Task 3—Development and verification of simplified design tools Juan Vargas – Junior in Civil Engineering – Vice President SCU SHPE Mark Aschheim – Professor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, August 2004
Advertisements

Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges
Coulomb or Dry Friction Damping.
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LABORATORY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COMPILED GREGORY G. PENELIS ANDREAS J. KAPPOS 3D PUSHOVER.
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uHelmut Krawinkler Seismic Demand Analysis.
MDOF SYSTEMS WITH DAMPING General case Saeed Ziaei Rad.
Hybrid Simulation with On-line Updating of Numerical Model based on Measured Experimental Behavior M.J. Hashemi, Armin Masroor, and Gilberto Mosqueda University.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Modelling of Spudcan and Suction Caisson Performance M.J. Cassidy, M.F. Randolph (University of Western Australia) and B.W. Byrne (Oxford University) Project:
Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Seismic Upgrading of Structures Using Conventional Methods Lisbon 24 th May.
University of Minho School of Engineering Territory, Environment and Construction Centre (C-TAC) Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de.
MAK4041-Mechanical Vibrations
Helicopter System Reliability Analysis Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Mark Andersen.
Inelastic Displacement Surface Method Tom Shantz CALTRANS- Division of Research and Innovation.
Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Hemangi Pandit Joel Conte Jon Stewart John Wallace.
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
Yousef Bozorgnia, Mahmoud Hachem, Kenneth Campbell PEER GMSM Workshop, UC Berkeley October 27, 2006 Attenuation of Inelastic Spectra and Its Applications.
Partially Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls
Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
One Dimensional Steady Heat Conduction problems P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Simple ideas for complex.
College and Engineering Physics Quiz 9: Simple Harmonic Motion 1 Simple Harmonic Motion.
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
MESB 374 System Modeling and Analysis Translational Mechanical System
Incremental Dynamic Analyses on Bridges on various Shallow Foundations Lijun Deng PI’s: Bruce Kutter, Sashi Kunnath University of California, Davis NEES.
Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Static Pushover Analysis
GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES THAT CORRELATE TO ENGINEERING DEMAND PARAMETERS Jonathan Bray and Thaleia Travasarou University of California, Berkeley.
Piezoelectric Equations and Constants
Weian Liu 3. Research Interest Soil Structure Interaction Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.
NUS July 12-14, 2005 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore Structures NUS – Keppel Short Course 1 Resistance to Accidental Explosions General.
NEESR-CR: Design of soil and structure compatible yielding to improve system performance [CoSSY] Team Meeting 14 October 2009 Kutter, Hutchinson, Aschheim,
Inelastic Seismic Response of Structures
Feb 23, Agenda We have 1.5 hrs, so lets tentatively plan to limit each topic to about 20 minutes. A) in-person mtg April - Bruce to work on draft.
Semi-active Management of Structures Subjected to High Frequency Ground Excitation C.M. Ewing, R.P. Dhakal, J.G. Chase and J.B. Mander 19 th ACMSM, Christchurch,
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Role of SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Technical Activity Group (GMSV TAG) in SEISM Project.
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST 1 Structural Vibration Control Using Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper Han-Rok Ji, Graduate Student, KAIST,
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Adaptive Nonlinear Analysis as Applied to Performance based Earthquake Engineering Dr. Erol Kalkan, P.E. United States Geological Survey TUFTS, 2008.
GMSV in SEISM Project Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles.
1J. Baker Jack Baker Civil & Environmental Engineering Stanford University Use of elastic & inelastic response spectra properties to validate simulated.
Chapter 16 Waves-I Types of Waves 1.Mechanical waves. These waves have two central features: They are governed by Newton’s laws, and they can exist.
Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Alex Pena,
U.S. – Taiwan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction November 4, 2003 Physical and Numerical Modeling Breakout Session.
SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 18 Force Vibration Response Spectrum.
Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames
Basics of Earthquakes Frequency
Force Vibration Response Spectrum
MESB 374 System Modeling and Analysis Translational Mechanical System
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis Koumousis
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
By Dr. A. Ranjbaran, Associate Professor
Estimation of Fundamental Natural Frequency, Damping Ratio and Equivalent Mass 421L/521L (Lab 8)
(PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN)
Simple Harmonic Motion
Structural damping - an energy dissipation mechanism
ANDRÉS ALONSO-RODRIGUEZ Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
MAK4041-Mechanical Vibrations
Assessment of Base-isolated CAP1400 Nuclear Island Design
MDOF Systems with Proportional Damping
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis Koumousis
Presentation transcript:

Task 3—Development and verification of simplified design tools Juan Vargas – Junior in Civil Engineering – Vice President SCU SHPE Mark Aschheim – Professor, Structural/Earthquake Engineering

Effect of Hysteresis Type on SDOF Response Rocking Sliding  MM  V u FS V = 2 FS V = 5 SDOF simulations to evaluate effect of “element” hysteresis type on peak displacement response. For different ground motions and select short, medium, and long periods: Given Sa (or R), what ductility (displacement) demands result? Alternatively, what Sa (or R) to get ductility demands of 2 and 6? Evaluate vulnerability to overturning (tipping over) relative to conventional oscillators with P-Delta (use FEMA 440 R max equation).  Peak displacement response ratios at select periods (e.g. C x )  To what extent do initial stiffness and hysteretic type matter?  Strategies to select elements/behavior to reduce response amplitudes  May suggest scaling ground motions to match peak displacement of appropriate inelastic oscillator PmPm PmPm PmPm u

Combinations of Elements Elements… Combinations…. Are there simple methods to estimate peak displacement response for parallel combinations of elements (hysteretic types) Repeat for series combinations. Can response with series combinations be chaotic? If so, under what conditions? Validate use of “equivalent SDOF” oscillators for estimating displacement response of MDOF systems composed of mixed hysteretic types. Is it necessary to adjust first mode parameters (  1 and  1 ) for change in displaced shape due to rocking/sliding? PmPm

Development of Design Approach Can we apply Yield Point Spectra with plastic mechanism approach to design structure and foundation system? Or to structure given a foundation? Perhaps define yield point parametrically for curvilinear hysteretic behavior? Perhaps retain conventional elastic spectra and apply new C x coefficients to derive inelastic spectra? What performance limits to design for, particularly for foundations? Admissible Yield Points Inadmissible Drift Limit Ductility Limit Inelastic Spectra (Yield Point Spectra) for conventional (bilinear) hysteresis  M M   M Composite Hysteretic Behavior