IETF Bridge WG Transition to IEEE 802.1 WG Dave Harrington Dan Romascanu This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE nan Submission September 2008 Phil BeecherSlide SG-NAN closing report for Waikoloa, HI, Sept 2008 Date: 11-sept-2008.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0085r2 Submission January 2005 Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 TGu Closing Report Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0623r1 Submission May 2009 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 Proposal for P&P Change - # Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission March 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 What is a CA document? Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /094 Submission May 2000 David BagbySlide F IAPP RP Meeting Agenda (& Meeting Report) May 2000.
Doc.: IEEE /0008r2 Submission March 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 EC Summary of PAR Development Notice: This document has been prepared.
SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Overview Draft Version.
Doc.: IEEE 802 EC Submission July 2014 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Formalizing the Wireless Chair’s Meeting Date: xx Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1495r /0059r0 Submission Sep 2006 Denis Kuwahara, BoeingSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0989r /0045r1 Submission July 2006 Denis Kuwahara, BoeingSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /215 Submission July 2000 David Bagby, 3ComSlide F IAPP RP Meeting Agenda (& Meeting Report) July 2000.
Doc.: IEEE wng0 Submission November, 2013 Pat Kinney, Kinney ConsultingSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
1 PSAMP WG Status 61st IETF Washington November 12, 2004 Discussion: (in Body: subscribe)
Doc.: IEEE /372r0 Submission July 2001 Jim Lansford, Tim Blaney, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Tuesday.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-01/010r0 Submission November 2001 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group November Plenary.
IS-IS WG IETF-80 Prague Chris Hopps Dave Ward. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF.
Doc.: IEEE /250r2 Submission March 2004 Lily Yang, IETF CAPWAP Design Team EditorSlide WLAN Architectural Considerations for IETF CAPWAP.
2/16/2004Sergei Sadilov PH/SFT 1 Bonsai in Integration Testing of Geant4 This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create.
Russ Housley IETF Chair 23 July 2012 Introduction to the IETF Standards Process.
IETF-IEEE Relationship Status Report. Agenda Administrivia – Nose count and agenda bash – Approval of minutes from leadership meeting RFC 4441bis status.
Project Status Group B-4 This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these.
Project Status OOMeter: Measuring Coupling and Cohesion of OO Systems This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action.
IETF Bridge WG Transition to IEEE WG Dave Harrington Dan Romascanu This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create.
Ecuador National Executive Committee INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF VOLUNTEERS 2001 IN ECUADOR "NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE" This presentation will probably involve.
Status Report External Communication Task Group Eric Zimmerman Antwerp, BE, 12 May 2004 This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which.
Computer Science Program Center for Entrepreneurship and Information Technology, Louisiana Tech University This presentation will probably involve audience.
RUCUS BOF IETF-71 IETF Exploratory Groups Bernard Aboba Microsoft Corporation Laksminath Dondeti Qualcomm, Inc. March 10, 2008 Philadelphia, PA.
IAB Report Technical Plenary IETF 81 July 25, 2011.
Mid Term Report Integrated Framework, Visualization and Analysis of Platforms This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create.
SIRs, or AIRs, or something draft-carpenter-solution-sirs-01.txt Brian Carpenter without consulting my co-author Dave Crocker IETF 57, 07/03.
IETF #82 DRINKS WG Meeting Taipei, Taiwan Fri, Nov 18 th
© 2013 IBM Corporation OSLC WG Transition **DRAFT** Plan 8 April 2013 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Lifecycle integration inspired by the web.
Karl Marx The German Ideology A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy Prepared by: Erin Mustard Jackeline Hernandez This presentation will.
ATS Message Handling System (AMHS)/ System Wide Information Management (SWIM) Workshop and the Seventh Meeting of Aeronautical Telecommunication Network.
Evening High School Ms. Baisden Intro to Computers Intro to Word Processing Typing This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will.
The Design of MCM1 Cayci Suitt, Sal Ledezma, Jimar Garcia, Gene Wie ICS 125 – Ebert 15 May 2001 This presentation will probably involve audience discussion,
Manufacturer Reporting Update Matt McCarron, CIWMB This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items.
Doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/050r1 Submission March 2002 Carl R. Stevenson, Agere SystemsSlide 1 SEC Closing meeting March 2002 Agenda item 4.6 Reply Comments.
THE BOOK BANK MAKERERE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to.
Bridge WG Status Report David Harrington Dan Romascanu This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
Operations and Management Open Area Meetings IRTF-68 Prague, March 2007.
March 2005 Dorothy Stanley (Agere Systems) IEEE IETF Liaison Report March 2005 Dorothy Stanley – Agere Systems IEEE Liaison – IETF
Electronic Engineering Dept.1 Final Year Project - Progress Presentation Wifi Controlled Robotics Mark Heneghan This presentation will probably involve.
Project Status [Project Name] [Presenter Name] This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint.
LMAP WG IETF 92, Dallas, TX Dan Romascanu Jason Weil.
Doc.: IEEE /0518 Submission November 2003 Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Bond-Jini Interoperability Mathew Lowery
Continuous Random Variables
2018/7/ Smart Grid Activity Will be formed as Executive Committee Study Group Depending on how PAR is developed: Option 1: Form Technical Advisory.
2018/7/ /7/29 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4i May 2011 Closing report Date.
TRILL Working Group TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links
CAPWAP Working Group IETF 66 Montreal
WEBDAV Washington, DC IETF
Final Project Presentation
CAPWAP Working Group IETF 73 Minneapolis 18 Nov 2008, 17:10-18:10
واشوقاه إلى رمضان مرحباً رمضان
Presented by: Arlene N. Baratang
Continuous Random Variables
IETF68 Mini-BOF MIB-Doctor-Sponsored MIB Document Templates
IETF-IEEE Relationship RFC 4441 Summary
Dartmouth College Status Report
IEEE Rail Transit Vehicle Interface Standards Committee
Baseline Matching / Grading
Test Flow: Acceptance & defect criteria The First half RUP summary
IETF Liaison to IEEE Dallas - November 2006
Department of Information Technology (DoIT)
Project Design Document
Liaison Report Date: Author: July 2006 Month Year
Formalizing the Wireless Chair’s Meeting
Presenting Project Status
Presentation transcript:

IETF Bridge WG Transition to IEEE WG Dave Harrington Dan Romascanu This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during your presentation In Slide Show, click on the right mouse button Select Meeting Minder Select the Action Items tab Type in action items as they come up Click OK to dismiss this box This will automatically create an Action Item slide at the end of your presentation with your points entered.

Vision Statement Improve timeliness and effectiveness of standard MIB module development Distribute the editing/publishing work load Transition MIB module development to the content experts Improve cross-SDO standardization of management

Bridge/802.1 Transition Goals MIB modules edited by the editors MIB modules available when technology available experts consider device, network and service mgmt needs MIB modules developed by content experts Improve IETF/IEEE technology sharing

Todays Situation Bridge MIB modules years behind approved technologies 802.1s (2002) – no standard MIB module 802.1t (2001) – IETF in progress (2004) 802.1u (2001) – IETF in progress (2004) 802.1v (2001) – IETF in progress (2004) 802.1w (2001) – IETF in progress (2004) 802.1x (2001) – including MIB module (2001) 802.1AB (~2004) – including MIB module (~2004)

Todays Situation New work not being accepted in Bridge WG Waiting for existing work to be completed 802.1s MIB module and other MIB modules not being started on a timely basis in IETF; cannot complete on a timely basis

How Did We Get Here? Early 90s IETF NM experts write standard MIB modules Mid 90s Wide-spread deployment of MIB and SNMP for IP management IESG: protocol WGs should write own MIB modules IEEE: protocol-independent management objects Late 90s data/voice convergence Increased cross-SDO liaison activities

How Did We Get Here? Early 00s Dramatic increase in IETF standard MIB modules to manage non-IETF technologies Mid 00s SDOs for non-IETF technologies encouraged to write their own MIB modules IETF willing to help MIB module development via mib-review-guidelines, MIB design advice, MIB Doctor reviews, etc. O&M area working to clarify the nature and amount of help we can provide.

Available Options Bridge WG continues Pro - SNMP experts involved in designs Con - Unsatisfactory MIB module timeliness Con - Personnel must attend both IETF and IEEE to understand technology to do timely MIB modules WG takes on mibs Pro - IEEE process promotes completion Pro - Timely delivery of MIB modules Pro – Personnel only need attend IEEE meetings Pro - IETF assists with MIB module design advice, informal MIB Doctor reviews, etc.

Status Summary Transition has been discussed by IEEE and IETF leaders Transition is proceeding smoothly transition may take a year MIB editors must attend IEEE meetings MIB editors need to learn IEEE style, starting projects, voting rules, etc.

Progress Jan2004 – IEEE Interim Meeting Bernard Aboba (IAB/IEEE liaison), Bert Wijnen (IETF Area Director), Dave Harrington (Bridge EG co-chair), Dan Romascanu (Bridge and Hubmib co-chair) meet with IEEE 802 Executive Committee and 802.x chairs to discuss cross-SDO cooperation Agreement to appoint default liaisons in 802 and IETF Cross-organization review of new work Bridge MIB WG efforts will transition to (pilot) IETF MIB Doctors will provide review

Progress Technical Advisor and MIB Doctor advice accepted in WG will develop management controls, with SMIv2-compliant MIB module as an illustration IEEE MIB modules will be published in ASCII format, free of charge, at MIB Doctor reviews done for 802.1AB (drafts 9, 10, 11) and 802.1AE documents 802.1AB and 802.1AE documents updated to match IETF mib-review-guidelines (to a degree)

Progress New IEEE standards work will include the corresponding MIB modules Work on new MIB modules for existing IEEE standards, and IEEE updates of existing IETF MIB modules will require following IEEE PAR process 802.1s MIB module proposals and 5-criteria are now being considered for a PAR

Schedule Nov 04 Publish RFC1493 update, RFC2674 update, RSTP-MIB Early 05 Bridge WG documents to Proposed Standard IEEE publishes 802.1AB standard, with MIB module Late 05 IEEE publishes 802.1aa (802.1X update) with MIB module IEEE publishes 802.1AE standard, with MIB module IEEE publishes 802.1af standard, with MIB module