1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PORTFOLIO.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:
Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Examining the Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Community School District, /19/2015v. 2.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Examining the Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Community School District, /5/10v. 2.
Collaborative Data Teams
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
OAC Principals Collaborative Professional Learning Opportunities What can one teacher do? What can one administrator do? What can one school do? Fall Webinar.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Get Ready.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
CCRESA Rubric Presentation Jeni Corn, Malinda Faber, Friday Institute, NC State University.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Principals & Self Study Coordinators. School Improvement Concepts Collaboration Data –Collect –Analyze –Use!!! Questions What? So What? Now What?
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
District Accreditation
This presentation may be used with school boards, community groups, as well as with staff and parents.
Are we ready for the change?
Overview of the Intent of the Iowa Core Curriculum
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”

Outcome 1- Leadership System Capacity Learning to Change and Changing to Learn- youtube.com Michael Fullan- Change Leader p36 start p39 response sheet Give check to Deb $60 Renewal $155- Drake Credit

Unveiling of the Outcomes p4 Outcomes are listed with “if, then” statements that describe the “theory of action” of how these outcomes will accomplish the intended results. Leadership, Community, and School Outcome 1: School leaders build and sustain system capacity to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum. Outcome 2: Community members and other supporting agencies work together to support the implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum. Outcome 3: A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and learning is used at the district and school level.

A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum is… The Six Outcomes

5 Outcomes Community: Support Implementation Professional Development Leadership: System Capacity Leadership - Community - Schools 1. Leadership: System Capacity 2. Community: Support Implementation 3. Schools: Continuous Improvement Schools: Continuous Improvement

The Core Curriculum Provides… Content Instruction Assessment Comprehensive picture of effective curriculum that addresses:

7 Outcomes Content - Instruction – Assessment 4.Alignment of Content, Instruction and Assessment 5.Professional Development to improve Content, Instruction, and Assessment 6.Instruction: Effective Practices in Instruction/Assessment Student Engagement Community Professional Development AlignmentInstruction

Implementation Protocol 6 Outcomes Target & Actions 8 Self Study Rubric Outcome 1 Outcome 2 Outcome 3 Outcome 4 (fall) Outcome 5 Outcome 6 (fall Action Plan - Action steps -Resources -Timeline

Iowa Core Curriculum Implementation Plan Worksheet District: Contact: Start Date: Update: Outcome(s) Targets /Actions to Reach Desired State Activities/Resources to Accomplish Targets/Actions Evidence of Progress Timelines (Use 1 row per each Target/Action.)

THE PROCESS 10

DATA RECORDER NEEDED Yellow sheets for leadership team use. White sheets turn into Deb for AEA use. Select one person from your leadership team

Let’s get started... Individually Star key words in outcomes and put question mark the concepts that seem confusing-p47 Team With your leadership team fill out main idea and current evidence in school district. Iowa Core Curriculum Outcomes - P49 Note page 51-summary of Implementation plan requirements 12

13 Leadership: System Capacity IF leadership actions are focused and committed to providing the expertise, guidance, and resources needed to build capacity and support teaching and learning, THEN the implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum will result in increased student learning and performance. Outcome 1

14 Leaders Teachers Administrators School Board

15 Leadership: System Capacity Target Implementation of leadership behaviors to sustain the Iowa Core Curriculum. Actions Establish a leadership team Clearly communicate a vision of ICC Manage the change process Demonstrate a deep understanding of the Core Establish a collaborative process Deploy needed resources Establish ways to sustain the implementation Model best practice of adult learning Develop the Implementation Plan Engage in discussion with local school board

Things always aren’t always the way we perceive them:

Purpose and use Baseline for each of the six stated outcomes Progress monitoring of implementation Prioritization of need for action planning State evaluation of Iowa Core Curriculum roll out and implementation

future directions Future Directions –Paper document now – online by 2010 –Working to embed into CSIP

Process of completion of the self study and related forms –Take this process back to complete with Full District Leadership Team – coordinate with AEA Iowa Core Curriculum Network Lead

Step 1- Identify: Self Study Respondents Representative group Persons on your Iowa Core Curriculum district leadership team Persons with knowledge of your district’s structures, policies and procedures Handouts needed: Outcome Guidance, Self Scoring Rubric, Consensus Rating Form, Feedback Form

Step 2 - Present: Scoring Rubric Description of Action Levels of Practice Possible Sources of Documentation Activity Time: 5-10 minutes Represents the desired final result Represents actions to get to final outcomes

Step 3 - Review: Self Study Reading Step 4 – Discuss: Q and A Each member receives copy of Outcome Guidance and Group question and answer Activity Time: minutes for all of Outcome 1; minutes for all other Outcomes

It’s about the process!!!

Step 5 - Rate: Individual Rating Each member rates each action on Scoring Rubric Activity Time: 20 minutes for all of Outcome 1; 10 minutes for all other Outcomes

Step 6 - Vote: Consensus Rating Fist-to-Four process – Round 2 All persons vote again on this action. –“Modal Number” on this vote becomes group’s answer for this item on the consensus rating Record this answer on the Consensus Rating form. If consensus not reached, further discussion and further votes till “Modal Number” emerges Continue voting process through actions 2 through 10

Step 7 - Prioritize: Identify Top Areas For Action Planning Have a conversation among your team Identify top 2 or 3 areas that would be priorities for initial action planning within this outcome Identify initial ideas about possible actions steps for each priority Activity Time: minutes

Step 8 - Record: Record ratings, priorities and initial ideas on Consensus Rating form Activity Time: 10 minutes

Step 9 – Submit: Forms to AEA 13 Network Lead Send a copy of your completed Consensus Rating form and Feedback form to: Deb Johnsen Harlan Regional Office Van Route #2 or Fax