NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 6 of 20 April 14, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SADC Course in Statistics Objectives and analysis Module B2, Session 14.
Advertisements

Strategies to Measure Student Writing Skills in Your Disciplines Joan Hawthorne University of North Dakota.
Factors to be considered in choosing metrics Shengmin Yu Energy Research Institute of NDRC, China Bonn, April 2012 Workshop on common metrics to calculate.
ASSESSORS ORIENTATION 2008 DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE EXCELLENCE AWARDS.
MAKING ENDS MEET GRADING RUBRIC STUDENTS: This is an exact copy of the sheet I’ll be using to grade your project. Use this as a tool to assess the strengths.
1 MAKING SUSTAINABILITY WORK Good Company 65 Centennial Loop, Suite B Eugene, Oregon phone fax /17/2015.
AGRICULTURE, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING OF PRODUCTS: a New Zealand perspective Stewart Ledgard AgResearch Ruakura, Hamilton, NZ &
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 2 of 20 March 31, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 7 of 20 April 19, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
LINKAGES AND SYNERGIES OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL EMISSION CONTROL Workshop of the UN/ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling January 27-29, 2003.
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
WMO UNEP INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES PROGRAMME WMO UNEP IPCC Good Practice Guidance Simon Eggleston Technical.
Early Childhood Education. Workshop #1 Agreement Share practices of Early Childhood Education Increase the understanding of the development needs of children.
A New Tool to Describe the Power of Our Work. Funding Provided by: City of Edmonton In Kind Contributions: City of Edmonton Edmonton Social Planning Council.
Contemporary Literature Week 6 September 26-30, 2011.
A life-cycle approach to measuring the sustainability of New Zealand’s primary production: a carbon footprint of beef/sheep Amélie Goldberg, MEnvStud School.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY REPORT 2009 Antioch University Seattle.
TRANSPORTATION Making informed transportation choices Climate Masters Updated
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Technical aspects of NAMAs: Options and methodologies for developing baselines for different categories of NAMAs* Neha Pahuja Associate.
Summary of LCA Review including carbon issues Julian Parfitt WRAP LCA Symposium ‘Making the most of LCA thinking’ 23 November 2006, Savoy Place, London.
Article 5 of the Energy Services Directive Edward Green.
[Organization Name] [Date] In consultation with:.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 14 of 20 May 17, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
Data Source: Owen, Videras and Wu (2008) First, if you had to choose, which of the following would be closest to your views? a. Government should let ordinary.
PAS 2050 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services Nigel Carter, En-Venture Chair, BSI GHG Committee.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 3 of 20 April 5, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 10 of 20 April 28, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene,
Results.
Density of Pennies Lab.
Topical Accounting Issues AS – Accounting 2.5 Presented by Elizabeth Pitu.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 11 of 20 May 5, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
How to write your special study Step by step guide.
Global Warming & Food Choices Mia MacDonald November 16,
Climate change, land, materials and products: new reports from EPA and the Product Policy Institute GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference October 19,
The Small Town Carbon Calculator (STOCC) Corey Johnson Undergraduate Research Conference April 24, :30 AM.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data Request Form Instructions for completing the form NICSA.
Maryland Climate Change Commission USM Overview Session on Sustainability Don Boesch October 11, 2007.
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January.
1 Impact Assessment. 2 Did You Miss Me? Real question: Did I miss you? Sydney.
Reid Harvey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chief, Climate Economics Branch Climate Change Division 6 th Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum.
Extension, Outreach and Research Activities For promotion to Public Service Associate J. Phil Campbell Crop and Soil Sciences Department.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 4 of 20 April 7, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 18 of 20 May 31, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR.
Bangalore, India,17-18 December 2012 METHODOLOGIES TO ASSESS THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF ICT KEVIN J HOUSTON, CEO CARBON MASTERS Member of Independent.
© OECD/IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS.
How can we reduce our Carbon Footprint? By:Elizabeth Fleetwood.
BAESI – Global Warming Carbon Footprint Dr. Eugene Cordero Department of Meteorology and Climate Science.
EDP 389H: Educational Disabilities in the Schools January 22nd, 2009.
Topical Accounting Issues AS – Accounting 2.5 Presented by Elizabeth Pitu.
Technical Science Scientific Tools and Methods Tables and Graphs.
Textbook Recommendation Reports. Report purpose u Starts with a stated need u Evaluates various options –Uses clearly defined criteria –Rates options.
Textbook Recommendation Reports. Report purpose u Starts with a stated need u Evaluates various options –Uses clearly defined criteria –Rates options.
GILDED wp2 – Comparative report. Comments Data correction and data amendment Maps – project map - case study areas maps – sources ????? Deadline ?
Informative vs Argumentative. What do you think? What is the root word in informative? What is the root word in argumentative?
By: Brian Kaufman.  the total set of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused by an organization, event, product or person.  Greenhouse gases can be emitted.
Carbon Footprint Dem Two: Enlly Bugarin Narciso Arevalo December 14, 2015.
Warwick Business School The drivers of low carbon business strategies Andrew Sentance, Warwick Business School Warwick University Climate Policy Workshop.
CARBON FOOTPRINT. REMEMBER THE CARBON CYCLE… LIST THE VARIOUS WAYS YOU DEPEND ON ENERGY IN A TYPICAL DAY.
Model Lesson 3 The Effects of the Great Depression.
CONVEYING PRIORITIES THROUGH POLICY BRIEFS This session will cover: 1.The purpose of policy briefs 2.Understanding the audience 3.Characteristics of policy.
Extension: Do you think there could be a bias in the research that is published? Discuss with somebody else what you think influences which research is.
Food, Its Environmental Consequences, and Carrying Capacity Christopher L. Weber Civil and Environmental Engineering Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,
Carbon Footprint & Sustainable Solutions
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Materials Management and Climate Change
Climfoot training session
Annex 57. Guidelines for Policy Makers
Presentation transcript:

NRG 173: Carbon Footprints for Climate Action in Complex Organizations Spring Term 2011 Class 6 of 20 April 14, 2011 Kelly Hoell Good Company Eugene, OR

overview review of learning objectives review iconic graphs from course so far this session’s readings –music delivery –food-miles (“meat vs. miles”) homework and extra credit opportunity review

learning objectives this session (Session 6) –Remember main lessons from iconic graphs. –Finish discussion of LCA examples. –Hone our understanding of the largest impacts for the various contexts studied. –Decide if the examples hold insights for other contexts. for next time (Session 7) –Learn how to calculate GHG emissions. –Evaluate pros and cons of publicly available tools. (Beware black boxes) –Become familiar with available resources to find emissions factors.

GHG Accounting 101 Source: World Resources Institute

home LCA

two views of US emissions Source: EPA’s Opportunities to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Materials and Land Management Practices

An issue of fairness? source: Union of Concerned Scientists

music delivery, 1 individual activity: for each of the following, write 1-2 summary sentences –Introduction and Purposes –Who commissioned / paid for the study? Possible areas of bias? Actions taken to limit bias? –Functional Unit (what is it and why?) –What is being studied here? What are the impact categories? –What was not included in the study? Is that reasonable? review conclusions implications -Personal behavior? -Corporate behavior?

music delivery, 2 why I love this analysis –presentation of results –sensitivity analysis –clear(ish) implications for behavior, policy potential problems with the analysis –fast-changing parameters might make it difficult to draw conclusions that have much shelf life -- examples? –key LCA point: carbon and energy only Note: one data source used was EIOLCA… another was CBECS…

music delivery summary graph

another way to say it

music delivery, 2 carbon/energy focus –What else might matter? –Are carbon and energy good proxies for each other? For other types of impacts? Business strategy implications? And/or take- aways for other contexts? –dematerialization –transport mode –consumer behavior (vs. delivered product)

carbon vs. energy impacts

Meat vs. Miles actual title (not my short-hand): Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States analysis based on EIOLCA model punchline(s)? Big Question: What does the graph mean?

Meat vs. Miles sense of scale: food miles

a less horrible presentation of data?

Meat vs. Miles to start –make a list of the key points from Weber/Matthews –consider both detailed technical points and high-level talking points for friends and family I’ll present my set piece, then you add to it or critique it, then I’ll show you some equations

smart people saying not-so-smart things sense of scale: food miles

miles, yes…but big GHGs or not? sense of scale: food miles

meat vs. miles sense of scale: food miles

lessons from the food miles frenzy an indicator may seize attention for a while truth will, ultimately, be victorious our intuition might not always guide us well seek a sense of scale (eat less meat) caveats: –miles may matter (even if food-miles don’t) –these comparisons all take the average American diet as the reference point sense of scale: food miles

lessons from Weber and Matthews for CO 2 e, agricultural production is a bigger deal than the transport of agricultural goods highest-leverage actions (for CO 2 e reduction) is reduce meat servings (and, to a lesser extent, dairy) caveats –all of this is focused on life-cycle CO 2 e (seeing the world through “carbon goggles”) –based on average American diet Take your carbon goggles off. What other sustainability concerns are related to food? What other sustainability concerns are addressed by “local” food? sense of scale: food miles

Meat vs. Miles How do these numbers relate to each other? How might these equations differ for different categories? Or for particular products inside a single category? How do the final two sets of columns relate to each other? sense of scale: food miles

What does this sentence mean? “…Many of the analyses have used life-cycle energy use as the relevant measure of sustainability and thus have not included the substantial non-CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions associated with agriculture.” (page 1) energy vs. GHG emissions from food

What does this sentence mean? “…Many of the analyses have used life-cycle energy use as the relevant measure of sustainability and thus have not included the substantial non-CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions associated with agriculture.” (page 1) energy vs. GHG emissions from food

Meat vs. Miles best part: sets individual decisions in appropriate context another way to say it: Not paper or plastic, but what you put in the bag other context that would be helpful for the relevant “decision maker”? Source:

homework, 1 Seattle Climate Partnership calculator Clean Air-Cool Planet calculator TCR GRP – how to do calculations section University of Texas, GHG Inventory Person carbon footprint and climate action plan – DUE TUESDAY!

homework, 2 Extra Credit / Absence make-up opportunity: –April 22, Eugene City Club: “Curbing Climate Change, One Bite at a Time”. –Write a one-page (500 words maximum) reaction to any discussion item based on your understanding of Meat vs. Miles, other readings, and carbon goggles. –Recording will be available on klcc.org. –Due Thursday April 28 (before class begins). –Must be well written!

Feel free to contact me: Kelly Hoell (541) 341-GOOD (4663), ext. 217 Have a good weekend!