1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
Advertisements

Clean Air Corridor Section 309 Requirements Presentation to WRAP Board July 24, 2002.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
1 July 12, 2006/10a Fire Emissions Tracking System White Paper Fire Emissions Joint Forum July 11-12, 2006 Portland, OR Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc.
WRAP Status Report EPA/RPO Meeting Durham, NC February 6, 2002.
Western Regional Air Partnership Emissions Database Management System Presentation to Fire Emissions Joint Forum Las Vegas, Nevada December 09, 2004 E.H.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
Developing a Workplan for Implementing the Strategic Plan for the WRAP Board October 1, 2008.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
MONTANA REGIONAL HAZE VISIBILITY PROTECTION PLAN REGULATION OF OPEN BURNING SOURCES BOB HABECK Montana Department of Environmental Quality June 17, 2004.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum Products for Section 309 WRAP June 24, 2002 Pete Lahm, USDA-FS FEJF Chair.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
Summary of WRAP 2004 Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting October 14, 2003 Salt Lake City, UT.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Guidance for Categorizing Natural vs. Anthropogenic Fire Emissions Follow-up Task from WRAP to Policy for Categorizing Fire Emissions WRAP Fire Emissions.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
1 Fire Emissions Joint Forum: Section 309 Requirements Continued… -Enhanced Smoke Management Programs -Annual Emission Goals for Fire -Fire Tracking Systems.
FIRE STRATEGY Fire Policy Update. Background Agricultural land is defined as forestland, rangeland, cropland and pastureland. Types of fires – Prescribed,
REGIONAL COORDINATION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Status Report Debra Wolfe November 30, 2005 WRAP FEJF Meeting Seattle, WA.
§309 Technical Support Document “Table of Contents” First Draft Tom Moore WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.
2005 WRAP Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 Rangeland Burning (Non-Federal Lands) Methodology Phase 2 Fire Emission Inventory WRAP – FEJF.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Colorado’s Smoke Management Program and HB Pat McLaughlin, EPSII Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment,
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
1 Incorporating Smoke Management Plans into SIPs: THE OREGON 309 SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Smoke Management Planning.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum Technical & Policy Products Overview June 16, 2004 Portland, OR.
309/308 Technical & Policy Overview Fire Emissions Joint Forum March 10-11, 2004 San Diego, CA.
Regional Haze Rule SIP Template Clean Air Corridors Section (d)(3) Brian Finneran - Oregon DEQ WESTAR 2002 Fall Technical Conference.
2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Summary of WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
WRAP WORK PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 2001 Submitted to WRAP Board for Approval Andy Ginsburg ODEQ, Co-Chair IOC Forum Mike George ADEQ, Co-Chair TOC Forum.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
State Regional Haze SIP Development Critical Path for Western States.
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Interim Air Quality Policy on Wildland and Prescribed Fires
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Annual Emission Goals for Fire
Visibility Coordinator’s Report
Western Regional Air Partnership 2003 Technical Workplan Elements
Western Regional Haze Planning and
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
Market Trading Forum Update
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Initiatives Oversight Committee Update on Other Activities
Status Report: “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Andy Ginsburg, Oregon DEQ
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
Market Trading Forum Update
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in a way that is adequate and required for SIP/TIP implementation under either 309 or 308. WRAP FTS Policy Identifies – Basic and essential fire activity information necessary to consistently calculate emissions and uniformly assess fire impacts to regional haze. WRAP FTS Policy intent – to reduce creation of individual infra-structure for tracking and to take advantage of regional emissions systems Comment Period still open…see WRAP Website

2 Policy Statement A Fire activity information for all fire types is needed in the WRAP region. A fire tracking system that captures this information will form the basis of a fire emissions inventory compiled annually, which is needed to support Regional Haze Rule requirements.

3 A. Fire Tracking System FTS Policy allows for – Direct data collection – Indirect estimation techniques Satisfy minimum spatial and temporal information needs – Support emissions inventories and modeling Progressive implementation – Ensure comparability between the tracking of fire activity information and monitored visibility changes.

