Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
EVALUATOR ORIENTATION Serving on Off-Site and On-Site Committees OVERVIEW.
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
Module 2.4 Workforce Transition Planning and Tool March
Hiring & Evaluating the Library Director Presenters: Dora U. Sims, Trustee, Birmingham Public Library Trustee at Large, United For Libraries Board Assisted.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Districts In Good Standing. Origins Discussed at November 2010 meeting Approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission during January 2011 meeting.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
The Dissertation Process
A Possible SE 685 Project Automated Reviewers’ Report For ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)
Report Tile Training & Management Assistance Branch UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Project Kick-Off Meeting for with Project Manager Name,
Office of Sponsored Programs November  Focus on What is Important  Proposal Structure  Proposal Development Process  Proposal Review.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
THE VISIT. BASIC PRINCIPLES Peer Evaluation Standards-Based System Relationship to Standards: compliance; substantial compliance; or non compliance.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
1 National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers THE ROADMAP TO NABH.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Preparing Your Self Study
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
“Developing an Exemplary Self-Study”.  1. Effective organization and implementation  2. Comprehensive Assessment  3. Documenting Compliance  4. Compilation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
THE EVALUATION AND POST EVALUATION Evaluator Training Workshop November 4, 2014.
HSAB Audit Findings Addressed Lisa Tennyson, Grants Administrator OMB July 2012.
THE VISIT Year Seven Self-Evaluation. BASIC PRINCIPLES Peer Evaluation Standards-Based System Relationship to Standards: compliance; substantial compliance;
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Joint Sponsorship American Association of Neurological Surgeons.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Implementation of the IPS MDTF
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Sam Houston State University
Terminate an Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
Sam Houston State University
Curriculum Committee Orientation
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Fort Valley State University
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation Dr. Tanmay Pramanik and Dr. Ron Cannon

Moving from Applicant to Candidate Status Candidacy Process Submission of Self-Study proposal and timeline a. TRACS President’s approval of Self-study Proposal and Timeline. b. TRACS staff visit to the institution to finalize timeline. c. Staff forms the on-site evaluation team.

Moving from Applicant to Candidate Status Self-Study sent to TRACS (minimum 3 months prior to visit) a. Audit received b. All supporting documentation received c. Visiting team travel deposit 3. Self-Study with documentation sent to team members by institution

Moving from Applicant to Candidate Status Team visit (minimum 3 months prior to the Commission meeting). Team report a. Draft is submitted to TRACS via staff b. Draft is left with the institution for verification of fact c. Report goes through final editing d. Final report is sent to the institution

Moving from Applicant to Candidate Status Billing for team expenses and change of status fee. Institutional response received (minimum 2 months prior to Commission meeting)

Moving from Applicant to Candidate Status Institution scheduled for Commission appearance (April or November) a. Grant candidate status without conditions (Candidate!) b. Grant candidate status with conditions c. Defer candidate status to correct serious weaknesses d. Deny candidate status

Steps To Accreditation Self-Study Proposal Organization of the Self-Study Team Timeline, Budget, and other Administrative Tasks Committee Work Self-Study Draft Approval of Self-Study Report by President and Board TRACS Review of the Self-Study TRACS Accreditation Visit Candidate Status, Accreditation or Reaffirmation

Self-Study Proposal A Self-Study Proposal must be completed and submitted to the TRACS office for review and approval before initiating the formal self-study process.

Self-Study Proposal Format Introduction and brief history of the institution Purpose of the Self-Study Goals of the Self-Study Self-Study Timeline or Schedule Organization for the Self-Study Role and scope of the committee Names of the committees Membership of the committees Role and scope of the chairs of the committee

Self-Study Proposal Format Materials and Resources Budget for the Self-Study Response to any/all previous Recommendations/Suggestions not completed Copy of the Institutional Plan and Assessment Mechanism as currently implemented

The Organization of the Self-Study Team Self-Study Participants President Self-Study Director Editor Steering Committee Sub-Committees

Timeline, Budget, and other Administrative Tasks Sample Self-Study Timelines Example One: 12-18 Months Oct - January January-April November Initiate the Self-Study at least 12-18 months prior to the desired completion of the Self-Study. Complete the Self-Study and send to TRACS at least three months prior to the Team Visit. TRACS team visit must be scheduled no later than April. TRACS Accreditation Commission action.

Agenda Date Steering Committee to meet to agree on the self-study process. Appointment of the Self-Study Director. Appointment of Steering Committee and Sub-Committees First Draft-Committees investigate, interview, analyze, and develop preliminary reports. Steering Committee reviews the first draft and gives feedback to the sub-committees. Second Draft-Committees incorporate input from the Steering Committee and submit Final Self-Study Report. Steering Committee compiles First Draft of Final Self Study Report Editor reviews and edits the First Draft of Final Self-Study Report President receives and reviews copy of the First Draft of Final Self-Study Report Steering Committee compiles Final Self-Study Report. Editor prepares the Final Self-Study Report for publication. President submits Final Self-Study Report to Board for approval President sends copies of Self-Study Report to TRACS & others.

Committee Work Development of the Self-Study Report Two major categories: 1. Foundational Standards 2. Operational Standards Use of Assessment Data

Self-Study Drafts The first draft of the Self-Study Report is compiled by the sub-committees. Upon review of the first draft of the Self-Study Report, the Steering Committee gives feedback to the sub-committees. The second draft of the report incorporates the additional input from the sub-committees and the steering committee. The steering committee will compile the Final Self-Study Report.

Self-Study Drafts Self-Study Report Format Most of the information can be provided in brief, narrative statements supported by charts, tables, and other primary documentation. The Self-Study Report should reflect the current status of the institution and long-term plans. A copy of the current Strategic Plan must be included. Every statement in the Self-Study Report must be documented and supported by analyzed assessment data.

Self-Study Report Format Self-Study Drafts Self-Study Report Format Materials to include with the Self-Study Report Self-Study Report narrative with attachments and documentation Catalog Student Handbook Faculty Handbook Financial Aid Manual Personnel Manual

Self-Study Report Format Self-Study Drafts Self-Study Report Format Materials to include with the Self-Study Report Board Manual Job Descriptions Strategic Planning Document Assessment Plan Policies and Procedures Manual Audit

Approval of Self-Study Report by President and Board The President and Governing Board must review and approve the Self-Study Report prior to submission to the TRACS office. Minutes indicating the approval of the Self-Study Report by the Board need to be included with the documentation.

TRACS Review of the Self-Study Report The final Self-Study Report and all additional materials should be mailed to the TRACS office no later than three months prior to the desired accreditation visit. Upon receipt of the documents the TRACS office will review the package of materials for completeness. The final date for the accreditation visit, selection of team members, and travel details will be completed.

TRACS Accreditation Visit Information concerning the details of a TRACS Accreditation visit is available in the TRACS Accreditation Manual. The visit brings the beginnings of closure to the Steering Committee. This is the opportunity for each of those who have worked carefully to develop a thorough and comprehensive document to affirm the contents of the report.

Candidate (Pre-accredited) Status, Accreditation or Reaffirmation The Accreditation Commission meets twice a year (in April and November) to review the recommendations of the on-site evaluation team and the documents that have been submitted by the institution. The items that the Commission reviews in determining whether a school should be granted candidate , accredited or reaffirmed status include:

Candidate (Pre-accredited) Status, Accreditation or Reaffirmation The institution’s Self-Study Report The on-site visiting team’s report The institution’s response to the team’s report The team chair’s letter to the Commission The Staff recommendation The Commission readers’ recommendation The institutions are required to send at least one representative to the Accreditation Commission meeting when action is being taken on that institution.