 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Assessment System Fall Administrator’s Workshop August 1, 2013 Presenter: Rob Bauer
Advertisements

© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Taking a Look at Rigor.
Smarter Balanced Assessment a Closer Look Level 1 Part 6.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.
CCSS/SBAC Update Sara Shore 1. SBAC Pilot Test Feb 20- May 10 Volunteer window closes Jan BalancedPilothttps://
Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
Common Core Circles: Part I How to Choose a Task Developed by the CMC-S CaCCSSM Committee.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Welcome Dana Families! Dena Hause Dana Middle School Back to School Night September 25, 2014.
Leadership Academy NMC Hagerty Center August 22, 2012.
SMARTER Balanced update/information Tom Thompson and Jennell Ives Oregon Department of Education Common Core State Standards CTE Academic.
M-Step Math Prep Grades 3-5 February 25, 2015 KRISTI HINEMAN, TRISH DUNN, MARIANNE SROCK,
M-Step Math Prep Grades 3-5 March 3, 2015 KRISTI HINEMAN, TRISH DUNN, MARIANNE SROCK,
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Common Core State Standards: Overview of CCSS Mathematics CSU STEM Conference March 14, 2014 Ivan Cheng CSU Northridge.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
Welcome to Common Core State Standards (CCSS) overview please sign in.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
TESTING to the TEACHer Smarter Balanced and Evidence-Centered DesignMathematics Terri Sappington Coordinator, Office of Assessment and Accountability West.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
Collaborative Curriculum Groups
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
{ Allegan AAESA March 17, 18, 2014 Linda Jordan. Agenda WelcomeClosingShare What’s Working? Questions Updates Work Time 2.
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
September 5, 2013 Teresa Lightle, Butte County Office of Education CA Common Core State Standards for.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Implementing the CCSS 3 rd – 5 th Grade Kristin Frang, Mathematics Consultant.
Overview Criteria Item Examples.  Create a sense of “measured urgency” ◦ Timeline is not immediate, but close ◦ Urgency in you and your teachers ◦ Difference.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows SUE BLUESTEIN ESD112 REGIONAL MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Welcome to the SCMP 2 Grades 3-5 Fall Content Day.
The 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice in the Common Core State Standards Names Here Content Created by June Apaza and Vicki Kapust.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. 3 Day Goals Planning: Writing Assessment Items and Choosing a 3 Act Task Create a 3 Act Task.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
THREE COMPONENTS OF AN SBAC ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (ELA) PERFORMANCE TASK.
SBAC Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision.
SBAC Claims > Targets > CCSSm Standards Understanding the assessment scheme Module 3, 22 October 2015.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Smarter Balanced 103: Item Types and Instructional Implementation Rachel Aazzerah Science & Social Science Assessment Specialist
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
KLC Meeting Explore the two samples provided considering the following questions: What are some of the possible similarities you see in how you.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
MTSS District Coaches Network March 22, 2013 Lea McAllister Marianne Srock.
Performance Assessment: The Core of Competency Based Learning Rose ColbyIowa ASCDJune, 2014.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Smarter Balanced Scores & Reports. The new assessment, Smarter Balanced, replaces our previous statewide assessment, the New England Common Assessment.
Mathematics Curriculum Evaluation Toolkit Transitioning to the Common Core May 16, 2014 Pam Tyson & Hilary Dito.
CCSS & Smarter Balanced Mathematics: Key Shifts to Claims tinyurl.com/UPK5math University of Portland Brian Graham Camas School District TOSA M.Ed.
Update on State Assessment and CCSS Presentation to the West Hartford Parent Teacher Council.
Presentation transcript:

 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD Ken Marks, Tacoma Schools February 27-28, March 27-28, 2013

Welcome to the SBAC Item Writing Workshop Please…  Get some refreshments  Rate yourself on your knowledge of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics and the SMARTER/BALANCED assessment writing process using the sticky dots  Find a seat  Make a name tent  Introduce yourself to your table mates

Workshop Goals  Gain an understanding of the variety of SBAC task types.  Apply a process similar to one used by Smarter-Balanced Consortium to produce classroom-based formative assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards.  Develop knowledge and skills necessary to use formative assessment data to influence instructional change.  How would we use these?  What is the nature of student conversations around these items?  Participate in an online community sharing assessment items.

