Rising Star An Overview Prepared for the District 97 Board of Education By Felicia Starks Turner and Cynthia Baranowski November 27, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:
Accreditation Update Bill Bagshaw Assistant Director Teacher Licensure, Accreditation & Evaluation Curriculum Coordinators – April 10, 2015.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Lighting our path to stellar learning Academic Development Institute Indistar®
Lighting our path to stellar learning Illinois State Board of Education Center on Innovation & Improvement.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Buckeye Elementary School District’s Curriculum Mapping Initiative
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Linking Systems: State, District, School, Classroom: The Virginia Project Chairs: Nancy Protheroe, Center on Innovation & Improvement Kathleen Smith, Virginia.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Lighting Our Path to Stellar Learning. The Goal The ultimate goal in school improvement is for the people associated with the school to drive its continuous.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Overview – Indistar® SSOS Online Web Tool in comparison to the publication “ Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” Assessment Process Planning Process.
Rationale for the Evaluation Frameworks Project Previous Paradigm in Our State A Compliance Exercise, Often Based Solely on Positional Authority.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
This presentation:  is “ready-to-use” for presentations to school division administrators, board members, library personnel, teachers, etc.  incorporates.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Scholastic Inc.1 Navigating Waves of Change: Driving Academic Improvement Through Challenging Times Sam Howe November 2010.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
A simple tool for a complex job INDISTAR. Learning Outcomes As a result of this training, participants will be able to… Navigate the Wisconsin Indistar.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning PLANNING FOR SUCCESS.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Oregon Team : Carla Wade : Jan McCoy :Dave Cook : Jennifer Arns
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright
Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support
Parent Discussion Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Rising Star An Overview Prepared for the District 97 Board of Education By Felicia Starks Turner and Cynthia Baranowski November 27,

Objectives Review the background for why the District is using Rising Star Reiterate District goals regarding growth and improvement Become familiar with the Rising Star Tool Understand how plan approval is different than in the past 2

Introducing..….Rising Star! A type of GPS for districts and schools *Purpose: Help you reach a specific destination *Shows the distance to that goal *Allows for alternate routes *Allows for stops, diversions, road blocks along the way but keeps the goal in mind 3

Rising Star Is a Tool A keep-moving, navigational tool – never really finished Research-based and field tested That guides everyone in moving in the same direction to improve learning 4

It’s All About Transformation, Not Compliance Transformation – Moving from one state to another Compliance - Meeting a set of requirements 5

The Continuous Improvement Cycle Not a one-shot issue Assess & Diagnose Plan Implement Monitor Adjust IMPROVED STUDENT LEARNING 6

Covers Many Aspects of Teaching & Learn 8 elements: Comprehensive planning, Conditions for Learning, Community and Family, Professional Development, Leadership, Curriculum Instruction, and Assessment 4 categories: Continuous Improvement, Learning environment, Educator quality, Teaching and learn 7

The Fit Continuous Improvement - Comprehensive planning Learning environment - Conditions for Learning, Community and Family Educator quality - Professional Development, Leadership Teaching and learning – Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment 8

Foundations for Success Culture of Candor Formal Team Structures Leadership Coaching and Support (external for District, internal for schools) Indicators of Effective Practice 9

The “Roll Up Your Sleeves, Real Work” Is Done in Steps by a Team How are Rising Star meetings different? Assigned roles – Process mgr., Capacity Building Coach, Facilitator, Open Chair Read and discuss the meaning of a Wise Ways, Assess where the district/school is in relation to full implementation of the Wise Ways, Create an action plan to reach full implementation, Monitor the action plan on an ongoing and regular basis Make adjustments as needed after monitoring (Monthly meetings) 10

Indicators and Wise Ways 11 Indicator: Instructional Teams develop standards-aligned units of instruction for each subject and grade level. (1045) Indicator: The district sets district, school, and student subgroup achievement targets. (1123) Indicator: The superintendent and other central office staff are accountable for school improvement and student learning outcomes. (1125) Indicator: The district provides the technology, training, and support to facilitate the school’s data management needs. (1149) Indicator: The district monitors to ensure the intended curriculum is implemented with fidelity. (2326)

Chunking It Out 189 Indicators – “Whew!” State mandated beginning with two foundational elements, 25 indicators Smart Start – focusing on meetings Smart Plan – focusing on district and school relationships The 25 indicators need to be “approved” by the Board at the first meeting in December 12

Choose level of development or implementation Explain the reason for their rating Conversation/discussion Consensus Do the same with: Priority Score Opportunity Score Team Determines a Priority and Opportunity Score 13

14

Level of development or implementation No development or implementation Partial development/implementation Full implementation Priority 3 = highest priority 2 = medium priority 1 = lowest priority Opportunity 3 = relatively easy to address 2 = accomplished within current policy and budget conditions 1 = requires change in current policy and budget conditions Development, Priority, and Opportunity 15

Evidence of Implementation, Creating the Plan The team then works to write a brief description of the evidence to support the rating for the selected level of development/implementation. After the evidence of implementation is complete, the team writes a detailed action plan to bring the school or district to full implementation of the Indicator 16

17

18

Next Steps Board Approval Monitor Smart Start and Smart Plan in December Add assessment of additional indicator(s) Board review of 8 additional school plans at Jan. meeting Teams continue to meet monthly for ongoing review 19

What does Board approval mean? 20

Questions? 21