Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How To Spot Price Fixing Merril Hirsh Partner Troutman Sanders LLP Washington, DC.
Advertisements

REDUCING A COMPANY’S RISK OF BEING A CARTEL VICTIM Brian R. Henry Senior Counsel Venturing and Emerging Brands and North America Competition Counsel The.
2012 ICN Cartel Workshop Panama City, Panama, Thursday, October 4 th, 2012 Lisa M. Phelan Chief of the National Criminal Enforcement Section (NCES) United.
Bid Rigging and Collusion in Government Contracts.
Public Procurement Seminar 16 th & 17 th June 2010 Savannah Hotel Fair Trading Commission Detecting Bid Rigging.
Darren A. Craig COOPERATION, COLLABORATION, OR COLLUSION? ENHANCED ANTI-TRUST SCRUTINY January 9, 2014.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations John Terzaken, Assistant Chief U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office
Scott D. Hammond Deputy Assistant Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Detroit, Michigan February 15, 2013.
Section 9.2.
Powerpoint Templates The fight against bid rigging- NACC experience Bridget Dundee Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2013.
Ten Strategies For Winning The Fight Against Hardcore Cartels Scott D. Hammond Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Criminal Enforcement Antitrust Division,
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief, New York Field Office Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Judicial Training Program Moscow, Russia July.
Antitrust Does Google have monopoly power? Microsoft? On what? Why? Why Not? Is that bad? Why? Can you name monopolies in other industries? Is Monopoly.
POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP ORIGINAL IDEAS. UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS. U.S. INTERNATIONAL CARTEL ENFORCEMENT Presented by Neil R. Ellis Vienna, Austria.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
Chapter 10 White-Collar and Organized Crime. Introduction ► White-collar crimes – criminal offenses committed by people in upper socioeconomic strata.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Collusion in Department of Transportation Contracts.
Chapter 47 Antitrust Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing March 12, 2008 Richmond, Virginia.
Criminal Antitrust Practice Donald C. Klawiter J. Clayton Everett, Jr. Jennifer M. Driscoll.
Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Patricia L. Jannaco, Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
Public Procurement Seminar Wednesday 16 th – 17 th June 2010 Savannah Hotel, Barbados The Certificate of Independent Bid Determination (CIBD) Fair Trading.
Copyright© 2010 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 10/17/2015 Canadian Competition Law.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
Federal Bureau of Investigation. What is the FBI? Investigates violations of federal law including the theft of federal funds Investigates violations.
 “Market power” is the power of company to control the market for its product.  The law does allow for market monopolies when a patent is issued. During.
Fines: A Contextual Approach The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do no necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission.
Public Procurement Seminar 16 th and 17 th June 2010 Savannah Hotel Fair Trading Commission Designing Tenders to Reduce Risk of Bid Rigging.
1 Antitrust Division Criminal Enforcement Program Presentation on Antitrust Violations & Prosecutions Michelle Pionkowski Trial Attorney U.S. Department.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Debra C. Brookes, Esq. Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust.
Judge Sarah S. Vance, Eastern District of Louisiana Establishing Damages Under U.S. Antitrust Law.
Chapter 10.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
Incident Reporting and Fraud (and FOIA) Dennis Swafford Analyst – Financial Management DOL - Chicago Regional Office
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations John Terzaken, Assistant Chief U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Nat’l Criminal.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Monopoly and Antitrust Policy. Imperfect Competition and Market Power An imperfectly competitive industry is an industry in which single firms have some.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Alaska Antitrust Fundamentals Clyde “Ed” Sniffen Jr. Senior Assistant Attorney General Alaska Department of Law.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Measures to prevent collusive tendering: an important adjunct to a liberalized government procurement regime Robert Anderson Counsellor, WTO Secretariat.
DESIGNING A PROCUREMENT TENDER TO MINIMIZE BID RIGGING Antonio Capobianco Senior Competition Expert OECD Competition Division
Price fixing and the Commerce Act 1986
New York State Attorney General’s Office Antitrust Bureau
Red flags OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
2017 SOA Annual Meeting & Exhibit
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
2018 SOA Life & Annuity Symposium
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
THE RULES OF THE GAME: Intro to Antitrust Law Robbyn Wysocki
Presentation by the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
The Antitrust Laws: Detecting Bid Rigging, Price Fixing, and Other Types of Collusion The views expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily represent.
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
Abigail Smith Assistant Attorney General
Presentation transcript:

Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division The views expressed are not purported to reflect those of the U.S. Department of Justice

The Road Ahead Antitrust Division Organizational Interview Criminal Antitrust 101 Identifying Bid Rigging & Market Allocation in Government Contracting Your Role in Prevention and Detection Q&A 2

Antitrust Division: Role and Responsibilities Exclusive, nationwide jurisdiction over all violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 Works with investigative agencies through its criminal enforcement program Over 100 lawyers, plus support staff, working solely on criminal matters Global leader in cartel enforcement: – led increases in criminal penalties – leniency program a model for competition authorities worldwide 3

Antitrust Division Within the U.S. Department of Justice Only component of USDOJ that can prosecute bid-rigging. 4

Criminal Office Territories 5

Criminal Antitrust 101 6

Why Do Antitrust Laws Matter? The cost of collusion: – Competitors want to limit competition to make more money – The result is that victims are overcharged and defrauded Anti-competitive behavior by firms participating in the government procurement process causes a direct loss to agencies that is often passed on to taxpayers 7

The Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §1) “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.” Prohibits agreements among competitors in restraint of trade or commerce 8

9 What We Prosecute Criminally Agreements Among Horizontal Competitors to: Fix Prices Rig Bids Allocate Markets (Customers/Territories) Allocate Sales Volumes/Restrict Output

