Meeting a Higher Standard in Student Success and Retention Dr. Gino Pasquariello TRACS Annual Conference November 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Laying a Foundation for First Year Assessment Nazareth College of Rochester, Marywood University.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Developing the Learning Contract
Essentials of Enrolment Management and Planned Organizational Change Presentation to the National Conference of the RCCFC November 3, 2006 Victoria J.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
What is a Structured Learning Environment?. The Typical Cedar Lane Classroom Personal care opportunities limited due to schedule Limited Mobility opportunities.
What’s an ADP Goal Got to Do with It? Division for Diversity and Inclusion: 2013/14 Presenter - Ken Coopwood, Sr., Ph.D., CDE, LSSBB Vice President for.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
The Role of Academic Leadership in Student Success August 21, 2012 Deans and Department Chairs` Dialogue Southern Utah University Charles Schroeder, Consultant.
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
3 High expectations for every child
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
2012 TRACS ANNUAL CONFERENCE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES 101 Dr. Gino Pasquariello.
1 Student Engagement Retreat: The Sophomore Student November 18, 2011.
Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Higher Education Conference. Engaging Faculty in Retention Issues Part II Presidential Summit on Retention The Need and Scope February 20, 2007 Dr. Richard.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
ORIENTATION 101 THE BASICS OF OTR & AN INTRODUCTION TO NODA Denise L. Rode Director, First-& Second-Year Experience Northern Illinois University
1 What We Know about Enrollment Management in American Higher Education By J. Fredericks Volkwein Center for the Study of Higher Education Penn State University.
Ivy Tech and the HLC Assessment Academy Learning College Conference February 26-27, 2009.
Dr. Gino Pasquariello 2011 Annual TRACS Conference.
SEM Planning Model.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Strategically Internationalizing Your Campus Using Trends and Data Jim Crawley, Director University Recruitment and Advising Services – ELS Educational.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
Engaging and Retaining New Developmental Education Students CASP Conference Thursday, Oct. 14, :00 – 10:00AM.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Results from the 2013 Undergraduate Alumni Survey Karen Gil, Dean and Distinguished Professor, College of Arts & Sciences Lynn Williford, Assistant Provost,
THE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING AT RYERSON PREDICTORS OF STUDENT SATISFACTION CHRISTOPHER EVANS VICE PROVOST ACADEMIC.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Achievement Portfolio
2011 Annual TRACS Conference Dr. Gino Pasquariello.
Understanding Court Reporter Education April 2, 2005 Philadelphia.
Creating Connections: Integrating Academic and Career Advising Betsy McCalla-Wriggins NJ NACADA Conference June 9, 2009.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Implementing an Ability Based Education System Colleen Keyes Dean of Academic Affairs Dr. David England Director of Institutional Effectiveness.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Educational Portfolio A work in progress November, 2013.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
CORE STRATEGIES:  Spiritual Development  Academic Excellence  Distinguished Faculty & Staff  Campus & Resource Development  Enrollment & Brand Development.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Student Success: Learning & Engagement DIVISIONAL COUNCILS Fall 2010.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Implementing QM towards Program Certification
Overview of Session Review of the 3 Pillar Documents
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Student Engagement Student engagement is important in and out of the classroom Engaged students are more likely to remain in college and complete their.
The Heart of Student Success
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Presentation transcript:

Meeting a Higher Standard in Student Success and Retention Dr. Gino Pasquariello TRACS Annual Conference November 2012

Defining Retention and Persistence Retention The ability of an institution to retain a student from initial enrollment through graduation (Unique student, annually – typically Fall-to-Fall) Persistence The desire and action of a student to remain enrolled in the program from beginning through degree completion (term to term) Progression Support strategies that provide students with progression check points that are program and year specific. Completion The rate that indicates the percentage of students that complete their degree program (100%, 150%, and Over !50% of total degree length)

Models of Retention Interactionalist Model –Student Entry Characteristics, Initial commitment, and Academic and social integration affect subsequent commitments to the institution and the goal of graduation. Institutional Experience Model –A students persistence behavior is shaped by their beliefs, and their beliefs are affected by their experiences (Institutional Environment). Student Involvement –Higher levels of interaction and involvement produce greater levels of institutional commitment. Student-Environment Fit Theory (Student Satisfaction) –Congruence between student expectations and institutional experiences, increasing student satisfaction,

