Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
City of Ashland Transportation System Plan Update September 6 th, 2012.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Improving the Passenger Experience Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association (PPTA) April 2015.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Educational Session 101 May 29, 2014.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
One Call Transportation Services One Call Transportation Services Building on a Network.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
May 9, 2011 RLS & Associates, Inc. Kent County Transit Needs Assessment Draft Findings and Recommendations.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
NCTPA ACCOMPLISHMENTS. NCTPA Overall Work Program (OWP) Serves as a reference to be used by citizens, planners, and elected officials throughout the year.
Blueprint for Tomorrow Fairhope City Council February 9, 2008.
A Connected Region for Our Future Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Good Afternoon/Introductions. Missoula’s LRTP Process Missoula Growth Workshop Base Case Scenario Envision Missoula Workshops Vision Scenario Envision.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Steering Committee Meeting Presented to Montgomery County Department.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN Future Scenarios October 19, 2009.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Regional Transit Study Final Recommendations March 15, 2010.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
Transportation: Issues and
Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Placer County Rural Transit Study Expanding Public Transit Service for Rural Placer County.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Title Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro Investigating options for improved bus service between.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
Keeping Harris County Moving A Coordinated Approach.
Transportation for Everyone Community Transportation for the Contoocook River Valley February 2007 Posted 2/14/07.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
September 2011 Public Open Houses
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Promoting Shared Rides: Where do Transit Agencies Fit?
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
September 2011 Public Open Houses
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions

2 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Welcome and Introductions Review of Project Scope and Schedule Overview of Existing Conditions Guided Small Group Discussion of Study Goals, Key Issues and Priorities Large Group Discussion and Wrap-Up Meeting Schedule

3 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Project Scope and Schedule

4 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Significant increase in the number of seniors and immigrants residing in the greater Mankato area and an increase in the number of multi-family housing units, both for university students as well as senior citizens. Significant street redesign within Mankato and roadway limitations. Desire to develop an accessible mass transit system Desire to expand frequency and hours of transit service. Desire to improve connectivity, coverage and directness of service. Desire to explore the feasibility of a regional and inter-regional multimodal transportation system. Study Context

5 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study 1.Assess and redesign the existing transit system Mankato and North Mankato 2.Further develop a phased implementation plan for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) As developed conceptually in MATAPS 3.Evaluate the potential for a four-county regional transit system Connections between the region and the greater Mankato area Primary Study Objectives

6 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Mankato/North Mankato City of Mankato City of North Mankato MSU, Mankato Four County Area Blue Earth County Nicollet County Le Sueur County Waseca County Study Area

7 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Work Scope and Study Schedule Project Initiation Existing Conditions Preservation and Contraction Service Scenarios Regional Service Plan Draft and Final Transit Redesign Study Mankato and North Mankato We are here Data Collection Community Profile Review of Previous Planning Efforts Evaluation of Existing Services Community Survey Inventory of Existing Facilities Marketing and Branding Evaluation Website Four County Area PMT, Advisory and Steering Committees & Public Input Expansion & BRT Service Scenarios

8 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Review of Existing Conditions

9 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Overview of previous planning efforts Envision 2020 Annual Report Mankato Area Transportation and Planning Study (MATAPS) BRT Concept Plan South Central Minnesota Rural Transit Needs Assessment (2009) City Center Renaissance Plan Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan 2010 MnDOT Transit Report MSU-Mankato Master Plan Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choices 2010 Transit Survey Current and future land use plans Study Background Regional route with feeder network recommended in South Central Minnesota Rural Transit Needs Assessment MSU Mankato Master Plan

10 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Summary of Key Issues and Findings from Previous Studies There is a significant increase in the number of seniors and immigrants residing within Mankato/North Mankato and an increase in the number of multi-family housing units, both for university students as well as senior citizens. Significant street redesign within Mankato. Roadway limitations. Three areas of examination: Redesign of existing bus route, phased implementation of a BRT system, and possibility of a four county system that is interconnected with the Greater Mankato System. Develop an accessible mass transit system; regional and inter-regional multimodal transportation system. Expand frequency and hours of transit service. Improve connectivity, coverage and directness of service. Study Background

11 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Streamlined service connecting multiple hubs Limited stops Enhanced vehicles and passenger amenities Focus on speed and reliability Study Background

12 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Where Workers Live (North Mankato and Mankato) Demographics and Travel Patterns

13 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Where Workers Work (North Mankato and Mankato) Demographics and Travel Patterns

14 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Where Workers Live (4 county area) Demographics and Travel Patterns

15 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Where Workers Work (4 County Area) Demographics and Travel Patterns

16 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Population Density (North Mankato and Mankato) Demographics and Travel Patterns

17 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Income (North Mankato and Mankato) Demographics and Travel Patterns

18 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Language Spoken at Home (North Mankato and Mankato) Demographics and Travel Patterns

19 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Auto Ownership (North Mankato and Mankato) Demographics and Travel Patterns

20 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Existing Transit Services

21 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Existing Transit Services – City Routes

22 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Existing Transit Services – City Routes

23 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Existing Transit Services – MSU, Mankato Routes

24 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Existing Transit Services – MSU, Mankato Routes

25 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Mobility Bus Complementary paratransit to fixed route service Fare is $3.00 Requires a medical certification Dial-A-Ride For travel to or from West Mankato to connect with a fixed route bus on Cherry Street Fare is $1.50 Reservation only Existing Transit Services – Demand Response

26 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Le Sueur Heartland Express Route Deviation/Dial-A-ride, Route Guarantee and Subscription Transportation Service. For residents of Le Sueur Weekdays: 7 AM to 4:30 PM Weekends: No Service Base Fare: $2.00 Existing Transit Services - Regional Services

27 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study St. Peter Transit Dial-A-Ride Service Serving the Cities of St. Peter and Kasota Weekdays: 7 AM to 8 PM (Kasota: 10 AM to 4:30 PM) Saturday: 10 AM to 5 PM (Kasota: 12 PM to 2:30 PM) Base Fare: $1.75 (St. Peter) $2.25 (Kasota) Existing Transit Services – Regional Services

28 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Land to Air Express Local Airport Shuttle; Mankato, St. Peter, Le Sueur, Belle Plaine, Jordan, MSP International Airport, U of M, and Amtrak. Round trip $65 Beginning October 25, 2011; daily service between New Ulm, Mankato and Rochester. Jefferson Lines College Connection regional service to the Twin Cities, with stop in St. Peter. Weekday and Weekend service Round trip from $25.50 – $27.25 VINE Volunteer based initiative serving Blue Earth and Nicollet Counties. For people over 60 or in those in need. People to Job Program Existing Transit Services – Other Providers

29 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study 2010 Transit Survey

30 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study 2010 Transit Survey

31 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study 2010 Transit Survey

32 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Goals, Key Issues and Priorities BRT/Route Redesign Advisory Committee

33 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study How do you feel about the transit services currently being provided in Mankato and North Mankato? Do you feel services are adequately meeting the needs? If not, why not? Be specific about the needs that are not being met? What are the major challenges Mankato and North Mankato are facing with regard to transportation? Ability for transit to offer competitive travel times? Traffic congestion? Integration with other modes – bike, ped, etc. Land use patterns What services are being provided well that can be built upon? What needs are not being met or need improvement? Your Feedback

34 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study What should be the purpose of transit service in Mankato and North Mankato? Service for people who do not have any other transportation options? To get cars off the road? Discuss the coverage and productivity tradeoffs Should transit service be expanded inside of the greater Mankato area? Service elsewhere in Mankato and North Mankato? Specific places it should be going? Longer service hours? Greater frequency? Route design, # of transfers? What are your thoughts about streamlining service (i.e., Bus Rapid Transit)? Should transit service be expanded outside of the greater Mankato area? Regional service beyond the Mankato area? Where? How often? What type of service? Regional commute service? Local transit services? Your Feedback

35 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Goals, Key Issues and Priorities Regional Advisory Committee

36 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study How do you feel about the transit services currently being provided in the four county area (Nicollet/Blue Earth/Le Sueur/Waseca Counties)? Do you feel existing services in Le Sueur and St. Peter are adequately meeting the needs? If not, why not? Be specific about the needs that are not being met? What are the major challenges the four county area is facing with regard to transportation? Access to work? Access to basic services (shopping, medical, etc.)? Local service for people who have no other transportation option? Service to colleges/schools? What services are being provided well that can be built upon? What needs are not being met or need improvement? Your Feedback

37 Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study What should be the purpose of transit service be in the four county area? Service for people who do not have any other transportation options? Commuters? Students? Regional service? Local service? How does this differ by county? Is there a need to travel to the greater Mankato area or to the Twin Cities? For what purposes? How does this differ by county? Are private transportation providers adequately meeting needs? Jefferson Lines? Your Feedback