Professional Performance Process School Leadership Team Training June 24-25, 2010 Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Professional Performance Process OPD 863 – Using the Rubric Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
Formative Assessment A Maryland Race to the Top Initiative Denise Hunt NCSA June 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
The CMSD Pyramid of Success – Implementing the Integrated Systems Model Leadership Team Training – August 2006 The Pyramid of Success: Creating a climate.
Principles of Assessment
Student-Centered Coaching Instructional Design and Assessment Presented by Diane Sweeney Author of: Student-Centered Coaching (Corwin, 2010), Student-
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.
A Mission of Restoration
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Data Analysis Needs Assessment Improvement Plan Implement & Monitor ●Set annual goals ●Identify a strategy ●Set quarterly goals ●Determine interventions.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Office of Service Quality
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
North Carolina Mentor Training Standards 4 and 5 A Lifeline for North Carolina’s Beginning Teachers.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Professional Performance Process School Leadership Team Training June 24-25, 2010 Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation

2 Welcome Back! Review of Yesterday What aspects of yesterday’s training were the most impactful on your thinking as you plan for PPP implementation?

3 Today’s Outcomes Participants will: Be able to identify highlights of the PPP Handbook Be able to write a schoolwide SMART goal Be able to create a Professional Growth Plan Be able to describe a professional educator who does not meet standard and one who exceeds a standard using the rubric Complete a Site-Based PPP Professional Development Plan

4 Overview of PPP Handbook Highlights from the Professional Educator Handbook

5 Implementing the PPP Doing It Effectively Review of SMART Goal Writing (Responder System)

6 I have written SMART goals before. 1.Yes 2.No

7 A SMART Goal is: 1.Successfully Making Academic Results in Time 2.Students Making Academic Results in Time 3.Successfully Measuring Academic Regression over Time 4.Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-Oriented, and Time-bound

8 I am comfortable with writing a SMART Goal. 1.Yes 2.No

9 Review of SMART Goals What a SMART Goal is: SPECIFIC Clear and Concise e.g. 100% of my students will make a year or more growth in reading as measured by the DRA 2 by June 1, What a SMART Goal is NOT: Broad and Vague e.g. 100% of my students will be better readers.

10 Review of SMART Goals What a SMART Goal is: MEASURABLE Data, Progress e.g. Beginning/end of year DRA assessments, running records What a SMART Goal is NOT: Survey of student interests in reading e.g. Teacher observation, “I just know.”

11 Review of SMART Goals What a SMART Goal is: ATTAINABLE Feasible, within reach, probable e.g. Strong possibility of achieving What a SMART Goal is NOT: Impossible, out of reach e.g. Unrealistic

12 Review of SMART Goals What a SMART Goal is: RESULTS-ORIENTED Progress evident, visual e.g. Reading level increases What a SMART Goal is NOT: No concrete progress

13 Review of SMART Goals What a SMART Goal is: TIME-BOUND Start date and end date e.g. Year long goal with progress monitoring What a SMART Goal is NOT: No time constraints

14 The Possibilities of Collaboration Collaborative Teams in PLCs at Work SMART Goals (Video) Collaborative Teams in Professional Learning Communities at Work Learning by Doing – Professional Development Video Set

15 Starting the Year Right Collaboratively Completing the Professional Growth Plan (PPP-1)

16 Professional EducatorEvaluator StatusP0 P1 P2 P3 CC EC PT School/Office PositionVA License Expiration Date Endorsement AreasEvaluation CycleANNUAL A-G H-N O-Z Child Abuse Recognition Training Yes NoTechnology Standards Yes No Sexual Harassment Training Yes NoSchool Year

17 PWCS Areas of FocusProfessional Educator Performance Standards Literacy Inclusive Practices Wellness Professional Learning Communities Knowledge of Students Knowledge of Content Planning, Delivery, and Assessment of Instruction Safe, Effective Learning Environment Communication and Collaboration Professionalism

18 Review and reflect on all available data, your School/Department Improvement Plan, PWCS Areas of Focus, and Professional Educator Performance Standards. Collaborate with your department/team and evaluator in the development of SMART goal(s) to improve student achievement. What data did you use to establish your SMART goal(s)? How do your SMART goal(s) align with your School/Department Improvement Plan and the PWCS Areas of Focus? What performance standards or key elements have you identified as areas for your professional growth? SMART Goal(s): e.g. 85% of my 7 th grade math students will achieve at least pass proficient on the SOL test in spring 2011.

