Changes to Department of Defense Real Property Accountability for Historic Properties Brian Michael Lione Cultural Resources Management Specialist Contractor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts Revised April 19, 2005 Deidre A. Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy Office.
Advertisements

Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Jennifer Gimbel, ACWI Chair Acting Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Department of Defense Real Property Inventory (RPI) Initiative: Historic Status Data Element Brian Lione Department.
Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program Project Commander’s Guide To Archaeological Curation - Presentation US Army Corps of Engineers,
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
Real Property Training
FASAB Update CIGIE/GAO Financial Statement Audit Conference Wendy Payne Executive Director March 30, 2011.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
NASA Real Property Program August 20, 2014 Scott Robinson Director, Facilities Engineering Division Acting Director, Integrated Asset Management Division.
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Physical Inventory Best Practices 1 Briefing for Joint Physical Inventory Working Group September.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics DoD Legacy Resource Management Program Pedro Morales Natural Resources Specialist 2007 Tri-Service DoD Pest Management.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Cultural Resources Management in the Department of Defense Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer Department.
DEFENSE PRIVACY & CIVIL LIBERTIES OFFICE Privacy Foundations Samuel P. Jenkins Director for Privacy Defense Privacy and Civil Liberties Office Identity.
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
Implementation of DOE Order 450.1: Self-Declaration and Report Letters Steven R. Woodbury US Department of Energy March 9, 2005.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
1 WARFIGHTER SUPPORT ENHANCEMENT STEWARDSHIP EXCELLENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WARFIGHTER-FOCUSED, GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAIN.
Asset Inventory & Financial Reconciliation Project Kick-off Meeting May 2, 2005 Boulder City, NV.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Current and Planned Management Initiatives for DoD’s Historic Infrastructure Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Protecting the Past, Preserving the Present: The Oyu Tolgoi Cultural Heritage Program Jeffrey H. Altschul Statistical Research, Inc./SRI Foundation American.
1 Transportation Alternatives Program FY2015 Application Update February 19, 2014 Jennifer DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Mr. Frank J. Anderson, Jr. President, Defense Acquisition University Acquisition Education Challenges and the Human Capital Strategic Plan.
Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) in the DoD Business Management Modernization Program April 2005 John Coho I&E Business Transformation.
DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) April 2004 Presented By: James.
Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) Defense Support Team (DST) and Report to Congress Mr. Richard Ginman OUSD(A&T)/DPAP Presentation to National Defense.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics DoD Cultural Resources Workshop: Prioritizing Cultural Resources Needs for a Sound Investment Strategy Maureen Sullivan.
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
1 What’s Next for Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB)? AGA/GWSCPA 6 th Annual Conference Dianne Copeland, Director, FSIO May 8, 2007.
Getting It… Developing Interagency Core Trail Data Standards National Park Service - Bureau of Land Management - USDA Forest Service Together.
1 WARFIGHTER-FOCUSED, GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAIN LEADERSHIP DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics The Department of Defense: Transforming the Business of Military Cultural Resource Data Brian Michael Lione Deputy.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Ms. Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations.
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
North East Lincolnshire Council delivering change through partnership ( Physical Regeneration, Property and Technical Services Partnership) Planning in.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE SERVICE ACT 2 OF 2011 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE.
Department of Defense Joint Services Environmental Management Conference April 14, 2005 Tampa, FL.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Cultural Resources Management in the Department of Defense Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer Department.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Authoritative Source for Location Lora Muchmore Director ODUSD(I&E) Business Enterprise Integration Directorate January.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.
DOE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
The Department of Defense Intelligence Oversight Program
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA EMS Building Blocks to Success Michael DeWit, QEP EMS Lead ICF Consulting Inc. Fairfax, VA Michael J. Green, PE.
Real Property Unique Identification: The Key to Location Lora Muchmore Deputy Director Business Transformation Directorate Office of the Deputy Under Secretary.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Anne Castle, ACWI Chair Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior William H.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Assign Priority Calendar Category Community Projects Staff Projects Update/Establishes Polices/Ordinances Strategic Plan Goal? Yes – Assign Goal No – Not.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
Demonstrating Success: NASA Performance and Results Mike A. McNeill Environmental Management Division NASA Headquarters.
©2015, Region One Education Service Center Curriculum Advisory Council Meeting March 26, 2015 EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance Office of School Improvement,
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Regulatory Improvement Workplan: Policy Package 3 Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council July 28, 2004.
1 Getting to Green at the Department of Energy Progress on OMB’s Environmental Sustainability Scorecard Andy Lawrence Director, Office of Nuclear Safety,
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Advanced Environmental Management (AEM) Training Phase I
Susan Barnes Vice-Chairman Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Current and Planned Management Initiatives
Workshop Session I.
Presentation transcript:

Changes to Department of Defense Real Property Accountability for Historic Properties Brian Michael Lione Cultural Resources Management Specialist Contractor, ODUSD(I&E) Joint Services Environmental Management Conference, Tampa, Florida April 14, 2005

2 Overview Discussion of Historic Properties Why Collect Real Property Information? Background of DoD Accountability for Historic Properties Summary of DoD Changes Benefits of New Changes The Future of DoD Asset Accountability

