Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
Advertisements

Missouri Brand Awareness & Destination Audit Study Fall 2003 Presented to: Missouri Association of Convention & Visitors Bureaus June 8, 2004.
Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
Wellbeing Watch: a monitor of health, wealth and happiness in the Hunter Shanthi Ramanathan.
Town Needs Survey Preliminary Results Presented to Board of Selectmen April 14, 2009.
Arizona’s Cultural Heritage Tourism Study. Purpose  The purpose of the study was to generate information about cultural heritage tourists in Arizona.
City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
 Why the survey was devised – Interlink in partnership with TLI project and Salford City Council  Information collected from January till April’13 
Town of Fairview Community Survey  RESEARCH AND TRAINING SPECIALISTS, INC  Concord, North Carolina  April 2011.
Pulsar Advertising Southeastern Institute of Research 1 VDOT Omnibus Study Wave I: December 2004 Pulsar Advertising G January 6, 2005 Southeastern Institute.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
2008 Survey of Cape Cod Second Homeowners Overview of Findings May 19, 2009.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
Regional Affordable Housing Study Summary Suk-Kyung Kim, Ph.D., Assistant Professor School of Planning, Design, & Construction Michigan State University.
A Deeper Understanding of Avery Fitness Center Customers
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
JANUARY 20, 2009 MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY. AGENDA What is Active Pictou County? The Partners Background Trends and Rationale Consultation Process Community.
RESEARCH AND TRAINING SPECIALISTS, INC Concord, North Carolina 2008 CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY Paul C. Friday, Ph.D. President
A National Survey of Adults Public Attitudes Regarding Pandemic Influenza Jim Wolf, Director Survey Research Center at IUPUI July 14, 2008.
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS 1 December 2007 Presentation of Findings from Research Around Development in Teton County LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS.
+ Southwood Mobile Home Community Presentation of Results February 11, 2010.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Danville Region Social Capital Survey Center for Survey Research A Unit of the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service University of Virginia Center.
CMUA 2004 Statewide Survey of California Residential Customers Served by Municipal Utilities City of Palo Alto Public Utilities April 2005.
San Joaquin County’s Health Profile: Useful Data to Improve Our Future Sponsored by the San Joaquin County Community Health Assessment Collaborative
CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions July 2013 Results of the 2013 Survey.
Kimball Area Community Survey Results. Methodology Mail survey Sample included Kimball, Banner and western Cheyenne Counties  Random sample of 649 households.
Module 10 Lesson 2 Factors Affecting Business Location.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
2009 Lane County Community Survey Demographic Breakdown.
Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute Ontario Trail Survey Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute Trail Usage in Ontario:
Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA) November 2, 2009 Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA)
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
PKSS Community Survey – Analysis and Conclusions Sep 11 th, 2009.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
Nobody’s Unpredictable Smoke-Free Spaces Survey August 2011.
OPP COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY 2009 Huronia West Detachment.
Results of National Afterschool Meals Survey of Low-Income Families September 10, 2013.
Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
Communities ASD Seminar 2 nd June 2009 Sinéad Power - GUS Project Manager Scottish Government.
Fayette County USA Expansion Opinion Survey Prepared for Cornett-IMS/Fayette Alliance The Matrix Group, Inc August 2006.
Buffalo's 311 Call Center: Program Evaluation Focusing on Department Goal of Reaction Time and Resident Satisfaction Jholane Haber, MPA Project Proposal.
3/4/2016 University of Missouri - Columbia 1 Bethany\Harrison County, Missouri.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
Aging in Place in Newport Toward A Model Senior-Friendly Community In Newport County, Rhode Island Visiting Nurse Services of Newport and Bristol Counties.
Redmond Police Functional Plan Update Council Study Session January 14, 2014.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
2017 Crozet Community Survey: Findings Related to Master Plan
Presentation transcript:

Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 2 Authors Thomas M. Guterbock Director Anna MacIntosh Research Analyst Katherine Draughon Research Consultant

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 3 Survey Goals Determine residents’ opinions about quality of life in Albemarle County Assess residents’ satisfaction with County’s efforts to achieve its Strategic Planning goals Determine residents’ level of satisfaction with County services Measure opinion about the way in which the County is managing growth Measure change on key indicators

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 4 Survey Features N of 707 Margin of error +/- 3.7% Some questions comparable to 1994 and 2002 surveys Field Period: June 2004

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 5 More Features RDD (random digit dialing) Respondent selection within household Balanced cross-section of County population, with post-weighting of sample CATI (computer-assisted telephone interviewing) Solid interviewer training

6 Quality of Life in Albemarle

Quality of Life Rating “Rate Albemarle as a place to live”