19 Based upon your review of data, reflection, and collaboration with your team and evaluator, list the actions/strategies you will use to complete your Professional Growth Plan. What professional development will support the achievement of your SMART goal(s)? What is your required professional development? What resources and/or support will you need? Actions/StrategiesWho?By When? Resources Needed Expected Outcomes e.g. Collaborate with 7 th grade math team to research best practices. 7 th grade math team MonthlyNCTM periodicals and instructional resources Incorporate 1 identified best practice into lesson plan/delivery per month e.g. Participate in required math professional development. 7 th grade math team May 2011 Offices of Mathematics, Sp. Ed., ESOL Increased knowledge and skill in math content and pedagogy 1. 2.

20 Describe the current committees/leadership positions/extra-curricular responsibilities you hold and their connections to the Professional Educator Performance Standards. Are there any committee/leadership positions/extra-curricular responsibilities in which you would like to be involved in the school or at the Division level? e.g. This year I am the cheerleading coach which allows me to provide more opportunities to support my students’ social and personal development, to communicate with parents, and to be a role model.

21 Discuss your Professional Growth Plan with your evaluator. What data will you collect to assess the achievement of your SMART goals? How will you ensure ongoing reflection of your current practices? Approval of Professional Growth Plan Professional Educator’s Signature: ______________ Evaluator’s Signature: _________________ Date: _________

22 Review the progress of this plan with your evaluator. What data have you collected to demonstrate progress toward your SMART goal(s)? What progress has been made toward the achievement of your SMART goal(s)? What additional resources/support do you need? What adjustments or modifications are needed at this time? Reflection and Next Steps: Professional Educator’s Initials: ______________ Evaluator’s Initials: ______________ Progress Review Date: _______________

23 Reflect on your Professional Growth Plan for the year. What data do you have to demonstrate progress or achievement of your SMART goal(s)? How has this Professional Growth Plan impacted your professional practice? What changes or improvements would you make to your Professional Growth Plan next year? Reflection and Next Steps: Professional Educator’s Signature: _______________ Evaluator’s Signature: _______________ Final Review Date: __________

24 ~ BREAK ~ (15 Minutes)

25 Staff DevelopmentSupervision Overview of PPP Introduce forms Review Professional Growth Plan (show examples) Administration meets with PLC groups Review student data Begin development of instructional goals Review of rubric Overview of timeline Explanation of Professional Growth Plan conferences (role play) Administration meets with PLC groups to finalize team goals Individual Professional Growth Plan conferences Informal classroom visits/drops ins Review methods for collection of evidence Share forms used for observations Continued dialogue at weekly PLC meetings with administrator Continue informal classroom visits Begin formal observations/reflective conferences Discussion of mid-year conferences Staff reflection survey Continue formal observations, drop in visits, dialogue Mid-Year Conferences Staff Training and Supervision Until Mid-Year Aug. Sept. Oct./ Nov. Dec.

26 Evaluation Component of the PPP Mid-Year Report and Conference (Role Play)

27 Professional Educator Performance Process – Overall Evaluation Rubric Using the Rubric Dialogue About Ratings Does Not Meet Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard

28 Professional Performance Process Using the Evaluation Rubric

29 Discussion questions: How have you used rubrics? Why should there be a rubric as part of the PPP? Rubric is used to describe levels of performance and to provide a consistent form of reference for evaluating performance, both formally and informally. Context: Why have a rubric?

30 Discussion tool –Describes what it looks like to meet or exceed standards for particular group of employees –Summarizes performance for each standard based on the evidence collected for each standard and key element using the collection of evidence record Evaluation tool –Ratings for each standard to be recorded on evaluation reports –Can also serve as a self-evaluation tool for employees Context: What is the purpose of the rubric?

31 The Rubric Development Process 1.Development of the standards 2.Determination of number of levels 3.Use key elements from standards to craft language for “Meets Standards” 4.Develop counter-examples for “Does Not Meet Standards” 5.Develop extensions for “Exceeds Standards”

32 Structure for the Rubric Levels of Performance –Start with “Meets Standards” and use the key elements of the standard as basis for description –Includes two other levels: “Does Not Meet Standards” and “Exceeds Standards” Threads of content across the levels to show development and growth opportunities

33 Defining “Does Not Meet Standards” Covers a wide range of performance Possible to be in “Does Not Meet Standards” in a given area at the beginning of the year but progress to “Meets Standards” Thought Question: How is “Does Not Meet Standards” different from “Unsatisfactory”?

34 Defining “Exceeds Standards” What does it mean to exceed standards? In order to exceed a standard, someone must first meet the standard – so “meets standards” is a prerequisite Thought Question: Is it possible in all cases to exceed standards?

35 Why is consensus so important? –Discussion of reliability and validity –Diving analogies –How do we get to consensus? What the pilot has taught us –Variability across schools Using the Rubric: Working Toward Consensus

36 Focus on the Knowledge of Students standard Task: At your table, discuss how you would rate the teacher from the video and role plays on this standard Discussion Questions: –What additional evidence would you need to see to make your rating? –What evidence would demonstrate “exceeds” for this standard? –What suggestions would you give this teacher in terms of this standard? Activity: Testing Out the Evaluation Rubric

37 Review your ratings the day after you make them –Would you still make the same judgments? –Are you consistent in your expectations across staff members? Discuss/share ratings as a team to get different perspectives –Periodically review your expectations as a group –Review your patterns to see how consistent you are Phone a friend! –Discuss any sticking points with someone else outside the situation (without identifying information) to see how they would handle it Using the Rubric: Tips for Ensuring Consistency

38 ~ Lunch ~

39 What Do You Now Know About the PPP? Responder System Questions

40 How many Professional Educator Performance Standards are there?

41 What % of your faculty do you think meets all the standards? % % % %

42 What is your level of readiness to implement the PPP? % % % %

43 Team Planning Time PPP Pilot Principal Panel –What is the most powerful professional development activity or year-long practice that you utilized last year that led to your staff’s greater understanding and skillfulness with the PPP? Site-Based PPP Professional Development Plan School Teams Volunteer to Share Plans

44 Essential Knowledge/Skills Learning Experience Person Responsible TimelineResources Needed Expected Outcomes e.g. Professional Educator Performance Standards e.g. Using a brainstormin g tool to engage in conversation about the standards e.g. Principal and Assistant Principal e.g. August faculty meeting e.g. Knowledge of Standards Brainstorming Tool; PPP Overview Video e.g. Professional educators will be able to describe what the Professional Educator Performance Standards look/sound like from the perspectives of both teacher and student. Site-Based PPP Professional Development Plan Consider the following, when completing Site-Based PPP Professional Development Plan: What essential knowledge and skills do staff members need? What are the big chunks of knowledge to focus on this year? What data will be used to determine the kind of professional development needed this year? Who on staff will facilitate and why? Does the plan connect with the Strategic Plan, PWCS Instructional Areas of Focus, Site-based Improvement Plan, and other professional development already planned for next year? What learning experiences will you provide for your staff?

45 Additional Support for PPP Implementation PLC Training EEE Conference Teachscape Training PPP in a Nutshell Additional PPP Training in

46 Final Thoughts on the PPP

47 Thank You! Please complete feedback forms and leave them on your tables.