Doc.: IEEE 802.18-04-0004-00-000 Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies This Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
$ Network Support for Wireless Connectivity in the TV Bands Victor Bahl Ranveer Chandra Thomas Moscibroda Srihari Narlanka Yunnan Wu Yuan.
Advertisements

ESTeem RF Design Tools SECTION 4 - RF System Design.
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### Design Issues for Wireless Networks Across Diverse and Fragmented Spectrum Collaborators: Bell Labs India:
Bluetooth / IEEE Coexistence Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
Sg-whitespace-09/0019r0 Submission January 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Impact of FCC R&O on IEEE 802 Date: Authors: Notice: This.
A Brief Introduction to the IEEE802.11h Draft
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission July 2009 Ari Ahtiainen, NokiaSlide 1 A Cooperation Mechanism for Coexistence between Secondary User Networks on.
Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission January 2006 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide 1 TV bands White Spaces and DTV receiver RF front-end performance and protection.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2003 Andy Gowans (UK RA) UK Ultra Wide Band (UWB) Compatibility Study Andy Gowans & Bharat Dudhia UK.
Submission Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d1 Andrew Myles, Cisco Systems Report of ad hoc group relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal Andrew.
Amer Hassan, Jan Kruys, Jim Raab, Stefan MangoldSlide 1Submission May 2004doc.: IEEE Spectrum Etiquette Rules for Shared and Unlicensed.
Cognitive Radio: Opportunities and Challenges Dr Ying-Chang Liang Senior Scientist & Project Manager Institute for Infocomm Research (I 2 R) Singapore.
Regional Information Meeting and Workshop related to the RRC-06 for the administrations of the Arab countries Damascus, Syria August 2005 Planning.
RRC 04/05 ITU Information meeting September Computer methods for planning Ken Hunt Rapporteur for Chapter 10.
FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE and UAS (22 September 2010)
Computers Are Your Future © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Faculty of Computer Science & Engineering
Interference Analysis of TV-Band Whitespace
© 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. UHF TV White Space --A New Challenge.
July 2011doc.: IEEE tv SubmissionSoo-Young Chang, CSUS Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
BFWAtg(00)30 Co-existence of MP- MP and PMP Systems Philip Whitehead Radiant Networks PLC.
Propagation Requirements for Broadband Fixed Wireless Access Dr M.J. Willis Radio Communications Research Unit Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Technical discussion on Re-channelization Proposal for DSRC band coexistence Date:
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr TGs – Outdoor Mesh RF Impacts Considerations July 2004 Tricci So, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Outdoor Mesh.
Doc.: IEEE /1062r2 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
tv Mi-Kyung Oh etc., ETRI Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TV White Space.
Doc.: IEEE /1421r1 Submission November 2012 Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1 TGaf Response to CA Comments Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1421r0 Submission November 2012 Rich Kennedy, Research In MotionSlide 1 TGaf Response to CA Comments Date: Authors:
RF Fundamentals Lecture 3.
FCC Actions To Support Development of WISPS Julius P. Knapp Deputy Chief Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission.
Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong EE3900 Computer Networks Data Transmission Slide 1 Continuous & Discrete Signals.
Advanced Topics in Next- Generation Wireless Networks Qian Zhang Department of Computer Science HKUST Wireless Radio.
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
RF Considerations for wireless communications Jose Antonio Echenique.
Wi-fi Range. Topics Discussed When we say range or coverage, what do we mean? What factors can affect range? Why are there so many different designs of.
NSMA Conference Interference Temperature Round Table May 18, 2004 Les Wilding Cingular Wireless 5565 Glenridge Connector Atlanta, GA
Link Budget Calculation
Doc: CRpNL-10/0012d0 Summary of White Space ruling in the USA Vic Hayes, TUDelft 06-Oct-10Submission by Vic Hayes, TUDelft1.
SSC Page 1 Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies Presentation to FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radios May 19, 2003 Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:
Wireless: Facts and Fiction Benjamin Friedlander Department of Electrical Engineering University of California at Santa Cruz Wireless Communications and.
© 2009, Shared Spectrum Company National Broadband Plan Staff Workshop Technology: Wireless Broadband Panel 2: Rural Broadband Thursday, August 13, 2009.
Signal Propagation Propagation: How the Signal are spreading from the receiver to sender. Transmitted to the Receiver in the spherical shape. sender When.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 1999 Jim Zyren, Intersil Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
A Survey of Spectrum Sensing Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Applications YaGun Wu netlab.
24/03/2003Jacques MdM / REF France1 HF Receivers desensitisation from wideband noise spurious in HF bands (1.8 to 30 MHZ) Impact of spurious radiations.
Designing for High Density Wireless LANs Last Update Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D.
Static Spectrum Allocation
Risk Analysis in Spectrum Policy Julius Knapp Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology U.S. Federal Communications Commission Silicon Flatirons Center.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ k Link Budget Considerations] Date.
Networked Systems Practicum Lecture 5 – Cellular Intro 1.
Doc.: IEEE /00144r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Dialog with FCC Nada.
1 Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE b and a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol Xiangpeng Jing and Dipankar Raychaudhuri, WINLAB Rutgers.
SE43 10th meeting5th-7th July 2011© IRT – Schuberth Study on a) maximum transmit power for TVWS devices b) available amount of TVWS in Bavaria/Germany.
8.5 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Spectrum Policy Technological Solutions for Policy Problems Allen Petrin ©2003 all rights reserved 1 System Architecture for a Dynamic-Spectrum.
Unit I: Introduction.
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster,
Cognitive Radio Based 5G Wireless Networks
Concept of Power Control in Cellular Communication Channels
Technician Licensing Class
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Nuts and Bolts of FCC FM Allocations
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Month Year May 2016
April 24, Study Group 1 A Regulatory Framework for Use of TV Channels by Part 15 Devices John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Geo-location in USA Date: Authors: January 2010
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar. 2010
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies This Presentation was originally made to an FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radios May 19, 2003 by one of Bills colleagues. (Bill was kind enough to share this information with SG1 in the interest of promoting discussion.)

