Interoperable Intelligent Optical Networking: Key to future network services and applications OIF Carrier Group Interoperability: Key issue for carriers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra-Carrier Solutions Enabled by the OIF NNI Erning Ye Nortel Networks.
Advertisements

MAKING GMPLS REAL Colm OBrien / Ian Hood Mahi Networks, Inc.
Achieving Seamless IP Optical Network Integration OIF Interoperability Update Amy Wang, Avici Systems.
MPLS and GMPLS Li Yin CS294 presentation.
Modeling Internet Application Traffic for Network Planning and Provisioning Takafumi Chujo Fujistu Laboratories of America, Inc.
All rights reserved © 2006, Alcatel Grid Standardization & ETSI (May 2006) B. Berde, Alcatel R & I.
1 Cross-layer Visibility as a Service Ramana Rao Kompella Albert Greenberg, Jennifer Rexford Alex C. Snoeren, Jennifer Yates.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum MEF 17 Service OAM Framework and Requirements February 2008.
G : DCM Signaling Mechanism Using GMPLS RSVP-TE ITU-T Workshop on IP-Optical, Chitose, Japan 7/11/2002 Dimitrios Pendarakis, Tellium, Inc. ITU-T.
Optical Control Plane Activities in IETF and OIF L. Ong 9 July 2002 L. Ong 9 July 2002
ITU-T Workshop on IP/Optical Chitose, 9-11 July 2002 Session Network Performance N eal Seitz, Chair SG 13/WP 4 IP Performance Specifications: Progress.
Steve Joiner, Technical Committee Chair John McDonough, Member OIF Board of Directors Optical Internetworking Forum.
Application-Based Network Operations (ABNO) IETF 88 – SDN RG
Deployment of MPLS VPN in Large ISP Networks
Presented by Economic and Tax Revenue Outlook Mark Zandi Economy.com, Inc.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Resource Provisioning and Bandwidth Brokering for IP-core Networks Chen-Nee Chuah ISRG Retreat Jan 10-12, 2000 Problem: How to provide end-to-end QoS in.
A Policy-Based Optical VPN Management Architecture.
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
Considerations on the Development of an Optical Control Plane draft-freeland-octrl-cons-00.txt Darren Freeland, Neil Harrison, Sergio Inglima, Keith James,
Enabling Broadband On-Demand Services Ethernet Services.
COnvergence of fixed and Mobile BrOadband access/aggregation networks Work programme topic: ICT Future Networks Type of project: Large scale integrating.
Copyright ©2004 Global Insight, Inc. Analyzing the Home Improvement Market Market Sizing and Forecasting Mike Sweet Senior Consultant, Business Planning.
BroadbandSuite Unleashing the Power Of Broadband October 15, 2006 Lisa Garza, Member Board of Directors, DSL Forum.
Peaking phase Falling phase Rising phase Bottoming phase Q U.S. office clock (overall) Source: Jones Lang LaSalle Los Angeles, Miami Dallas, San.
TERENA Networking Conference 2004, Rhodes, Greece, June Differentiated Optical Services and Optical SLAs Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and.
OSCARS Overview Path Computation Topology Reachability Contraints Scheduling AAA Availability Provisioning Signalling Security Resiliency/Redundancy OSCARS.
IST Project LION 2 Outline IST-project LION –Layers Interworking in Optical Networks –Overview – objectives –Testbed Progress: 2 examples –Recovery experiments.
The CHRO Network. 2 Goals of Engaging Senior Executives We are engaging senior HR executives with one another and with SHRM to: > Build their peer networks.
The Role of a Supplier in a Disaster or Emergency Craig Hodges March 6 th 2012.
Optical Control Plane - The realization of distributed control for optical switches Siva Sankaranarayanan ITU-T Workshop on IP/Optical Chitose, Japan July.
CA*net 4 Open Grid Services for Management of Optical Networks CENIC Workshop May 6, 2002
Page 1 OIF worldwide interoperability demonstrations on ASON inter-domain interfaces A carrier’s point of view Hans-Martin Foisel Deutsche Telekom OIF.
