Perspective on the ASTM Roadmap for Supporting Civil Nuclear Energy Plants Workshop on Emerging Trends in Nuclear Energy – The Standards Component June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
Chapter 1 Image Slides Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January ERASMUS MUNDUS PREPARING YOUR APPLICATION.
1 Leading the Learning Function September 14, 2009 Dr. Gretchen Van der Veer Director, Office of Leadership Development and Training Corporation for National.
NRC Consensus Standards Program
ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Pat Picariello, Director, Developmental Operations 1 Strategic Planning & New Activity Development.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES September.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Strategic Planning & New Activity Development September 2013.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
1 NRC Status and Plans for License Renewal – A Role for Consensus Standards Allen Hiser, Jr. Robert Gramm Stacie Sakai Division of License Renewal Office.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Membership & Roster Maintenance September 2013 ASTM Officers.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Membership & Roster Maintenance Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Kevin Shanahan 1.
CEFPI Southeast Region Strategic Planning September 2011 Focus Groups Update – Sept
Web Design Issues in a Business Establishment Panel Survey Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys (ICES-III) June 18-21, 2007 Montréal,
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Lisa Brown and Charles Thomas LAWNET 2002 Taking the Mystery Out of Project Management.
AIAA Task Force on Earth Observations 2 October 2009 AIAA HQ Reston VA.
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 DOE Safety Committee Handbook. 2 Effective Safety Committee! Make it work for you!
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
1 Kentuckys Public Safety Awareness Initiative Program Coordination and Partnerships August 23, 2005.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Chapter 5 – Enterprise Analysis
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
“RULES FOR INSERVICE INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR PLANT COMPONENTS”
Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Safety Committee Orientation Environmental Energy Technologies Division November 18, 2011.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Stakeholders and the Public
Chapter 10 COMMUNICATION PLANS [ENTER FACILITATOR’S NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION] Developed by Troutman Sanders LLP Developed for the Virginia Department.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Orientation and Training Susan A. Abravanel Sydney Taylor June 25 th, 2014.
BC Ministry of Health NP4BC Workshop Pre-Questionnaire High Level Results.
Project Purpose and Background
G-30 Self Assessment CDS “A Case Study” Bruce Butterill Vice-President, Product Management The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited November, 2003.
G-131 & E/L-131: Exercise Evaluation and Improvement Planning
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Sport Workforce Audit Tool Capability Building in Sport Organisations Pre-forum Workshop 2 Our Sporting Futures.
Management Plan: An Overview
Week 1.
Internal Control and Control Risk
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
05/19/04 1 A Lessons Learned Process Celebrate the Successes Learn From the Woes Natalie Scott, PMP Sr. Project Manager.
CTS Strategic Roadmap Walkthrough, v1.2 Dan Mercer.
Chapter 14 Fraud Risk Assessment.
ASME SMR ROADMAP (STP-NU-072)
Dr. Jose Pires Structural, Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering Branch
ASME / NRC Management Meetings Kevin Ennis Director, Nuclear C&S Ryan Crane C&S Project Engineering Manager ASME 2 Park.
ASTM International Nuclear Initiatives Roadmap Steve Byrne and Joe Koury March 2013.
1 NRC Plans for NESCC Concrete Specifications, Codes & Standards (SCS) Endorsement NESCC Meeting March 28, 2013 Richard Jervey USNRC Office of Regulatory.
NESCC Meeting March 28, Topics Accomplishments Since Last Meeting Program Management for NESCC Support to the NESCC Sponsor Committee Review and.
November 7, Status * Concrete Repair Report was published in August * Included 40 recommendations for: * Revisions to standards. * New standards.
1 Standards Database: Status of Development NRC/RES/RGDB Tom Boyce Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative (NESCC) November 29, 2012.
1 Standards Database Initial Development Tom Boyce, NRC/RES/RGDB Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative (NESCC) March 1, 2011
Nuclear Standards for Polymeric Piping Aaron Forster, NIST Engineering Laboratory NIST, MS Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD (301)
Presentation transcript:

Perspective on the ASTM Roadmap for Supporting Civil Nuclear Energy Plants Workshop on Emerging Trends in Nuclear Energy – The Standards Component June 15, 2011

Introduction NESCC formed to support Nuclear Energy –ASTM and NRC are participants. January 2011 ASTM survey to gain members input on needed standards actions. Next steps: Create the ASTM Roadmap or providing the needed support 2 ASTM Roadmap for Civil Nuclear Energy Plants

Background In the early 1980s, NRC (Chuck Serpan) asked ASTM E10 (Len Steele) to address list of issues via development of standards. 25 years later, the Nuclear Renaissance is on the horizon and NESCC has been formed to assist it. 3 ASTM Roadmap for Civil Nuclear Energy Plants

Background (continued) NESCC established (4/30/09) to foster needed standards and technology –included NRC/ASTM goal to identify key actions by ASTM to address critical NRC needs in support of current and future nuclear plant designs. 4 ASTM Roadmap for Civil Nuclear Energy Plants

Objectives 1.Review perspective on what SDOs need to do in order to create the ASTM Roadmap. 2.Summarize points from ASTM survey as they pertain to the ASTM Roadmap. 5 ASTM Roadmap for Civil Nuclear Energy Plants

First Objective Identify what likely has to be done in order to create the ASTM Roadmap. 6 Perspective on ASTM Roadmap

