Characterization of Model Rockets in Flight Section 4, Team 1 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3 and Student 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida Hybrid Rocket Team’s Mile High Club
Advertisements

Exploring the Four Forces of Flight
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
E80 Final Report Section 4 Team 2 Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 May 5, 2008.
Pressure sensors and thermistors -What do they do and how to calibrate them? E80 Feb 21, 2008.
Northwest Indian College Space Center First Nations Launch 4/29/10 – 5/2/10.
Closing Summary Design Testing Abstract Monitoring crop heath via aerial photography is a proper technique used to maximize agricultural productivity.
Rocket Trajectories By Jan-Erik Rønningen Norwegian Rocket Technology [ [ ]
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Irradiation Sample Transfer Line Snubbing Section Behavior Greg Padilla and Keane Nishimoto.
Lecture161 Instrumentation Prof. Phillips March 14, 2003.
EN400 – Principles of Ship Performance
Problem 1: Rocket Trajectory Write a computer code to predict flight of the V-2 rocket. –Rocket info:
U U 1 Excitation of Structural Resonance Due to a Bearing Failure Robert A. Leishear David B. Stefanko Jerald D. Newton IMECE 2007 ASME, International.
Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
 All teams are provided with a “kit” – set of (mostly cardboard) templates to assist with rocket assembly  Our kit will be a “North Star” design seen.
Aerodynamic Theory Review 3
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Topic 1 different attributes that characterize sensors ETEC 6405.
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
“Sky Rockets in Flight” Experimental Engineering Section 1,Team 3 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, Student 4 May 5, 2008.
Science Fiction. Rocket flight Centre of Mass or Centre of Gravity (CM or CG) Centre of mass is the mean or central location of all the mass of an object.
Human Powered Submarine: System Modeling Jason Collins, William Darling Advisor: Michael “Mick” Peterson, Ph.D. Background The System Modeling Team was.
Sensing self motion Key points: Why robots need self-sensing Sensors for proprioception in biological systems in robot systems Position sensing Velocity.
Transducers/Sensors Transducer/sensor converts a non- electrical quantity, measurand, into a related electrical output signal Ideally there is a linear.
The Finite Element Method
Encoders What is an encoder? An encoder is a sensor for converting rotary motion or position to a series of electronic pulses.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Measurement of Pressure Distribution and Lift for an Airfoil  Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Instrumentation  Data reduction.
An Introduction to Programming and Algorithms. Course Objectives A basic understanding of engineering problem solving process. A basic understanding of.
Where No One Has Gone Before… E80: The Next Generation Section 1, Team 1 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, and Student 4 May 5, 2008.
Rockets Applied Science Fall 08 Mrs. Dickerson.
 Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis.
Section 17.2 Position, Velocity, and Acceleration.
Rocket Flight Dynamics Section 1, Team 4 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3 May 5, 2008.
MECH 391 Instrumentation Lab 9 Vibration Analysis of an Aluminum Cantilever Beam Performed: 03/15/04 Sinan Ozcan : I believe I performed 100% of this lab.
VIBRATIONS EXPERIMENT OBJECTIVES: 1. Solve a second order non-homogenous differential equation describing the displacement of a specimen.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Mathematical Model of Motion Chapter 5. Velocity Equations Average velocity: v =  d/  t To find the distance traveled with constant or average velocity.
Analysis of Rocket Flights Section 4, Team 4 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, Student 4.
E80 Section 3 Team 3 Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 May 5, 2008.
6 Kinetics Year 11 DP Chemistry.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
Lecture 9: Modeling Electromechanical Systems 1.Finish purely electrical systems Modeling in the Laplace domain Loading of cascaded elements 2.Modeling.
Analysis of Rocket Flights E80 Spring 2008 Section 2, Team 2 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, and Student 4.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
R OCKET S IMULATORS By Howard Smart. C ONTENTS Introduction to Rockets Introduction to Rocket Simulators An introduction to each simulator and how they.
Kinetics Senior Chemistry. Particle Collisions For a reaction to proceed to products, the reactants must collide with one another. Rate of reaction The.
Trajectory Analysis Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 E80: Section 4 Team 3 Harvey Mudd College 5 May 2008.
Chapter 2 Motion in One Dimension. Kinematics Describes motion while ignoring the external agents that might have caused or modified the motion (Dynamics.
INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
Analysis of the Mudd III Rockets
Medium Rocket Analysis
PhD student: Jia Sun Supervisor: Leif Kari MWL/AVE/ KTH
Rocketry.
Critical Design Review Presentation
Off-design Performance of A Rotor
Sky Diving Motion Analysis.
LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DAMPING PARAMETERS
Lesson 12: Analog Signal Conditioning
6 Kinetics Year 11 DP Chemistry.
The First Free-Vibration Mode of a Heat Exchanger Lid
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Reading Between the Lines
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Characterization of Model Rockets in Flight Section 4, Team 1 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3 and Student 4

