Simplification of Bevacizumab Administration: Do we need 90, 60, or even 30 minute infusion times? LB Saltz, K-Y Chung, D Reidy, J Timoney, V Park, E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Carfilzomib: High Single-Agent Response Rate with Minimal Neuropathy Even in High-Risk Patients 1 Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy Does Not Impact the Efficacy.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Pharmacy 483 Outcomes & Cost Management in Pharmacy Practice Janet Kelly, Pharm.D., BC-ADM February 22, 2005.
OPTIMISING MEDICINES USE GRAHAM DAVIES Professor of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics Institute of Pharmaceutical Science King’s College London.
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Module 6 Inactivated poliovirus vaccine AEFI monitoring Training for Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV) introduction.
Abstract Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy First, Followed by Chemoradiation and Then Surgery, in the Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer A. Cercek, K.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Bosch F et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3345.
1Stopeck A et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Renal Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
SAR650984, a CD38 Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Selected CD38+ Hematological Malignancies — Data from a Dose-Escalation Phase I Study Martin TG.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
ASCO 2009 Safety and Efficacy of AMG 655 Plus Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and Bevacizumab (B) for the First-line Treatment of Patients (Pts) With Metastatic.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Xeloda ® plus oxaliplatin: rationale in colorectal cancer (CRC)  Oxaliplatin is active in CRC, especially when combined with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)  Superior.
Efficacy results from the ToGA trial: a phase III study of trastuzumab added to standard chemotherapy in first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor.
What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited metastatic disease with ECOG-1? Gemcitabine.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
Eastern cooperative oncology group Impact of Bevacizumab Dose Reduction on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Treated on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group’s.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 175.
NSABP C08 adjuvant colon cancer Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Praxbind® - Idarucizumab
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
Raafat R. Abdel-Malek, MD, FRCR Ass. Prof Clinical Oncology Cairo University, Egypt Efficacy & Toxicity of Sunitinib in mRCC patients in Egypt.
TAXOL® (paclitaxel) for Adjuvant Treatment of Node Positive Breast Cancer Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee TAXOL® (paclitaxel) for Adjuvant Treatment.
Figure 1. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival analyzed with fixed effect model. Table 1: Relevant trials Table 2. Methodological quality Conclusions.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
A Multicentre Phase II Study of Cisplatin (C), Gemcitabine (G), and Bevacizumab (B) as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
ASCO 2009 BEVACIZUMAB IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: An Update of the CALGB and AVOREN Trials Reviewed by: Dr. Daniel.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
 Using conventional ionic contrast agents, total adverse reactions can be expected with a frequency of ~5-8%  Adverse reactions from intravascular contrast.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Final Results for the 1703 Phase 1b/2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple.
Anaphylactic Shock On The Cath Table: Bivalirudin To Blame?
Hypothermia for Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Foundations of Interprofessional Collaboration (FIPC): An Introduction to TeamSTEPPS® LEVEL 3 Overview of Clinical Management of Anaphylaxis for Respiratory.
TREATMENT ARM B: Cycles 1–3: Cycles 4+: 5-FU continuous infusion
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Lunedì 04 giugno Highlight a cura di Filippo de Marinis
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): Safety Analysis of the first 800 Patients in a Randomized Phase III Trial (EPIC): Abstract.
Using Q-learning Method in Identify Optimal Treatment Regime
Presentation transcript:

Simplification of Bevacizumab Administration: Do we need 90, 60, or even 30 minute infusion times? LB Saltz, K-Y Chung, D Reidy, J Timoney, V Park, E. Hollywood, N Sklarin, R Muller Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA

Background Bevacizumab (Bev) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A). Due to concerns of the possibility for infusion related hypersensitivity reactions (HSR’s), the phase I clinical trials of bev employed an initial 90 minute infusion of IV bevacizumab. If the 90 minute initial infusion was tolerated without a hypersensitivity reaction, the next dose was given over 60 minutes; if that dose did not produce a HSR, then all subsequent doses were given over 30 minutes.

Background (continued) This 90, 60, 30 minute infusion schedule has remained the standard administration schema throughout the development and registration of bevacizumab. The continued need for this practice, which was established when very little clinical experience with bev was available, has never been addressed. No significant infusion-related toxicities were reported in the pivotal phase III registration trial, which used the above schedule. (Hurwitz et al, NEJM 2004). We therefore postulated that bev could be safely administered without initially prolonged infusion times.

Methods We initially obtained an IRB waiver of authorization to review the records of patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) who were treated with bev in the first 3 months of commercial availability (cut-off date 5/15/04). Subsequently, we obtained further authorization to review all patients treated with bev at our institution for the first 2 years of commercial availability (cut-off date 2/28/06).