Copyright 2004 National LambdaRail, Inc N ational L ambda R ail Update 9/28/2004 Debbie Montano Director, Development & Operations
The OIF: A Beacon for Industry Progress and Convergence.
WORLDWIDE INTEROPERABILITY DEMONSTRATION Carlo Cavazzoni Alessandro D’Alessandro.
Optical Control Plane, Optical/IP integration Concepts and Issues Greg Bernstein Greg Bernstein
Applicazione del paradigma Diffserv per il controllo della QoS in reti IP: aspetti teorici e sperimentali Stefano Salsano Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
OIF NNI: The Roadmap to Non- Disruptive Control Plane Interoperability Dimitrios Pendarakis
What is Bandwidth on Demand ? Bandwidth on Demand (BoD) is based on a technology that employs a new way of managing and controlling SONET-based equipment.
A PRESENTATION “SEMINAR REPORT” ON “ GENERALIZED MULTIPROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING“
Page 1 Unclassified _NB_Next Steps.ppt Phillip E. Paulsen Space Communications Office NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) Cleveland, Ohio 6 November.
Call Detail Records for UNI 1.0 Dan Spears Director – Applications Marketing CIENA Corporation.
Lucy Yong Young Lee IETF CCAMP WG GMPLS Extension for Reservation and Time based Bandwidth Service.
Contribution Number: oif Working Group: Architecture & Signaling Title: Project proposal for interworking of G RFC 3473 network domains.
Enabling the Future Service-Oriented Internet (EFSOI 2008) Supporting end-to-end resource virtualization for Web 2.0 applications using Service Oriented.
Optical Architecture Invisible Nodes, Elements, Hierarchical, Centrally Controlled, Fairly Static Traditional Provider Services: Invisible, Static Resources,
A DVANCE AND I MMEDIATE R ESERVATIONS OF V IRTUALIZED N ETWORK R ESOURCES Laia Ferrao Fundació i2CAT
Page 1 Recent Progress in ASON Technologies in the OIF Joe Berthold President – Optical Internetworking Forum.
MPLS-TP INTER-OP: WHAT, WHY, AND HOW? General Objectives for MPLS-TP Inter-Op Test Program at UNH-IOL.
 Graphs  Paths  Circuits  Euler. Traveling Salesman Problems.
1 | © 2015 Infinera Open SDN in Metro P-OTS Networks Sten Nordell CTO Metro Business Group
SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKING/OPENFLOW: A PATH TO PROGRAMMABLE NETWORKS April 23, 2012 © Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
Tom Afferton Member of OIF Board of Directors Division Manager – AT&T Labs OIF Website:
Technology With Vision IMTC –H323 Forum May 14-16, 2002 Geneva, Switzerland Chaim E. Fried.
Optical Control Plane Standardization - OIF / IETF / ITU Lyndon Ong, Director, Network Control Architecture Ciena Corporation
Dynamic Network Services In Internet2 John Vollbrecht /Dec. 4, 2006 Fall Members Meeting.
Emerging Control Plane Standards and the Impact on Optical Layer Services Thomas DiMicelli, Senior Product Manager Sycamore Networks.
1 3/15/2016 Requirements on the O-UNI Olivier Duroyon, Alcatel Monica Lazer, AT&T Jen-Wei Kuo, Fujitsu Hirokazu Ishimatsu, Japan Telecom Zhi-Wei Lin, Lucent.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
Survivability in IP-over-WDM Networks. Introduction Multilayer network architecture is moving into IP-optimized two-layer architecture. ․ They have same.
Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control draft-kdkgall-ccamp-dwdm-if-mng-ctrl-fwk-01 Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom Gabriele Galimberti Cisco.
The Internet2 Network and LHC Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 LHC Meeting 23 October 2006 FERMI Lab,
Jim McEachern Senior Technology Consultant ATIS July 8, 2015.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Requirements for Ring Protection in MPLS-TP
Dynamic Network Services In Internet2
Data Center Colocation Services.
Unit 3 Lesson 5: Regional Cities
Data Center Colocation Services.
Presentation transcript:

Interoperable Intelligent Optical Networking: Key to future network services and applications OIF Carrier Group Interoperability: Key issue for carriers and ISPs

Carrier Participation

OIF Carrier Involvement  Carrier’s integral members of OIF: OIF Carrier Working Group Established in 2001 with charter to develop requirements and guidelines for services and functions to be supported by future optical networking products Guiding OIF work to address pressing issues within carrier networks Providing detailed requirements for developing specifications  Carrier participation in other working groups Ensuring that technical solutions being developed address network and service requirements Contributing to technical solutions and interoperability agreements

Intelligent Optical Network: Motivations  Distributed intelligence (control plane)  Mesh topologies  Dynamic network reconfigurability  Network is “database”  New service enabler  Scalability  Reduced carrier-specific management system development  Technology reuse  Reduced inventory and dependence on forecasts  Improved customer service: reduced provisioning times  Reduced capital expenditure – mesh restoration  Reduced management system development costs  Accurate, real-time state information  Bandwidth on Demand  Optical VPNs  Scheduled connections

Intelligent Optical (Transport) Networks Portland Newark Houston Phoenix Salt Lake City Detroit Seattle Raleigh Denver Atlanta Minneapolis Tampa Orlando Chicago St Louis San Diego Intelligent Optical Network Element Cambridge San Francisco Kansas City Los Angeles Dallas Wash.DC Manchester Ft. Lauderdale Phil NY C connection provisioned Transport link Austin

Control Plane Interfaces Service Provider A Admin Domain UNI Inter-carrier External Network Network Interface (E-NNI) Service Provider B Admin Domain I-NNI Domain A1Domain A2 E-NNI Internal-Network Network Interface (I-NNI) I-NNI User Domain A User Domain Z User to Network Interface (UNI) Service provider 1 I-NNI (OIF UNI 1.0 & 2.0) (OIF NNI 1.0) Intra-carrier External Network Network Interface (E-NNI)

OIF Interoperability Agreements  OIF develops interoperability agreements and manages interoperability testing: Physical Link Layer Networking  Networking agreements focused on UNI and intra- carrier E-NNI UNI 1.0 interoperability agreement finalized November 2001 Interoperability event staged Supercomm 2001 and OFC 2003 UNI 2.0 interoperability agreement in progress NNI 1.0 interoperability agreement in progress Capabilities demonstrated in early interoperability event OFC 2003

Network-to-Network Interface (NNI)  NNI: interworking between “control domains” to provide: Summarized topology and reachability information across domains Signaling for connection establishment, removal and restoration  Immediate NNI applications: Interworking between (already deployed) proprietary control planes Scalability Interworking different transport network technologies E.g., all-optical and opto-electronic  NNI 1.0 is scoped to intra-carrier E-NNI

Intra-Carrier NNI Metro-Core Example Metro Intercity Metro Customers Different metro / core domains Different economics Different services  Dissimilar control issues  Different vendors  Multiple profit centers NNI

Optical User to Network Interface (O-UNI)  O-UNI: allows clients (e.g., IP routers) to dynamically request bandwidth from the intelligent optical network Signaling for connection establishment, modification, deletion and query No topology information exchanged between IP and optical network  Potential UNI applications: Reduced operations overheads – simplified provisioning of new IP router connectivity New services: bandwidth on demand, optical Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Integrated IP and optical failure recovery mechanisms

O-UNI UNI Connection request  Client requests new connection between client source and client destination  Client sees optical network as a “cloud”  Optical network responsible for routing connection to client destination Optical Network

Conclusions  Intelligent optical networking is a reality Large scale network deployments End-to-end provisioning  Implementation agreements and standards are critical to future intelligent optical networks Network-to-Network Interface (NNI) Optical User to Network Interface (UNI)  Carrier participation ensures that developing implementation agreements and standards meet network and service requirements