Boston Family Child Care Study Boston CPC Family Child Care Committee September 18, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2010 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child and Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Advertisements

Invest in Children Child Care Quality Fund: Accreditation and Literacy
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Overview of revised standards and initial pilot design.
1 Inclusive Classrooms and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding April 2, 2012.
1 Increasing Access to Higher Education for Early Educators with Limited English Proficiency.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.
The Massachusetts Child Care Quality Cost Model Anne MitchellAndrew Brodsky Presentation to the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care September.
Created in programs Based on recommendations from Advisory Committee on Services for Families with Infants and Toddlers in September 1994.
Stanislaus County CARES Plus Information Session.
Teachers’ views of the challenges and solutions of their work: including children identified as at-risk and disabled Sallee Beneke University of Illinois.
Massachusetts Early Care and Education and School Readiness Study
A training on how scoring works and ways to easily increase scores
Early Success A framework to ensure that ALL children and families in the District of Columbia are thriving... CHILDREN & FAMILIES Community Supports Education.
EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn QUALITY CONNECTIONS Presentation at the Board Meeting August 31,
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
Massachusetts Capacity Study Research Team: Nancy L. Marshall, Ed.D. Wendy Wagner Robeson, Ed.D. Julie Dennehy, M.M. Betsy Starr, M.Ed. Funded by: The.
Family Child Care Quality: Implications for Children with Disabilities Michael Gamel-McCormick Center for Disabilities Studies University of Delaware Annual.
Child Care: Lessons from the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project January 2003.
+ Utah CHILD CARE LICENSING STANDARDS DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS Minimum age for a director is 21 years of age. Associates, Bachelor’s or Graduate.
NAEYC- Early Childhood Program Standards
Components of Quality Program Assessment Tools.  “Inclusion has legal status in legislation mandating educational services for all children with disabilities.
Results of Pennsylvania’s early learning programs,
Chelmer Station Community Kindergarten Selection Criteria - Assistant Teacher’s position - - Assistant Teacher’s position -
The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Preschool Classrooms 2014 NJ Division of Early Childhood Education.
Copyright 2006 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Caring for School-Age Children Chapter 16 Quality and Standards.
1 EEC Board Meeting June 11, 2013 Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Review of Standards Removal Board Vote Feb 12, 2013.
EQUIP is a public & private initiative to improve the quality of early care and education in Oregon. August, 2010 EQUIP is a public & private initiative.
1 QUALITYstarsNY Field Test Community Information Session 2010 WELCOME!
Family Child Care Home Accreditation Presented By: Jill Norris Child Care Resource & Referral at Western Kentucky University.
Early Childhood Education The Research Evidence Deborah Lowe Vandell December 11, 2003.
Early Childhood Trends and Issues Prepared for the April 20, 2013 GAYC Board Meeting.
0 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Program Overview May 2010.
Washington Student Achievement Council Early learning /Higher Education Panel Bette Hyde, Director March 26, 2013.
Other Webcasts to View Why Wellness? An Overview of the Child Obesity Epidemic and Prevention Strategies in.
A Guide to NAEYC Accreditation
TOGETHER WE’RE BETTER Collaborative Approaches to Including Children With and Without Disabilities Camille Catlett & Jennie CoutureNovember 9, 2012.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
Kelly Maxwell, Ph.D. Senior Scientist and Associate Director Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute TQRIS 2012 Inclusion.
Millie Cortes Capstone Project Master of Public Administration University of Alaska Anchorage April 16, 2011.
Standards, Assessment and Accountability: Administration of Environmental Rating Scales by EEC Regional Staff Board of Early Education and Care December.
Management Improvement Plan. The Nationally Accredited team at East Wayne Head Start focuses on improving families by putting families first through a.
Circassian Benevolent Association WAYNE, NEW JERSEY Day Care Center.
1 The Community Resources for Children Report A Preliminary Report UEY Red Deer Preliminary Results Research Forum: December 1, 2009 Laurie Lafortune.
FY14 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Grant Board of Early Education and Care: Discussion Tuesday, April 9,
1 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Program Overview and Update May 2008.
Creating a jigsaw for early learning: developing high quality teaching and learning programs for K-3 classrooms Jean Rice September 2008.
Early Childhood Permanent Subcommittee November 26, 2012 Division of Child Care and Early Childhood Education
1 Report for Early Learning Council Presentation to WERA December 5, 2008 Access to High Quality Early Learning for Washington’s Young Children “Forging.
New England Cost & Quality Studies Nancy L. Marshall, Wendy Wagner Robeson, Joanne Roberts, Cindy Creps & Nancy R. Burstein With Frederic B. Glantz, Betsy.
0 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) UPK Alignment with QRIS May 2011.
 Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminars ECERS-R Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale – Revised Edition.
Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Phase-In Planning and FY08 Expansion EEC Board Meeting Tuesday, October 9, 2007.
Understanding Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care Programs in Massachusetts Findings from the Preschool Program Quality Study and Highlights.
1 Child Development Associate (CDA) Scholarship FY2009 Program Expansion Board of Early Education and Care September 9, 2008.
Aligning the Goals of Preschool and K-12 Dr. Susan Tave Zelman Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction National Governor’s Association Governors Forum.
1 Early Education and Care Advisory Council September 20, 2013 Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) UPDATES.
Copyright © 2014 California Department of Education – All rights reserved Desired Results 1 Session V: Environment Rating Scales.
Caring Communities for Young Children Tonya Russell Division of Child Care and Early Childhood Education/AR DHS March
 This kind of thinking based on a lack of knowledge about the process of working with adults and about the needs of young children  Supervisors in early.
Enhancing Physical Activity in Early Care and Education Settings through PSE Michele Buran, MA CSU, Chico Center for Nutrition & Activity Promotion
Massachusetts Universal Pre- Kindergarten Program Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Pilot Initiative Alyssa Rulf Fountain Barbara Goodson September.
Selecting & Evaluating Quality Child Care Presented by.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
Cost & Quality in Massachusetts What is the quality What is the cost? What is the relationship of quality to cost Full-day, year round programs in 2000.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
Middletown School Readiness Shaping our children’s school success!
Creative Center for Children is proud to be accredited by the
Dr. Amber Reed, School of Educational Leadership
In 2010, 10,208,400 children and youth called Canada home
Presentation transcript:

Boston Family Child Care Study Boston CPC Family Child Care Committee September 18, 2007

Motivation for the Studies Present a comprehensive picture of the quality of Boston’s family child care and center-based programs to inform strategic planning To provide a baseline within Boston Public Schools for improvement efforts Hired the same research team – led by Nancy Marshall at the Wellesley Centers for Women

Overview of the Scope & Methodology Scope of the Study  Visited 52 Family Child Care Homes  Homes were randomly selected Areas of Assessment:  Space & Furnishings  Basic Care  Language-Reasoning  Learning Activities  Social Development  Adult Needs Methodology  FDCRS  Provider Interviews  Family Survey “Boston Quality Inventory: Family Child Care Homes” Nancy Marshall, Joanne Roberts Wellesley Centers for Women July 2007 Boston Public Schools K1 and K2 Programs, Needs Assessment: - BPS Study: Visited 43 K1 and 85 K2 classrooms in 68 schools Boston Quality Inventory - PreK and Infant/Toddler Classrooms: - Community PreK: Visited 81 center-based PreK classrooms and XX infant and toddler classrooms - Measures: ECERS-R, SELA, CLASS, Teacher Survey, Director/Principal Interview, Family Survey

Research has proven what closes the achievement gap RESEARCH NIEER UPK Study by Frank Porter Graham Nancy Marshall ECERS National Longitudinal Study Higher quality (as demonstrated as a 5/good on the FDCRS/ECERS) closes the achievement gap

Do we as a city want to bring all programs to a 5 / “Good”? Opportunities: Close the achievement gap Strengthen access for all families to high quality ECE Challenges: Costly Requires new resources and opportunities for professional development Need solutions for how to raise reimbursements/comp -ensation

Summary of Findings: Family Child Care Homes “Closes the Achievement Gap”

How can we ensure every child has access to a high quality early care and education experience?

Recommendation: Bring all family child care homes up the NAFCC Quality Standards. Support NAFCC accreditation –Only 16% of BQI-FCC were accredited or in process; most had no plans to become accredited. Efforts to raise the quality of FCC should include support for NAFCC accreditation Support further education for family child care providers –Research supports the importance of provider qualifications –In the BQI, 17% of providers had a BA degree or more –In the BQI, providers with a CDA, some college, or a college degree were more likely to meet the Good benchmarks on the total FDCRS (23% compared to 9%).

Recommendation: Provide additional professional development. Physical Activity Infant and Toddler Care Developmental Learning Activities Television Use Hand-washing and health

Recommendation: Improve the safety of playgrounds 1 in 5 FCC homes did not have a safe outdoor or indoor space for active physical play such as tricycle riding, ball playing or climbing. Many programs rely on public playgrounds, which often lacked adequate fencing or well-maintained equipment, or required young children to walk along busy streets

Recommendation: Provide all family child care homes with the furnishings and materials needed to provide a high quality early childhood care and education FCC Homes need: –Furniture –Physical play materials –Eye-hand materials –Dramatic play materials

Additional Recommendation: Include family child care homes in plans for early care and education for Boston’s children. Close relationship between the provider and child High Levels of Family Involvement Staff Diversity Reflective of Children Served Full-day, Full-year Programming to Meet the Needs of Working Families Access to comprehensive services

Children are in all settings We need common efforts for all programs to reach all children The question is not what to do but how to do it?

These are the common ways we can improve quality across all ECE settings in Boston: Support accreditation Support further education Provide materials and supplies Improve the safety of public playgrounds Provide additional professional development opportunities

For more information and full copies of the reports: Corey Zimmerman x