Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca: Program Update Susanne Cote PTAC Resource Access & Ecological Issues Forum November 30 th, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.
Advertisements

USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Environment Canada Alberta Environment and Water April 23,
LAMP 101 Elizabeth LaPlante US Co-Chair, Superior Work Group US Environmental Protection Agency.
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
Traditionally relied on MWI Random transect aerial survey –Reinecke et al. (1990) –Pearse et al. (2005) –State agencies continuing work MDWFP (2005-present)
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Update from Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Calgary Regional Airshed Zone Annual General Meeting 26 March 2014.
Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca: Program Development and Implementation Presentation to the Alberta Environmental Monitoring Panel,
Systems Approach Workbook A Systems Approach to Substance Use Services and Supports in Canada Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation The original.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
The Discovery Corridor Concept and its Applicability January 13/14, 2004 workshop St. Andrews Biological Station, St. Andrews, N.B.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
1 Cumulative Impact Management: A Framework for Northeast BC Presentation of Research Results Science and Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Presented.
The Fundamentals of Conservation Design Image by Rex Johnson.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Fort Air Partnership 11 Apr 2005 Beaver Hills Initiative Planning for a Sustainable Future.
Wooded Boreal Fens: An Ecoregional Perspective David A. Locky Athabasca River Basin Research Institute.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
First Nations-Focused Scientific Reviews of Environmental Assessments MSESMSES Prepared by Sarah Hechtenthal, M.Sc., P. Biol.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Commonly referred to as MIS.  From the 1982 planning regulations 36 CFR (a)(1)- “… certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the.
© All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Project Outline: Wildlife Working Team 1 Rick & Lynne to edit by may meeting Team Scope Roundtable.
1. IASC Operational Guidance on Coordinated Assessments (session 05) Information in Disasters Workshop Tanoa Plaza Hotel, Suva, Fiji June
Development of lake Druksiai/Drisviaty Basin Management Program Feasibility study.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency National Capacity Self Assessment (GEF/UNDP) The Third GEF Assembly Side Event – 30 th August,2006 Cape town Integrating.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
Survey Priorities Discussion Group Participants: Wang Hao, Cristiano, Megan, Wiggy, Curtis, Simon, Henni, Kristen, Naamal, Matt, Lisa, Leeanne, Tom L.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,
Integrated Waterbird Management & Monitoring Program IWMM Andy Wilson USGS Patuxent, Laurel, Maryland
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
Implementation and follow up Critically important but relatively neglected stages of EIA process Surveillance, monitoring, auditing, evaluation and other.
The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum The SALCC Strategic Plan and What It Means Thursday, April 19, 2012.
Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.
1 Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda BERINA UWIMBABAZI.
Conservation Strategy Revisions: 1. Grassland Conservation Strategy Natural Temperate Grassland Button Wrinklewort Ginninderra Peppercress Baeuerlan’s.
In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
The International Plant Protection Convention
R. Kolli Chief World Climate Applications & Services Division
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Preparatory Workshop of the Pilot Boreal Natura 2000 Seminar
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
New Biogeographic process
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
Presentation transcript:

Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca: Program Update Susanne Cote PTAC Resource Access & Ecological Issues Forum November 30 th, 2011 Calgary, AB

Background Industry requirements for biodiversity and wildlife monitoring in EPEA – Not designed for regional picture – Not standardized ABMI operates a provincial biodiversity monitoring program – Additions to ABMI could address region-specific priorities Agreement in 2009 to seek improvements to current system through a coordinated approach

Program Development Early industry and government create the Regional Terrestrial Monitoring Joint Working Group (RTMJWG) Focus on developing recommendations for improved terrestrial monitoring – to understand cumulative effects of development Geographic focus on the Lower Athabasca Planning Region (LAPR) Recommendations report issued August 2010

Key Outcomes of the Report Guidance Document – Outlines goals and path forward – Builds on ABMI but addresses regional priorities Governance Model Funding Approach – GoA suspends specific EPEA approval clauses for oil sands operators. Recommended a broad work plan and budget for 2011

Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca (EMCLA) New governance group held their first meeting in December 2010 First tasks: – Refine EMCLA purpose and scope – Further develop 2011 work plan – Implement 2011 work plan

EMCLA Purpose Improve the quality of monitoring done to fulfill specific clauses in EPEA approvals for oil sands developments – Move beyond current focus on individual projects Key priorities include: – Filling gaps in existing regional monitoring systems – Coordinating data collection amongst different development projects  Better information available for environmental management in the LAPR

Key Principles Transparency – Data and reports publicly available Scientific Credibility – Partnership with the ABMI – Project teams include academics, managers, and subject matter experts Relevance – Addresses issues raised through regulatory processes of project reviews and approvals

Governance 11 Representatives sit on Committee Industry Government ABMI Ex-officio Program Manager (ABMI) GoA (4) GoC (1) OSDG Members (20 companies)

Funding Project funding to date provided by OSDG member companies EMCLA develops annual work plan and required budget OSDG coordinates funding allocation among companies

2011 Work Plan First year of EMCLA program EMCLA approved three projects for 2011: – Caribou movement and linear developments – Uncommon Animals – Rare Plants

Project Team Participants Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute Alberta Innovates Technology Futures University of Alberta Royal Alberta Museum Bird Studies Canada Devonian Botanical Garden Alberta Conservation Association Environment Canada Beaverhill Bird Observatory Boreal Avian Monitoring Project Strix Ecological Consulting Alberta Tourism, Parks, and Recreation Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Al-Pac Forest Industries Golder Associates

1) Effects of Linear Development on Caribou Conduct a review of the effects of linear features on caribou movement relative to other factors that affect caribou populations Develop a spatially explicit model of range- scale caribou movements Preliminary application of movement model to mitigation efforts

1) Caribou Cont’d Shift focus of project to look at long-range movements Results show that: – short and long-range movements are distinguishable – long-range movements are influenced by both habitat type and anthropogenic features Caribou long-range movements are not random Substantial individual variation Further analysis in linked to mitigation

2) Uncommon Animal Species Purpose is to develop an effective, long- term animal monitoring program to address gaps in ABMI monitoring In 2011, EMCLA chose to conduct a feasibility assessment for regional monitoring of Yellow Rails, owls, and amphibians In 2011, objectives are to: – Prioritize research and management questions – Compile existing data and information on target species – Develop monitoring designs

Example: Yellow Rail

2) Animal Species Cont’d Major recommendations for monitoring program are to: – Conduct pilot fieldwork using existing data to guide sampling design – Test the use of automatic recorders (cryptic, nocturnal species) – Develop better spatial habitat data GIS layers (especially for wetlands)

3) Rare Plants Rare Plant surveys conducted on lease sites only ABMI program does not effectively monitor many rare plant species (e.g. habitat specialists) Purpose of project is to provide credible information on the abundance and distribution of plant species that are rare or of conservation concern In 2011, project objectives are to: Assemble and synthesize existing rare plant data Analyze existing data Generate lists of candidate species for monitoring Begin design for an informative and appropriate rare plant monitoring program

3) Rare Plants Cont’d Data assembled – ACIMS as base; added ~1200 additional records in the LAPR – Included bryophytes, lichens, and vasculars Carried out species distribution modeling for 66 species – Emphasized regionally important plants – Used 46 different predictors (climate, habitat, topography, etc.) Recommend an adaptive sampling approach for 2012 and beyond – Additional data collection to improve predictive models – Combined with trend occupancy and abundance sample plots stratified by disturbance level

Looking Ahead: 2012 Work Plan EMCLA has an approved work plan for 2012 All three existing projects will continue into 2012 Rare Plants Three animal projects (Yellow Rail, amphibians, owls) Caribou movement modeling Fieldwork for both plants and animals 2012 budget is set Funding allocations among OSDG members under discussion

The EMCLA has taken steps to better coordinate wildlife and biodiversity monitoring in the LAPR Similar groups exist for other media However, there is still a need for improved coordination…. EMCLA: Moving Forward

How can industry and government work together to ensure that resources are used efficiently? Reduce overlap in programs Ensure monitoring dollars are spent wisely Provincial monitoring system under development EMCLA is eager to work with other regional initiatives to ensure our work is relevant, timely, and addressing information gaps EMCLA: Part of a Larger Regional System