypothesized that changing the time the mice are exposed to a drug will change their breathing rate. #2: We hypothesized that the Na + uptake into the cells resulted from a novel but unknown substance.

Better Hypotheses! We hypothesize that the enhancement of CCK- induced satiation by gastric distention involves 5-HT3 receptor activation. We hypothesized that 8 wk of stretch-shortening cycle exercise training would increase fiber cross-sectional area, peak Ca 2+ -activated force, maximal shortening velocities, and power in slow and fast muscle fibers.

Writing in Stages Discuss with your collaborators –Research Tasks –Writing Tasks –Authorship Write an outline for the paper Do a thorough literature search, including older literature Start writing as you finish the experiments –Your methods –Your results to identify missing data/needed experiments Seek input from colleagues Consider practical and political issues Patents, secrecy regulations No one way to write a paper

Questions to Ask Yourself Before Writing Have you written an outline? Have you agreed on who the authors will be? Have you agreed on who is writing each section of the manuscript? Have you selected a journal? Is your command of English grammar good enough?

Judgment Calls Knowing when to start and stop writing Knowing when youve done enough experiments Determining enough versus too much in your story Ask mentors for assistance

Summary Good writing does not make up for poor science Poor writing can mask good science Plan before you start the experiments! –Rationale and hypothesis –Experimental design –Paper outline Early discussions with collaborators Watch your writing improve through… –Practice –Accepting critical feedback