Theoretical Variables Major Factors and Revisions –Variation according to Institutional Type, Student Entry Characteristics, Academic and Social Integration –The Impact of Environmental Factors on Adult Student departure decisions Major Psychological Dimensions –Student Motivation (Internal and External), Persistence (ability to face challenges and overcome obstacles), and Self-Efficacy (individuals perception of ability to succeed) Economic Influences on Persistence –Cost/Benefit Analysis, Ability to Pay and Financial Aid

Six Primary Intersecting Persistence and Retention Factors Entering Student Characteristics Initial Commitment Student Expectations Academic and Social Integration Institutional Experiences Student Satisfaction and Success

Exemplary Retention Initiatives Systematic and on-going assessment, evaluation and implementation of retention interventions –Annual cycles of data collection, analysis, and reporting –Identifying key areas for improvement –Dedicated retention leadership, oversight and management –Ongoing, timely and effective response (Best Practices, Data-Driven) Primary Institutional Commitments –Emphasis on Core Distinctives and Student Expectations –Constant promotion of student success (Early Identification and Intensive and Continuous Intervention) –Campus wide Involvement (Faculty involvement)

A Contextualized Approach While the goal of increasing student retention may sound singular, the reality of the task is quite multi-dimensional requiring us to ask contextually specific questions

The Flow of Persistence Student Entering Characteristics Currents of Resistance Experiences Currents of Persistence Experiences Expectations Academic Ability Initial Commitment (Goal Orientation) Personal Relationships Ministry Commitments Work Commitments Tuition Costs Curriculum (Academics) Administration Relevance Connectedness Advising/Mentoring Purpose/Goal Alignment Degree Program Fit Motivation/Engagement Student Assessment and Institutional Fit Initial Orientation, Advisement, and First Year Programs Ongoing Program Specific Goals, Support & Development, Student Satisfaction

Core Institutional Assessment Instruments Entering Student Inventory (ESI) Seminary Experience Inventory (SEI) Graduating Student Inventory (GSI) Alumni Inventory (AI) Faculty Satisfaction Inventory (FSI)

Assessment Findings Student Engagement –Active Learning Techniques –Class Structure –Emphasize Practical Application and Personal Relevance in the course work –Meaningful, Guided Interaction –Building Community and Connectedness

Assessment Findings Entering Student Inventory (ESI) –60% of new entering students are fulltime students –There is a mix of age range and work commitment –Students are active to very active in church ministry –The schools doctrinal position is a strong indicator of enrollment –Desire to serve and explore calling are high priorities –Theological position was a key enrollment factor –Most learned about SCS through a friend or the website

Assessment Findings Decision to Attend (ESI) –Comfort with the Schools Doctrinal Position –Quality of the Faculty –Academic Reputation of the School –Quality of the Admissions Staff –Close to Home/Work

Assessment Findings Pursuit of Theological Education (ESI) –Desire to Serve God –To Discern Gods Will –Experienced a call from God –Opportunity for study and Spiritual Growth –Intellectual Interest in Theological Education

Assessment Findings Importance Items (SEI) –Instructors demonstrate expert knowledge and depth of insight –Instructors exemplify a deep faith commitment –I am developing a deeper spiritual life and faith commitment –I am learning valuable principles that apply to my chosen field –The education that I am receiving is a valuable investment of my time –The financial cost of my education is a good investment –My educational experiences are relevant to my current ministry –Instructors exemplify professionalism in the classroom –Instructors provide timely and valuable feedback on assignments

Strategic Actions and Recommendations: Increasing the Flow of Persistence Retention Initiatives –Improved Academic Advising –Simplified the administration of the Internship Programs and increased value –Provided Faculty Development on Instructor Feedback and Active Learning techniques –Improved Academic Support: Research and Writing Skills and Study Skills/Time Management –Increased Sense of Community (Communication and Connectedness)

Strategic Actions and Recommendations: Increasing the Flow of Persistence Institutional Practices –Employ Authentically Engaged Personnel –Establish institutional persistence, progression and retention goals and tracking –Develop program specific progress checkpoints –Implement First Year co-curricular support programs –Develop a documented system for timed-out student follow-up

Contact Information Blessings and Thanks! Dr. Gino Pasquariello Dean of Student Services and Institutional Research Southern California Seminary El Cajon, CA Office: Cell: