1 Advanced Software Engineering Association for Computing Machinery High School Competition System Prof: Masoud Sadjadi Fall 2004 First Deliverable By:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calculating Quality Reporting Service
Advertisements

BANKING SYSTEM Software Requirements Document CEN Advanced Software Engineering Fall Term
Design Validation CSCI 5801: Software Engineering.
Using the Self Service BMC Helpdesk
Use case tutorial examples.
This demonstration will help you understand and perform (Internet Explorer Users: Click Browse, then Full Screen, to enlarge your view of this presentation.)
Scott Wilson Shaun Moats Arjun Shrestha Andrew Garrison.
SRC Application Process Fall 2014 Version: November 12, 2014.
Maintenance Modifying the data –Add records –Delete records –Update records Modifying the design –Add fields into tables –Remove fields from a table –Change.
SwE 313 Case Study Registration System.
Robustness Analysis Dr. Neal CIS 480. Outline What is robustness analysis? Key roles in robustness analysis Object types found in discovery Diagramming.
Title 1 Software Linked Interactive Competitive Environment Software Requirements Specification November 2 nd, 2011.
Introduction to Databases CIS 5.2. Where would you find info about yourself stored in a computer? College Physician’s office Library Grocery Store Dentist’s.
11 3 / 12 CHAPTER Databases MIS105 Lec14 Irfan Ahmed Ilyas.
Actor Specification Actor Name: Designer Abstract: No
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science © Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution.
New Student Orientation Registration System Stephen Nakamura EE496 Final Presentation Fall 2008.
Competitive Algorithm Calculation Testing in a Unified System (C.A.C.T.U.S.) Requirements Specification 11/2/2011 Presented By: ExoNET Solutions 1.
SABAL SHRESTHA SHERIF HALAWA SHAMA KHADPEKAR JIANWEI LAI SI TRAN GROUP A Tri-Airport Shuttle System.
Presented By: Shashank Bhadauriya Varun Singh Shakti Suman.
1 Addendum Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. September 11, 2006.
This demonstration will help you understand and perform (Internet Explorer Users: Click Browse, then Full Screen, to enlarge your view of this presentation.)
RUP Requirements RUP Artifacts and Deliverables
CSCC40 tutorial 08 1 use cases are created based on identified functional requirements but are not mapped one-to-one to requirements... specify expected.
Project Analysis Course ( ) Week 2 Activities.
Advanced Software Engineering Association for Computing Machinery High School Competition System Prof: Masoud Sadjadi Fall 2004 Second Deliverable By:
System Basics and Structure. NOTE: Not Rostered – refers to team assignment in club tab only. It DOES NOT mean the player is officially.
IMC service provider bidding steps. Add your Username and Password as shown above.
SYSTEM PLANNING Addendum FALL 2003 RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. October 2003 PLEASE.
1 Objectives  Describe design constraints.  Identify methods of specifying functional requirements.  Describe techniques for writing and structuring.
BLUE STARS PRESENTING EDUCATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
Title 1 Software Linked Interactive Competitive Environment Acceptance Test April 26 th, 2012.
Enrolment Services – Class Scheduling Fall 2014 Course Combinations.
Team ELL System Requirements Ladakeysha Thomas Elizabeth Waldo LaWanda Warren Brandon Williams.
CCRS Comprehensive Conference Registration System Detailed Design March 6 th,
Lead Management Tool Partner User Guide March 15, 2013
Presentation on SubmissionTrackingTool: by Anjan Sharma.
CCRS Comprehensive Conference Registration System Acceptance Test May 1 st,
Instructors begin using McGraw-Hill’s Homework Manager by creating a unique class Web site in the system. The Class Homepage becomes the entry point for.
Credit Hours Agenda IntroductionProblem Statement Objectives Project PlanMethodology Work Breakdown Structure Requirements and specificationSoftware Requirements.
1 EXT400 – Corporate Vendor Admin Activities. 2 1.Corporate Vendor Admin Process Overview 2.Complete Vendor Registration 3.Register Plants/Shipping Locations.
Advanced Software Engineering Association for Computing Machinery High School Competition System Prof: Masoud Sadjadi Fall 2004 First Deliverable By: Prasad.
Payroll System Bank System Any bank(s) to which direct deposit transactions are sent. Employee A person that works for the company that owns and operates.
Faculty of Computer & Information
1 DMIS COG Administrator Course DMIS Web Services Release 2.3.
Traffic Management Transit Management Emergency Management Fixed Point-to-Fixed Point Communications Roadway Toll Administration Remote Traveler Support.
Plan Design Analyze Develop Test Implement Maintain Systems Development Life Cycle eBookSharing.
CCRS Comprehensive Conference Registration System Preliminary Design December 7 th,
Student Attendance System Requirement Analysis Presentation.
Courselist Project Automated Graduate Student Information System Final project for CS 3354.
DotNetFM Chris Zamanillo Ana Rodriguez Allen Lee Peter Singh
FP6 IT System 1 ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION SYSTEM.
Registration Solutions for your Event Management.
UML’s StateChart FSM, EFSM in UML Concurrent states Tool support.
Configuring and Troubleshooting Identity and Access Solutions with Windows Server® 2008 Active Directory®
Milestone #2 e-Class Roster System University of Macau Faculty of Science and Technology Department.
FDOT Database Training #2 May 3, 2010 Presented by Erica Hughes & Michael Faraone Bridge Software Institute University of Florida.
Software Configuration Management SEII-Lecture 21
Digital Library Syllabus Uploader Will Cameron CSC 8530 Fall 2006 Presentation 1.
UML - Development Process 1 Software Development Process Using UML.
Software and Systems Division “RTMMS IHE-PCD F2F WG meeting Kansas City, MO (Cerner) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) John.
1 Addendum FALL 2004 RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. November 2004.
Programming Contest Scoreboard and Submission 1 Welcome Mr. Matthews and Dr. Vandenberg SEG Acceptance Test April 26th, 2005.
Use Case Diagrams A Detailed Description. Use Case Diagrams Use case diagrams describe relationships between users and use cases A use case is a (usually.
Project Management: Messages
INFORMATION RETRIEVAL AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION SYSTEM
UML’s StateChart FSM, EFSM in UML Concurrent states Tool support.
Student Introduction to CORE ELMS
ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. February 23, 2006
Presentation transcript:

1 Advanced Software Engineering Association for Computing Machinery High School Competition System Prof: Masoud Sadjadi Fall 2004 First Deliverable By: Prasad Tummala, Hien Nguyen, Jose Ballesteros, Pablo A. Maurin, Bin Liu, Rafael Alpízar (Team four)

2 Road Map  Introduction  Current System  Proposed System Overview  Requirement (Functional, Non-Functional)  Registration Sub-System  Game Management Sub-System

3 Introduction The Programming Competition brings high school teams to FIU to compete for the prestigious FIU-ACM awards.

4 Current System Registration Table A successful event, Needs Automation and streamlining

5 Proposed System Overview  Registration  Game-Management.

6 Registration Subsystem Requirements  Functional Requirement Web Registration  Non-Functional Requirement Ease Backup/Restore User Friendly Scalable  Constraints Ease of backup/restore. Database Independence

7 Game Mgt. Subsystem Requirements  Functional Requirement Controlled Solution Submission. In system Judging/feedback. Automatic Result Generation  Non-Functional Requirement Ease Backup/Restore User Friendly Maintain Team anonymity

8 Game Mgt. Subsystem Requirements  Constraints Ease of installation. Database Independence Interconnectivity Constraint Platform independence System must Standalone

9 Road Map  Registration Sub-System Scenarios Registration Sub-System Scenario 1 (Hien) Registration Sub-System Scenario 2 (Jose)  Game Management Sub-System Scenarios Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Bin) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 2 (Prasad) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 3 (Rafael) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 4 (Pablo)

10 Web Registration Use Case Diagram

11 Actor Specification Actors: Coach ACMOfficer System Actors Description: Coach: uses the system to create an account that allows him to register teams for the competition. Moreover, he can manage his account and teams. ACMOfficer: uses the system to maintain team information and coach accounts. System: actor in charge of sending s.

12 Add Team Use Case Specification Brief Description This use case allows a Coach or ACMOfficer to add a new team. Flow of Events 1. System displays the form used to register a team. 2. Coach or ACMOfficer enters all the required information and submits data. 3. System validates that the required info was entered. 4. System sends a confirmation to the Coach. 5. System storages the new team data. Entry Condition: Coach or ACMOfficer is presented with the registration form. Exit Conditions: Coach or ACMOfficer adds a team and receives confirmation message and an .

13 Add Team Sequence Diagram

14 Add Team User Interface

15

16 Road Map  Registration Sub-System Scenarios Registration Sub-System Scenario 1 (Hien) Registration Sub-System Scenario 2 (Jose)  Game Management Sub-System Scenarios Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Bin) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 2 (Prasad) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 3 (Rafael) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 4 (Pablo)

17 Web Registration Use Case

18 Manage Account & Teams User Interfaces

19 Manage Account & Teams Use Case Specification Brief Description This use case allows a Coach or ACMOfficer to modify a team. Participating actors: Coach, ACMOfficer, System. Flow of events: 1. A Coach or an ACMOfficer logs into the system. 2. If the user is a Coach, System presents all the information about the teams from his school and a list of possible actions (Add Team, Delete Team, Modify Team and Manage Account), excluding the actions Report Payment and Write Comment. 3. If the user is an ACMOfficer, System presents a list of all posible actions and all the information about all schools and their respective teams. 4. Coach or ACMOfficer selects an action and team(s) if the action is to be applied to a team. 5. Include the corresponding use case. Entry Condition: Coach or ACMOfficer logs into the system. Exit Conditions: An action is carried out.

