Session II: Glycemic control, when the lower is not the better Strict glycemic control and cardiovascular diseases Stefano Genovese Diabetologia e Malattie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Importance of early glycemic control in management of type 2 diabetes
Advertisements

Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1544) Randomisation Avoid ACE inhibitors/ beta-blockers (n = 390) Tight BP control (n =
Practical implementation of the ADVANCE results in real life Davide Carvalho Centro Hospitalar S. João, University of Porto Medical School, Portugal 12.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Aggressive Hyperglycemia Management. Significant hospital hyperglycemia requires close follow-up Previously diagnosed diabetes and elevated A1C Without.
Foos et al, EASD, Lisbon, 13 September 2011 Comparison of ACCORD trial outcomes with outcomes estimated from modelled and meta- analysis studies Volker.
Benefits of intensive multiple risk factor intervention.
Cholesterol and Lipids TIPS Wokefield Park 15/5/2013.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Diabetes Update Glycemic Control Raymond O. Estacio, MD Denver Health Associate Professor of Medicine University of Colorado, Denver School of Medicine.
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines Targets for Glycemic Control Chapter 8 S. Ali Imran, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Stuart Ross.
ACCORD - Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes to Prevent Vascular Disease VADT - Veterans Administration Diabetes.
Causality Matters John Adler, Head of Biometrics & Information Science for Cardiovascular and Metabolics, AstraZeneca FMS Dec 2, 2013 Some examples from.
Improving Medical Management of Diabetes
Glucose Targets for Patients with Diabetes: 2011 Irl B. Hirsch, M.D. Professor of Medicine University of Washington School of Medicine.
Translating Clinical Trials Into Clinical Practice Cliff Bailey on behalf of the Global Partnership for Effective Diabetes Management This slideset was.
Blood glucose: is lower better for diabetic patients?
Individualizing Targets and Tactics for High- Risk Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Practical lessons from ACCORD and other cardiovascular trials Featured.
Joint Effects of Routine Blood Pressure Lowering and Intensive Glucose Control ADVANCE Adapted from EASD 2008.
Modern Management of Cholesterol in the High-Risk Patient.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee 1st June 2008 Rury Holman Clinical outcomes with anti-diabetic drugs: What we already know.
Lower the better; the case for glucose Professor Taner DAMCI Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical School, TURKEY.
ORIGIN Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) Trial Overview Large international randomized controlled trial in patients with.
The ADVANCE trial: update and new results Jean-François Gautier Saint Louis Hospital, Paris 12 th Meeting of the Mediterranean Group for the Study of Diabetes.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015 Stan Schwartz MD,FACP Affiliate, Main Line Health System Emeritus, Clinical Associate Professor.
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Study Design Scirica BM, Bhatt DL Braunwald et al, Sexagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
1 Part 1 Importance of Identifying and Managing Postprandial Hyperglycemia An Educational Service from G LYCO M ARK G LYCO M ARK is a registered trademark.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
Enrollment, Randomization, and Follow-up of Study Participants ADVANCE Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 2008;358:
ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288:
UKHDS (UKPDS): UK Hypertension in Diabetes Study Purpose To determine whether tight control of blood pressure (aiming for BP
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: UPDATE Glycemic Goals in the Care of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes ADA and AACE Guidelines: Room For Improvement.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
An initiative of South Asian Federation of Endocrine Societies (SAFES)
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Prevalence (%) estimates of diabetes (20-79 years) 2010.
Part 3. Diabetes Report Card: HbA 1c Levels in the United States Hoerger TJ, et al. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: Patients (%) HbA 1c (%)
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
Journal Club Julie Shah, MD Milton S Hershey Medical Center Penn State University.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015 Stan Schwartz MD,FACP Affiliate, Main Line Health System Emeritus, Clinical Associate Professor.
Management of Diabetes in the Older Person
ACCORD Design and Baseline Characteristics
Contents Physiology and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes
Recent Breakthroughs in Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in T2DM
Disclosure Consultations and Honoraria Grant Support
Management of Diabetes in the Older Person
Macrovascular Complications Microvascular Complications
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
366 میلیون نفر در جهان مبتلا به دیابت هستند.
Early Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease
Incidence of CV Events in Subjects With T2D vs the Nondiabetic CAD Population
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
CV Risk Management in T2DM: What Did We Learn from ADA 2016?
Incidence of CV Events in Subjects With T2D vs the Nondiabetic CAD Population
Glycemic control for macrovascular disease in type II diabetes: Evidence and insights from recent trials  Sanjay Rajagopalan  Journal of Indian College.
Pharmacotherapy for Diabetic Coronary Disease:
New frontiers in Diabetes management
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
EMPA-REG OUTCOME: Cumulative incidence of the primary outcome
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Section overview: Hyperglycemia in ACS
Presentation transcript:

Session II: Glycemic control, when the lower is not the better Strict glycemic control and cardiovascular diseases Stefano Genovese Diabetologia e Malattie Metaboliche Thirteenth International Symposium Heart Failure & Co. “My Sweet Heart” Città della Scienza, Napoli April 2013

Questions Is hyperglycemia an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease? Is hyperglycemia an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients? Lowering glycemia reduces the risk for cardiovascular disease?

