Link Selection and OAM Version 01 Stephen Haddock July 18, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Virtual Trunk Protocol
Advertisements

Experiences with IEEE 802.1ah (Provider Backbone Bridges) Ronald van der Pol SARA Sep 2009NORDUnet meeting, Copenhagen.
Split Brain Detection Version 00 Nigel Bragg September 4 th,
DRNI – Intra-DAS Link Version 01 Stephen Haddock July 20,
Multi Domain Traffic Engineered Transport Networks (E-OTN, PTN) supporting P2P, P2MP, RMP and MP2MP Ethernet Services An overview of architecture and functionality.
Geneva, 27 May 2010 Types and Characteristics of Packet Transport Network (PTN) Equipment (Draft Recommendation - G.ptneq) Jia He and Hilmar Hofmann G.ptneq.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum MEF 19 Abstract Test Suite for UNI Type 1 February 2008.
1 Transport Services Layer Protection Switching Types Interacting with DRNI Maarten Vissers
1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers
1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers Version 01.
LAN Segmentation Virtual LAN (VLAN).
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ICND v2.3—2-1 Extending Switched Networks with Virtual LANs Introducing VLAN Operations.
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v4 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.
Application Guide For Mesh AP – MAP-3120
Virtual LANs.
1 DRNI and Distributed Protection Examples Maarten Vissers v01 Based on slides presented in IW meeting in Nanjing on Thursday Sept 22.
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v3 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.
Geneva, Switzerland, 13 July AX-REV – Link Aggregation Revision Panagiotis Saltsidis, Senior Specialist, Ericsson Joint IEEE-SA and ITU Workshop.
DRNI Examples, DAS position, MEP/MIP position
Ethernet and switches selected topics 1. Agenda Scaling ethernet infrastructure VLANs 2.
VLANs Semester 3, Chapter 3 Allan Johnson Website:
Institute of Technology, Sligo Dept of Computing Semester 3, version Semester 3 Chapter 3 VLANs.
1 CCNA 3 v3.1 Module 9. 2 CCNA 3 Module 9 VLAN Trunking Protocol.
© Wiley Inc All Rights Reserved. CCNA: Cisco Certified Network Associate Study Guide CHAPTER 8: Virtual LANs (VLANs)
(part 3).  Switches, also known as switching hubs, have become an increasingly important part of our networking today, because when working with hubs,
1 DRNI Data Plane Model I/II Comparison & MAC Address Values in DRNI Maarten Vissers v00.
1 Data Plane Summary Maarten Vissers v1.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Virtual LAN Design Switches also have enabled the creation of Virtual LANs (VLANs). VLANs provide greater opportunities to manage the flow of traffic on.
Semester 3, v Chapter 3: Virtual LANs
– Chapter 5 – Secure LAN Switching
1 Portal Models Maarten Vissers v1. 2 DRNI Applicability DRNI model is applicable to many different portal types 1.PB Portal (S-DRNI) 2.BCB.
Rough Outline for a Intra-Portal Protocol Version 03 Stephen Haddock September 12,
Rough Outline for a Intra-Portal Protocol Version 02 Stephen Haddock August 23,
Chapter 6 1 Chap 6 – Implement Inter-VLAN Routing Learning Objectives Explain to the satisfaction of a qualified instructor how network traffic is routed.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 9 Virtual Trunking Protocol.
Switch Features Most enterprise-capable switches have a number of features that make the switch attractive for large organizations. The following is a.
Cisco S3C3 Virtual LANS. Why VLANs? You can define groupings of workstations even if separated by switches and on different LAN segments –They are one.
Chapter 3 - VLANs. VLANs Logical grouping of devices or users Configuration done at switch via software Not standardized – proprietary software from vendor.
Objectives Blue Color VLAN’s Should reach Message Server from all locations Red Color VLAN’s Should not Reach Message Server In Each L2 Switch Blue Color.
Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) Part II
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 9 VLAN Trunking Protocol Cisco Networking Academy.
Configuring VLAN Chapter 14 powered by DJ 1. Chapter Objectives At the end of this Chapter you will be able to:  Understand basic concept of VLAN  Configure.
CCNA3 v3 Module 9 v3 CCNA 3 Module 9 JEOPARDY K. Martin.
Cisco 3 Frame Relay.
1 Large-scale (Campus) Lan design (Part II)  VLANs  Hierarchical LAN design.
Discussion for Distributed Aggregation Sublayer Ting Ao, Yuehua Wei, Jinghai Yu 1IEEE Plenary San Francisco 2011.
Ethernet Virtual LANs Hubs versus Switches –Hubs broadcast bits out all ports –Switches usually send a frame out a one port More fundamentally –In unicasting,
Portal Models Maarten Vissers v2
Introduction to Telecommunications, 2/e By M.A.Rosengrant Copyright (c) 2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Figure 28–1 A next generation.
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/0562r0 May 2014 SubmissionSlide 1Norman Finn, Cisco Systems, Mark Hamilton, Spectralink ak and 802.1AC Convergence Function Date:
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v1.
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/0562r7 November 2015 SubmissionSlide 1Norman Finn, Cisco Systems, Mark Hamilton, Spectralink ak and 802.1AC Convergence Function.
Supporting VUNI in DRNI Maarten Vissers v00
CCNA 3 Chapter 10 Virtual Trunking Protocol
Large-scale (Campus) Lan design (Part II)
Pertemuan 12 Virtual Trunking Protocol
SUPA/YMCA (Yang Models for Configuration and topology Abstraction)
Link Aggregation Simulator Version 1
Introduction to Networking
802.1AX-REV – Link Aggregation Revision
Routing and Switching Essentials v6.0
Stephen Haddock September 13, 2012
CCNA 3 v3 JEOPARDY Module 9 CCNA3 v3 Module 9 K. Martin.
Chapter 3 VLANs Chaffee County Academy
DRNI and Distributed Network Protection Model Evolution: Maarten  Norm  Steve Maarten Vissers v1  
Lecture#7: Trunking and STP
TIME-SHARED LINK – DRNI LEARNING
Presentation transcript:

