Classification & Compensation Study 2007-2008. Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Resources Administration in Education
Advertisements

Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools July 17, 2007 Employee Orientations.
Non-Bargaining Compensation Brevard Public Schools.
COMPENSATION / SPECIALIZED HIRING Pamela Kasardo Senior Compensation Analyst Sam Barringer Compensation Analyst Cathy Hunt Secretary, Asst. Superintendent,
June 17,  Title Conversion  Career Service Pay Plan (Pay Grid)  Differentials  Initial (Partial) Implementation  Accessing Future Pay.
Classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project MU Staff Job Title and Salary Study Office Administration and Support.
DENTON ISD Pay Study Design
1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
PUSD Compensation Committee Process Overview Governing Board Study Session January 7, 2013.
MGMT Managing Employee Reward Systems Salary Structures Purpose and Goals –establish series of grades to classify jobs according to similar worth.
A step by step guide to recruiting vacancies. Completing a recruitment request- position descriptions: All requests for recruitment begin with an appropriate.
Stephenville ISD Pay Study Design August 20, 2012 Ann R. Patton CCP Sr. Compensation Consultant.
District Salary Committee Update March 2005.
Supplemental Salaries. History School Board ask Personnel Policy Committee to look into supplemental pay Personnel Policy Committee formed a Supplemental.
Human Resources Midwestern State University HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Budget Hearing Presentation FY 2014.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Total Rewards and Compensation
classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
1 Classified Staff Salary Study. 2 Overview Provide an overview of study Provide an overview of study Review study methodology Review study methodology.
What is the Global Grading Project
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
Compensation management “Attracting, retaining and motivating magic people”
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Pay, Compensation and Benefits
Staff Meeting Compensation Plan Adopted during the November 11, 2010 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting.
Cash, Bonuses, Insurance,
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
BUILDING A UNIVERSITY FOR THE GLOBAL CENTURY Presented by: Terri Phillips and Sheila Wright Associate Vice President for HR and Compensation Manager.
© 2015 Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. All rights reserved. January 29, 2015 Presented by: Ann R. Patton Managing Compensation Consultant Compensation.
1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
Compensation & Benefits – Basic Compensation & Employee Benefits CHAPTER 9 HRM.
 School Impact of Formula Changes  Purpose/Function by Funding Source  Salary Schedules: › State Salary Schedules › Local Salary Schedules › Local.
H R Toolbox – Roles and Functions to Reach Your Destination Presenter: Dr. Donna Patrick – Consultant Pivot Learning Partners This.
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.
 Compensation Philosophy  Implementation Policies and Procedures  Survey  Timing, Position Descriptions, Pay Plan Relationships, Cost  Additional.
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
Recommendations Recommendation 1: Regrade the ten classifications found to be 20 percent or more below market midpoint to be in alignment with the market.
MAG Management Advisory Group, Inc.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION. Classification & Compensation Position Classification Career Banding / Broadbanding Competency Assessments PeopleAdmin.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
City of Missoula July 26,  FY07 compensation and classification plan  25 Pay Grades  Entry level, midpoint and maximum  30% spread from entry.
Building Effective Compensation and Classification Systems to Attract and Retain Talented Employees 5050 Quorum Drive, Suite 625, Dallas, Texas
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.
Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.
Wage and Salary Management
About the Study 1 Summary 2 Market Study Results 3 Recommendations 4.
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
FVP Review and Presentation of the SCPS Evergreen Study to the Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors.
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
Presentation transcript:

Classification & Compensation Study

Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study of Jobs Evaluation of Jobs Write Job Descriptions Manual & Materials to Maintain Compensation Study External Competitiveness Market salary survey Results of both studies were used to design a new pay plan that is both internally equitable and competitive to the outside market.

Classification Study Employee orientation. Employees filled out job surveys. Supervisors read and approved or made comments on the survey. Employees from each job title were interviewed. Consultant placed like or similar level jobs into proposed “Classification Titles”. Consultant assessed and rated all classifications using the “Classification Matrix System” based on these factors: Knowledge & Occupational Skill- 52% Supervisory Authority- 20% Public Relations- 20% Working Conditions- 8% Each area consists of two sub-sections. Each area consists of two sub-sections. Job Descriptions were developed for all classifications.

Compensation Study Participating Schools Buffalo/Hanover/Montrose Cannon Falls Farmington Forest Lake Inver grove Heights Rosemount Apple Valley/ Eagan Stillwater South Washington South St. Paul Waconia West St Paul

Compensation Study cont. Benchmark Jobs- 43% Sample Superintendent Director of Business Network Admin. Director of Food Service Director of Com. Ed. Director of Spec. Srv. Director of Marss/Dac MS Principal Payroll/Benefits Supervisor Director of Athletics ECFE Coordinator Classroom Teacher Assistant Principal ABE Coordinator Custodian Lead Cook II SAC Program Coordinator RN Payroll Specialist Cooks Assistant Admin. Asst. Supt. Secretary I Secretary II Secretary III Administrative Assistant Accounts Payable Clerk Accounting Specialist Lead Custodian Senior Citizen’s Program Coord. Student Accounting Specialist Adult & Youth Enrichment Coord. Student Assistant

Combining of Both Studies Conducted two statistical procedures. Compared internal and external salaries (minimum, average, maximum) on a “job by job” basis. Performed a statistical analysis called regression analysis on all market pay rates and districts internal rates, a powerful averaging tool used to predict midpoints using both market data and internal data. Developed a new salary plan based on the blending of market pay outcomes and the districts job ratings. Minimum and maximum of each range were built around the midpoint using the analysis tools. Each employee was assigned to a salary range based primarily on job rating outcomes.

BCC Recommendation Consistency in steps and ranges is the essential and underlying principal of the MN Pay Equity Act and provides for consistency and fairness across different bargaining groups. Implement a 13 step schedule Grades 1-12 steps Grades 13 + ranges For Licensed Teachers BBC recommended that the current structure remain intact.

District’s Market Analysis Information not included in the market survey Information Health Contributions Paid Days Off Vacation Days Vacation Days Holidays/Non Work Days Holidays/Non Work Days Personal/Essential Days Personal/Essential Days Emergency Leave/Vacation Days Emergency Leave/Vacation Days Sick Days/Bereavement Leave Sick Days/Bereavement Leave 403B Match Plans Severance Payments Retiree Health Payments DistrictsFarmingtonStillwater South St. Paul Rosemount/Apple Valley/ Eagan Valley/ Eagan

Findings from the Study Entry level pay schedules tend to be below minimum rate for grades 6-9. Our more experienced positions are very close to the market. Overall the market survey shows that we are within 2.73% of the market average (This does not include insurance or paid days off).

Hastings Public Schools Trend Analysis

The district has : 313 Employees / 65 Classifications 300 Teachers / 8 Classifications 88 Employees were below the minimum rate. 34 Employees were above the maximum rate. 4 Positions were reclassified based on the nature of the job 4 Positions were reclassified based on the nature of the job 4 Classifications adjusted due to market. 4 Classifications adjusted due to market. It will cost the district $130,164 to bring those below the minimum onto the proposed schedule.

Excerpt of Classification Summary Handout

What does the Board want to do? Go to the recommended 13 Step Schedule Move individuals onto the schedule who are below the minimum rate Freeze individuals that are above the maximum rate Pro-Rate Health Insurance based on hours worked by grade Roll in and/or eliminate longevity and any language referring to additional pay in any form. Equity across contracts for Paid Days Off Caps on Retiree Health/Severance New hires go to 403(b) Match

13 Step Schedule

Placement on the System Less than $0.40 – will move to Step II in year one of negotiations. $0.40 – $1.05 – will move to Step I in year one. Greater than $1.05 – divide amount by two and receive ½ in year one, in year two – move to step 1. New Hires - $0.50 below Step I (move to Step I in year two).

Health Insurance Pro-Rated on Hours Worked Maximum Minimum Annual Annual %1,8881, %1,6051, %1,4161, %1, %

Grades

Holidays

Paid Days Off