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Agenda Requirements Spectrum occupancy characteristics –Significant amount of low hanging fruit Spectrum access methods –Listen-Before Talk TDMA spectrum Broadcast spectrum –Probe –Geo-location/database

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Frequency Agile Radio Requirements Create insignificant interference –Secondary operation with minimal requirement for coordination with primary system licensees –Unlicensed with equipment certifications on a system basis to assure avoidance of interference Operate in multiple bands –Assured capacity Offer cost/capacity/link range/deployment benefits –Access more (5 X?) spectrum than any current system –Operate in VHF/UHF TV band –Rapid spectrum agreements for itinerate use

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Spectrum Occupancy Is Low In many bands, spectrum access is a more significant problem than physical scarcity of spectrum, in large part due to legacy command-and-control regulation that limits the ability of potential spectrum users to obtain such access. 1 Shared Spectrums measurements indicate –Many bands have no detectable occupancy –Some bands have low occupancy –Some bands have high occupancy Note 1: FCC Spectrum Policy Task Force Report, page 3

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Typical Spectrum Occupancy Measurement No signals Medium and short duration signals FCC should conduct and publish spectrum occupancy measurements to identify low occupancy bands

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Initially Harvest the Low Hanging Fruit Measurements show a large quantity of long duration, large area spectrum holes Simple spectrum access methods are sufficient –Minimal coordination between transceivers –Moderate computational costs Later evolve algorithms to handle more complex situations –Short duration, small spectrum holes –Optimize frequency assignments for increased capacity

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Agenda Requirements Spectrum occupancy characteristics –Significant amount of low hanging fruit Spectrum access methods –Listen-Before Talk TDMA spectrum Broadcast spectrum –Probe –Geo-location/database

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Adaptive, Receive-Only Spectrum Access Method P max TX = 10*log10(k * T * B) + P Primary – P measured - Margin –Margin = 10 to 20 dB, required for cummulative effects, rapid propagation changes, false alarm minimization –T – Interference Noise Temperature, in K –B = signal bandwidth, in Hz