Methods (continued) Computerized pharmacy records were utilized to identify all patients who had received bev during the time period in question, thereby preventing any recall bias. Our institutional adverse drug reaction reporting program was utilized to identify any infusion reactions related to bev. Additionally, patient electronic medical records were reviewed for further confirmation if any grade HSR was reported.

Bevacizumab Treatments at MSKCC (Feb ‘04 through Feb ’06) # pts treated with bev 892 Total # doses given8250 # pts treated at 5 mg/kg 669 Total # doses at 5 mg/kg6969 # of 5mg/kg doses with duration of dose administration recorded in electronic pharmacy record5795

MSKCC Institutional Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Reporting System Hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) kits are readily available in all chemotherapy treatment areas. Kits contain diphenhydramine, hydrocortisone, ranitidine, albuterol neb, EpiPen®, and ADR reporting form Policy & Procedure: Any time kit is used, ADR form is completed. In addition, any HSR of any grade is reported.

Definitions Used for Severity Reporting of HSR at MSKCC Mild: resolved with no medications given; no harm to patient Moderate: resolved, but prescription medication given. No harm to patient. Severe: any one or more of the following: –Hypoxia (0 2 sat < 89%) –Severe bronchospasm or hypotension –Use of epinephrine –Felt by MD or reviewer to be potentially life- threatening. –Contributed to permanent disability or death

Results Following initial commercial availability of bev in February 2004, 202 consecutive colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were treated with bev (5 mg/kg) at MSKCC starting as a 90 minute, then 60 minute, then 30 minute infusion. No hypersensitivity reactions were seen.

Results (continued) A decision was then made to establish an institutional practice of using 30 minute infusion times for all doses, including initial doses, of bev. Subsequently, 464 CRC patients were treated with bev 5 mg/kg, initially as a 30 minute infusion (no 90 or 60 minute infusions). No infusion hypersensitivity reactions have been observed.

Conclusion #1 Bevacizumab can be safely administered as a 30 minute infusion without the need for 90 minute or 60 minute initial treatments.

Infusion times less than 30 minutes Standard bev doses at 15 mg/kg over 30 min have an infusion rate of 0.5 mg/kg/min. As of Nov 1 st, 2005, MSKCC adopted this as the institutional standard infusion rate for all bev infusions. – mg/kg/min = 30 minutes – mg/kg/min = 20 minutes – mg/kg/min = 10 minutes

From Nov 1, 2005 through Feb 28, patients received a total of 1059 doses of bev 5mg/kg over 10 minutes –185 patients converted from ongoing 30 minute infusions to 10 minutes – no HSR’s reported. –74 patients began therapy with all doses over 10 minutes – no serious HSR’s reported (2 moderate HSR’s, each on 2 nd dose …see details that follow)

HSR reaction #1 71 y.o. male with CRC, received dose #1 FOLFOX bev (10 min) without incident. During cycle 2, pt felt flushed, noted to have red face and abd pain 5 min into infusion. Had small volume emesis. 0 2 sat = 95%. Patient given diphenhydramine 50 mg and ranitidine 50 mg, then completed rest of infusion over 1 hr. He received 2 further doses of bev with premeds over 90 min without incident, then changed therapy due to P.O.D.

HSR # 2 70 y.o. male with metastatic CRC receive 1 st dose of FOLFOX/bev (5mg/kg over 10 min) without incident. During second dose, at completion of bev (10 minutes), patient reported feeling hot. Facial flushing noted. 0 2 sat = 97%. Diphenhydramine 50 mg given and FOLFOX then completed. Patient remains on treatment with 25 mg diphenhydramine before bev, and has received 3 further doses of bev at 5 mg/kg over 10 min without incident.

HSR # 3 (30 min infusion, 15 mg/kg, 2 nd dose) 66 y.o. female with metastatic breast cancer, with history of allergic reaction to carboplatin, had been on long-standing paclitaxel. First dose of bev 15 mg/kg over 30 min added to paclitaxel without incident. Fifteen minutes into 2 nd bev dose, patient with shaking chill. 0 2 sat = 99%. No SOB or erythema noted. Patient had received prior diphenhydramine, ranitidine, and dexamethasone for paclitaxel. Given more diphenhydramine and dexamethasone and completed infusion without incident. Patient has continued bev, and remains on bev 10 mg/kg over 20 min 6 months later without incident.

Conclusions 90 and 60 minute initial infusions of bev do not appear to be necessary. Routine 30 minute initial bev infusions –appear to have a similar, excellent safety profile in terms of HSR’s to 90 min initial infusions –are more convenient for patients –require less chair time in chemotherapy units –are less expensive

Conclusions (continued) An infusion rate of 0.5 mg/kg/minute 5 mg/kg over 10 minutes 10 mg/kg over 20 minutes 15 mg/kg over 30 minutes –is logical, based on standard practice with high dose infusions –is our current standard practice at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center –thus far shows no serious hypersensitivity reactions