Day 4 Principal Evaluation Training March 12, 2012 Albany, NY Day Long Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Math Content Workshop Focus: Progression of Fractions in Grades 3-5
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Fall Conference - Keynote Speaker Sunday, September 25 th, 2011 – Don Shalvey from the Gates Foundation 3 Ambitious Goals of the Gates Foundation 1.80%
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Math Professional Development October 17, 2013 Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Lenoir County Public Schools SIOP Leadership Meeting for Planning, Support, and Implementation February 3, 2011 Rochelle Middle School.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Should Students Have A Voice?
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Facilitate Group Learning
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Implementing the Common Core Standards
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
Day 4 Principal Evaluation Training March 12, 2012 Albany, NY
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Presentation transcript:

Day 4 Principal Evaluation Training March 12, 2012 Albany, NY Day Long Session

Who is in the room? Welcome Brief introductions 2

Goals for the Day By the end of the day, participants will be able to: Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications of the different use of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute, and selected Rubric) in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study, to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of feedback. 3

Practice Leads to Results 4 60 points 40 points Practice Results What are high impact goals that provide guidance to principals and change school practice?

ISLLC Standard #1 5 An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all stakeholders. Functions: A. Collaboratively develop and implement a shared vision and mission B. Collect and use data to identify goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and promote organizational learning C. Create and implement plans to achieve goals D. Promote continuous and sustainable improvement E. Monitor and evaluate progress and revise plans * 2008 Educational Leadership Policy Standards- from the Council of Chief State School Officers

Goal Setting When setting goals: –What should the principal consider? –How does the principal know that the goal is objective? 6

SMART Goals Specific Measurable Attainable Realistic Timely 7

SMART Goals More Specific: A specific goal has a much greater chance of accomplishment than a general goal. To set a specific goal, you must answer the six “W” questions: *Who: Who is involved? *What: What do I want to accomplish? *Where: Identify a location. *When: Establish a time frame. *Which: Identify requirements and constraints. *Why: Specific reasons, purpose or benefits of accomplishing the goal. 8

What is Objective Evidence? 9 Teaching Learning Solutions defines ‘Objective Evidence’ as: Evidence that is quantifiable when appropriate, includes specific numbers and or references. The evidence is completely free of bias, opinions, summary statements and judgments.

10 TLS Observer Evidence Rubric

Activity 1: What does “good or objective” evidence look like at the school level? Identify the context/place/event where evidence can be collected Identify the Evidence Provide an example of that evidence Chart your findings 11

Case Study- School Goal # 2 80% of the Teachers will attend at least 4 Data Analysis meetings by the end of the school year and will learn now to effectively participate in data analysis meetings and use the results of the analysis to improve the practice.” 12

13 Identify the context/place/event where evidence can be collected What is the evidence? Provide an example of that evidence How does the evidence satisfy the statute/ISLLC Standard #1 and the Rubric? Identify “good or objective” Evidence from the Case Study

Turnkey check list What are the key takeaways from this activity? the purpose of this activity is to identify the many places one can collect evidence and to recognize that evidence can appear in many different formats…..through conversation, data, observation, etc. Which goal (s) does this activity address? Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications for the different uses of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute and their selected Rubric) in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. In your role, what additional materials or information would you need to turnkey this activity? 14

Activity 2: The Case Study Benjamin Franklyn Middle School The Benjamin Franklyn Middle School Case Study Take 15 minutes to skim through the case study The purpose of this quick review is to get a sense of what the case is about, what artifacts may be used as evidence, and which standards the artifacts address 15

Case Study Orientation Case Study Review –What assumptions/predictions did you make in the case study? –What questions do you have about the case study? 16

Turnkey check list What are the key takeaways from this activity? The purpose of part 1 of activity #2 is to do a pre-reading that allows for the participant to begin to familiarize him/herself with the case study The purpose of part 2 of activity #2 is to assess the participants’ understanding of the case study and to surface questions and assumptions about the case study. Which goal does this activity address? Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications of the different use of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute and your selected Rubric) in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study, to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of your feedback. In your role, what additional materials or information would you need to turnkey this activity? 17

