Modeling meditation ?! Marieke van Vugt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MODELING PARAGIGMS IN ACT-R -Adhineth Mahanama.V.
Advertisements

Time-constrained reasoning Learn to be a split-second expert Niels Taatgen and John Anderson Carnegie Mellon University Funded by grants from ONR (ACT-R),
Working Memory Dr. Claudia J. Stanny EXP 4507 Memory & Cognition Spring 2009.
Integrating Object-Oriented Technology with Cognitive Modeling Pamela E. Scott-Johnson, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts Bheem Kattel,
SAL: A Hybrid Cognitive Architecture Y. Vinokurov 1, C. Lebiere 1, D. Wyatte 2, S. Herd 2, R. O’Reilly 2 1. Carnegie Mellon University, 2. University of.
Threaded Cognition: An Integrated Theory of Concurrent Multitasking
COGNITIVE VIEWS OF LEARNING Information processing is a cognitive theory that examines the way knowledge enters and is stored in and retrieved from memory.
Expert System Human expert level performance Limited application area Large component of task specific knowledge Knowledge based system Task specific knowledge.
Psyco 350 Lec #2 – Slide 1 Lecture 2 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.
1 Soar Semantic Memory Yongjia Wang University of Michigan.
ACT-R.
The Information-Processing Approach
Models of Human Performance Dr. Chris Baber. 2 Objectives Introduce theory-based models for predicting human performance Introduce competence-based models.
Psychology of Music Learning Miksza Memory Processes.
Abstraction and ACT-R. Outline Motivations for the Theory –Architecture –Abstraction Production Rules ACT-R Architecture of Cognition.
DDMLab – September 27, ACT-R models of training Cleotilde Gonzalez and Brad Best Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory (DDMLab)
CIS465: Adv. Info. Sys. Memory Systems Min Song Information Systems Dept.
ACT-R 6 Why aren’t you using it yet? Dan Bothell April 8, 2005.
Research Methods for HCI: Cognitive Modelling BCS HCI Tutorial 1 st September, 2008.
ACT-R 5.0 and ACT-R/PM Michael D. Byrne Department of Psychology Rice University Houston, TX 77005
Introduction to Psychology Human Memory. Lecture Outline 1)Encoding 2)Storage 3)Retrieval and Forgetting 4)Multiple memory systems.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Using Expectations to Drive Cognitive Behavior Unmesh Kurup, Christian Lebiere,
Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture
The human 2 of 3 1 The Human 2 of 3 chapter 1. the human 2 of 3 2 the human Lecture 2 Information i/o … visual, auditory, haptic, movement Lecture 3 (today)
Human Memory.
SD 142 – Catherine M. Burns 1 Memory Text p
Implications of Human Cognitive Architecture for Learning David F. Feldon, Ph.D. University of Virginia June 25, 2012
MODELING HUMAN PERFORMANCE Anderson et al. Article and Taatgen, Lebeire, & Anderson Article Presented by : Kelsey Baldree.
Information Processing. History In response to Behaviorism, a cognitive model of mind as computer was adopted (1960’s, 70’s) Humans process, store, encode,
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 8 The Information-Processing Approach.
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, a Subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 8 The Cognitive Information- Processing.
Cognitive Architectures: A Way Forward for the Psychology of Programming Michael Hansen Ph.D Student in Comp/Cog Sci CREST / Percepts & Concepts Lab Indiana.
Cognitive Information Processing Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
Division of Information Management Engineering User Interface Laboratory 21 The Modular Organization of the Mind How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical.
Computational Cognitive Neuroscience PSYC 4175/5175 Randall O’Reilly.
Queuing Network Modeling of Transcription Typing.
Compilation and Instruction ACT-R Post Graduate Summer School 2001 Coolfont Resort ACT-R Home Page: John R. Anderson Psychology.
Korea Univ. Division Information Management Engineering UI Lab. Korea Univ. Division Information Management Engineering UI Lab. IMS 802 Cognitive Modeling.
The human 2 of 3 1 The Human 2 of 3. the human 2 of 3 2.
ACT-R 6.0 Updates Summer ‘10 – Summer ‘12 Dan Bothell Carnegie Mellon University
Cognitive Theories of Learning Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
Theories of Learning: Cognitive Theories Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos 15 May 2009.
1/28 Unit 3. Attention 3.1 Visual Locations 3.2 The Sperling Task 3.3 Visual Attention 3.4 Auditory Attention 3.5 Typing and Control 3.6 Declarative Finsts.
Human Abilities 2 How do people think? 1. Agenda Memory Cognitive Processes – Implications Recap 2.
Ch 7. Memory Process by which we recollect prior experiences and information/skills learned in the past.
ACT-PRO Action Protocol Tracer A Tool for Analyzing Simple, Rule- based Tasks Wai-Tat Fu & Wayne D. Gray ARCH Lab George Mason University.
Unit 3 – Neurobiology and Communication
Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory Carnegie Mellon University 1 Social and Decision Sciences Department ACT-R models of training Cleotilde Gonzalez and.
1 Human Memory Don’t ask too much of mere mortals Material mainly from Dix et al chapter 1.
Project Impact CURR 231 Curriculum and Instruction in Math Session 3 Chapters 3.
ACT-R 6.0 Software Updates Summer ‘08 – Summer ‘09 Dan Bothell Carnegie Mellon University
How conscious experience and working memory interact Bernard J. Baars and Stan Franklin Soft Computing Laboratory 김 희 택 TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences vol.
RULES Patty Nordstrom Hien Nguyen. "Cognitive Skills are Realized by Production Rules"
SOAR A cognitive architecture By: Majid Ali Khan.
The Information Processing Approach Chapter 8 By Eva Tantri Mahastri
ACT-R 5.0 Architecture Christian Lebiere Human-Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University
GOMS as a Simulation of Cognition Frank Ritter, Olivier Georgeon 28 oct 2014.
Multitasking Computational Neuroscience NSCI 492 Spring 2008.
Unit 3 - Neurobiology and Communication CfE Higher Human Biology 18. Memory.
Section 1: Taking in and Storing Information.   Memory- the storage and retrieval of what has been learned or experienced  3 memory processes  Encoding-
Millisecond Time Interval Estimation in a Dynamic Task Jungaa Moon & John Anderson Carnegie Mellon University.
MEMORY, COGNITION & INFORMATION PROCESSING MEMORY The.
ACT-R 6.0 Software Updates Summer ‘09 – Summer ‘10 Dan Bothell Carnegie Mellon University
Typical Person :^) Fall 2002 CS/PSY 6750.
Memory and Thought Chapter 3.
Symbolic cognitive architectures
An Integrated Theory of the Mind
GOMS as a Simulation of Cognition
GOMS as a Simulation of Cognition
Typical Person :^) Fall 2002 CS/PSY 6750.
Presentation transcript:

Modeling meditation ?! Marieke van Vugt

Modeling framework ACT-R: adaptive control of thought – rational (John Anderson, CMU, 1994)

ACT-R Visual module = simulated eyes Aural module = simulated ears Motor module = simulated hands Speech module = simulated speech Imaginal module = simulated scratch pad Declarative module = memory Procedural module = keeps track of goals Fires production rules

Declarative memory Contains facts Retrieval speed (add-dm (b ISA count-order first 1 second 2) (c ISA count-order first 2 second 3) (d ISA count-order first 3 second 4) (e ISA count-order first 4 second 5) (f ISA count-order first 5 second 6) (first-goal ISA count-from start 2 end 4)) Contains facts Retrieval speed depends on activation Conscious knowledge

Production A 50-ms step of cognition IF-THEN rules A serial bottleneck Only one production at a time can “fire” Associated with basal ganglia Reflects procedural knowledge

Example production (P counting-example =goal> isa count state incrementing number =num1 =retrieval> isa count-order first =num1 second =num2 ==> number =num2 +retrieval> first =num2 ) English Description If the goal chunk is of the type count the state slot has the value incrementing there is a number we will call =num1 and the chunk in the retrieval buffer is of type count-order the first slot has the value =num1 and the second slot has a value we will call =num2 Then change the goal to continue counting from =num2 and request a retrieval of a count-order chunk to find the number that follows =num2

Imaginal module Reflects internal imagery Also called “problem state” or “working memory” Holds intermediate outcomes of computations or representation of task E.g., solving an equation 3x + 4 = 8 Imaginal: 3x = 12 Takes 200 ms

