Observational Criteria for Small-Scale Turbulent Dynamo in the Solar Photosphere Valentina Abramenko, Philip Goode, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Kwangsu Ahn Big Bear.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small-scale solar surface fields M. J. Martínez González Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.
Advertisements

Coronal Responses to Explosive Events Adria C. Updike Smith College / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Amy Winebarger and Kathy Reeves, Center.
Hot explosions in the cool solar atmosphere Hardi Peter Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research Göttingen H. Tian, W. Curdt, D. Schmit, D. Innes,
Using Feature Tracking to Quantify Flux Cancellation Rates Evidence suggests that flux cancellation might play a central role in both formation and eruption.
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
Do active Regions Emerge in a Similar Regime? Valentyna Abramenko Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory Big Bear Solar Observatory California,
Magnetic fields in the photosphere and heliosphere: structure, statistical parameters, turbulent state Valentyna I. Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory.
One mask to group them all, One code to find them, One file to store them all, And in a structure bind them. William (Tolkien) Simpson m.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
Valentina Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT Multi-fractality of Solar Magnetic Fields: New Progress with HMI Abstract. The SDO/HMI instrument.
Intermittency in the Photosphere and Corona as Derived from Hinode Data Valentina Abramenko Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT Haimin.
FLUX CANCELLATION IN PROMINENCE FORMATION Piet Martens Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA & Paul Wood University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
We infer a flow field, u(x,y,) from magnetic evolution over a time interval, assuming: Ideality assumed:  t B n = -c(  x E), but E = -(v x B)/c, so.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Stokes profiles Swedish 1m Solar Telescope, perfect seeing.
Multi-fractality of Solar Magnetic Fields: New Progress with HMI Valentina I. Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT Poster #40.
Spatially Dependent Emergence Rate V. Abramenko. Outlook Compare results from the paper by Abramenko, Fisk, Yurchyshyn ApJ 641 (hereafter AFY) with that.
Flare Flux vs. Magnetic Flux …extending previous studies to new regimes.
Distribution of the magnetic flux in elements of the magnetic field in an active region Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT.
Active Region Flux Dispersal (SH13A-1518) B.T. Welsch & Y.Li Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley The ultimate fate of the magnetic flux introduced into the.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
V.I. Abramenko, V.B. Yurchyshyn, H. Wang, T.R. Spirock, P.R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine
Calculation of Intermittency in the Photosphere and Corona from Hinode Data Valentina I. Abramenko And Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory of.
Statistics of Lorenz force in kinematic stage of magnetic dynamo at large Prandtle number S.S.Vergeles Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics in collaboration.
Magnetic Field and Heating of the Corona Valentyna Abramenko and Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory.
Pre-Flare Changes in Current Helicity and Turbulent Regime of the Photospheric Magnetic Field V.I. Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory,NJIT Crimean Astrophysical.
Sept. 13, 2007 CORONAL HEATING (Space Climate School, Saariselka, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Valentina Abramenko 1 Gary Zank 2 Alexander Dosch 2 Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear solar Observatory of NJIT, CA 2 – CSPAR, Univ. of Alabama in Nuntsville,
Modeling and Data Analysis Associated With Supergranulation Walter Allen.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
What coronal parameters determine solar wind speed? M. Kojima, M. Tokumaru, K. Fujiki, H. Itoh and T. Murakami Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
Analysis of Coronal Heating in Active Region Loops from Spatially Resolved TR emission Andrzej Fludra STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1.
Seething Horizontal Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Solar Photosphere J. Harvey, D. Branston, C. Henney, C. Keller, SOLIS and GONG Teams.
Solar eclipse, , Wendy Carlos and John Kern Structure of solar coronal loops: from miniature to large-scale Hardi Peter Max Planck Institute for.
0 Local and nonlocal conditional strain rates along gradient trajectories from various scalar fields in turbulence Lipo Wang Institut für Technische Verbrennung.
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Solar Atmosphere A review based on paper: E. Avrett, et al. “Modeling the Chromosphere of a Sunspot and the Quiet Sun” and some others [Alexey V. Byalko]
Signatures of Intermittent Turbulence in Hinode Quiet Sun Photosphere Valentina Abramenko, Big Bear Solar Observatory, USA, Plasma.
Big Bear Solar Observatory. New View on Quiet Sun Photospheric Dynamics Offered by NST Data Big Bear Solar Observatory Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn,
SLIDE SHOW 3 B changes due to transport + diffusion III -- * * magnetic Reynold number INDUCTION EQUATION B moves with plasma / diffuses through it.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Helicity Observations by Huairou Vector Magnetograph Mei Zhang National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Plan of the Talk: 1.Huairou.
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
1 Abramenko V.I., 1 Yurchyshyn, V., 2 Linker, J., 2 Mikic, Z. 1 - Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT; 2 – Predictive Science Inc., San Diego Anomalous.
1. Twist propagation in Hα surges Patricia Jibben and Richard C. Canfield 2004, ApJ, 610, Observation of the Molecular Zeeman Effect in the G Band.
Flux Emergence Rate in Coronal Holes and in Adjacent Quiet-sun Regions Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory Lennard Fisk Lennard Fisk University.
Valentina Abramenko 1, Vasyl Yurchyshyn 1, Philip R. Goode 1, Vincenzo Carbone 2, Robert Stein Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT, USA; 2 – Univ.
Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Philip R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT SH31C-18 06: Size and Lifetime Distributions of Bright Points.
High resolution images obtained with Solar Optical Telescope on Hinode
New Insights into the Sun’s Photosphere Dynamics Offered by New Solar Telescope of BBSO Big Bear Solar Observatory Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn,
Small-scale Dynamo Action in the Quiet Sun : Observational Aspects
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
Prandtl number dependence of magnetic-to-kinetic dissipation 1.What gets in, will get out 2.Even for vanishing viscosity 3.What if magnetic fields 4. contribute?
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
BBSO 2007 Science Planning. Focal Plane Instruments AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) IRIM.
The energy and temperature dissipation rates. The budget equation: ● Turbulent kinetic energy ● Turbulent motion ● Potential energy ● Molecular diffusion.
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
Diagnostic of Chromospheric Flare Plasma
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
The Loop Width Distribution – Are we Hitting Rock Bottom
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
On the nature of moving magnetic feature pairs around sunspots
Observations of emerging and submerging regions with ASP and Solar-B
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
Solar magnetic elements at 0
Emerging Active Regions: turbulent state in the photosphere
Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT
Valentina Abramenko and Kwangsu Ahn
Presentation transcript:

Observational Criteria for Small-Scale Turbulent Dynamo in the Solar Photosphere Valentina Abramenko, Philip Goode, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Kwangsu Ahn Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al.

2

3 Magnetic elements (color contours) against granulation in a coronal hole area. Yellow – SOT FG/negative; Blue/red – NST/BBSO negative/positive Stokes V; Green – NST/BBSO Stokes (Q 2 +U 2 ) 1/2 1”

How to explore the turbulent dynamo from observations? from observations? 1 - From kinetic and magnetic energy spectra on small scales 2 - From diffusivity regime on small scales 3 - From observations of small-scale magnetic flux emergence The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al.

1 - Kinetic and Magnetic Energy Spectra Kinetic dissipation scales, λ ν Spatial scale Kinetic Spectrum wavenumber Power Spectrum Magnetic dissipation scales, λ η Magnetic Spectrum Batchelor 1959 Nakagawa & Priest 1973 Schekochinin The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. Magnetic dissipation scale is smaller than Kinetic dissipation scale  Small-scale dynamo action is ensured

1 - Kinetic and Magnetic Energy Spectra (cont) The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 0.8’’ 0.16’’ 0.10’’

7 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 1 - Kinetic and Magnetic Energy Spectra (cont)

The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al.

9 0.16’’ - Observed λ η <0.1’’ As the resolution improves, the observed magnetic dissipation scale - λ η might decrease 1 - Kinetic and Magnetic Energy Spectra (cont) λ η ~ η – coefficient of turbulent magnetic diffusion. For a regime of super-diffusivity, η decreases as the scale decreases

10 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 2 – Turbulent Diffusion Regime From trajectories of magnetic bright points we obtain their displacements, ∆l ∆l∆l Magnetic bright points trajectories

11 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 2 – Turbulent Diffusion Regime (cont) Magnetic turbulent diffusivity: η ~ ((∆l) 2 ) (γ-1)/γ

12 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 2 – Turbulent Diffusion Regime (cont) Magnetic turbulent diffusivity decreases with decreasing scale, creating favorable conditions for the small- scale turbulent dynamo Magnetic Turbulent Diffusivity, η, km 2 /s

13 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 3 – Small-scale magnetic elements statistics NST/Near Infrared magnetogram of a coronal hole region Pixel size: 0.”1; ticks separation is 1”

14 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 3 – Small-scale magnetic elements statistics (cont) NST diff. limit N=2213 Power Law Index= – 1.86±0.10 down to 2x10 16 Mx Compare: Parnell et al. 2009: % are smaller than 500 km 93% - flux below 2· Mx 85% live shorter than 4 min 90% - magn energy below 5· erg Parnell et al. 2009

15 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 3 – Small-scale magnetic elements statistics

16 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. Conclusions Conclusions We observe the following evidences for the small-scale turbulent dynamo action in the solar photosphere: The magnetic energy spectrum tends to be extended toward small scales and to overtake the kinetic energy spectrum on scales below Mm; The magnetic turbulent diffusivity regime – super-diffusivity – is present in the QS photosphere, which ensures the shallow magnetic spectrum and favors the turbulent dynamo action; Distribution functions of size, flux, lifetime, and energy of the magnetic elements extend until the diffraction limit without any saturation, which supposed to be observed when the turbulent dynamo is at work. Total unsigned magnetic flux related to the turbulent dynamo action may consist of (6-13)·10 14 Wb, which is about (20-50)% of the total solar flux during a solar minimum.

17 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al. 3 – Small-scale magnetic elements statistics (cont) Yellow – SOT/FG/-100G Blue/red- NST negative /positive LOS Green – NST B trans 10’’ FG:~500 km NST: -50 km x z Small loops closed below ~500km Why magnetic elements are more numerous in NST magnetogram?

18 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al.

19 The 220 th AAS Meeting / SPD, Anchorage, Alaska - June 10-14, 2012 Abramenko et. al.