Case Study Review Three goals in the case study that were collaboratively set by the superintendent and the principal: Goal #1- Teachers will effectively implement one Common Core Shift in ELA and one in Math: –ELA/Literature- 5 of the 6 ELA teachers will effectively implement Shift #4- ‘Text Based Answers’ in at least one unit each semester –Math- 8 of 8 math teachers will effectively implement Shift #1- ‘Focus’ in at least one unit each semester Goal # 2- 80% of the Teachers will attend at least 4 Data Analysis meetings by the end of the school year and will learn how to effectively participate in data analysis meetings and use the results of the analysis to improve their practice Goal # 3- The school community will be one where teachers and students feel safe to take intellectual risks and being “wrong” is part of development 18

ELA Shift 4- Text-Based Answers Shift 4 Text-Based Answers- Students have rich and rigorous conversations which are dependent on a common text. Teachers insist that classroom experiences stay deeply connected to the text on the page and that students develop habits for making evidentiary arguments both in conversation, as well as in writing to assess comprehension of a text. 19

Math Shift # 1- Focus Shift 1- Focus: Teachers use the power of the eraser and significantly narrow and deepen the scope of how time and energy is spent in the math classroom. They do so in order to focus deeply on only the concepts that are prioritized in the standards so that students reach strong foundational knowledge and deep conceptual understanding and are able to transfer mathematical skills and understanding across concepts and grades. 20

Activity 3: Deeper Look at the Case Study- Collecting Evidence –Dive deeper into the case study by carefully reviewing the artifacts and identifying the evidence in the artifacts that satisfies one of the principal evaluator rubrics, and addresses one of the three goals. –Use the worksheet provided for the principal evaluation rubric you selected to record the evidence. –Chart your findings and prepare to share 21

Turnkey check list What are the key takeaways from this activity? The purpose of activity #3 is to do a more in-depth reading of the case study and the artifacts presented in the appendices, and provide an opportunity to use the rubric selected by the district. Which goal does this activity address? Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications of the different use of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute and their selected Rubric)in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study, to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of their feedback. In your role, what additional materials or information would you need to turnkey this activity? 22

Activity 4: Case Study Evidence Collection 23 Goal # 1 Rubric: Marzano Indicator ISLLC Standard #1 ABCDE Objective evidence (which appendix) How is this aligned to the language of the principal evaluation rubric Marzano Domain 2.1: School Admin provides a clear vision as to how instruction should be addressed (School Goal 1: CC Shift) 1 A & B 1. Staff Meeting Agenda & Minutes (9/19; App P, p.47) record that Pat explains the 3 school goals, resources for CC shifts, responsibilities of teachers for shifts. 2. Staff Meeting Agenda & Minutes (10/24, App P, p.49) list CC shifts on agenda, principal explains shifts and shows 12-minute video on ‘Text based Answers.’ Math & ELA Scopes (pp ) list SLOs per grading period. Marzano Domain 2.1, Indicator 1: A written document articulating the school-wide model of instruction is in place Marzano Domain 2.1, Indicator 2: PD opportunities are provided for new teachers regarding the school-wide model of instruction.

Activity 4: Case Study Evidence Collection 24 Goal # 3 Rubric: Marzano Indicator ISLLC Standard #1 ABCDE Objective evidence (which appendix) How is this aligned to the language of the principal evaluation rubric Marzano 4.4: School Admin ensures teachers/staff have formal ways to provide input 4.5: School Admin ensures that stucents and parents have formal ways to provide input (School Goal 3:Safety to take intellectual risks and being “wrong is part of development) 1B 1.Research based surveys (Tripod) have been administered in 2010 & 2011 to teachers and students (App M, pp 32-36) 2. Research based surveys collect data about student attitudes regarding teachers’ “care” and “correcting mistakes” (App M, pp 34-35) Marzano Domain 4.4, Indicator 1: Data collection systems are in place to collect opinion data from teachers and staff regarding the optimal functioning of the school. Marzano Domain 4.5, Indicator 1: Data collection systems are in place to collect opinion data from students and parents regarding the optimal functioning of the school