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 8 On a 10-point Scale… The mean rating is 7.96 Seventy-one percent gave the county an “8” or better Sixteen percent gave the county a “10” Twelve percent rated the county “6” or lower

Quality of Life  Not significantly different from 1994 or 2002

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 10 High Ratings Come From… Women Those residents who have lived in Albemarle longer and older residents Homemakers, students, or retired residents Those residents with high incomes Homeowners and those who live in single family homes Those who reported themselves as living “out in the country” and those living in the rural areas in the southern & western parts of the County

11 Satisfaction with Efforts to Achieve Strategic Plan Goals

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 12 Questions drawn from County’s four strategic directions: providing high quality educational opportunities for Albemarle County citizens of all ages; protecting the County’s natural, scenic, and historic resources; enhancing the quality of life for all Albemarle County citizens; and providing effective and efficient County services to the public in a courteous and equitable manner.

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 13 Most satisfied with… Efforts to make the County a safe and healthy community (94%) Efforts to create learning opportunities for all ages (93%) Efforts to provide effective, responsive, and courteous service to customers (90.8%)

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 14 Least Satisfied with… Efforts to promote the development of affordable places to live (48.1%) Efforts to protect and preserve the County’s rural character (67.6%) Efforts to provide needed infrastructure (68.6%)... See page 18 of report for full list.

15 Views of Government Spending

What Should Albemarle Do About Taxes and Services?

Satisfaction With Value for Tax Dollar Percent satisfied: 80.4%

18 Satisfaction With Services

Overall Satisfaction with County Services Percent Satisfied: 90.6%

Overall Satisfaction  Not significantly different from 2002  Significantly greater than 1994

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 21 Of the 27 Satisfaction Items in the Survey… 22 had satisfaction levels of 60% or better 16 items had satisfaction levels of 75% or better

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 22 Satisfaction was highest for… Fire protection95.9% Library services95.0% Emergency rescue services94.3% Safety in business areas92.6% Police protection92.4%

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 23 Satisfaction was lowest for… Ease of getting around by public transportation45.8% Level of recycling services54.2% Safety for walkers and bicyclists 55.3% Efforts to manage growth56.4% Supporting adequate housing56.5%

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 24 Satisfaction with Quality of Education 85% in 2004 Not significantly different from % of those with children in schools were satisfied

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 25 In General… Residents were most satisfied with public safety items. Items related to growth management had lower satisfaction ratings.

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 26 Changes from 2002 No significant increases Significant decreases in 9 items

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 27 What Went Down… Efforts to manage growth Ease of getting around by car Ease of getting around by public transportation Efforts to protect natural resources and the environment Efforts to preserve open space Safety for walkers and bicyclists

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 28 And Also Down… Keeping citizens informed about programs and services Emergency rescue services Efforts to support adequate housing

29 Satisfaction with Contact with the County

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 30 Contact with County During the past 12 months, 45.7% of respondents contacted the County government Most frequently contacted departments were: Finance Police Building Code/Zoning Services

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 31 Satisfaction with Contact 81.5% were satisfied with the helpfulness of County employees 84.9% agreed that the length of time that they had to wait for service was within reason 83.5% were satisfied overall with their experience contacting the County.

32 Planning and Growth

Support for Development Areas Percent Favoring: 69.9%

Support for Development Areas

Support for Development Areas by type of Area

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 36 How Can we Attract People to Live in Urban Areas? We asked: “Please tell me how important each service is for attracting people to live in the urban areas rather than the rural areas within the County.”  Very important  Somewhat important  Not very important

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 37 How Can we Attract People to Live in Urban Areas? Most important: Public utilities Faster emergency response times A variety of housing types

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 38 How Can we Attract People to Live in Urban Areas? Least important: Having a mix of commercial, residential, and/or office uses Having bikeways Having neighborhood or corner stores Substantial variation by subgroup

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 39 Shopping Outside of County Almost half (46.5%) had traveled outside of Albemarle County for the primary purpose of shopping in the past month. Most Frequently Visited Destinations: Richmond Area Staunton/Waynesboro Northern Virginia Most Frequently Purchased Items: Clothing Groceries Housewares

40 Summary

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 41 The Survey Said… Residents are very satisfied with the quality of life in Albemarle County Ratings of most County services remain high There are some significant decreases from the 2002 survey, especially in growth-related service areas Residents are concerned about issues related to growth and development

Overall Satisfaction with County Services Percent Satisfied: 90.6%

Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004

Center for Survey Research University of Virginia Center for Survey Research University of Virginia 44 For further information please contact: Thomas M. Guterbock Director