Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D. President, Behavioral Pathway Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
YMCA Proposal Writing Successful Strategies for Financial Development.
Advertisements

Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
The Florida Behavioral Health Benchmarking Initiative: A Portal to Organizational Excellence and Efficiency Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D. President, Behavioral.
The Florida Behavioral Health Benchmarking Initiative: A Portal to Organizational Excellence and Efficiency Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D. President, Behavioral.
Service User Survey 2011 Service User Survey Results 2011 Toni Martin – Senior Consultant Quality Health.
Presented by: Bob Prill, CPA and Tori Bryson, CPA Hoffman, Stewart & Schmidt, P.C.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL 2008 Legal Department Spending and Staffing Benchmarks.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Building Performance Excellence in Health Care James R. Evans Professor of Quantitative Analysis and Operations Management College of Business University.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Types of Evaluation.
Managing Projects
A Framework for Financial Statement Analysis Chapter 11.
YMCA Proposal Writing Successful Strategies for Financial Development.
The Value to Project Managers at Company X Construction Industry Institute BENCHMARKING WITH CII ® Updated: March 1, 2007.
Organizational Climate Survey. Why Measure Organizational Climate? Organizational climate is one of the most powerful drivers of organizational effectiveness.
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Benchmarking: How to Make your Data Come Alive! CCPA ANNUAL MEETING Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D. December 10, 2010.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
©2009 OCS, Inc Hospice and Palliative Care Association of Iowa QAPI Snapshot Program Presented by Becky Anthony Roger Herr.
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership / ValueOptions
/ 1 Benchmarking today’s results for tomorrow’s success Grant Corderoy Senior Partner.
EmEx-Compare Emergency Department Benchmarking Improve ED Performance Benchmark your ED to similar EDs and best practices Measure your performance on.
SGS Indicators Project Cynthia Cappello, Board of Trustees Mo Copeland, Head of School.
South Carolina Association for Healthcare Quality Using Data to Drive Organizational Improvement July 11, 2008 Bryan Bowles, Client Executive Premier Healthcare.
Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program™: Implementation Options Catherine Eikel February 6, 2006.
Comprehensive Cultural Assessments Summary of Scope & Methodology A. Levin © SYNERGY Consulting Services Corporation, 1999.
Commitment to Excellence in Nursing Regulation Presented at the 2004 CLEAR Annual Conference September 30 – October 2 Kansas City, Missouri Kathy Apple,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Identification and Selection of Development Projects.
Enterprise Risk Management Chapter One Prepared by: Raval, Fichadia Raval Fichadia John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Copyright, © 2004, Theresa M. Welbourne, Ph.D. 1 HR Confidence June Leadership Pulse Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report June 16, 2004.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” AHCCCS/ADHS Report Summary & Recommendations.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
Benchmarking to Improve Global Eye Care Services An initiative by sponsored by Seva Foundation and the Global Sight Network.
11 Mayview Regional Service Area Plan (MRSAP) Tracking: Supporting Individuals in the Community June 18, 2008.
DOE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
OCS Connection Series OCS-Connection II Inbox, Report Folio and Report Builder Accessing On-line Reports Accessing On-line Reports Beginning.
Benchmarking The Art of using Numbers to Tell Your Self- Operated Foodservice Story Julie Jones, Ohio State Wexner Medical Center Liz Boone, Corporate.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Getting the most out of eMed Survey Reporting Presented by: Jay Bishop, COO.
OREGON CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT FIDELITY SCORING DECISION RULES.
Northern Lincolnshire Healthy Lives Healthy Futures Programme Programme Update for North East Lincolnshire Partnership Board 12 September 2013.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Illinois report cards Project introduction to the P-20 Council April 27, 2011.
Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment 2009 SAAS National Conference/ NIATx Summit Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D. July 30, 2009.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
Health and Social Care Integration Update Name Role October 2015.
Organization  As a member of the Strategy & Business Development team, this position will support the development and execution of Corporate, Sector,
Unifying Talent Management. Harnessing the Power of Workforce Intelligence in Talent Planning to Drive Business Performance.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
©2012 THE ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY ADVISORY.COM Gaining Provider Feedback In February – March 2014, we administered a medical staff survey to employed &
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Diane Trimble, MSN, RN-BC Saint Luke’s Health System.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
The Use of Data in Performance Management
Developing Community Assessments
Pet Retail Performance Report: Identify Profit Opportunities
Presented by Robert Ford
Engagement Follow-up Resources
ASHHRA / PwC SaratogaTM HR Metrics Tool
Engagement Follow-up Resources
2. Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester
Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D. President, Behavioral Pathway Systems

The Measurement of Organizational Performance Performance is measured in all addiction treatment settings How helpful is performance data? Does data drive organizational vision? Does data drive organizational decision- making?

The Limitations of Outcomes A thermometer reading would be of no value as a measure of your health… If you didn't know that 98.6 is the “average” temperature!

