ITC Practice Panel Discussion Trying Your Case in the PTO: The New AIA Hearings and Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Atlanta IP American.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WISACCA – 2014 Annual Conference

Advertisements

By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.

Webinar: Request for Comments on AIA Trial Proceedings Before the PTAB July 29, Scott Boalick, Vice Chief Judge (Acting) Patent Trial and Appeal.

© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.

Patent Strategy Under the AIA Washington in the West January 29, 2013.

Director’s Meeting Legislation and Case Law Update by Dave Risley July 29, 2011.

The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases

Patent Animation Litigation Timeline 4.

INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property

© 2005 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Offense as Defense in U.S. Patent Litigation Anthony L. Press Maximizing IP Seminar October 31, 2005.

PROSECUTION APPEALS Presented at: Webb & Co. Rehovot, Israel Date: February 14, 2013 Presented by: Roy D. Gross Associate St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens.

Greg Gardella Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Proceedings.

Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.

BIPC.COM STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OF POST ISSUANCE PATENTABILITY REVIEW: THE NEW, OLD, AND NO LONGER Presented By: Todd R. Walters, Esq. B UCHANAN, I NGERSOLL.

Administrative Trials

America Invents Act (AIA) Changes in Patent Law That Impact Companies May Mowzoon: Mowzoon Law Office, PLLC 1.

Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association CURRENT TRENDS/EFFECTS OF AIA on US Patent Practice at the US Patent.

Connecticut Intellectual Property Law Association Scott E. Kamholz, M.D., Ph.D. Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal Board September 25,

IPR Litigation System & Recent Case in Korea Hee-Young JEONG Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA April 22, 2015.

HOW WILL THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA) CHANGE THE WAY WE PROTECT AMERICAN IMAGINEERING? Michael A. Guiliana April 24, 2012 Disney’s Grand Californian Hotel.

Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.

Protection of Taxpayer in Court - Protection at and during the Institution of Proceeding Phase IATJ 5th Assembly, Washington, October, 2014 Dr. Anette.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Counseling Clients re New USPTO Post Grant Proceedings and Interplay with Litigation.

The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.

AIA Strategies.

A Comparative Analysis of Patent Post-Grant Review Procedures in the U

SBZL IP LAW FIRM We bring IP Patent & Trademark Protection in CHINA.

Remember Adam Smith and the pillars of a free market system?

Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,

Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.

Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.

Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on Inter Partes Disputes and the PTAB _____ John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson.

Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.

PatentEng-Berkeley-Lavian Week 6: Validity and Infringement 1 Patent Engineering IEOR 190G CET: Center for Entrepreneurship &Technology Week 6 Dr. Tal.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.

Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.

Yoshiki KITANO JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA Annual Meeting, 2014 IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Post-Grant Opposition.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on AIA Implementation Especially post grant processes Alan J. Kasper AIPLA/JPO.

Basics of Patent Infringement Litigation UC Berkeley Patent Innovation and Strategy Dr. Tal Lavian November 24, 2008.

1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.

Intellectual property research institute of australia IP Enforcement in Australia What’s Actually Happening in the Courts? Presentation by: Kim Weatherall.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.

Challenges Associated With, And Strategies For, U.S. Patent Litigation Russell E. Levine, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP LES Asia.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association PTAB Update: IPR & CBM Sponsored by the Japan Patent Office Ron Harris, The Harris Firm.

© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.

The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.

QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.

Peter C. Schechter Vice-Chair, AIPPI-US Div. of AIPLA Partner, Osha Liang LLP Post-Issuance Review Proceedings: Update & Trends in IPR & PGR 1 © AIPLA.

Takeo Nasu JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA 2015 Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Updates of Post Grant.

Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.

Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues Hosted by: Update on U.S. Patent Legislation.

Prosecution Group Luncheon September, America Invents Act Passed House and Senate (HR 1249) Presidential Signature expected Friday Most provisions.

Boston New York San Francisco Washington, DC Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Understanding Intellectual Property June 4, 2008.

Using the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) for Post Grant Pilot Applications How to identify relevant information in AIA proceedings at the Patent.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.

Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 3 – The Patent Owner Preliminary Response 1.

Bridging the Gap Workshop

Omer/LES International/

Inter Partes Review and District Court

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 1 – PTAB Basics and Procedure

Patent Quality Improvement: Proposed WIPO Discussion Topics

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 12 – PTAB Popularity and Reasons

PTAB Bootcamp: Nuts and Bolts of IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs

Lessons learned – Lab IP Enforcement

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics

IPRs: Coordination & Estoppel

Chapter 4: Patents and Trade Secrets in the Information Age.

Presentation transcript:

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Trying Your Case in the PTO: The New AIA Hearings and Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Atlanta IP American Inn of Court Pupilage Group 7 May 15, 2013

International Super Spy Peter Gunnar Peter Gunnar

Gunnar’s Invention – Original Sketch in Lab Notebook

Gunnar’s Invention – Improved Safety for Critical Applications Protecting Dignitaries And Government Officials Worldwide U.S. Secret Service duty vehicle with Easy Ejector Seat from Espion

Commercial Success of the Easy Ejector Seat: Global Unit Sales

Gunnar’s Invention – Awarded Patent Protection

Wannabe Super Spy Brazen Golddigger Brazen Golddigger

SpyTech’s Allegedly Infringing Rejector 2005 System

Golddigger Stole Gunnar’s Girlfriend Gunnar’s Ex-Girlfriend

Golddigger’s New Favorite Client Kim Jong Un

The Rejector 2005 Is Similar to Gunnar’s Invention

Infringement Analysis: Claim 1 of ’007 Patent Claim 1 SpyTech’s Rejector An ejector seat for use in a passenger vehicle, the seat comprising: a removable portion of a vehicle floorboard; a removable portion of the vehicle side panel; at least one passenger seat mounted to the removable portion of the floorboard; a passenger restraint system; and at least one parachute.

Standard AIA Trial Timeline

Prior Art Incredible Hulk Rollercoaster

Prior Art ’917 Patent

SpyTech’s Petition for Inter Partes Review ’917 PatentHulk Rollercoaster

SpyTech’s Petition for Inter Partes Review ’917 PatentHulk Rollercoaster

‘007 Claim 1 SpyTech Contends the ’007 Patent Is Obvious ’917Hulk 1. An ejector seat for use in a passenger vehicle, the seat comprising: a removable portion of a vehicle floorboard; a removable portion of the vehicle side panel; at least one passenger seat mounted to the removable portion of the floorboard; a passenger restraint system; and at least one parachute.

Inter Partes Review Timeline  December 22, 2012 – Spytech petitions for inter partes review of the ’007 patent  December 29, 2012 – PTO issues a Notice of Filing Date Accorded Petition and Notice for Setting the Time Period for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response  March 17, 2013 – Espion elects not to file a preliminary response  April 15, 2013 – PTO issues Decision to Initiate Trial for Inter Partes Review  May 15, 2013 – Teleconference

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Scheduling Issue - Extension of Time

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Scheduling Issue - Early Claim Construction

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Protective Order Issue - Prosecution Bar

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Discovery Dispute - Deposition of Dr. E. Ville

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Discovery Dispute - Espion’s Request for Additional Discovery to Depose B. Esser

Factors in Assessing Additional Discovery 1.More than a mere possibility and mere allegation 2.Litigation positions and underlying basis 3.Ability to generate equivalent information by other means 4.Easily understandable instructions 5.Requests not overly burdensome to answer

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Deposition Disputes

Prior Art ’917 Patent

ITC Practice Panel Discussion Thank You!