Simulation of Droplet Drawback in Inkjet Printing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
My First Fluid Project Ryan Schmidt. Outline MAC Method How far did I get? What went wrong? Future Work.
Advertisements

Fluid Mechanics Research Group Two phase modelling for industrial applications Prof A.E.Holdø & R.K.Calay.
Impact of Microdrops on Solids James Sprittles & Yulii Shikhmurzaev Failure of conventional models All existing models are based on the contact angle being.
Dominic Hudson, Simon Lewis, Stephen Turnock
Lecture 2 Properties of Fluids Units and Dimensions.
Dynamic model of a drop shot from an inkjet printer.
Aero-Hydrodynamic Characteristics
The Bernoulli Equation - Work and Energy
Introduction: Gravitational forces resulting from microgravity, take off and landing of spacecraft are experienced by individual cells in the living organism.
Flow Over Notches and Weirs
An Analysis of Hiemenz Flow E. Kaufman and E. Gutierrez-Miravete Department of Engineering and Science Rensselaer at Hartford.
Continuity of Fluid Flow & Bernoulli’s Principle.
Results It was found that variations in wettability disturb the flow of adjacent liquid (Fig. 3). Our results suggest that for a given liquid the normal.
UNICAMP THE HEIGHT OF LIQUID METHOD FOR FREE SURFACE FLOWS Flow simulations of real processes often involve fluids that are separated by a sharp interface.
Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Geometric Parameters on Liquid Single-Phase Pressure Drop in Micro- Scale Pin-Fin Arrays Valerie Pezzullo,
Finite-Element-Based Characterisation of Pore- scale Geometry and its Impact on Fluid Flow Lateef Akanji Supervisors Prof. Martin Blunt Prof. Stephan Matthai.
Lecture 8: Div(ergence) S Consider vector field and Flux (c.f. fluid flow of Lecture 6) of out of S rate of flow of material (in kg s -1 ) out of S For.
1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.
California State University, Chico
Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)
A FemVariational approach to the droplet spreading over dry surfaces S.Manservisi Nuclear Engineering Lab. of Montecuccolino University of Bologna, Italy.
James Sprittles ECS 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E. Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
Single and multi-phase flows through rock fractures occur in various situations, such as transport of dissolved contaminants through geological strata,
1 MFGT 242: Flow Analysis Chapter 3: Stress and Strain in Fluid Mechanics Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO.
Modeling Fluid Phenomena -Vinay Bondhugula (25 th & 27 th April 2006)
ABSTRACT Many new devices and applications are being created that involve transporting droplets from one place to another. A common method of achieving.
1 Example of Groundwater Primer - Yours will be fluid mechanics primer – see homework assignment sheet
Fluid mechanics 3.1 – key points
Chapter:1 Fluids & Properties
Chapter 1 – Fluid Properties
In the analysis of a tilting pad thrust bearing, the following dimensions were measured: h1 = 10 mm, h2 = 5mm, L = 10 cm, B = 24 cm The shaft rotates.
Fixed and Fluidized Beds
By Paul Delgado Advisor – Dr. Vinod Kumar Co-Advisor – Dr. Son Young Yi.
Momentum. NEWTON’S LAWS Newton’s laws are relations between motions of bodies and the forces acting on them. –First law: a body at rest remains at rest,
September, 18-27, 2006, Leiden, The Nederlands Influence of Gravity and Lift on Particle Velocity Statistics and Deposition Rates in Turbulent Upward/Downward.
James Sprittles BAMC 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,
CP502 Advanced Fluid Mechanics
AMS 599 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 5 James Glimm Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University Brookhaven.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Physics 1B03summer-Lecture 13 Final Exam April 18 2 hours long – 30 MC questions Covers all material with approximately equal weight, up to and including.
Reynolds Transport Theorem We need to relate time derivative of a property of a system to rate of change of that property within a certain region (C.V.)
A Numerical Model for Multiphase Flow, I: The Interface Tracking Algorithm Frank Bierbrauer.
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
Fluid Resistance.
Ale with Mixed Elements 10 – 14 September 2007 Ale with Mixed Elements Ale with Mixed Elements C. Aymard, J. Flament, J.P. Perlat.
Modelling Transport Phenomena during Spreading and Solidification
Walter Schostak Center for Materials Under eXtreme Environment
Numerical simulation of droplet motion and two-phase flow field in an oscillating container Tadashi Watanabe Center for Computational Science and e-Systems.
Governing Equations Conservation of Mass Conservation of Momentum Velocity Stress tensor Force Pressure Surface normal Computation Flowsheet Grid values.
©2002 Regents of University of Minnesota Simulation of surfactant mechanics within a volume-of-fluid method Ashley James Department of Aerospace Engineering.
Two-phase hydrodynamic model for air entrainment at moving contact line Tak Shing Chan and Jacco Snoeijer Physics of Fluids Group Faculty of Science and.
Modelling Spray Impingement
Direct Numercal Simulation of two-phase turbulent boundary layer over waved water surface O. A. Druzhinin, Yu.I. Тroitskaya Institute of Applied Physics.
Chemistry 232 Transport Properties. Definitions Transport property. The ability of a substance to transport matter, energy, or some other property along.
SIGGRAPH 2005 신 승 호 신 승 호. Water Drops on Surfaces Huamin Wang Peter J. Mucha Greg Turk Georgia Institute of Technology.
Computer Animation Rick Parent Computer Animation Algorithms and Techniques Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Droplet Dynamics Multi-phase flow modelling Background D d = 0.001m,  d = 1000 kg/m 3,  d = kg/ms,  ad = N/m,  a = 1 kg/m 3,  a = 1 ×
11th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering (ICME2015)
Lecture – 1 Ms. Thevasha Sathiyakumar
Numerical Modeling of Dynamics and Adhesion of Leukocytes
Modeling and experimental study of coupled porous/channel flow
Sunny Ri Li, Nasser Ashgriz
Porous Flow.
FLUID MECHANICS REVIEW
Lab - 4 Momentum Flux Determine forces on a surface due to a jet impinging on it Over what ranges of forces can good agreement (consistently less than.
Convective Heat Transfer
Anthony D. Fick & Dr. Ali Borhan Governing Equations
Collision & Separation of Liquid Drops: Modeling Off-axis Collisions
Presentation transcript:

Simulation of Droplet Drawback in Inkjet Printing Ali Jafari and Nasser Ashgriz Multiphase Flow & Spray Systems Lab (MUSSL)

Motivation Investigate the interaction between two impacting droplets (drawback) Investigate the effect of different parameters and liquid properties on the final droplet shapes (coalesced or not coalesced drops)

Overview Basic assumptions Involved mechanisms laminar and incompressible fluid flow density constant Involved mechanisms fluid dynamics: viscous and capillary effects Solidification is not considered

Governing Equations Continuity and momentum equations Volume of Fluid (VOF)

Interface Tracking Procedure: Surface Reconstruction Fluid Advection A sample “F” field 1 .85 .92 .68 .35 .09 .31 .42 Two-fluid VOF method based on Piecewise Linear Interface Calculation (PLIC) algorithm. Procedure: Surface Reconstruction Use F-field to determine cell “normal” Determine “case” using normal Position plane with known slope based upon volume fraction Compute plane area and vertices Fluid Advection Compute flux across cell side (case dependent) Operator Split (i.e. do for x, y and z sweeps)

Validation: comp. with Fujimoto’s experiments Single water droplet impaction on a surface D=0.56 mm, V=2.65

Simulation parameters 20 cells per radius ρ=997 kg/m3 μ=.000891 kg/m.s D=40 μm V=5 m/s σ=0.073 N/m Ө=90º

Non-coalesc., Δt=30 μs, Δx=58.5 μm Times: 0, 9, 25, 30, 36, 43, 49, and 60 μs respectively

Coalesc., Δt=30 μs, Δx=57.5 μm Times: 0, 9, 25, 30, 36, 43, 49, and 60 μs respectively

Non-coalesc., Δt=25 μs, Δx=56 μm Times: 0, 9, 25, 30, 36, 43, 49, and 60 μs respectively

Coalesc., Δt=25 μs, Δx=55 μm Times: 0, 9, 25, 30, 36, 43, 49, and 60 μs respectively

Velocity field (non-coalescence) Velocity distribution for case 1, Δt=30 μs, Δx=58 μm at times 36, 40, 43, 45, 49, and 60 μs respectively

Velocity field (coalescence) Velocity distribution for case 1, Δt=30 μs, Δx=57.5 μm at times 36, 40, 43, 45, 49, and 60 μs respectively.

Coalescence case 2: effect of timing Case 2, Δt=25 μs, Δx=55 μm at times 30, 34, 36, 38, 49, and 60 μs respectively.

Non-dim. Pressure contours Δt=30 μs, Δx=57.5 μm at times 43, 45, and 60 μs respectively Δt=30 μs, Δx=58 μm at times 40, 43, and 60 μs respectively.

Conclusions Drawback is sensitive to Drop spacing Impact velocity Contact angle Inter-drop time Small changes in any of the above parameters may result in coalescing or non-coalescing drops: e.g. for Δt=25 μs, coalescence at drop spacing of 55 m; no coalescence at 56 m Further investigation of all important cases and parameters is planned and from these data, theoretical relations for the threshold of coalescence and non-coalescence would be developed.