The Limitations of Outcomes in Your Organization Similarly, knowing that your missed appointment rate is 27% is of little value in evaluating the health of your agency…if you don’t know how others are performing

Data without Meaning We are deluged with data without meaning Data without a context is just a bunch of numbers What is the answer?

The Role of Benchmarking Benchmarks provide the vital external context for understanding your outcomes

Benchmarking Defined Gift and Mosel (1994) define benchmarking as “the continual and collaborative discipline of measuring and comparing the results of key work processes” Gift, R. and Mosel, D. (1994). Benchmarking in Health Care, American Hospital Association

A Tiered Model of Benchmarking Descriptive Benchmarking Comparative Benchmarking Process Benchmarking Each builds on the preceding type

Descriptive Benchmarking Most common form of benchmarking Industry overviews, government reports Static snapshot of industry performance No formal or statistical comparisons between an organization’s performance and industry norms “Eyeball analysis” can be misleading

Comparative Benchmarking Formal comparison of an organization’s performance against a descriptive benchmark Typically reported as percentile rankings but can be reported in graph form also

The Importance of Formal Comparative Benchmarks

The Limitations of Benchmarking Benchmarks profile your organization against others and help identify opportunities for improvement

Improve? How? Benchmarks do not give any indication as to how to improve

The “How”: Process Benchmarking Based on a simple premise: The methods of top performers differ from those of others Process benchmarking systematically compares tactics of top performers with those of others Methods that distinguish between top performers and others may be regarded as potential best practices

Benchmarks: Where are They? Readily accessible, relevant and affordable comparative benchmarking data is hard to come by

Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment SAAS, NIATx, and Behavioral Pathway Systems are partnering to sponsor an addiction-specific national benchmarking initiative BPS specializes in behavioral health and human services benchmarking and has numerous state and national benchmarking initiatives underway

Objectives of Benchmarking Initiative Provide SAAS with information it needs to advocate for its members Provide participating organizations with individualized comparative benchmark data that can serve as a vital context for understanding measured outcomes Provide a powerful vehicle for the identification of best practices and organizational improvement through process benchmarking and the application of NIATx principles

Benchmark Selection Process National interest survey conducted Interest Availability of Data 354 respondents Survey findings guided Steering Committee decisions

Scope of Benchmarks Comprehensive range of benchmarks Operational, clinical, organizational climate, and financial domains of performance 21 benchmark dimensions Approximately 150 input metrics

Operational Benchmarks Initial Access Length of Stay/Utilization, by Level of Care Subsequent Access (Number of days from intake to first treatment appt) Average Caseload Size of Clinician, by Level of Care Outpatient Productivity Average Group Size

Clinical Benchmarks Engagement/Retention, by Level of Care Outpatient No-Show/Cancellation Rates Client Satisfaction/Perceptions of Care Degree of Engagement with Recovery Support Services Involvement of Significant Others

Organizational Climate Staff Morale/Satisfaction (25 Item Measure and automated administration and scoring to be provided) Staff Retention/Turn-Over Percent of Staff Position Vacancies (Counselors)

Financial Benchmarks Cost per Unit of Service, by Level of Care Salaries, by Role Administrative Overhead as a Percent of Total Expenses Payer Mix Current Ratio (Assets Divided by Liabilities) Net Days in Accounts Receivable Days of Cash on Hand

Data Submission On-line benchmarking survey Aggregated anonymous data-no complicated encounter-level data No software needed User-friendly, encrypted and secure Available 24/7 Submit relevant and available data--no reporting requirements State-of-the-art on-line data validation

Benchmarking Reports Standard Report Executive Summary Report Organizational Climate Report Run Charts

Standard Benchmarking Report Normative Data –Sample Size –Mean –Median –Standard Deviation Comparative Data –Overall Percentile Rankings –Peer Group Comparisons (budget size, geographic area, setting) “Apples to Apples” –Maine Norms Previous Scores

Standard Benchmarking Report

Executive Summary Report Designed for busy senior leaders and boards Graphic representation of scores Brief, key highlights

Executive Summary Report

Executive Summary Report II

Run Charts Track your data over time Trend analysis Examine interplay among different benchmarking dimensions

Accommodations for Multiple Locations Satellite locations easily accommodated Each location can be benchmarked independently to produce a separate report No limit to number of additional locations

Moving Beyond “the Numbers” Benchmarking is not just about data When data is generated, real fun begins Identify potential best practices through process benchmarking and other vehicles Enhance organizational performance through NIATx principles Emphasis on shared learning from one another and from “top performers” A learning community

Shared Activities and Available Resources Monthly audio-conferences/user support meetings Monthly newsletter to educate and inform Telephonic and user support Free telephonic consultation in interpreting your data and developing improvement strategies Articles and other resources

One Year Subscription Fee Annual Subscription Fee: $1,000 Includes all benefits described Brochure/Order form available through SAAS

Questions? Contact: Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D. President, Behavioral Pathway Systems (Toll-Free)