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Primary Transceivers Frequency Agile Transceivers Interference/Connectivity Limit Exclusion Zone Frequency Agile Coverage Morphs To Fit Primary Users Hidden-node problem overcome by each Frequency Agile transceiver listening to all Primary users within range

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. High Sensitivity Receiver Performance

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. 10 ground vehicles spread over 25 km moving at 25 km/hr 10 stationary ground vehicles spread over 25 km West Virginia location 3 m antenna height Simulation Example Primary users are stationary XG users are mobile Omni-directional antennas 420 MHz signal frequency

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Link closure Interference Longley-Rice Model 420 MHz Free space loss Actual loss Propagation Losses

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Frequency Agile network reduces TX power automatically Network needs switch to another frequency at low TX power levels XG TX Power (dBm) Target interference level of –100 dBm Primary Interference Level (dBm) TX Power and Interference

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. TV Receiver Frequency Agile Transceiver TV Transmitter Region of Potential Interference P T (kW) HAAT (m) Listen-Only Method in the Broadcast Bands TV Receiver L1 L2 Differential propagation loss = L1-L2

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Transmit Power Rule P max TX = Po if Primary signal is not detected = Transmission prohibited if Primary signal is detected where, P max TX = Frequency Agile transmitter power level, in dBm Po = specified power value, in dBm

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. TV Receiver with Grade B reception Frequency Agile Transceiver TV Transmitter Terrain Blockage Building Blockage LOS Location LOS to Frequency Agile Transceiver Multi-Path Effects Minimal Interference Joint probability of three conditions –Agile Receiver doesnt detect TV signal –Primary user receives TV signal –D/U < 15 dB

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Minimum Detectable Signal (-121 dBm) Minimum Signal Strength – Grade B (-81 dBm) Min D/U =15 dB Acceptable Interference = Thermal Noise (-96 dBm) Received Power (dBm) 40 dB 25 dB Maximum Differential Propagation Value Maximum differential propagation value = 40 dB Maximum practical sensitivity improvement due to special detection processing Signal level at TV receiver Signal level at Frequency Agile receiver

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Simulation of Differential Propagation Test reception points along a ~ 8 km path Scenario – Mid-Atlantic Region Elevation contours TV transmitters

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Large Change in Propagation Loss over a Short Distance is Rare Signal from TV station A Signal from TV station B ~30 dB change in propagation loss over a small distance

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Low Power Transmitters Have a Small Interference Range Noise Obstructed propagation Free-space propagation Maximum interference range of 4 km in free- space Maximum interference range of 600 m in obstructed conditions 1 mW transmit power

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Spectrum Probing Method 75 km to 200 km spacing Frequency Agile transceiver Broadcast Receiver 1) Transmit (Pt) at a very low power 3) Measure Pr of the very weak signal using high processing gain 2) Very weak signal doesnt interfere with primary user 4) Pt minus Pr is the propagation loss 5) Repeat with N nodes to estimate minimum propagation loss into area Frequency Agile monitors

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Geo-Location Method TV Receiver Frequency Agile Transceiver TV Transmitter Region of Potential Interference P T (kW) HAAT (m) TV Receiver Protected Area Position information GPS, telephone Beacon TX Protected area boundary database information Telephone, over-the-air, special beacons, Internet, manually entered Guard Distance

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Significant White Space Between TV Coverage Areas Grade B 50% and 90% contours Channel 5 and channel 54

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. How Large A Guard Distance? Noise Maximum interference range of > 100 km in free-space Maximum interference range of 2 km in obstructed conditions 1 W transmit power Large guard distances reduce spectrum harvest TV bands: 100 km is too large >> Limit TX power to mWs Other bands: Max TX power ?

doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Summary Multiple, robust spectrum access methods –Listen-Before Talk TDMA spectrum Broadcast spectrum –Geo-location/database FCC should conduct and publish spectrum occupancy measurements –Many spectrum holes are large and have long duration FCC should allow experimental interactive operations –All access methods including Probe –TV and other bands