Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
Washington Headquarters Services Executive Services Directorate Information Management Division OMB Collection Number Paperwork Reduction Act – DoD Public.
Changes to HIPAA (as they pertain to records management) Health Information Technology for Economic Clinical Health Act (HITECH) – federal regulation included.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
ADEQ Regulatory Process
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Suzanne Powers
The Public Information Act Rights and Responsibilities of a Governmental Body Local Government Seminar January 29, 2015 Presented by: Barry Gaines.
Compliance Application Notice Process Update and Discussion with NERC MRC.
Surface Transportation project delivery program
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
Understanding the Enforcement Process Environmental Trade Fair Colin Barth Region 11 Compliance Assistance Specialist. Small Business Local Government.
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Complaint Handling.
Steve Stich Director Safety and Inspection Standard 6 Breakout Session Compliance and Enforcement Program March 12, :00am – 12:00 pm Julie Loera.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
Collaboration Nation: Piloting EPA’s Small Local Governments Compliance Assistance Policy Ken Harmon, Attorney Office of Compliance U.S. Environmental.
Water Users’ Workshop – Session March 2007 Dixie Center – St. George, Utah Water Users’ Workshop – Session March 2007 Dixie Center – St.
Administrative Agencies Chapter 4. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Identify executive-branch agencies. Explain that administrative.
Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Audit Privilege Act
Contacted for Audit: What to Expect November 13, 2013 Presented by Tennessee Department of Revenue.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Steps in the Hazardous Waste Permit Reissuance Process December 10, 2014.
How to prepare for an Authorized Agent Compliance Review Ronald Hebert Water Section Manager Region 10/ Beaumont (409)
NERC Data Collection & Coordination. Rules of Procedure: Section 1600 Overview  NERC’s authority to issue a mandatory data request in the U.S. is contained.
State Program Review Process Presented by GSFC Compliance Team.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Southern California Training and.
Child & Adult Care Food Program Serious Deficiency Process & Provider Appeals.
Notices to Comply (NTC) and Notices of Violation (NOV) March 22, 2006 Peter Moore Yorke Engineering, LLC x24
CONSIDERATION OF STREAMLINED PROCESS FOR STIPULATED WASTE TIRE HAULER AND WASTE TIRE FACILTY ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY CASES CIWMB Board Meeting Agenda Item.
2015 Safety Action Plan & Regulatory Strategy California Public Utilities Commission January 29, 2015.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING Wednesday, September 13, 2006.
1 UST Stakeholders Meeting Compliance & Enforcement “C/E 101” MassDEP January 2012.
Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Pertaining to Enforcement of all M/NM Mines. New ombudsman within the Office.
THE REVIEW PROCESS. 2 OVERVIEW Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Request Departmental Review Review Process Documentation Conference Final Determination Other.
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
1 Overview of Proposed Changes to Rules for Import of LLRW By: Rod Baltzer, President November 9, 2011 Texas LLRW Disposal Compact Commissioners.
Employee Privacy at Risk? APPA Business & Financial Conference Austin, TX September 25, 2007 Scott Mix, CISSP Manager of Situation Awareness and Infrastructure.
Chapter 6: Administrative Agencies
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
ABSENTEE VOTING PROCEDURES FOR UNIFORMED AND OVERSEAS CITIZENS Election Commissioners’ Association of Mississippi Annual Meeting Presented by: Liz Bolin.
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
© 2005 Powell Goldstein LLP. All rights reserved. Practical Pointers for Using EPA’s Audit Policy Matthew Mattila
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Insight into the Government’s Perspective Consideration of Government Enforcement Factors Nancy Kaplan Of Counsel Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. Wellesley,
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
Washington State Collection Agency Board: Regulatory Process Grace Hamilton, Investigator Department of Licensing – Collection Agency Board Complaint Process.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
TCEQ Helps Compliance and Assistance Programs
Understanding the Enforcement Process.
ENFORCEMENT ISSUES IN STORMWATER REGULATION
Office of Compliance and Enforcement
Enforcement Overview James Gradney Enforcement Division
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Industrial and Hazardous Waste Easier, Better, Faster Permitting
Background (history, process to date) Status of CANs
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Introduction to OSHA.
Annual Enforcement Report Overview
Understanding the Enforcement Process.
Enforcement Division Overview
Presentation transcript:

Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015

OCE Mission Statement “The Office of Compliance and Enforcement is dedicated to protecting human health and the environment by ensuring compliance with state and federal regulations. The office seeks to promote voluntary compliance through a comprehensive program of regional inspections, technical assistance, environmental monitoring, training and outreach. When enforcement is necessary, however, the office will take swift action that is fair, sensible and responsive to the needs of the citizens of Texas.”