Fasting blood glucose and cardiovascular mortality in healthy nondiabetic men Bjornholt JV et al. Diabetes Care 1999;22:45.

Intensive Diabetes Treatment and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes N Engl J Med 2005;353:

UKPDS

Other Questions Is it feasible an intensive treatment of hyperglycemia? Are CV events reduced by an intensive treatment of hyperglycemia? Is there a first choice drug in intensive treatment to reduce CV events? UGDP UKPDS 34 UKPDS 33 DIGAMI Kumamoto ACCORD VADT ADVANCE

ACCORD Study Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: ACCORD In the ACCORD study a HbA1c value <6,5% has been reached in less than one year and maintained

ADVANCE Collaborative Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: ADVANCE In the ADVANCE study a HbA1c value <6,5% has been reached in three years and maintained

VADT In the VADT study a HbA1c value around 6,5% has been reached in one year and maintained Baseline1 year2 years3 years4 years5 years6 years Years on Study HbA1c (%) Standard Intensive

ACCORD Study Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: Nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, death from cardiovascular causes p=0,16 p=0,04 Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes - ACCORD

ACCORD Study Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes - ACCORD

ACCORD Study Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes - ACCORD

ACCORD Study Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes - ACCORD

Causes of death in the ACCORD ACCORD Study Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: Causes of death: Unexpected or presumed cardiovascular disease Condition other than cancer or cardiovascular disease What is the role of hypoglycemia?

VADT – Predictors of CVD death VariableHazard Ratio P Value Prior CVD event Age (per 10 yr)2.090<.0001 HDL (per 10 mg) Baseline HbA1c per 1% Severe Hypoglycemia

The ACCORD suggests that outcomes differ according to – HbA1c below or above a 8,0% – Presence of previous CV events Is there a study on the intensive treatment in T2DM in a population with – Basal HbA1c <8,0% – No previous CV events? Hypothesis…..

ACCORD vs ADVANCE CharacteristicsACCORDADVANCE Baseline data Participants, n Mean age (years) 6266 Duration of diabetes (years) 108 Mean HbA 1C (%) History of CVD (%) 3532 Dluhy R.G. et al. NEJM 2008;358:2630-3

Characteristics ACCORDADVANCE Intervention Target HbA 1C (%) <6.0<6.5 Duration of the study (years) Drugs at study end (intensive vs standard) (%) Insulinn77 vs 5541 vs 24 Metformin95 vs 8774 vs 67 Secretagogues (sulfonilureas or glinides)87 vs 7494 vs 62 TZD92 vs 5817 vs 11 Incretin18 vs 5 NA Statin88 vs 8846 vs 48 Any anti-hypertensive91 vs 9289 vs 88 ACE inhibitors70 vs 72 NA Aspirin76 vs 7657 vs 55 ACCORD vs ADVANCE Dluhy R.G. et al. NEJM 2008;358:2630-3

CharacteristicsACCORDADVANCE Results (intensive vs standard) Median HbA 1C mediana at study end(%) 6.4 vs 7.5*6.4 vs 7.0* Total mortality (%) 5.0 vs 4.0*8.9 vs 9.6 CV Mortality (%) 2.6 vs 1.8*4.5 vs 5.2 Non fatal MI (%) 3.6 vs 4.6*2.7 vs 2.8 Non fatal stroke (%) 1.3 vs vs 3.8 Serious Hypoglycemia (%/anno) 3.1 vs 1.0*0.7 vs 0.4 Weight gain(kg) 3.5 vs vs -1.0* Smokers (%) 10 vs 108 vs 8 Dluhy R.G. et al. NEJM 2008;358: ADVANCE does not confirm the reduction of MI suggested by ACCORD

ADVANCE Collaborative Group et al. NEJM 2008;358: Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type Diabetes In the ADVANCE the intensive treatment reduces the microvascular endpoint Mortality does not increase p=0,01 p=0,32 p=0,28

Is there a study on the intensive treatment in T2DM in a population with – Basal HbA1c <8,0% – No previous CV events? Hypothesis……. Yes, the …….. UKPDS where participants had basal HbA1c of 7,0% without previous CV events

In the UKPDS the effect of intensive treatment showed p=0,052 and no effect on mortality According to the UKPDS duration the follow-up of ACCORD, ADVANCE e VADT seems to short In the UKPDS-PTM the reduction of MI was statistically significant

Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus Lancet 2009; 373: 1765–72

Hypothetical representation of the natural history of diabetic patients enrolled in the study VADT Generation of “bad glycaemic legacy” Risk of complications Time from diagnosis (years) 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 7,0 6,5 6, HbA 1c (%) Del Prato S. Diabetologia 2009 Before entering the VADT, intensive treatment arm After entering the VADT, intensive treatment arm The "bad" metabolic memory increases the macrovascular complications of T2DM

Position Statement ADA EASD Diabetologia Jun;55(6): Diabetes Care Jun;35(6):

Answers Are CV events reduced by an intensive treatment of hyperglycemia? YES, in patients with HbA1c <8% and no previous CV events Is it feasible an intensive treatment of hyperglycemia? YES Pay attention to: hypoglycemia fragile patients don't hurry choose the right drug!