1 Experiences with IP Teaching in different (non law) disciplines Prof. Marie-Christine JANSSENS Centre Intellectual Property Rights Catholic University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intellectual Property Strategy: Professional Skills for IP Asset Management June 6, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique.
Advertisements

Principal Patent Analyst
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
Marice Cumber Director. Getting Out of Bed Knowledge transfer for the creative industries.
Bologna and the Third Cycle Anthony J Vickers UK Bologna Expert.
Open Educational Resources / production workshop / february 2009 Except where otherwise noted, this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution.
Overview of the Rose-Hulman Bachelor of Science in Software Engineering Don Bagert SE Faculty Retreat – New Faculty Tutorial August 23, 2005.
Neil McKenzie, Dedicon Multimedia training Packages by EUAIN.
Ronan Fitzpatrick June 2007 A dissertation life cycle.
Distance learning: issues and trends MOOC and OER Anna Maria Tammaro University of Parma.
Department of Economics and Finance Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong Page 1.
Integrating IP Teaching in Law Curricula Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
A Tool for Effective Capacity Building, Education and Training in Korea April 3, 2009 In International Conference on Intellectual Property for Women in.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Computers and Legal Education at the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Methodology and Experiences Karol Dobrzeniecki, LLM.
SMEs Division National IP Action Plan for Entrepreneurs and SMEs March 2008 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
SFI’s Conference and Workshop Programme Eimear Holohan, Scientific Programme Officer.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN ZIMBABWE Kathy Matsika(Ms) National University of Science and Technology.
Law as an enterprise skill: ‘Intellectual property and project commercialisation in engineering enterprise’ Professor Jim Roach Design Computing & Engineering.
Idea During the last decade, teachers/trainers of science and technology subjects have been faced with an extensive use of computer based approach in.
Intellectual Property in the Context of Growth and Development of the World Economy Luciano Daffarra, Attorney at Law Daffarra, d’Addio & Partners China-Italy.
Module Final Review - MIS  Highlight main topics and concepts  Need to review sample exam papers  Make sure how the reading materials are related to.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
National Seminar on Intellectual Property and its Impact on Economic Development Human Resource Development in the Field of Intellectual Property for Scientific,
Experiences in Undergraduate Studies in the University of Zaragoza LEFIS Undergraduate studies Oslo, 19 th -20 th May 2006.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Helpdesk A presentation by Daniela Nolte.
Protection FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
Page 1 IOP Genomics Workshop Patents and Patenting Biotech Inventions Annemieke Breukink, Ph.D. September 8th, 2009.
Deepak Maheshwari Director – Corporate Affairs Microsoft India.
1 Bilbao, February 2007 “European Curricula for Economic Animator in The Enlarging Europe” Testing Phase.
TRUST SOSMIE – Paris Meeting n° 1: 4th - 6th October 2012 Workshop n.1: Partner presentation Workshop n.2: Key questions.
NOIP: Challenges and Strategies IPRTA forum Mexico City, July 9-11, 2008 Pham Phi Anh Deputy Director General National Office of Intellectual Property.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Teaching Excellence Project funded by CELT Teaching Economics through Innovative Content and Effective Teaching Methods Necati Aydin,
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC WIPO’s Support in Development of Intellectual Property (IP) Strategies.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1 Intellectual Property Rights and National Development Goals – Ensuring Innovation in Russia St. Petersburg/Moscow Study Tour 2008 Christoph.
8. Annual WIPO Forum on Intellectual Property and SMEs for Intellectual Property Offices and Other Relevant Institutions in the OECD Countries 04-05/10/2010,
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
IP Audit Prelude to IP Strategy June, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique Intellectual Property and New Technologies Division.
S tandards Education in Technology Programs Amin Karim, DeVry University Jennifer McClain, IEEE Educational Activities.
Intellectual Property Dr Laura Rush Business Development Manager Research Enterprise Services copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF IPR ACROSS THE LIFECYCLE OF INNOVATION Bob Stembridge Principal Patent Analyst, IP & Science.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Mr. Pedro Cartagena Technical Adviser SPTO. Madrid, Spain.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Session 9: Cross-Cutting Issues. Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources  To describe the key cross-cutting.
Inter-regional Workshop on Technology Transfer Issues Technology Transfer Issues in Turkey Mehmet Nurşad SÖZER Patent Examiner, Turkish Patent Institute.
Intellectual Property Legal Implications. What is Intellectual Property? The product of creativity and intellectual endeavour Intellectual Property Rights.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
Intellectual Property Valorization
Amin Karim Joaquin Mayoral The Importance of Teaching Standards in Engineering & Technology Programs February 12, 2011.
Knowledge Transfer Accelerating Innovation. slide 1 The Knowledge Transfer Group at the HR Induction Program (session II) 6 th September 2011 Enrico Chesta.
Developing An Agenda for University Education and Research in Technical Standards Timothy Schoechle International Center for Standards Research University.
Intellectual Property Teaching in the Czech Republic Ladislav Jakl Professor, Metropolitan University Prague IP Teaching Roundtable, Bucharest November.
Major / Minor Technology and Entrepreneurship (HIR/BEng) March 16, 2016.
 Understand what intellectual property is about  Balance the pros and cons of applying for a patent  Understand what a patent is  Know how to obtain.
Co-funded by the European Union Ref. number: LLP FI-ERASMUS-ENW OI-Net The European Academic Network for Open Innovation ,
Teaching IP to an Interdisciplinary Audience: Experiences from Poland Piotr Zakrzewski University of Warsaw, Patent Office of the Republic of Poland Bucharest,
Study on the Patent Involved in National Standards China National Institute of Standardization September, 2009.
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
Copyright Intelllectual Property and Thesis Maria Rehbinder,LL.M.
6th International Scientific
SOCIAL SECURITY EDUCATION IN EUROPE: SURVEY RESULTS
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
Is IP Helping or Impeding Economies?
Law of Intellectual Property Rights
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
Standards Aware Course Review
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

