Mokelumne Avoided Cost Analysis Technical Committee Meeting: GeoWEPP modeling 1/9/2013 Mary Ellen Miller Michigan Tech Research Institute Bill Elliot,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
InVEST Sediment Retention Model Estimate the amount of watershet erosion and sedimentation and its economic impact on hydropower production and water quality.
Advertisements

©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
Final BMP Modeling Workshop September 29, 2011 UB Geography Department Sponsored by the Buffalo District of the US Army Corps of Engineers.
M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C. Byrne, S. Rahman, R. Powell, W
The Effects of Different Resolution DEMs in Determining Overland Flow Regimes Stacy L. Hutchinson 1, J.M. Shawn Hutchinson 2, Ik-Jae Kim 1, and Philip.
Useful Tools for Predicting Erosion from Disturbed Rangelands: Disturbed WEPP for Rangelands The Water Erosion Prediction Project in the Forest Service.
GeoWEPP ArcGIS 10.1 Development Team LESAM Lab Team
2012 Southwest Wildfire Hydrology and Hazards Workshop Evan Friedman and Dr. Paul Santi Colorado School of Mines 3 April 2012.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, CA Kings River Experimental Watersheds KREW.
Watershed Characterization System (WCS) and its Modeling Extensions
Abstract Ryan Stanley and Steve Taylor, Earth and Physical Sciences Department, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon, Land Cover Analysis.
Forest Hydrology Issue: Interaction of forests, fish, and climate One of the dominant pathways by which land cover change affects freshwater fish habitat.
Woodam Chung University of Montana Han-Sup Han University of Idaho.
CVEN 689 Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Estimating Salt Concentration at Ungaged Locations from Parameters derived using GIS Ganesh Krishnamurthy Water.
Using GIS to Aid Flow Prediction in the Yampa River Basin Shane Coors April 16, 2003 CVEN 689.
Surface Water Simulation Group. Comprehensive watershed scale model developed and supported by the USDA-ARS capable of simulating surface and groundwater.
Creating a Hydrologically Conditioned DEM
Utilization of the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing to Demonstrate the Effects of Shrub Encroachment on a Small Watershed Jason Afinowicz Department of Biological.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
USDA Process-based Tools for Estimating Runoff, Soil Loss, and Sediment Yield – The WEPP Model Dennis C. Flanagan Research Agricultural Engineer USDA-Agricultural.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Modeling Variable Source Area Hydrology With WEPP
GeoWEPP ArcGIS 10.1 for soil erosion project Development Team Haoyi Xiong – Application leading developer Jonathan Goergen - Application co-lead developer.
Ag. & Biological Engineering
AGWA Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment: GIS-based Hydrologic Modeling Tool for Watershed Assessment and Analysis © Copyright Adriel Heisey.
Victoria Naipal Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology Land Department; Vegetation Modelling Group Supervisor: Ch.Reick CO-Supervisor: J.Pongratz EGU,
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Sediment Retention model
Runoff Pond Design, Lutsen, MN By Mark Greve. Problem Poplar River increases in sediment load near Lutsen ski hills Structure needed to slow flow and.
WEPP—A Process-Based Hydrology and Erosion Model for Watershed Assessment and Restoration Joan Q. Wu, Markus Flury, Shuhui Dun, R. Cory Greer Washington.
1 GIS in Hydrology Watershed management Definitions Algorithms Watershed delineation Automatically delineating watersheds Flow length Raster to vector.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
CE 513. Erosion in the Fall Creek Watershed Rick Faber.
Augustine Avwunudiogba Department of Geography MODELING SOIL EROSION RIO PANUCO BASIN, MEXICO.
Impacts from a warming climate can cascade downstream Increase fire intensity Increase erosion and sedimentation Decrease summer flows and increase stream.
Ex_Water Yield Model Data needs 1.Soil depth,an average soil depth value for each cell. The soil depth values should be in millimeters (Raster) Source:
Creating a Hydrologically Conditioned DEM Dean Djokic
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
February 25-26, 2003 San Diego, California Inventory & Monitoring Technology Development USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Application Center,
The Effects of Vegetation Loss on the Two Elk Creek Watershed as a Result of the Proposed Vail Category III Ski Area Development CE 394 K.2 By Dave Anderson.
Flash Flood A rapid and extreme flow of high water into a normally dry area, or a rapid water level rise in a stream or creek above a predetermined flood.
LTHIA and Online Watershed Delineation - Tale of a DEM consumer Larry Theller,Bernie Engel, and Tong Zhai Purdue University Agricultural and Biological.
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Terrain Susceptibility Kyle Renner GIS in Water Resources 2015
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
New AGWA Functionality Parameterization look-up tables Batch parameterization Batch simulation Updated burn severity tool interface Hydrograph visualization.
Impacts of Landuse Management and Climate Change on Landslides Susceptibility over the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State Muhammad Barik and Jennifer.
Effects of Rain Water Harvesting on the Hydrograph Tyler Jantzen May 3, 2007 CE 394K.2.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey October 22, 2015 EROS Fire Science Understanding a Changing Earth.
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
Effect of Soil Data on SWAT Modeling SSURGO, STATSGO, and SoLIM derived.
USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center, FSWeb: WWW: National Geospatial Fire.
NASA BAER Project: Improving Post-Fire Remediation Through Hydrological Modeling NASA Applied Science Program Applied Sciences Program - Wildfires.
Predicting the hydrologic implications of land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Great Lakes Tributary Modeling Workshop The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPPP) [1] National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA),
Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Van R. Kane University of Washington
Computer Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow and Riparia
Application of soil erosion models in the Gumara-Maksegnit watershed
Following the Lower Colorado River with the guidance of BASINS 3.0
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Predicting the hydrologic and water quality implications of climate and land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil.
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
BASINS 3.0 and SWAT: A Study in the Austin-Travis Lakes Watershed
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Prediction of Channel Response Areas due to Wildfire Disturbance using GIS and TauDEM Karen Williams GIS in Water Resources.
Presentation transcript:

Mokelumne Avoided Cost Analysis Technical Committee Meeting: GeoWEPP modeling 1/9/2013 Mary Ellen Miller Michigan Tech Research Institute Bill Elliot, USDA Forest Service

Modeling Overview Disturbed WEPP soil parameters Erosion maps GeoWEPP Climate forecast DEM Burn severity from Flame Length predictions Climate data Cligen Rock:Clime Land Cover Data Landfire EVT Disturbed WEPP Land use/management Soils Landfire STATSGO

Batch Processing: The Cookie Cutter Approach For each batch file: – TOPAZ carries out channel delineation – Outlet point based on elevation (iterate if needed) – TOPAZ watershed delineation – Select Cligen station closest to the outlet or for Mokelumne selection based on climate zone using a LUT – TopWEPP2 converts files into WEPP inputs and runs WEPP Post-processing scripts – Mosaic the results Create a polygon watershed delineation based upon input DEM – I use ESRI watershed tools. Sub-watersheds are then used to cut out smaller raster inputs for batch files.

Climate Forecasts 50 years of weather modeled 3 local Cligen stations (Twin Lakes, Calaveras Big Tree, and Tiger Creek) Rock:Clime used to generate 5 additional climates in order to account for the impact of elevation. The average elevation of the initial sub-watersheds were used to select appropriate climate file.

Inputs: Climate forecasts from Cligen stations and Rock:Clime

Inputs: Landcover Existing Vegetation Cover reclassified for Disturbed WEPP

Inputs: Flame length predictions reclassified to burn severity For the Mokelumne Basin 12% of the area predicted not to burn 41% predicted to burn at low severity 29% moderate severity 18% high severity

Inputs: Soils modified by burn severity and land cover

Inputs: Hillshade derived from National Elevation Dataset 30m

Results: Hillslope scale first year post-fire erosion predictions

Results: Erosion Predictions x Burn Probability averaged by AU unit

Results: Erosion Predictions Our mean hillslope scale predicted erosion rate is 32 Mg/(ha yr -1 ) with a standard deviation of 73 Mg/(ha yr -1 ) the range is 0 - 2,955 Mg/(ha yr -1 ) Average annual erosion values observed by Pete Robichuad in California: – Mixing fire were 6-13 Mg/(ha yr -1 ) – Cannon Fire were Mg/(ha yr -1 ) – Cedar Fire Mg/(ha yr -1 ) In all cases, the climates were drier than most of the Mokelumne Basin (604 mm, 669 mm, and 464 mm respectively). These were all from high severity fires, and compare reasonably well with our predictions. Our predictions are also comparable to published sediment yields for the Pacific Medium rainfall regime with a reported range from – 490 Mg/(ha yr -1 ) and a mean value of 97 Mg/(ha yr -1 ) for hillslope measurements. (Moody and Martin 2009) Moody JA, Martin DA (2009) Synthesis of sediment yields after wildland fire in different rainfall regimes in the western United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 96– 115.