3 Discussion of Historic Properties What are Historic Properties? –Real Property Only oBuildings oStructures oInfrastructure oCan be listed on: National Historic Landmarks List oCan be listed on, or eligible for listing on: National Register of Historic Places –Does not include archaeological sites or other types of cultural resources –Does not include Personal Property items omuseum collections oartifact collections ostatic display items

4 Why Collect Real Property Information? Facilitate the use, management, and maintenance of real property; Enable evaluation of real property assets for planning; Identify and justify requirements; Develop reimbursement rates and support Interservice Support Agreements; Monitor compliance with laws, rules, and regulations; Support information requirements of installation tenants; Support capacity analyses; Support space management and stationing; Conduct “what if” assessments at HQ levels; and Support reporting requirements.

5 Background of DoD Historic Property Accountability Traditional DoD Method of Accountability –DoD Component Database Systems oArmy IFS oNavy iNFADS oAir Force ACES oWashington Headquarters Service –Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) oFacility Analysis Database (FAD) Executive Order – Preserve America (March 3, 2003) –Reporting of number; use; condition of historic properties –Directs enhanced planning for, and management of historic properties –Establishes Senior Policy Official (SPO) for Historic Preservation Issues

6 Background of DoD Historic Property Accountability Executive Order – Real Property Asset Management (February 6, 2004) –Establishes Federal Real Property Council –Directs creation of standards/guidelines for real property accountability –Connection to EO – Preserve America –Establishes Senior Real Property Officer (SRPO) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations & Environment (DUSD(I&E)) –Designated SPO and SRPO –Designated DoD Representative to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation –Business Transformation (BT) Directorate (est. May 2003) oPart of DoD-wide Business Management Modernization Program oMeets needs of EO13327 and FRPC oImplements more detailed DoD standards for Real Property Management

7 Summary of DoD Changes Under DUSD(I&E) BT: –Update DoD Real Property Management Program oReal Property Inventory Work Group oAssistance from DoD Historic Preservation Work Group: Define “Facility Historical Action Codes” Define “Historical Definitions” Update Codes and Definitions of Historic Properties as RPI “Core Data Element” –Changes included in Real Property Inventory Requirements Book (RPIR) (January 2005) –Changes included in revised DoD Instruction DoD Real Property Inventory Reporting and Forecasting (forthcoming)

8 Summary of DoD Changes –New “Historic Status Codes” for Facilities, part 1 NHLI – Individually Listed National Historic Landmark NHLC – Contributing Element to a NHL District NRLI – Individually Listed on the National Register of Historic Places NRLC – Contributing to a NRHP District NREI – Individually Eligible for the NRHP NREC – Contributing to a District Eligible for the NRHP ELPA – Eligible for the NRHP for the Purposes of a Program Alternative Descriptions of all “Facility Historical Status Codes” are available as a handout; source: RPIR, Appendix D – RPI Core Data Elements, DRAFT, January 2005

9 Summary of DoD Changes –New “Historic Status Codes” for Facilities, part 2 NCE – Non-Contributing Element of NHL/NRL/NRE District DNL – NHL Property, Designation Rescinded DNR – NRHP Property, Designation Rescinded RNR – Removed Resource – NHL, NRHP, NRHP Eligible DIL – Determined Ineligible for Listing NEV – Never Evaluated REV – Needs to be Reevaluated Descriptions of all “Facility Historical Status Codes” are available as a handout; source: RPIR, Appendix D – RPI Core Data Elements, DRAFT, January 2005

10 Benefits of DoD Changes –Improved Accountability of Historic Properties, DoD-wide: oUnderstanding of the number, type, condition, use, and historic status of historic properties oImproved planning, programming, and budgeting for historic properties management oProvides basis for further development and inclusion of historic properties in Facilities Sustainment and Facilities Recapitalization Models –Improved accountability is a pillar of new DoD Cultural Resources Instruction (forthcoming, 2005) –Improved Reporting for oEO13287 Preserve America oPortions of DoD Financial Management Regulation (FMR) Reporting Requirements for Heritage Assets oAnnual DoD Component Management Reviews

11 Future of DoD Asset Accountability –Improved compliance for, and stewardship of, historic properties –Connect FAD information to Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) o“One Installation, One Map” oCan display other cultural resources Archaeological Sites Traditional Cultural Places oCan fill reporting requirements not covered by FAD Federal Archaeological Report to Congress Other Heritage Assets as listed in DoD FMR

12 Future of DoD Asset Accountability –FAD+DISDI connection benefits oReal-time access to all information on all cultural resources, not just historic properties Open access to other federal agencies CR information available electronically to support Heritage Tourism –Potential FAD+DISDI concerns oOpen Access to Protected information Archaeological Site Locations Tribal community concerns about providing locations of TCPs and Sacred Sites oOngoing Maintenance of Data by Qualified Personnel

13 Contact Information Changes to Department of Defense Real Property Accountability for Historic Properties Brian Michael Lione Cultural Resources Management Specialist Contractor, ODUSD(I&E)