20 Manage Account & Teams Sequence Diagram

21 Web Registration Use Case

22 Modify Team Use Case Specification Brief Description The use case allows a Coach or ACMOfficer to modify a team. Flow of events: 1. System presents existing information and allows modifications. 2. Coach or ACMOfficer modifies information and submits the new data. 3. System validates that the required information was entered. 4. System sends a confirmation System updates the team data. Entry Condition: Coach or ACMOfficer is presented with current information of a team. Exit Conditions: Information about the team is updated.

23 Modify Team Sequence Diagram

24

25 Web Registration Class Diagram

26 Road Map  Registration Sub-System Scenarios Registration Sub-System Scenario 1 (Hien) Registration Sub-System Scenario 2 (Jose)  Game Management Sub-System Scenarios Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Bin) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Prasad) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Rafael) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Pablo)

27 Scenarios of Check-in Subsystem  Name:Prepare the System  Participating Actors:Administrator  Flow of Events: Administrator create a folder to store the team’s solution. Administrator enter the information of judge Administrator enter and confirm competition rules  Name:Check-In Teams  Participating Actors:Administrator  Flow of Events: Administrator verify the team information and payment status Assign each team an unique team ID

28 Use Case Diagram for Check-in Subsystem

29 Sequence Diagram for Check-in

30 Sequence Diagram for Prepare

31 Class Diagram for Check-in Subsystem

32 Road Map  Registration Sub-System Scenarios Registration Sub-System Scenario 1 (Hien) Registration Sub-System Scenario 2 (Jose)  Game Management Sub-System Scenarios Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Bin) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 2 (Prasad) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 3 (Rafael) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 4 (Pablo)

33 Competition Use Case

34 Actors Specification  Actors: Judge Team  Actors Description: Judge: Uses the system to grade the solutions and to update the scores for each team. Team: Uses the system to participate in the Competition and solves the problem those are given during the Competition.

35 Competition Sub-System  Brief Description This Use Case allows the Team to submit the solution that is solved.  Participating Actors:Team, Judge.  Flow of Events: Team selects the question number they want to submit. Team selects the location of the directory or file where is the answer. Team submits data. System removes the submitted question number from the list of question numbers. Judge is alerted of the new submission.  Entry Condition:  Team is able to select the question number and browse for the file location.  Exit Condition:  Judge is alerted of new submission.

36 Sequence Diagram for Submit Solution

37 Class Diagram for Submit Solution

38 Road Map  Registration Sub-System Scenarios Registration Sub-System Scenario 1 (Hien) Registration Sub-System Scenario 2 (Jose)  Game Management Sub-System Scenarios Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Bin) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 2 (Prasad) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 3 (Rafael) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 4 (Pablo)

39 Game Mgt. Use Case Diagram

40 Receive Solution Use Case  Brief Description This Use Case describes the process that the Judge follows upon receipt of a solution.  Participating Actors:Team, Judge.  Flow of Events: Judge is alerted that a team has submitted a solution If she chooses to grade this solution she does the following Otherwise she does nothing. Downloads the files Inspects and grades the solution Submits a grade report to the team  Entry Condition: Judge is alerted that a team has submitted a solution  Exit Condition: Judge Submits a grade report to team

41 Sequence Diagram: Receive Solution

42 Game Mgt. Use Case Diagram

43 Road Map  Registration Sub-System Scenarios Registration Sub-System Scenario 1 (Hien) Registration Sub-System Scenario 2 (Jose)  Game Management Sub-System Scenarios Game Management Sub-System Scenario 1 (Bin) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 2 (Prasad) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 3 (Rafael) Game Management Sub-System Scenario 4 (Pablo)

44 Game Mgt. Use Case Diagram

45 Actors Specification  Actors: Judge  Actors Description: Judge: Uses the system to grade the solutions and to update the scores for graded solution.

46 Competition Sub-System  Brief Description This Use Case allows the Judge to enter into the system the evaluation of a submitted solution.  Participating Actors:Judge.  Flow of Events: Judge enters into the GradeSolutionForm his evaluation of solution. System records score for submitted solution System invokes rules engine to compute new team scores and rankings. System notifies and updates Scoreboard.  Entry Condition:  After Judge finishes grading a solution, the results of his evaluation are need to be entered.  Exit Condition:  Judge is alerted of new submission.

47 Sequence Diagram for Grade Solution

48 Class Diagram for Grade Solution

49 Game Mgt. Class Diagram

50 Thank you