Purpose of the Roadmap Literally, the roadmap provides a strategic plan for getting to the intended destination. The strategic plan should have: –A vision statement. –Goals and aspirations for the near term (e.g., 1-3 years), medium term (e.g., 3-5 years) and long term (e.g., 5-10 years). –Specific assigned actions with metrics to judge success in attaining each defined goal and aspiration. 7 Perspective on ASTM Roadmap

Purpose of the Roadmap (continued) Start with the long term vision. Then build the list of goals and aspirations. –The Roadmap needs to be unique to ASTM and specific to nuclear power. Critical that vision be shared with NRC –Also important to get buy-in from other NESCC participants that ASTM is appropriate organization to undertake those items. 8 Perspective on ASTM Roadmap

Roadmap Process Initial step: Define vision. Identify ASTM Committees with expertise involved with issue. Identify needs: –Get input from NRC and ASTM committees, via ASTM membership survey –Compile list of ASTM standards cited in NRC Regulations, Nuclear Codes and Standards. 9 Perspective on ASTM Roadmap

Vision ASTM and NRC should define this together to serve as basis for the eventual Roadmap. [For example, ASTM working with NRC to assist Nuclear Renaissance via standards development.] Goals and Aspirations Will be specific to Nuclear Power and must be unique to ASTM. Should be shared between ASTM and NRC, and acknowledged by other stakeholders. Roadmap Inputs ASTM survey results and follow-up. List of ASTM citations in NRC Guides and Regulations, as well as in Nuclear Codes and Standards. Advice provided by cognizant ASTM subcommittees. 10 ASTM Roadmap - Summary

Outputs Establish specificity to gaps (new vs. updated standard or technology). Rank order based on relevance, significance, likelihood and time criticality. Action Plan Create plan for each gap. Assign to specific ASTM S/C. Establish schedule for completion. Roadmap Generation Assign sponsor and establish funding, and coordinate with NESCC. Communicate regularly with ASTM/NRC team. Mange Roadmap once created and Respond to emerging issues. 11 ASTM Roadmap - Summary

Second Objective Summarize points from January 2011 ASTM survey as they pertain to the ASTM Roadmap. 12 Overview of ASTM Survey

Committees responding to or cited in ASTM Survey A01 (A01.06) Steel and Stainless Steel B5 Copper and Copper Alloys D18 Soil and Rock D19 (D19.04) Water/Radiochemical Analysis D33 Protective Coating and Lining/Power Gen. E08 Fatigue and Fracture E10 (E10.02 and E10.05) Nuclear Technology and Applications. E48 Biotechnology 13 Overview of ASTM Survey

Potential Resources Vessel forging specifications (A508, A541, A723, A965) are responsibility of subcommittee A Fracture and fatigue standards with nuclear applications are responsibility of Committee E08. Reactor vessel integrity and neutron metrology standards are responsibility of Committee E10, and previously has worked with NRC on regulatory needs. D33 is working on NIST/NESCC project for concrete codes and standards. 14 Overview of ASTM Survey

General Observations Various subcommittees (D19.04, E10, D33) reported active involvement or representation by NRC; often reported desire for more NRC participation. 15 Overview of ASTM Survey

Potential ASTM Actions - New Plant Designs For passive reactor designs (e.g., AP1000), some follow- up suggested on containment vessel coatings for thermal conductivity or coating weight; and technology with respect to treatment of corrosion product buildup on coating. Consideration of buried piping, modular design, torsional shear testing, and aging of coatings. Consideration of component material specifications for international applications – clarity of interpretation by non-English speaking fabricator. Consideration of specifications for new material applications (since cannot base performance on current plant experience). 16 Overview of ASTM Survey

Potential ASTM Actions – Operating Plants Check for consistency in citing standards between NRC, DOE, EPA and Homeland Security (Agreement States) and for use of current versions of ASTM standards in Nuclear Codes. Assess need to update ASTM specifications on reagent water and for non-destructive fuel assay techniques. Determine need for updated fracture toughness testing standards, nuclear fuel reprocessing and test protocols, neutron detector and radiochemical analysis technology and standards for high strength rebar. 17 Overview of ASTM Survey

Potential Communication Paths Symposiums and workshops with invitations to academics. Certification and training (for which ASTM can add specific value). Collaboration with other organizations (NACE, ASME, ASCE, ASFE, NSSS vendors, academia) in the preceding and to execute the ASTM Roadmap. Recurring theme: The more others are involved, the better the end result. 18 Overview of ASTM Survey

Summary Process underway to identify key ASTM committees involved with standards for the civil nuclear power industry and for examining NRC regulations for citations to ASTM standards. Numerous potential actions identified in ASTM Survey. –Some Subcommittees are already addressing identified gaps. Need to identify potential gaps and to get agreement of their significance to the Nuclear Renaissance and, hence, to their place in the ASTM Roadmap. 19 Perspective on the ASTM Roadmap for Civil Nuclear Energy Plants

Summary (continued) This Workshop is one step in process to create the ASTM Roadmap for civil nuclear energy. It is important for the NRC and ASTM: –to work together to define the gaps and –to create the ASTM Roadmap and manage it to fill key gaps on a timely basis. 20 Perspective on the ASTM Roadmap for Civil Nuclear Energy Plants

21 The more others are involved, the better the end result. Questions? Perspective on the ASTM Roadmap for Civil Nuclear Energy Plants