New Directions: Online Learning & the University of California’s A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Directions: Online Courses & the University of Californias A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions.
Advertisements

Dr. Tracy Tucker Thomas Coy Arkansas Department of Education
A-G Updates and the New Piece of the Puzzle: Common Core Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions University of California |
Fast Forward: University of Californias A-G Online Course Policy & the Growth of Online Learning Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Learn More from UC about A-G
A-G Course List Manager. UC ARTICULATION Today’s Session  Introducing the new A-G Course Management Portal  User registration & system access  A-G.
A Year in the Life: UC & You (with Dos, Don’ts & More!) Nancy Purcille Jennifer Forsberg University of California | Office of the President Annual CIAC.
The Basics of UC’s A-G Nina Costales
Online A-G Courses.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
New Directions for UC Articulation Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Undergraduate Admissions UC Office of the President College Access & Preparation (CAP) Forum June.
Navigating the Avenues of A-G
Virtual Schools are Virtually Here: Now What? A National Perspective Matthew Wicks Chief Operating Officer International Association for.
McMaster Accessibility Council (MAC) Annual Report Highlights October, 2013.
Hannah Frankel High School Articulation Analyst
Maine Course Pathways Maine School Superintendents’ Conference June 24 – 25, 2010.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 ARTICULATION 101 Joanne Benschop MiraCosta College.
Online School Administration and Supervision Programs: Two Pathways for Success Online Information Session Wednesday, July 8, :00-7:30 PM EST.
academic Planning school year
Nina Costales High School Articulation
COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DEVELOPING A STRATEGY FOR REGION 6 Region 6 Planning Commission 903 East Main Street Marshalltown, IA
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Advanced Understanding of UC’s A-G Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions and Nina Costales High School Articulation Coordinator.
Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Navigating Change in UC’s A-G
English Language Arts and Reading Adoption Supplemental Science Request.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
Big Changes from UC about A-G Nina Costales High School Articulation Coordinator University of California | Office of the President California Charter.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
New York’s State of Online Learning S/CDN Thursday, March 3, 2011 Office of Educational Design and Technology
University of California Transfer Course Articulation Process April 2011.
Learn More from UC about A-G Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Undergraduate Admissions UC Office of the President The Western Association for College Admission Counseling.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.
1 Archdiocese of New York Academic Initiatives.
Trends in CTE Trends in CTE Dr. Patrick Ainsworth Rob Atterbury November 19, 2010.
Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy Educational Design and Technology Updates.
Revision of Initial and Continued Approval Standard Guidelines for Educational Leadership Programs Presentation to FAPEL Winter Meeting Tallahassee, FL.
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
UC & CTE: The Why & How Behind CTE for A-G Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director Undergraduate Admissions UC Office of the President CALCP / CAROCP CTE.
ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College.
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Annual CUE Conference 2013 Kelley Day
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Quality Review August 30, 2010 Office of Academic Quality Division of Performance & Accountability.
 Credit Demonstrated by Mastery Principals’ Meeting September 2014.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
  NEW JERSEY ALTERNATE ROUTE CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION CERTIFICATE OF ELIGIBILITY   EDUCATOR  PREPARATION PROGRAM (CTE-CE EPP)
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Alternative Education Programs
Comprehensive Planning
The Minefield of Accreditation
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Management and Evaluation Programs for Faculty
Resident Educator Program
Eden Collegiate High School Eden CISD School Board Presentation
Presentation transcript:

New Directions: Online Learning & the University of California’s A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions University of California | Office of the President e-Learning Strategies Symposium December 7, 2012

2 Overview  Policy background  The “a-g” course lists & course update process  New “a-g” review process for online courses  Policy implementation: challenges & successes

Policy Background

4 UC and Online Learning  University of California priority: accessibility of a broad range of high-quality, rigorous college-preparatory courses  UC keeping pace with the changing landscape of online learning –Facilitate students’ access to “a-g” online courses –Encourage online educators to uphold promising practices of online learning for student success  Revised policy to offer improved guidance and more efficient process of satisfying UC admission requirements

5 Highlights of Policy Revisions  UC “program status” requirement for online entities has been eliminated  New policy focuses on quality assessment of online courses for “a-g” purposes –Flexible to accommodate differing types of online courses –Addresses UC faculty online learning guidelines  Policy revisions incorporate national quality standards for online courses and programs  Partnership between UC and the California Learning Resource Network (CLRN)

A-G Course Lists & Course Update Process

7 A-G Course Lists  UC and CSU admissions requirements include satisfying a 15-course pattern of college-preparatory “a-g” courses –High school courses must undergo “a-g” review and approval to appear on the “a-g” course list  The “a-g” course list is an important component of the applicant review process –All “a-g” course lists must be updated each year to maintain accuracy for applyUC and for UC’s comprehensive review  Updates to the “a-g” course list are submitted using the UC Online Update website: –

8 A-G Course List Update Timeline New update cycle opens on February 1 Submit new courses and other course list updates New courses submitted on or before June 1: up to 2 resubmissions allowed New courses submitted on or before August 1: only 1 resubmission allowed New courses submitted on or before September 15: no resubmissions allowed Update cycle closes on September 15

New A-G Review Process for Online Courses (effective )

10 Online Course Publisher vs. Online School  UC now differentiates between an online course publisher and an online school –Online course publishers develop their own curriculum and sell or license their online courses for delivery by a teacher within a high school or district –Online school is a credit- or diploma-granting institution that offers courses strictly through Internet-based methods, with time and/or distance separating the teacher and learner  Institutions that act as both an online course publisher and online school will follow the procedures for online schools

11 Review of Online Courses (effective ) Submit online course to CLRN for review* Assess the online course against the iNACOL Standards for Quality Online Courses and CA content standards CLRN-certified OR Self-assessed Submit online course to UC for “a-g” review Conduct subject- specific review against UC faculty’s content criteria Approve course for “a-g”? Add course to online publisher’s or online school’s “a-g” course list; approval expires in 3 years STEP 1 STEP 2 *If not eligible for CLRN review, the online course must be self-assessed by the online publisher or school. YES

12 Step #1A: CLRN Certification  Effective for: –Online course publishers serving public institutions –Public online schools  A CLRN-certified online course must: –Meet at least 80% of CA Content or Common Core Standards –Fulfill all 15 “power standards” from the iNACOL Standards for Quality Online Courses –Satisfy at least 27 (or 80%) of the remaining iNACOL Standards  Courses not aligned with a set of standards must be self- assessed (Step #1B)  To submit a course to CLRN: –

13 Step #1B: Self-Assessment  Effective for: –Online course publishers serving only private institutions –Private online schools –Any online courses not aligned with state standards – school year: Non-online high schools, districts, and programs  Institution conducts self-assessment against iNACOL Standards for Quality Online Courses  Self-assessment will be incorporated into the course submission process for UC “a-g” review

14 Step #2: UC A-G Course Review  Only CLRN-certified or self-assessed online courses can be submitted to UC during the course list update cycle –Open annually, February 1 through September 15  Basis for “a-g” course review and approval: –“a-g” course evaluation guidelines –Subject area course requirements  All courses are reviewed by a subject area analyst –“Blind” reviews –Goal: new CLRN-certified online courses reviewed within 2-4 weeks  To submit a course to UC: –

15 Adding A-G Online Courses Access UC’s “a-g” Online Update website Indicate intent to add previously approved online course(s) Certify that program/school/district will satisfy UC’s online learning guidelines and policy for online courses to receive “a-g” approval (once per annual update cycle) Add online course to “a-g” course list Select online course to add to “a-g” course list

Policy Implementation: Challenges & Successes 16

17 Challenges  Shifting the focus from UC “approving providers” to UC approving courses  Identifying expert reviewers of quality online delivery  Sheer volume of “homegrown” teacher-created online courses  Definitions of online entities are not always clear-cut

18 Successes  The appropriate experts are reviewing online courses: –CLRN ensuring quality online delivery –UC ensuring quality “a-g” content  Improved efficiencies in seeking “a-g” approval for online courses  Anticipated increase in “a-g” online course offerings –Broader access to “a-g” courses –Greater preparation for UC admissions  Enhanced quality of online learning for students

19 New Directions  Elimination of principal certification for non-UC-approved online courses –Not acceptable for online courses completed in academic year and beyond  Re-evaluation of policy regarding online courses in laboratory science and in visual & performing arts –Under current policy:  Online science courses OK but require supervised, on-site wet lab  Online VPA courses not allowable  UC encourages educators to incorporate promising practices for excellence in online teaching and learning

20

21 Resources  Helpful links: –California Learning Resource Network (CLRN)  –International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL)  –UC Doorways websites:  “a-g” Course List website –  Online Update website –  Contact High School Articulation in UC systemwide Admissions: – –Phone: (510)

22 Thank You To provide feedback on this session, please go to: