Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Case Study 2 New York State Route 146 Corridor. This case study is about a Traffic Impact Assessment for a proposed site development in Clifton Park,
The role of volume-delay functions in forecast and evaluation of congestion charging schemes Application to Stockholm Leonid Engelson and Dirk van Amelsfort.
Corridor planning: a quick response strategy. Background NCHRP Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques (1978) Objective: provide tools.
SATURN and DIADEM Practical Experience Toni Dichev 31 st Oct 2008.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Lec 10, TD Part 3: ch5.4.2 & H/O, pp : Trip Distribution Trip distribution: why is it needed? The Fratar Method (read, not covered in class; get.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Challenge 2: Spatial Aggregation Level Multi-tier Modeling in Ohio Attempts to Balance Run Time and Forecast Granularity Gregory Giaimo, PE The Ohio Department.
TrendReader Standard 2 This generation of TrendReader Standard software utilizes the more familiar Windows format (“tree”) views of functions and file.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
April 2010 Scott Smith Volpe Center / RITA / U.S. DOT Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Boston, MA An Integrated Regional Planning / Microsimulation.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Bangkok September, Economic Integration 2 Bangkok September, 2012.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Challenges in Using Paramics in a Secondary Plan Study – Case Study of Downsview, Toronto Paramics Users Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Project Level Traffic Forecasting Summary of Practices from other States TNMUG March 6, 2008.
May, 07, The Corradino Group, Inc., 14th TRB Planning Applications Conference 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, Ohio 1 Developing.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Easy Breezy Beautiful DTA: Modeling of the Geary Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project Elizabeth Sall, Michalis.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
MnSGC Ballooning Team Techniques: APRS tracking-data processing James Flaten Summer 2010.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
TRB Planning Applications Conference May 2009, Houston,TX A Caveat on O-D Matrix Estimation/Adjustment: Deviations from a seed matrix and Simultaneous.
Semi-Automated Approach to Develop Focus Area Forecasts from a Statewide Model 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17-21,
Problem 6: Route 146 Arterial Study We’re going to look at 7 intersections simultaneously: the Shenendehowa Campus entrance, Moe Road, Maxwell Drive, Clifton.
Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Compatible with the latest browsers; Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Opera and Internet Explorer 9 and above.
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Provincial Models in Gauteng
Mesoscopic Modeling Approach for Performance Based Planning
Network Attributes Calculator
OptiSystem applications: BER analysis of BPSK with RS encoding
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program(ATTAP) MIDCAP & MUID
Maryland Unconventional Intersection Design Analysis Tool
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Michael Mahut, Michael Florian and Nicolas Tremblay INRO
Problem 3: Shenendehowa Campus
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented to the 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 9, 2007 By Gregory Giaimo, Ohio Department of Transportation

Motivation of Presentation Demonstrate Use of New Techniques to Improve TDF Model Results for Project Analysis Emphasis on a Careful and Methodical Implementation versus “Push Button”

Two Key Tools Explicit Intersection Delay Modeling Turn Movement Level Matrix Estimation

Background on the Mansfield Traffic and Parking Study Various one way street configurations downtown to be analyzed Need opening (2012) and design year volumes for the AM and PM peak hours Consultant has already set up and run a Synchro analysis using the base year counted volumes and the existing operational configuration Task: to create good forecast turn movement volumes on these alternatives for further Synchro operational analysis to produce a final alternative

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Network Lane Checking Turn lane configurations in the model were checked vs. Synchro. These were double checked vs. aerial photos and video log. Errors in network were corrected and full validation model rerun. Some errors in the Synchro data were found and were sent to the MPO

Check Count Consistency Turn counts were checked for consistency in a spreadsheet They were also aggregated to link level and plotted on the network Overall, the turn counts from adjacent intersections were reasonably consistent PM Peak Turn Volumes Aggregated to Links

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Updating Signal Operations Over-ride signal locations Signal phasing editor Updated signal timings and progression based on Synchro files Moral: assumed default signal operation parameters don’t work with operational level studies

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Rerun Base Year Model Save Paths

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Extract Sub Area Net and Trip Table Not always necessary but helpful in this case

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Fratar Cordon Volumes 24 Hour Link car/truck counts at cordon converted to period level directional values using full model assignment Original sub area trip table Fratared

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Check for Routing Problems Fratared trip tables assigned and assignments checked for path problems Some small speed adjustments corrected most problems Due to odd routing of SR 13 through CBD, SR 13 through trips were placed in their own volume group to force them on the SR 13 signed route (because a much shorter path down Main Street exists but counts indicate the through traffic largely remains on the signed route)

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Prepare Inputs for Matrix Estimation Car/Truck are compressed, turning movement counts were by class but truck volume was too low to bother with independently Extract trip ends Add confidence levels to data: –Trip table cell1 –Internal trip end10 –External trip end50 –Older turn count50 –New turn count75

Run Matrix Estimation Can accept various data items such as: –Link or turn counts –Trip ends –Seed trip table –Etc. All inputs require confidence levels –Relative values –Order of magnitude difference needed to see much impact Adjusts the trip matrix to fit the various weighted (through confidence levels) observed data with minimum error

Run Matrix Estimation (cont.) 2 Matrices required, trips and confidence level ASCII, zone, origins, destinations, O confidence, D confidence ASCII, screen number, from-through-to nodes, count, confidence level The information contained in the print file is extremely important and should be well understood by anyone wishing to use matrix estimation properly Need a path file from a previous assignment

Run Matrix Estimation Print File Here’s information on average confidence levels and amounts of data, very important for helping set confidence levels. This shows input matrix characteristics, the warning messages show counts that had no trips assigned in the prior assignment. This is important, a link or turn with no assignment before won’t get any in matrix estimation either. This shows that convergence occurred and the number of iterations. This shows how good each zones trip ends match. This shows how well each count was matched, notice that the counts match better than trip ends due to higher confidence.

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Check Forecast Variables Variables checked in spreadsheet and through plots Noticed large discrepancy between 2000 and 2005 due to changes in assumptions

Check Forecast Variables (cont.) In contrast the 2005 and 2030 variables are consistent and show growth in reasonable areas Since the forecast variables aren’t “official” it was decided to use these to derive growth factors for the base year

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Run Forecast Year Model Base Year Model with Forecast Variables New Scenarios added for forecast land use

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Fratar to Forecast Year Trip ends extracted from forecast year trip tables Fratar factors (not targets) calculated in spreadsheet Separate Origin and Destination factors (excerpt below is from the Origin factor computation)

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Code Alternative Networks Four alternatives –Alt. 1: Two way operation on Main and Diamond –Alt. 2: Two way operation on Main and Walnut –Alt. 3: Two way operation on Diamond, Main, Mulberry and Walnut –Alt. 4: As Alt. 3 plus two way operation on First and Second In addition to adding two way operation, lane configurations and signal operations updated appropriately

Code Alternative Networks (cont.) Nobuild (Existing) Alternative 1 TURNLANE annotated, LANES colored

Code Alternative Networks (cont.) Alternative 2 Alternative 3 TURNLANE annotated, LANES colored

Code Alternative Networks (cont.) Alternative 4 TURNLANE annotated, LANES colored

Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels Check network & count coding Turn counts and Synchro files from MPO Rerun base year model using revised network Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and PM periods Add detailed signal timing and progression Calculate Fratar targets at sub area cordon Run matrix estimation to create final base year demand volumes Forecast zonal variables from MPO Check variables, reformat and fix as necessary Create scenarios in full model for forecast years Extract sub areas for each period for each forecast year Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future Fratar base demand to future Code alternative networks Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening, design) to all networks Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV format Study Flow Chart Reassign, correct obvious path problems, reassign

Assign & Export to Synchro Save Turn Volumes to DBF Lookup tables of Synchro direction codes and intersection ID’s required in spreadsheet to convert Cube From- Thru-To node A pivot table in spreadsheet then easily converts turn movements to the tabular format required by Synchro

Impact of Adjustments on Volume

Impact of Adjustments on Volume (cont.)

Turn Volumes From Several Methods The obvious question: After all this effort what is the impact on the final results? Different turning movement volumes are obtained using the adjusted sub-area model vs. simply coding the network changes/variables into the original model as shown below What impact do these differences have?

Validated Regional ModelAdjusted Sub-area Model 2000 Alternative 1, PM Peak Assignment, Intersection of Diamond & Park Ave West 263 Left 389 Through 378 Right 236 Left 859 Through 353 Right

Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.) As expected the adjusted model matches counts better While the standard link based %RMSE of this model is 33%, the CBD turning movements have a substantially higher value of 73% for the validation year model

Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.) The regional model using junction based assignment performs marginally better than the regional model using equilibrium when compared to counts

Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.) However, more importantly, the sensitivity of traffic to the coded alternative is much closer to that obtained with the adjusted model

Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.) Changes resulting from the forecast year are much smaller than the model error (without adjustments) due to the low growth in the area

Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.) Changes resulting from the alternative are similar magnitude to the model error without adjustment Thus, the adjustment process and junction modeling is most likely needed to reasonably predict turning movement level outputs in an area highly regulated by traffic control devices such as the CBD

Comparison of Model LOS Original ModelFinal Sub Area Model How do these volume differences impact the decision making process? Different Volumes, Same Methods (Year 2000 No Build Shown)

Questions Please Use Microphone