Supreme Court Cases through pictures. Marbury vs. Madison 1803.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Cases You Need to Know
Advertisements

Landmark Supreme Court Cases Marbury v Madison Description (Key Question) –Who has the power to decide what is Constitutional? Decision –Established.
Supreme Court Cases Supreme Court Project. Directions: 1.Students should listen to the categories that these cases fall into and a brief description to.
Supreme Court Case Review. Marbury v Madison What was an influence this case had on the power of the Federal Government?
Supreme Court Decisions
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  John Marshall used the case to establish Judicial Review which allows the court to declare.
Supreme Court Cases. What you need to know to present your case: The background of the case – What happened? – What were both sides of the argument? Constitutional.
Unit 4 Citizenship Individuals can demonstrate national identity by fulfilling duties and responsibilities.
1. Issue: Can the press print articles that are against the government if the Information is true? 2. Case Summary: John Peter Zenger was charged with.
IMPORTANT US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
Supreme Court Decisions. GIBBONS V. OGDEN MIRANDA V. ARIZONA FURMAN V. GEORGIA GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT TINKER V. DES MOINES U.S. V. NIXON NY TIMES V. U.S.
Jeopardy!!! 1st Amendment At School Equal Protection Rights of the Accused Potpourri \
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
Jeopardy The Bill of Rights Landmark Cases First Amendment Random Name That Case Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.
2.05 Starter Why were the Civil War amendments so important? Explain the 14 th amendment in your own words. Which amendment was repealed (done away with)?
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) A United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  William Marbury was commissioned Justice of the Peace of the District of Columbia at the end of President.
IMPORTANT US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. Marbury v. Madison (1803) federal powers Checks and Balances Judiciary Act of 1789 part of the act was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court.
Important Supreme Court Decisions. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the Supreme Court’s right of judicial review (the right to determine the constitutionality.
SUPREME COURT CASES CASES EVERY POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT NEEDS TO KNOW.
Supreme Court Cases EOC Review Becky Griffith. Marbury v. Madison, 1803 Judicial Review.
CHAPTER 5 CIVIL LIBERTIES. FREEDOM OF SPEECH Schenk v US (1919) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance.
U.S. Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison 1803 Established judicial review— allowing for the court to rule on whether or not a law is allowed by the.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison 1803 DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the Supreme Courts right of Judicial Review (right to determine the constitutionality.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
Supreme Court Case Review. Marbury v Madison What was an influence this case had on the power of the Federal Government?
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v Madison This case establishes the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Constitutional basis: supremacy clause What.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Question – Does the Supreme Court have the authority to declare laws passed by Congress unconstitutional?
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison  1803  Article III – Judicial Powers  Establishment of Judicial Review – the power of the Supreme.
Key Supreme Court Cases. Cases on Federalism Marbury v. Madison (1803): judicial review, strong S.C. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): court has implied powers,
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison Does the Judiciary Act of 1789 allow Marbury to take his case directly to the Supreme Court? Does the.
Do-Now Make sure your case books are ready to turn in—they should have a name, situation, key phrase, and picture on every page! Study study study!
Look over all the cases in the powerpoint and select only one of the cases. Open the Supreme Court Cases Reading file on Edmodo and read about the case.
The Supreme Court! Supreme Court ► ► Highest court in the land ► Final interpretation of Constitution ► Judges appointed by _________ with ________ approval!
SUPREME COURT CASES Other Cases Civil Rights (1) Student Rights Civil Rights (2) th, 5 th, 6 th Amendments Federal Government.
Jeopardy Free Speech Freedom of Religion and Assembly Defendant’s Rights & Privacy Civil Rights Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300.
Supreme Court Cases. Warm Up 1. How does a case reach the Supreme Court? 2. What is the cartoon below implying?
4.04: Creation and Defense of Individual Rights Supreme Court Cases.
Supreme Court ► ► Highest court in the land ► Final interpretation of Constitution ► Judges appointed by _________ with ________ approval! ► “Equal Justice.
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison Issue: Should the Constitution be very strictly interpreted or is there room for interpretation? If there.
Major Supreme Court Cases 2.05 & Analyze court cases that illustrate that the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land & how the Bill of.
SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury v. Madison (1803)
1. Name the two distinct court systems in our nation?
SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury v. Madison (1803)
US SUPREME COURT CASE PROJECT
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS
AP Gov Review: Unit #6 in 10 minutes
3.12 landmark supreme court cases
Supreme Court Cases.
SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Gov Review Video #50: Important Supreme Court Cases To Know
Supreme Court Cases.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
10 Court Cases in American History
Significant Supreme Court Cases
C3.2(2) LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
Historic Supreme Court Cases
Civics Final Exam Review I
Landmark Supreme court cases
Key Supreme Court Cases
Judicial Branch/Court Cases
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
Landmark Supreme court cases
Presentation transcript:

Supreme Court Cases through pictures

Marbury vs. Madison 1803

Marbury vs. Madison Established the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review The Court has the power of judicial review – the ability to review laws at the federal, state, and local levels and determine if the laws are constitutional. Therefore, it is not the Constitution that gives them the power – “the Constitution is what the Supreme Court says it is” ~ Former Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes

McCulloch v. Maryland 1819

Gibbons v. Ogden 1824

Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896

Plessy vs. Fergussen Louisiana. Homer Plessy, an African American, decides to sit in a section of a train marked “For whites only!” When he refused to move, he was arrested and convicted for violating Louisiana’s segregation law. Taken to the Supreme Court, and upheld as Constitutional under the 14 th Amendment equal protection clause. Said African Americans could be provided “separate but equal” public facilities; began nation-wide segregation.