Today’s Goals  Identify similarities and differences between familiar item types and test structures and the SBAC assessment structure.  Understand and use the item development process and relevant guiding documents.  Understand CCSSM and Practices shifts  Write items for content coming soon in your classes  Analyze items for Depth of Knowledge

A pre-assessment  This assessment is designed to get you thinking about similarities and differences between assessments you are familiar with and the structure of the SMARTER/BALANCED Assessment Consortium (SBAC) assessments being developed

Analyzing the pre-assessment  Which item structures would you classify as ‘traditional’? What are the characteristics of these items?  Which items would you classify as ‘new’ or ‘non- traditional’? What characteristics make these items different from the others?

Evidence Centered Design- Assessment Claims in SBAC Assessment  Primary Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.  Primary Claim 2: Problem Solving Students can solve a range of well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem-solving strategies  Primary Claim 3: Communicating Reasoning Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.  Primary Claim 4: Modeling and Data Analysis Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.

Item Types in SBAC Assessment  Selected response-SR  Multiple choice  Extended multiple choice  Constructed response-CR  Extended response-ER (A CR item as part of a performance task)  Technology enhanced-TE  Performance task-PT

Item Codes in Intro Assessment Item 1: MAT.HS.SR.1.00FIF.K.082 Subject.GradeLevel.ItemType.Claim.ContentDomain.Target.ItemNu mber

Item Codes in Intro Assessment Item 1: MAT.HS.SR.1.00FIF.K.082 Item 2: Traditional Item 3: MAT.08.CR F.E.135 Item 4: MAT.08.TE.1.000EE.C.200_V1 Item 5: MAT.08.CR F.F.090 Item 6: Traditional Item 7: MAT.08.TE.2.000EE.A.145 Item 8: MAT.HS.ER.2.00SID.C.264 Item 9: MAT.08.ER.3.000EE.A.139_V1

Anton Jackson An overview of the SBAC Assessment System  The nature of the MSP/EOC & Smarter-Balanced Assessments  The life of an item  Key features of item writing to which classroom teachers should be attending

Test and Item Specifications Standards Item/Rubric Reviews Item/Rubric Development OSPI, WA Educators Contractor WA Bias/Sensitivity: OSPI, Contractor, WA Citizens * Content Reviews: OSPI, Contractor, WA Educators OSPI, WA Educators Expert Consultants Operational Item Bank Operational Range Finding Operational Scoring Reported Results Pilot Item WA Educators, OSPI, Contractor Scoring Contractor OSPI, Contractor WA Educators Pilot Item Range Finding Pilot Item Scoring Pilot Item and Data Reviews Item Development Process

Guided Item Writing for Claim 1  Standard and Learning Target  Assessment Claim  Depth of Knowledge  Difficulty level  Distractor selection

Analyzing Depth of Knowledge (DOK)  Level 1: Recall  Level 2: Skill/Concept  Level 3: Strategic Thinking  Level 4: Extended Thinking

Analyzing Depth of Knowledge (DOK)  Either individually or with your writing partner, analyze the depth of knowledge of the item(s) you’ve written so far. Cite evidence from the item and language from the DOK chart to support your conclusions.  Exchange items with an author (or author pair) and analyze each other’s items using the DOK chart.  Discuss your analyses and try to come to consensus.

Guided Item Writing for Claim 1  Standard and Learning Target  Assessment Claim  Depth of Knowledge  Difficulty level  Distractor selection

Evaluation and Looking Ahead Day 2 Overview  Write items for Claims 2 and 3  Writing rubrics for CR items  Intro to the Item Review Process-Bias and Sensitivity; Accessibility  Implementing your items, homework for next time

 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD Ken Marks, Tacoma Schools February 27-28, March 27-28, 2013

Welcome to the SBAC Item Writing Workshop-Day 2 Please…  Get some refreshments  Find a seat  Make a name tent  Introduce yourself to your table mates

Workshop Goals  Gain an understanding of the variety of SBAC task types.  Apply a process similar to one used by Smarter-Balanced Consortium to produce classroom-based formative assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards.  Develop knowledge and skills necessary to use formative assessment data to influence instructional change.  How would we use these?  What is the nature of student conversations around these items?  Participate in an online community sharing assessment items.

Today’s Goals  Write rubrics for Constructed Response items  Understand the Item Review process  Bias and Sensitivity  Accessibility issues  Write items for Claims 2 and 3  Select items to give to students between now and next session

Claim 2-Problem Solving  Sample items from the zip file docs  MAT.08.CR.2.000EE.A.133  MAT.HS.CR.2.OAREI.A.032

Claim 3-Communicating Reasoning  Sample items from the zip file docs  MAT.08.ER.3.000SP.B.134  MAT.HS.ER.3.OAAPR.F.045