Turnkey check list What are the key takeaways from this activity? The purpose of activity 4 is to provide the participant with an opportunity to review different artifacts collected at a school, determine the use and objectivity of that evidence, and align it to the ISLLC Standard and Rubrics. Which goal does this activity address? Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications of the different use of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute and their selected Rubric) in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study, to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of their feedback. In your role, what additional materials or information would you need to turnkey this activity? 25

Activity 5: Role Play Observe the role play between the principal and the teacher Take notes 26 When listening to the role play, keep in mind- What kind of evidence do you expect to see during the role play? Which Function of ISLLC Standard one do you expect would be addressed in the discussion?

Activity 6: Collecting Evidence from the Role Play 27 Goal # _______ Rubric: ______________ Indicator ISLLC Standard #1 ABCDE Objective evidence (which appendix) How is this aligned to the language of the principal evaluation rubric

Turnkey check list What are the key takeaways from this activity? The purpose of activity 6 is to provide the participant with an opportunity to collect evidence using role play by observing a common event at the school level. Which goal does this activity address? Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications of the different use of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute and their selected Rubric)in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study, to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of their feedback. In your role, what additional materials or information would you need to turnkey this activity? 28

Appendix M:Teacher and Student Survey results Use Appendix M- Student/Teacher survey results for this activity. The data represented in the Appendix presents information on Benjamin Franklyn Middle School. The questions are drawn from Tripod Project surveys of students and teachers about leadership, teaching effectiveness, classroom learning environments and student engagement. Point participants to Appendix M1 29

1.Caring about students (Encouragement and Support) 2.Controlling behavior (Press for Cooperation and Peer Support) 3.Clarifying lessons (Success Seems Feasible) 4.Challenging students (Press for Effort, Perseverance and Rigor) 5.Captivating students (Learning seems Interesting and Relevant) 6.Conferring with students (Students Sense their Ideas are Respected) 7.Consolidating knowledge (Ideas get Connected and Integrated) Tripod Student Survey- The 7 C’s 30

First, describe to one another what your general thoughts are in reference to your observation of the data. What does the data tell you? Based on the data, what concerns you most? Based on the data, what concerns you the least? Activity 7: Using Student and Teacher Data Survey Evidence 31 What questions would you ask during a school visit (after seeing this data)? What would you look for during a school visit? What would you ask the school’s leader to work on as priorities?

Turnkey check list What are the key takeaways from this activity? The purpose of activity 7 is to provide participants with an opportunity to review student and teacher surveys to find appropriate evidence that can be used to support the evaluation of a principal. Which goal does this activity address? Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study, to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of their feedback. In your role, what additional materials or information would you need to turnkey this activity? 32

Activity 8: Preparing for the Unannounced Visit In table groups, discuss and agree on the response to the following three questions –What information do you have? –What information do you still need? –What are some of the things you would look for on an unannounced visit to BFMS? Chart your responses Be prepared to present 33

Preparing for the Unannounced Visit What information do you have? What information do you still need? What are some of the things you would look for in an unannounced visit to BFMS? 34

Turnkey check list What are the key takeaways from this activity? The purpose of activity #8 is for participants to reflect on the information reviewed for the case study and determine what additional information participants need to evaluate the principal in the case study. Which goal does this activity address? Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications of the different use of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute and their selected Rubric) in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of their feedback. In your role, what additional materials or information would you need to turnkey this activity? 35

Key Points of this Session Align ISLLC Standard #1 to the State Statute and analyze the implications of the different use of language in the three documents (ISLLC, Statute and their selected Rubric) in describing the standard. Identify reliable, unbiased evidence about principal performance in ISLLC Standard 1, and on a particular rubric, based on fact. Use a case study, to collect evidence, develop feedback for the principal and reflect on the quality and effectiveness of their feedback. 36

Feedback on Today + 37