10 What We Prosecute Criminally Antitrust Division also prosecutes other crimes where competition is subverted, taxpayer funds lost, or the integrity of our investigations compromised Some examples: Mail/wire fraud Bribery of public officials Tax offenses Obstruction/False statements

Sherman Act Elements Unreasonable restraint of trade/conspiracy – Price Fixing – Customer/Market Allocation – Bid Rigging Knowingly joined – intended to agree Affects interstate or foreign commerce Statute of Limitations: 5 years from the last act in furtherance of the conspiracy 11

What products or services are frequently subject to collusion?  Bread  Milk  Construction  Road Building  Concrete/Cement  Trash Hauling/Waste/Scrap Metal  Government Contracts 12

Examples of Prosecutions Related to Government Contracting Superfund site contracting – Nine individuals and three companies pleaded guilty/convicted – Charges included big-rigging, kickbacks, and fraud – Over $6 M in fines and restitution; prison sentences months Disaster relief – Typhoon Paka bid rigging – Numerous pleas and convictions – Bid rigging, wire fraud, bribery Federal E-rate cases – Federal funds for school internet access – Bribes, kickbacks, and bid-rigging – Dozens of guilty pleas, $10s of millions in restitution 13

Sherman Act Penalties? It's risky, of course---if we're caught, it could mean many hours of community service. 14

Penalties Are Significant Corporation – Up to $100 million Individual – $1,000,000; and/or – 10 years incarceration Corporation or Individual – Twice gain to defendant; or – Twice loss to victim 15

Identifying Bid Rigging & Market Allocation 16

Bid Rigging Agreement in advance to manipulate outcome of bidding process Two or more competitors: Predetermine the winning bidder Agree to bid or not bid on a contract Submit a “complimentary bid” (an intentionally high or low bid designed to lose) Arrange a payback for the losing bidders – quid pro quo – Examples: money, a subcontract, another contract 17

18 Identifying possible bid rigging Look for: Bid patterns over time Non-competitive pricing Vendor comments Sham bidders Clues in bid documents

What Does Bid Rigging Look Like? Competitor Interactions Fewer than normal number submitting bids Qualified bidders do not bid Competitors meet or socialize before bids Patterns in Amounts of Bids Identical bids or identical increments between bids Unusually high bids or bids with no relation to cost Physical Similarities/Alterations Same handwriting or font Same typos or mathematical errors White out 19

20 What Does Bid Rigging Look Like? Milk Bid 1 Firm A $100 Firm B $120 Firm C $130 Firm D $140 Milk Bid 2 Firm B $100 Firm A $120 Firm C $130 Firm D $140 Milk Bid 3 Firm C $100 Firm A $120 Firm B $130 Firm D $140 Milk Bid 4 Firm D $100 Firm A $120 Firm B $130 Firm C $140

What Does Bid Rigging Sound Like? “I know I am not the low bid.” “It’s not our turn. We will take the next one.” “I wasn’t trying to win this job. I just threw in a number as a favor.” “We are all working together on this one.” “I can get you a couple more bids.” 22

Allocation Agreements among competitors to: – Allocate customers – Allocate territories – Allocate sales volumes – Allocate production volumes – Allocate market shares 23

Spotting Market Allocation Look out for: Same company repeatedly the low bidder for certain products or areas Competitors suddenly stop selling in a territory or to a customer Company refers customers to other competitors 24

What Does Market Allocation Sound Like? “We can’t sell to you” “You aren’t in our area” “We don’t sell in that area – you will need to call Company X” “Company Y should not be calling you for that product” 25

Your Role in Prevention and Detection 26

Working to Crack Cartels CCreate competition culture CMaintain open dialogue CLook for indications of collusion CReport cartel conduct!

28 What you can do to encourage competition and discourage collusion Pre-Bid Process Seek or encourage new bidders Write specifications to expand pool of qualified bidders Do not ask bidders to obtain additional bids

29 What you can do to encourage competition and discourage collusion During the Bid Require disclosure upfront of all intended subcontractors, joint ventures, suppliers Require disclosure of all persons involved in preparing and submitting bids Used sealed or anonymous bid processes if appropriate Require “no collusion,” “independent prices,” or “no contact” certifications

30 Sample Certificate of Independent Price Determination Bid offeror must certify: (1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at independently, without, for the purpose of restricting competition, any consultation, communication, or agreement with any other offeror or competitor relating to (i) those prices, (ii) the intention to submit an offer, or (iii) the methods or factors used to calculate the prices offered; (2) The prices in this offer have not been and will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror, directly or indirectly, to any other offeror or competitor before bid opening (in the case of a sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in the case of a negotiated solicitation) unless otherwise required by law; and (3) No attempt has been made or will be made by the offeror to induce any other concern to submit or not to submit an offer for the purpose of restricting competition. Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR"), 48 C.F.R. §

31 What you can do to encourage competition and discourage collusion After the Bid Review bids carefully for patterns Carefully consider what information is made public when a bid is awarded to avoid unnecessarily educating competitors Do not disqualify bidders from future contracts if they fail to submit a bid Maintain procurement records

Red Flags of Collusion “MAPS” M = MARKET Who is in the market for this award? A = APPLICATIONS Are there similarities between vendor applications or proposals? P = PATTERNS Have patterns developed among competing vendors? S = SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR Have vendors demonstrated behavior that suggests that they worked together on the award? 32

Contact Us Washington Criminal II Section Main Number: Leah McCoy Trial Attorney (202) Citizen Complaints antitrust.complaints.recov Citizen Complaint Center Antitrust Division 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Room 3322 Washington, DC (888) or

Questions? 34

35 Resources Visit the Division Website’s Criminal Page: Antitrust Primer for Federal Law Enforcement Personnel Economic Recovery Act Initiative recovery.html