Introduction Using prototypes can prevent costly errors in complicated systems Different types of sensors are required to collect a wide variety of data The current set of rockets follow in the footsteps of Mudd I and Mudd II

Preparation: Rocket Launch Following a series of checklists: Configure R-DAS and Video Load parachute and ejection charge Install motor Followed NAR and Tripoli guidelines

Procedures: Data Collection R-DAS - Rocket Data Acquisition System Three batches of sensors: IMU Strain Gauges Thermistor and Pressure Transducers These batches are used to model: Velocity and position Vibration and response Atmospheric variables Calibration curves are used to convert from digital signals to physical variables Video camera © Bruce Yan

Theory: Rocket Flight Simulation The MATLAB script numerically integrates acceleration given by an experimental thrust curve It makes several simplifying assumptions: The rocket only moves in two dimensions The wind exerts a constant lift force The rocket travels straight for 6 feet along the rail. Then it instantaneously changes direction towards the wind The coefficient of drag is.75

Theory: IMU The IMU contains: Accelerometers Gyroscopes Sensors are mutually orthogonal to create a local set of axes Can convert between local axes to global variables by using a rotational matrix Data were used to recreate the rocket flight path The global variables can be found from the local variables by using a rotation matrix.

Theory: IMU IMU Calibration Curve

Medium Rocket: IMU A variety of engines were used Theoretical models were created using MATLAB and RocSim Flights were modeled using the IMU data in conjunction with a MATLAB script Both the theoretical models overestimated the altitude of the apogee

Rocket Flight Model: Medium IMU Experimental Modeling of IMU Rocket Flight 2 (Motor G79W, 4/26/2008)

Rocket Flight Model: Medium IMU Experimental 3D Modeling of IMU Rocket Flight 2 (Motor G79W, 4/26/2008)

Rocket Flight Video: Medium IMU © Masanori Honda

Small Rocket: IMU Tragedy Strikes! The R-DAS did not detect apogee and deploy the parachute Data was irrevocably damaged by the fall © Masanori Honda

Rocket Flight Model: Small IMU

Theory: Thermistors The locations of the Thermistors are shown below Temperature can be found as a function of the resistance of the thermistor using the Steinhart – Hart (S-H) Equation displayed below.

Theory: Pressure Sensors The rocket has two pressure sensors R-DAS IMU The two pressure sensors were calibrated with an desiccation chamber The altitude of the rocket can be calculated using the relationship between altitude and the atmospheric pressure shown below.

Smoothing Function

Medium Rocket: Temperature and Pressure Apogee R-DAS: m IMU: m Medium Temperature and Pressure Flight 1(Motor G67R, 4/19/2008)

Theory: Vibration The Modal shape of a linear objects can be given by the following equation The first three Modal shapes should have the shapes below The following diagram displays the location of the strain gauges on the rocket

Medium Rocket: Vibration Plot of time vs raw data for 3-4 secondsPlot of time vs raw data for seconds

Medium Rocket: Vibration

Plots of sensor positions to corrected magnitude

Conclusions The IMU rocket showed: Theoretical models consistently overestimate the actual apogee by 30-40% The temperature pressure rocket: Consistency between two pressure sensors Temperature of the rocket during flight The vibrational rocket: Only the first mode was observed The first resonance occurred at 43 Hz © Masanori Honda

Further Work Suggestions for design improvement: Change from the R-DAS to another type of data acquisition system due to issues: The R-DAS altitude sensor does not reliably detect apogee due to low resolution The R-DAS doesn’t sample at high enough of a frequency to detect higher vibration modes Further rocket flights to determine any inefficiencies in the rocket design © Masanori Honda

Acknowledgements Professor Spjut Professor Cardenas Professor Miraghaie Professor Yang Professor Wang Proctor 1 Proctor 2

Acknowledgements And the E80 students who have risked their lives for the course © Med Temp. Press. Rocket

Questions?