What does that mean? Swift Action –Case assignment to mail out – 60 days –Achieve settlement or refer to the Litigation Division – 60 days Fair, Sensible, and Responsive –Use of the Commission-approved Penalty Policies –Use the facts of the case and the applicable rules –Discuss the case with the Respondent

Percentage of Enforcement Action Referrals Received by Areas during Fiscal Year 2014

Expedited Enforcement Process Overview Within 14 days of assignment, Enforcement Action Referrals (EARs) are screened Enforcement documents are drafted and mailed within 60 days of assignment There are 60 days from after the proposed order is mailed to reach a settlement agreement If settlement is reached, the case is scheduled for Commission or Executive Director Agenda If settlement is not reached, the case is referred to the Litigation Division (LD)

Enforcement Process

Enforcement Screening The Enforcement Coordinator will: Verify the correct Respondent name and CN/RN associations Contact the Respondent for information regarding the Notice of Enforcement Validate the violations contained in the referral Discuss specific corrective actions (what has and what needs to be completed)

Types of Enforcement Actions Most enforcement actions will follow the expedited enforcement process Agreed Orders With a denial of liability Referred to as a The 74 th Texas Legislature passed SB 1660 regarding Agreed Orders in Includes a 20% deferral of the penalty Without a denial of liability (Findings) As defined by 30 Tex. Admin. Code §70.11 Does not include a 20% deferral

Enforcement Documents The Respondent will receive: Cover letter with contact information and Financial Inability to Pay and Supplemental Environmental Project information (if applicable) Agreed Order (1660 or Findings) Penalty Calculation Worksheet (PCW) Compliance History report EC will discuss the enforcement documents with the Respondent

Need Technical Assistance? TCEQ’s Small Business and Local Government Assistance Program (SBLGA) Provides Technical Assistance with understanding the rules and meeting requirements Can provide one-on-one help and resources

SBLGA Contact Info Hotline M-F 8:00am-5:00pm

Penalty Calculation Penalties are assessed in accordance with the Commission’s Penalty Policy Revision 2 Effective on September 1, 2002 Revision 3 Effective on September 1, 2011 Revision 4 Effective on April 1,

Penalty Calculation Factors that affect the penalty: Major or minor source Nature, gravity, and duration of violation Compliance history Culpability Compliance status Economic benefit Penalty Calculation Worksheet (PCW) – reflection of the Commission’s Penalty Policy

60 Day Settlement Period Discussions between the TCEQ and the Respondent include: Additional information that can impact the proposed order Penalty calculation Need for a settlement conference Ability or willingness to pay the penalty Interest in Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) Ability to comply with the technical requirements/ corrective actions and the applicable deadlines as written in the order Desire to settle the case and avoid litigation

60 Day Settlement Period Respondents are strongly encouraged to read and re-read the entire order. If the Respondent signs the order and pays the assessed penalty, then the Respondent is agreeing with the terms of the order. The Respondent is required to completely and timely fulfill the terms of the order. Additional enforcement actions including increased penalties may result if compliance is not achieved.

If We Have Achieved Settlement… Notice of the Agreed Order is published in the Texas Register for a 30 day public comment period Cases are scheduled for final approval –Commission agenda Final Assessed Penalties greater than $7,500 Agreed Orders without a denial of liability Special circumstances –Executive Director (ED) agenda All other cases are delegated to the ED for adoption

Commission Agenda The Respondent will be contacted before the scheduled Commission agenda: 19 days prior via letter By the EC to determine status of the technical requirements At Commission agenda, the orders will be presented in a group to the Commissioners. If the Respondent wishes to speak at Commission agenda, please arrive early at TCEQ and sign-in.

What happens after the order is approved? Effective date of the order is three days after the approved order is mailed to the Respondent Order Compliance Team will track open technical requirements (TRs) Financial Administration Division will monitor remaining payments If the penalty has been paid and TRs have been completed, then the Respondent will receive a compliance letter The order is effective for five years

If Settlement Has Not Been Reached… Case is referred to LD within 70 days after the initial settlement offer was mailed Assigned LD attorney drafts an Executive Director’s Preliminary Report and Petition If the Respondent does not respond, a Default Order is issued The Respondent may request an administrative hearing After the hearing, the State Office of Administrative Hearing judge presents a Proposal for Decision at Commission Agenda

Total Number of Administrative Orders Issued by Fiscal Year

Percent of Orders Issued by Media Type

Additional Types of Enforcement Actions Contested Cases –Referral to the Attorney General –Referral to the EPA –Criminal Prosecution –Emergency Orders

The Take Away Communicate with the assigned Enforcement Coordinator throughout the enforcement process and ask for help (512)

Questions? Melissa Cordell, P.G. (512)