1 Experiences with IP Teaching in different (non law) disciplines Prof. Marie-Christine JANSSENS Centre Intellectual Property Rights Catholic University Leuven Prof. Marie-Christine JANSSENS Centre Intellectual Property Rights Catholic University Leuven “Disseminating IP knowledge in universities” Roving workshop - Prague – 2 December 2009 “Disseminating IP knowledge in universities” Roving workshop - Prague – 2 December 2009

2 Agenda I.Conceiving an IP course for students of non-legal faculties  A prototype of university-industry collaboration in respect of IP education II.Teaching IP to a interdisciplinary (non) legal audience  Teaching IP without the ‘L’  Involvement of practitioners and industry experts I.Conceiving an IP course for students of non-legal faculties  A prototype of university-industry collaboration in respect of IP education II.Teaching IP to a interdisciplinary (non) legal audience  Teaching IP without the ‘L’  Involvement of practitioners and industry experts

3

4 Origins of the course (CIR goal)  Integrate IP awareness at the undergraduate stage in science based programs  Make (senior) undergraduates understand IP  Practice-oriented education  Active participation from industry  Brush up ‘dusty image’ of the sector  Integrate IP awareness at the undergraduate stage in science based programs  Make (senior) undergraduates understand IP  Practice-oriented education  Active participation from industry  Brush up ‘dusty image’ of the sector

5 Origins of the course  Difficulties: 1.Integration in the already crowed curricula of science and business faculties 2.Sensitization of students (soft v. hard subject) 3.Financial consequences?  Difficulties: 1.Integration in the already crowed curricula of science and business faculties 2.Sensitization of students (soft v. hard subject) 3.Financial consequences?

6 1. Integration in the existing curricula  European Commission (+ Belgian Council for Trade and Industry) “ The education of scientists, technologists, and business managers in most of Europe does not usually include formal exposure to the field of intellectual property. (…) Measures to address this (failure) are relatively straightforward. All science, engineering and technology professional qualifications must include provision for appropriate IPR knowledge”  European Commission (+ Belgian Council for Trade and Industry) “ The education of scientists, technologists, and business managers in most of Europe does not usually include formal exposure to the field of intellectual property. (…) Measures to address this (failure) are relatively straightforward. All science, engineering and technology professional qualifications must include provision for appropriate IPR knowledge”

7 2. Sensitization of students  Marketing approach (flyers)

8 3. Cost factor  Commitment from the industrial partners  yearly contribution  active involvement  Involvement of other companies  Commitment from the industrial partners  yearly contribution  active involvement  Involvement of other companies

9 4. Last but not Least the naming issue : avoid ‘law’  “Intellectual Property Management”  in Dutch  not possible without “Recht” (law)  Solution  Shakespeare “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers” (2 Henry VI, Act IV, Scene II)  Relevance of “what’s in a name”  Stick to English title ““Intellectual Property Management”  in Dutch  not possible without “Recht” (law) SSolution  Shakespeare “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers” (2 Henry VI, Act IV, Scene II)  Relevance of “what’s in a name” SStick to English title

10 II. Teaching IP to non-legal audience  Why IP? :  Whatever the nature of your future business, you are very likely to have to deal with some form of IP  Aim?  Make you understand the importance of IP as a tool to protect a company’s intellectual assets (knowledge = core value in information society)  How?  Why IP? :  Whatever the nature of your future business, you are very likely to have to deal with some form of IP  Aim?  Make you understand the importance of IP as a tool to protect a company’s intellectual assets (knowledge = core value in information society)  How?

11 Industry Players Academics Other Practitioners

12 IP managers -Engineers -Chemists, physicists -Bio-engineers -Inhouse TM counsels IP managers -Engineers -Chemists, physicists -Bio-engineers -Inhouse TM counsels Faculties of Law & Economics -patent/TM agents - registration authorities -patent/TM agents - registration authorities

13 Overview course content (6 modules – 26 hours) 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry)  Closed and open innovation (electronics industry) 2.Legal Framework  Overview, benefits of copyright for companies, basic principles of patent law 3.Economic Framework 4.Extracting value from patents  Turning inventions into profit-making assets (patent portfolio management, licensing strategies, …)  Significance of patents as source of scientific and business information  How to read and obtain information from a patent  Usefulness of patent information for different purposes (incl. Business Intelligence and IP landscaping) 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry)  Closed and open innovation (electronics industry) 2.Legal Framework  Overview, benefits of copyright for companies, basic principles of patent law 3.Economic Framework 4.Extracting value from patents  Turning inventions into profit-making assets (patent portfolio management, licensing strategies, …)  Significance of patents as source of scientific and business information  How to read and obtain information from a patent  Usefulness of patent information for different purposes (incl. Business Intelligence and IP landscaping)

14 Overview course content (6 modules – 26 hours) 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry) 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry)

15 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry)  Closed and open innovation (electronics industry) 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry)  Closed and open innovation (electronics industry)

16 Overview course content (6 modules – 26 hours) 2. Legal Framework  Overview, benefits of copyright for companies, basic principles of patent law 2. Legal Framework  Overview, benefits of copyright for companies, basic principles of patent law EPC

17 Overview course content (6 modules – 26 hours) 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry)  Closed and open innovation (electronics industry) 2.Legal Framework  Overview, benefits of copyright for companies, basic principles of patent law 3.Economic Framework 4.Extracting value from patents  Turning inventions into profit-making assets (patent portfolio management, licensing strategies, …)  Significance of patents as source of scientific and business information  How to read and obtain information from a patent  Usefulness of patent information for different purposes (incl. Business Intelligence and IP landscaping) 1.Research & Development phase  Life cycle of product (biomedical industry)  Closed and open innovation (electronics industry) 2.Legal Framework  Overview, benefits of copyright for companies, basic principles of patent law 3.Economic Framework 4.Extracting value from patents  Turning inventions into profit-making assets (patent portfolio management, licensing strategies, …)  Significance of patents as source of scientific and business information  How to read and obtain information from a patent  Usefulness of patent information for different purposes (incl. Business Intelligence and IP landscaping)

18

19 Overview course content 5.Trademarks & Designs  Legal framework – basic principles  Trademark Policies in practice – different models of trademark architecture  Policy Anheuser-Busch Inbev (Multibrand)  Policy Philips (Umbrella)  Protection of industrial designs not to be neglected! 5.Trademarks & Designs  Legal framework – basic principles  Trademark Policies in practice – different models of trademark architecture  Policy Anheuser-Busch Inbev (Multibrand)  Policy Philips (Umbrella)  Protection of industrial designs not to be neglected!

20 Brand achitecture

21 Overview course content 6.Topical issues (as choice module?)  Computer programs (and alternative of open source)  Domain names  Biomedical inventions: can life be patented? 7.Concluding course - Holistic approach 6.Topical issues (as choice module?)  Computer programs (and alternative of open source)  Domain names  Biomedical inventions: can life be patented? 7.Concluding course - Holistic approach

22 GLOBALISATION & Impact on IP Stragegies GLOBALISATION & Impact on IP Stragegies

23 Teaching materials  Handouts slides  Textbook  Basics IP law without mentioning particular legal provisions  Possible Exam questions  8 – 10 questions per module  Handouts slides  Textbook  Basics IP law without mentioning particular legal provisions  Possible Exam questions  8 – 10 questions per module

24 A number of key points!  Integrate and analyze real life stories  (DVD story, Senseo story, …)  Instruct lecturers not to discuss articles of laws or conventions  Focus not merely on obtaining IP protection but rather how to create value from it  Create image of IP system as a dynamic and modern system  Integrate and analyze real life stories  (DVD story, Senseo story, …)  Instruct lecturers not to discuss articles of laws or conventions  Focus not merely on obtaining IP protection but rather how to create value from it  Create image of IP system as a dynamic and modern system

25 Points of particular interest  Risks of overlap between the various guest speakers  Avoid ‘Commercial publicity’  Students are very sensitive !  Identifying good lecturers  Student expectations  conference public  Time-management  ‘so much to tell, so little time …’  Risks of overlap between the various guest speakers  Avoid ‘Commercial publicity’  Students are very sensitive !  Identifying good lecturers  Student expectations  conference public  Time-management  ‘so much to tell, so little time …’

26