ECMP for 802.1Qxx Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria Version 2 16 people from ECMP ad-hoc committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experiences with IEEE 802.1ah (Provider Backbone Bridges) Ronald van der Pol SARA Sep 2009NORDUnet meeting, Copenhagen.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /661r1 Submission November 2002 Ziv Belsky, WavionSlide 1 Proposal for the 5 criteria for the HT SG.
Doc.: IEEE /661r0 Submission November 2002 Ziv Belsky, WavionSlide 1 Proposal for the 5 criteria for the HT SG.
PAR for Media Converters r2IEEE interim, October, PAR for Media Converters revision 2 Norman Finn Cisco Systems.
802.1H Kevin Nolish Michael Wright H Project The reason for the update of 802.1H is, primarily, mandated reaffirmation of the standard. As part.
DRNI – Intra-DAS Link Version 01 Stephen Haddock July 20,
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum MEF 17 Service OAM Framework and Requirements February 2008.
Shortest Path Bridging IEEE 802
Extended Service Set (ESS) Mesh Network Daniela Maniezzo.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r2 Submission July 2011 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide Response to Comments received on the proposed a PAR and 5C Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE Comment #1 from WG Comment: In Section 5.2.b two examples of spectrum resource measurements are given: PER and.
802.1ag - Connectivity Fault Management Tutorial – Part 1 Dinesh Mohan July 12, 2004.
CSD for P802.1AS-REV WG Wednesday, 05 November 2014.
IEEE 802.1ABrev Extension for Auto Attach Nigel Bragg Dan Romascanu Paul Unbehagen.
Bridging. Bridge Functions To extend size of LANs either geographically or in terms number of users. − Protocols that include collisions can be performed.
Oct 12, 2004CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 Virtual LANs Network Protocols and Standards Autumn
21-08-xxxx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: mrpm Title: Comments on PAR/5C of MRPM SG Date Submitted: September 7, 2008.
IEEE Qbv DRAFT 5C’s for Time Aware Shaper enhancement to 802.1Q
Business Data Communications Chapter Six Backbone and Metropolitan Area Network Fundamentals.
Jan 10, 2008CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 Virtual LANs Network Protocols and Standards Winter
1 Computer Networks LAN Bridges and Switches. 2 Where are we?
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 2: LAN Redundancy Scaling Networks.
LAN Overview (part 2) CSE 3213 Fall April 2017.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 2: LAN Redundancy Scaling Networks.
TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) March 11 th 2010 David Bond University of New Hampshire: InterOperability.
Doc.: IEEE /0981r1 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations September 6, 2004 Tricci So & W. Steven Conner.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference.
Proposal for device identification PAR. Scope Unique per-device identifiers (DevID) Method or methods for authenticating that device is bound to that.
Technical Policy and Standards Andy Gorton – Senior Architect: Institutional Networks.
IEEE SCC41 PARs Dr. Rashid A. Saeed. 2 SCC41 Standards Project Acceptance Criteria 1. Broad market application  Each SCC41 (P1900 series) standard shall.
PAR and CSD for P802.1Qxx WG January PAR (1) 1.1 Project Number: P802.1Qxx 1.2 Type of Document: Standard 1.3 Life Cycle: Full Use 2.1 Title:
Standardization of Mobile Wireless Small Cell Backhaul (SCB) Document Number: IEEE r Date Submitted: Source: Junhyeong.
Doc.: IEEE /0498r0 Submission April 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Modifications to the 60GHz PAR & 5 C’s Proposal Date:
Page 1 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Items required by the IEEE 802 CSD are shown in Black text, supplementary items required by.
15.1 Chapter 15 Connecting LANs, Backbone Networks, and Virtual LANs Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or.
CSD for P802.1Qcj WG January Project process requirements Managed objects – Describe the plan for developing a definition of managed objects.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
1 Recommendations Now that 40 GbE has been adopted as part of the 802.3ba Task Force, there is a need to consider inter-switch links applications at 40.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0319r0 Submission March 2004 W. Steven Conner, Intel Corporation Slide 1 Architectural Considerations and Requirements for ESS.
1 6/3/2003 IEEE Link Security Study Group, June 2003, Ottawa, Canada Secure Frame Format PAR: 5 Criteria.
Doc.: IEEE /0981r0 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations August 30, 2004 Tricci So.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference Architecture Considerations.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
1 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Fast Recovery for Chains and Rings Proposal for PAR and 5.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /0860r0 Submission July 2010 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 Comments for p New PAR – July 2010 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE ulp Submission Slide 1 May 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
IEEE Std Proposed Revision Purpose, Scope & 5 Criteria.
Contents of this presentation ● PAR material (Title, Scope, Purpose) ● Material as developed at previous meetings ● Provision for new/revised material.
Contents of this presentation ● PAR material (Title, Scope, Purpose) ● Material as developed at previous meetings ● Provision for new/revised material.
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR&5C's proposal
IEEE P criteria responses
Comments on HT PAR & 5 Criteria
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Congestion Management Study Group
Lecture#10: LAN Redundancy
Chapter 16 Connecting LANs, Backbone Networks, and Virtual LANs
NTHU CS5421 Cloud Computing
IEEE SCC41 PARs Date: Authors: August 2009 August 2009
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
<month year> Denver, March 2006
Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR&5C's proposal
Jan Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PAR and CSD document discussion] Date Submitted:
900 MHz ISM Band Date: Authors: January 2010 Month Year
<month year> Denver, March 2006
comments on Pending 802 PARs – July 2011
Comments for p New PAR – July 2010
Submission Title: BAN closing report for San Diego, CA
Presentation transcript:

ECMP for 802.1Qxx Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria Version 2 16 people from ECMP ad-hoc committee

Project Authorization Request

Title PAR for an amendment to existing Standard 802.1Q-2011 P802.1Qxx IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-- -Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks : Amendment: Equal Cost Multiple Paths (ECMP)

Scope This standard specifies protocols, procedures and managed objects to support utilizing multiple possible next hop choices for frames within a single service in SPBM networks. This is accomplished by applying one of a set of standard functions per frame at ingress and using the result as an input to all subsequent choices among multiple next hops as the frame transits the SPBM network. These functions are selected to ensure that frames belonging to the same data flow take the same path. It is anticipated that a new Tag will be defined possibly including a Time to Live (TTL) field. The standard will ensure that Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) can be used to proactively monitor and diagnose the paths that data takes through the network.

Dependencies This standard is dependent on the completion of 802.1aq.

Purpose.1Qxx provides the additional capability to use many more equal cost paths than 802.1aqs current ECT mechanism due to improved scaling properties with respect to network diameter..1Qxx would be used in conjunction with an 802.1aq based control plane and would use specific B-VIDs and new ECT-ALGORITHMs as defined by 802.1aq..1Qxx may include multipath function information and may use TTL loop mitigation. Corresponding new EtherTypes would identify the new Tag formats. It is expected that both the current 802.1aq ECT and 802.1Qxx ECMP would be used at the same time in the same network (for different traffic/service categories) but differentiated by B-VID Qxx enhances Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) to monitor and diagnose the richer connectivity of.1Qxx.

Need As diameter and number of adjacencies grow the number of paths increases exponentially. In such richly connected networks ECMP in addition to ECT allows for better utilization in proportion to the state required. TTL augments loop mitigation in the face of hardware, software and design failures. An augmented SPBM with this capability addresses urgent customer requests to meet the above needs with a single protocol, a single data path and a unified OA&M suite.

Stakeholders Vendors, users, administrators, designers, customers, and owners of Provider Backbone Bridged Networks, Carrier Ethernet Networks or next generation data centers.

Other Standards with a Similar Scope There are no IEEE standards solving this problem. There are other standards (TRILL, VPLS) that cover parts of the problem encompassed by 802.1Qxx but the scope of this standard is more complete than any of them.

Other Questions no

Five Criteria

Broad Market Potential –Broad sets of applicability. The commercial provision of Ethernet services across a Data Center, metropolitan or larger networks is large and growing business. Provider Backbone Networks are a significant part of this market and a required component of the evolving Data Center Qxx enables even greater use of these richer topologies. –Multiple vendors and numerous users. This work is being proposed by a number of major vendors representing the majority of current users in the market. –Balanced costs (LAN versus attached stations). This project does not materially alter the existing cost structure of bridged networks. Attached stations would not be aware of the operations by transit bridges.

Compatibility –IEEE 802 defines a family of standards. All standards shall be in conformance with the IEEE Architecture, Management and Inter- working documents as follows: 802- Overview and Architecture, 802.1D, 802.1Q and parts of 802.1f. If any variances in conformance emerge, they shall be thoroughly disclosed and reviewed with Qxx would use the 802.1aq SBPM ECT-Algorithm framework for forwarding compatibility. This guarantees that 802.1Qxx bridges can be added to a network of 802.1aq bridges to increment the network functionality. –Each standard in the IEEE 802 family of standards shall include a definition of managed objects that are compatible with systems management standards. Such a definition will be included..

Distinct Identity –Substantially different from other IEEE 802 standards. This is an amendment to 802.1Q the only standard for VLAN aware bridges. –One unique solution per problem (not two solutions to a problem). There is currently no general on-data-path solution for ECMP forwarded frames. –Easy for the document reader to select the relevant specification. This project will amend only the IEEE 802 standard defining VLAN aware bridges.

Technical Feasibility –Demonstrated system feasibility. Hash based ECMP is widely deployed in IP networks and is well understood. The main issue is one of OA&M and we will standardize Ethernet solutions to OA&M issues raised by this new behavior. –Proven technology, reasonable testing. The main concepts are well proven. No unproven test technologies are required. –Confidence in reliability. ECMP has wide spread use today with known acceptable reliability. –Coexistence of 802 wireless standards specifying devices for unlicensed operation. Not applicable

Economic Feasibility –Known cost factors, reliable data. Minimally this will require either a software upgrade to NPU based Ethernet switches, or in the case of ASIC based devices a new B- VID behavior that mirrors existing 802.1ah with the exception of a hash based choice of possible next hops. There would therefore be a cost upgrade for ASIC based switches. –Reasonable cost for performance. The required hardware and software changes are a fraction of the cost of a typical network and provide commensurate additional capabilities. –Consideration of installation costs. This functionality can be incrementally introduced thus minimizing installation costs.