Link Selection and OAM Version 01 Stephen Haddock July 18,

Example Scenario 2 Server Client Co-Location Facility Data Center Network Carrier Network Client connects to a Server in a Co-Location facility A single VLAN is used to carry this service within the Data Center Network All frames transmitted and received by Server are untagged. VLAN is monitored using CFM with Up MEPs at each interface to the Data Center Network.

Server connects with Link Aggregation 3 Server connects using Link Aggregation 5-tuple hash used to distribute frames among LAG links. Up MEP sits above Link Aggregation In practice, separation of the physical ports of the LAG may complicate implementation of the MEP, forcing it to be either distributed between the ports or centralized but not resident on a single physical port. Server MAC Relay VLAN (6.9) Link Agg MAC Server Link Agg MAC

Server connects with DRNI 4 Distributed Relay (EmulatedSystem C) VLAN (6.9) Link Agg MAC Server Link Agg MAC (6.9) Server B A MAC (6.9) Relay (B) MAC (6.9) Relay (A) Gateway Links (virtual) Server connects to two physically separate nodes (Systems A and B) The logical view, as seen from the point of view of the Server and the Data Center Network, is that there the Server connects to a third node (Emulated System C) through a single logical port.

Distributed Relay as seen by Systems A and B 5 Distributed Relay (C)* (6.9) LAG* MAC Server Link Agg MAC (6.9) MAC (6.9) Relay (B) MAC (6.9) MAC (6.9) Distributed Relay (C)* (6.9) LAG* MAC (6.9) Relay (A) IPL Selected Gateway for this VLAN Link Selection still based on 5-tuple hash, so both LAG links carry data. Where does the Up MEP go?

Options for MEP Implementation 1.Distribute MEP functionality across the physical DRNI ports. –Requires standardizing how MEP functionality gets distributed. –Almost certainly requires support from the Intra-Portal Protocol. 2.Distribute MEP functionality across the Intra-Portal Port and the DRNI ports in the system with the selected Gateway. –Distributes MEP functionality among ports in the same physical system (which is the same problem that arises with todays LAG). –Intra-Portal Link is not included in the MA monitored by the MEP. –MEP functionality moves when the selected Gateway changes. 3.Constrain the Link Selection such that all frames that would pass through the same MEP use the same DRNI link. –VERY restrictive constraint. 4.Are there any other options? 6

2 nd Example: DRNI at an I-tagged service interface 7 Carrier B Network Carrier A Network The service ID on an I-tagged service interface is the I-SID. Link selection is by I-SID Multiple I-SIDs map into a B-VLAN in the Carrier A Network The B-VLAN is monitored using CFM with Up MEPs at each interface to the Carrier A Network. I-tagged Service Interface* B A B-components (B-BEBs) * Reference: 802-1Q Figure 25-9 and

I-tagged DRNI as seen by Systems A and B 8 Distributed Relay (C)* (6.11) LAG* MAC (6.9) MAC (6.9) Relay (B) MAC (6.9) MAC (6.9) Distributed Relay (C)* (6.11) LAG* MAC (6.9) Relay (A) IPL Selected Gateway for this B-VLAN Link Selection based on I-SID, so I-SIDs from both LAG links could map to the B-VLAN. Where does the Up MEP go?

Thank You. 9