Separate but equal

Korematsu v. US 1944

Brown vs. Board of Education 1954

Brown vs. Board of Education Justices ruled that racially separate schools are unequal because they are separate. Court finds unanimously that segregation is a violation of 14 th Amendment equal protection clause. Overturned Plessy vs. Fergussen (1896); which said African Americans could be provided “separate but equal” public facilities; began school integration

Mapp vs. Ohio 1961

Engel vs. Vitale 1962

Engel vs. Vitale Held that a public school district’s practice of starting the day with prayer violates the establishment clause What is the establishment clause?

Gideon vs. Wainwright 1963

Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. US 1964

Miranda vs. Arizona 1966

Swann vs. Charlotte Mecklenburg School District 1969

Tinker vs. Des Moines 1969 Freedom of Speech/ Students Rights

Tinker vs. Des Moines Des Moines, Iowa: In protest of the Vietnam War, students wore black armbands to school. The principal feared that their symbolic gesture might cause commotion, so the principal forced students to take either take off the armbands or face suspension. The Supreme Court ruled the following, according to the Oyez Project: “The wearing of armbands was "closely akin to 'pure speech'" and protected by the First Amendment. School environments imply limitations on free expression, but here the principals lacked justification for imposing any such limits.”

Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier Hazelwood East High near St. Louis, MO, sponsored a student newspaper as part of its journalism classes. Before it could be printed, had to be viewed by Principal Reynolds. He objected to 2 articles because spoke of students, and so he cancelled the pages. Newspaper students sued the school, claiming 1 st Amendment rights had been denied. Local court upheld decision that 1 st Amendment rights denied. Brought to the Supreme Court, and denied: “[a school] may refuse to disseminate student speech that does not meet [its] standards.”

The New York Times vs. US 1971 Pentagon Papers Free Press

Furman vs. Georgia 1972 Equal Protection/ Due Process Cruel and Unusual Punishment/ 8 th Amendment

Roe v. Wade 1973 Abortion Rights Right of Privacy/ State Rights/ Reserved

Roe vs. Wade Legalized a woman’s right to an abortion under certain circumstances.

United States vs. Nixon 1974 Watergate/ Federal Due Process Executive Power

University of California vs. Bakke 1978 Affirmative Action/ Equal Protection

University of California vs. Bakke 1978 Ruled in favor of affirmative action, and established the rights of students to appeal college admission policies. This particular case ruled against the admission process of the Medical School which set aside 16 of 100 seats for non-white students. Could not set aside a certain amount of seats for a certain race because would exclude other races, but could consider race as a “plus” factor in admissions program.

Texas vs. Johnson 1989 Flag Burning/ Free Speech

New Jersey vs. T.L.O 1985 Search and Seizure/ Students Due Process

Skokie vs. Illinois (1977)

Skokie is a town in Cook County, Illinois, near Chicago. It was settled by German farmers, but had a substantial Jewish population. In the mid-1970s, Skokie was at the center of a case concerning the First Amendment right to assemble and the National Socialist Party of America, a neo- Nazi group. Skokie ultimately lost that case. The Illinois lower court ruled that the Nazi party could not march down Main Street or wear the Swastika in demonstration in Skokie against the Jewish population there. Supreme Court ruled that the members of the Nazi Party in Skokie could march down Main Street and that their First Amendment rights had been violated by the Illinois lower court.

Phillips vs. Martin Marietta (1971)

Under Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer may not refuse to hire women with pre-school children while hiring men with such children. Ida Phillips, a mother, applied for a job at the company and was denied because of her circumstance as a mother. Phillips sued under Title VII claiming that the policy was discriminatory. The Supreme Court unanimously held that the Marietta Corp. policy did discriminate on the basis of sex and overturned the lower courts finding then sent the case back to the lower court for trial.

Schenck vs. United States (1919)

Schenk vs. United States (1919) Charles Schenck, of the Socialist Party of America, was responsible for printing, distributing, and mailing leaflets that advocated opposition to the draft to prospective military draftees during World War I. These leaflets contained statements such as; "Do not submit to intimidation", "Assert your rights”. For these acts, Schenck was convicted of violating the Espionage Act of Schenck appealed to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the court decision violated his First Amendment rights. The Court, unaminously held that Schenck's criminal conviction was constitutional. The First Amendment did not protect speech encouraging insubordination, since the circumstances of wartime permit greater restrictions on free speech than would be allowable during peacetime.

Schenck vs. United States (1919) In this, the Supreme Court invented the “Clear and present danger test” to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment. In reviewing the conviction of a man charged with distributing provocative flyers to draftees of World War I, the Court asserted that, in certain contexts, words can create a "clear and present danger" that Congress may constitutionally prohibit. While the ruling has since been overturned, Schenck is still significant for creating the context-based balancing tests used in reviewing freedom of speech challenges