4 A. Emissions Inventory Fire tracking system information provides minimum basis for fire emissions inventories Regional approach encouraged in RHR – WRAP emissions inventory system Point, area, biogenic, mobile, & fire sources Temporal and spatial resolution Man-made and natural sources Visibility impairing pollutants State/Tribe can calculate emissions internally within jurisdiction if they so choose

5 A. Emissions Inventory Update fire activity information and the subsequent emissions inventory within the WRAP region on an annual basis. – Variability: strength, impact, location, timing – Other common RHR emission requirements Stationary Source Milestones Clean Air Corridors

6 A. Applicability Applies equitably across all land types and fire sources. – Wildland and Agricultural Lands Regardless of ownership, cause of ignition, or purpose of fire Consistent consideration of fire between Sections 308 and 309 Does Not Apply To – Other open burning activities – Native American cultural non-vegetative burning

7 Policy Statement B A fire tracking system includes the following seven essential components that are necessary in order to consistently calculate emissions and to uniformly assess impacts to regional haze: 1. Date of Burn 2. Burn Location 3. Area of Burn 4. Fuel Type 5. Pre-Burn Fuel Loading 6. Type of Burn 7. “Anthropogenic” or “Natural” Classification

8 B. Essential Components 1. Date of Burn – Attribute temporally to a specific day – Fire activity on each given day 2. Burn Location – Attribute spatially to a specific location 3. Area of Burn – Blackened acres 4. Fuel Type – Predominant fuel or cover type consumed by the fire

9 B. Essential Components 5. Pre-Burn Fuel Loading – Amount of fuel present at burn location 6. Type of Burn – Predominant fuel configuration 7. “Anthropogenic” or “Natural” Classification – Apportion fire’s contribution to natural visibility conditions and anthropogenic visibility impairment

10 B. Essential Components No De Minimus Level recommended – Recommend use of source-receptor relationship basis for justification – FEJF FY03 Work Task to assist in exploration of fire source-receptor relationships

11 Policy Statement C A fire tracking system should include additional components as needed to support the development and implementation of annual emission goals and other control measures.

12 C. Annual Emission Goals WRAP AEG Policy Additional components to support annual emissions goals and other control measures – emission reduction technique used – emissions reductions achieved – other information (e.g. fuel moisture)

13 Policy Statement D A fire tracking system should include a component that addresses the projection of fire emissions, which is necessary to meet the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule.

14 D. Fire Emissions Projection Sections 308 & 309 – Anticipated net effect on visibility due to projected changes in fire emissions necessary for long term strategies. – Future projected emissions necessary for periodic progress reports. Section 309 – Evaluation of the degree of visibility impairment from smoke for both planning and operational purposes in SIP/TIP.

15 D. Fire Emissions Projection Fire emissions projection component developed in a variety of ways. Projections may be determined by – Surveys – Growth factors – Multipliers – Other techniques

16 D. Fire Emissions Projection One-year projection components – Provide information critical to implementation of ESMP regional coordination element Operational smoke management Regional planning Five-year projection components – Regional planning Period addressed by long-term strategy – Demonstration of reasonable progress Period addressed by progress reports

17 Policy Statement E The development of fire tracking systems by states and tribes will be done collaboratively with state, tribal, local and federal land management agencies, and private parties.

18 E. Collaborative Development State/Tribe, land management agencies, and private parties per GCVTC Report. Collaborative process – Consider numerous mechanisms and infrastructure options Promote economic efficiency Avoid duplication of time and effort – Future refinements to reflect policy changes or technical advances

19 Future FEJF Policy Related Work Assess potential de minimis levels for FTS – FEJF base on source/impact relationships Guidance on format for FTS components – FEJF work closely with Emissions Forum – FEJF develop further guidance procedure for submittal and format of fire tracking system information quality assurance methods FTS fire emissions projection component – FEJF develop further guidance AEG Guidance on applicable emission reduction techniques and factors (Appendix D) – Common WRAP fuel types/agricultural crops & activities