Visual modules Reflects visual attention Contains what and where distinction What = visual buffer Where = visual-location buffer Contains objects with features Attention can move from one object to the next Requires 65 ms to shift attention or encode

Modeling counting How do you count from 2 to 4? Retrieve the first goal: count-from start 2 end 4 Retrieve a bit of information about the number that comes after 2 (first 2 second 3) If we haven’t yet reached the final count (4), then retrieve another bit of information (first 3 second 4) When we have reached the final count, stop We start by

What model output looks like > (run 1) 0.000 GOAL SET-BUFFER-CHUNK GOAL FIRST-GOAL REQUESTED NIL 0.000 PROCEDURAL CONFLICT-RESOLUTION 0.000 PROCEDURAL PRODUCTION-SELECTED START 0.000 PROCEDURAL BUFFER-READ-ACTION GOAL 0.050 PROCEDURAL PRODUCTION-FIRED START 0.050 PROCEDURAL MOD-BUFFER-CHUNK GOAL 0.050 PROCEDURAL MODULE-REQUEST RETRIEVAL 0.050 PROCEDURAL CLEAR-BUFFER RETRIEVAL 0.050 DECLARATIVE START-RETRIEVAL 0.050 PROCEDURAL CONFLICT-RESOLUTION 0.100 DECLARATIVE RETRIEVED-CHUNK C 0.100 DECLARATIVE SET-BUFFER-CHUNK RETRIEVAL C 0.100 PROCEDURAL CONFLICT-RESOLUTION 0.100 PROCEDURAL PRODUCTION-SELECTED INCREMENT 0.100 PROCEDURAL BUFFER-READ-ACTION GOAL 0.100 PROCEDURAL BUFFER-READ-ACTION RETRIEVAL 0.150 PROCEDURAL PRODUCTION-FIRED INCREMENT 0.150 PROCEDURAL MOD-BUFFER-CHUNK GOAL 0.150 PROCEDURAL MODULE-REQUEST RETRIEVAL 0.150 PROCEDURAL CLEAR-BUFFER RETRIEVAL 0.150 DECLARATIVE START-RETRIEVAL 0.150 PROCEDURAL CONFLICT-RESOLUTION 0.200 DECLARATIVE RETRIEVED-CHUNK D 0.200 DECLARATIVE SET-BUFFER-CHUNK RETRIEVAL D 0.200 PROCEDURAL CONFLICT-RESOLUTION 0.200 PROCEDURAL PRODUCTION-SELECTED INCREMENT 0.200 PROCEDURAL BUFFER-READ-ACTION GOAL 0.200 PROCEDURAL BUFFER-READ-ACTION RETRIEVAL 0.250 PROCEDURAL PRODUCTION-FIRED INCREMENT (c ISA count-order first 2 second 3) (d ISA count-order first 3 second 4)

How would you model meditation? Choose type of meditation Go through instructions What happens at every moment in time? You can use: Visual Motor Imaginal (working memory) Retrieval (episodic memory) Production/goals

Starting point: a box-and-arrow model Now here is what I did. I started with a published box-and-arrow model. Vago & Silbersweig (2012)

paying attention thought pump This was my simplification: there is a competition between an attentive process and a “thought pump”

Focused Attention (FA) Meditation Model Model also evokes many questions: how do we really become distracted?

Crucial mechanisms: Becoming distracted: Returning to meditation we forget to checking our goal goal decays in memory competing goal of distraction takes over Returning to meditation Retrieving the memory of „I want to meditate“ Easier to return to meditation when the thoughts are not very captivating In addition to this, there can be different types

Testing the model: mind-wandering During meditation, no behavior But: crucial component of model is thought-pump Scientists started measuring thought pump in simple, boring tasks More errors, more response time variability when distracted

Task Press button when “O” appears, but not when “Q” Many more “O” than “Q” Only one stimulus every 3 seconds When in thought pump, model does not retrieve stimulus-response mapping

Predicted data

Conclusions Cognitive architecture which simulates a complete cognitive process with simulated eyes, ears, memory etc. Example model of counting First attempts at modeling meditation (shamatha with support)