PERITONEAL MEMBRANE CHARACTERISTICS IN SAUDI PATIENTS Prof. Jamal Alwakeel, Dr Saira Usama Dr Abdulkareem Alsuwaida, Dr Mohammad AL Ghonaim, Dr Akram Askar, Dr Niaz Feraz, Dr Shahid Qayyum Dr Abdo Qudsi.
Global Prevalence of ESRD on RRT Lysaght, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002 Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Annual Report
PD in KSA Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Annual Report
Important to understand To tailor the therapy To improve adequacy To improve technique survival Membrane Physiology and Transport Kinetics for the target population
Globally used Accurate and reliable over repeated periods of observation to determine membrane type Extremely well controlled In-center procedure Mujais S, Nolph K, Gokal R, et al: Evaluation and management of ultrafiltration problems in peritoneal dialysis. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Ad Hoc Committee on Ultrafiltration Management in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int 20:S5-S21, 2000 (suppl 4)
Low-average Low Transporter < 0.50 High- average High Transporters > 0.80
Baseline Peritoneal Equilibrium Test Gokal R, Mallick NP: Peritoneal dialysis. 1999
To identify the characters of membrane permeability in the local Saudi population assess the role of various factors affecting solute transport across the peritoneal membrane Aim of the Study
Patients and methods 52 patients in the Peritoneal Dialysis Unit of King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh
Primary cause of ESRD
ST DEVMAXMINMEAN BMI BSA RESIDUAL RENAL FUNCTION (ML/DAY) Patient characteristics The average age 50.5 yrs 24 patients were above 60 yrs of age
UREACRTCAPHOSPTHHB ALBU MIN Total Kt/V Total Cr Cl L/wk Hb Gm/dl EPO DOSE Mean Min Max ,000 Std dev Results
The average daily glucose exposure was ( ± 58.63) gm per day. 31 patients were using icodextrin either as night cycle in CAPD or as Long day dwell in CCPD patients. PD Fluids
High transporter7 High Average19 Low Average13 Low Transporter1 RESULTS Membrane type in Saudi patients
DIABETIC PATIENTS
Older Age Group 46 % patients - above 60 yrs of age
COMPARING WITH OTHER POPULATIONS
54 adult PD patients at Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. distribution of the patients by peritoneal transport 0 low 17 low-average 22 high-average 15 high 1.Rachel M. Pilkeyet al Inflammation, Peritoneal Transport, and Response to Erythropoitin in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Queen’s University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Perit Dial Int 31:48–63, 2006 Canada
The study group at Department of Nephrology and Mineral Metabolism,, Mexico DF, 55 patients (29 male, 26 female) Peritoneal transport distribution: 24% - low 29% - low average 34% - high average 13% - high transporter Angel Diaz-Alvarenga, Marcela Abasta-Jimenez, Bemardo Bravo, Gerardo Gamba, Ricardo Correa-Rotter Serum Albumin and Body Surface Area Are the Strongest Predictors of the Peritoneal Transport Type Perit Dial Int 23:75–89, 2004 Mexico
918 patients from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry 153 (16.7%) - H 472 (51.4%) - (HA), 257 (28.0%) - (LA) 36 (3.9%) - (L). 1.Rumpsfeld M, McDonald SP, Purdie DM, Collins J, Johnson DW: Predictors of baseline peritoneal transport status in Australian and New Zealand peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 43:492–501, 2004 ANZDATA
Comparatively Speaking
The results are comparable to other populations The slight differences could be explained by the pre existing renal disease, co morbidities as well as the racial differences There is need for a national renal registry to fully understand the membrane kinetics in the local population CONCLUSION