Intermediate Microeconomics Ch 1 Example: TV and radio ads Katherine M. Sauer, Ph.D. Besanko & Braeutigam’s Microeconomics 4 th ed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linear Programming We are to learn two topics today: LP formulation
Advertisements

Findings on the effectiveness of Outdoor advertising from Econometric studies conducted by BrandScience - Retailers (and highlights from FMCG study) 21.
KPI’s Search Engine Marketing Chapter 2 Instructor: Dawn Rauscher.
AD Budgeting.
Goal Programming How do you find optimal solutions to the following?
Chapter 4 Consumer Choice. © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved4-2 Figure 4.1a Bundles of Pizzas and Burritos Lisa Might Consume.
1/31: LP Applications From last time: Using MS Excel to solve LPs
Consumer Choice Theory. Overview Over the last several weeks, we have taken demand and supply curves as given. We now start examining where demand and.
15.Math-Review Review 1.
Economics 214 Lecture 37 Constrained Optimization.
Unit 1. Fundamentals of Managerial Economics (Chapter 1)
Utility Maximization Module KRUGMAN'S MICROECONOMICS for AP* Micro: 15
Linear Programming Econ Outline  Review the basic concepts of Linear Programming  Illustrate some problems which can be solved by linear programming.
Mr. Bernstein Module 51: Utility Maximization September 8, 2014
Chapter 8: Overview of Advertising Management. Advertising Functions A. Informing B. Persuading C. Reminding D. Adding Value E. Assisting Other Company.
Microeconomics 3070 Prof. Barham
Elasticity Test Those students who have not completed their elasticity test must do so during the period. When completed, please submit with your name.
Utility Maximization: Equalizing Marginal Utility per Dollar.
Introduction to Quantitative Business Methods (Do I REALLY Have to Know This Stuff?)
1 Exercise in Cost Accounting: De Niro, Scorsese and Pesci, Inc. DSP, Inc. is a home maintenance services operation, started by three men, De Niro, Scorsese.
Optimization Techniques Lecture 2 (Appendix C). 1. Optimization is: a process by which the maximum or minimum values of decision variables are determined.
Limits, Alternatives, and Choices
Chapter 2 Marginal Analysis and Optimization Techniques
The Concept of Elasticity
BA 452 Lesson A.8 Marketing and Finance Applications 1 1ReadingsReadings Chapter 4 Linear Programming Applications in Marketing, Finance, and Operations.
Media Buying.
1.6 Theory of Consumer Behavior Blog posts: "Utility" Theory of Consumer Behavior (AP only unit) Total Utility and Marginal Utility Utility Maximization.
Theory of Consumer Choice
CHAPTER 10 The Rational Consumer PowerPoint® Slides by Can Erbil © 2004 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved.
Marketing Evolution0 MarketingEvolution.com | CONFIDENTIAL Marketing Evolution AT&T Moto X Case Study.
CHAPTER 1 1 Analyzing Economic Problems. 2 Chapter One Chapter One Overview 1.Defining Microeconomics 2.Who Should Study Microeconomics? 3.Microeconomic.
Integer Programming Each year CrossChek decides which lines of golf clubs and clothing it will market. Consider that each line of golf clubs is expected.
Data Type 2010 (Estimate) Population 4.4 million Literacy rate 100 % Per capita GDP US $ 4,400 Urban/rural population 53%/47% Cell phone penetration 2.8.
Optimization Techniques Lecture Optimization is: a process by which the maximum or minimum values of decision variables are determined.  Examples.
Media Expenditures View as slideshow Adapted from AdPrin.com.
Objectives:  Use the utility-maximizing model to explain how consumers choose goods and services.  Use the concept of utility to explain how the law.
5 - 1 Lecture 3: Spreadsheet Engineering Spreadsheet Engineering Builders use blueprints or plans. – Without plans structures will fail to be effective.
Slide 1  2002 South-Western Publishing Web Chapter A Optimization Techniques Overview Unconstrained & Constrained Optimization Calculus of one variable.
Marketing Metrics. Whatever career path you choose in the marketing world, it'll do you a world of good to have an understanding of and level of comfort.
CHAPTER 10 The Rational Consumer.
Utility Maximization. Utility and Consumption ▫Concept of utility offers a way to study choices that are made in a more or less rational way. ▫Utility.
Utility Maximization Lesson Utility as Satisfaction Utility and Consumption – Utility is an imaginary measure of satisfaction. Principle of Diminishing.
2002 Microeconomics Question 3.
EXAMPLE 1 Use the elimination method Solve the system. 4x + 2y + 3z = 1 Equation 1 2x – 3y + 5z = –14 Equation 2 6x – y + 4z = –1 Equation 3 SOLUTION.
Media Planning. Challenge to Planners Right PeopleRight Message Right Time Aperture Right Contact Point.
EXAMPLE 4 Solve a system using substitution Marketing The marketing department of a company has a budget of $30,000 for advertising. A television ad costs.
Optimization and Lagrangian. Partial Derivative Concept Consider a demand function dependent of both price and advertising Q = f(P,A) Analyzing a multivariate.
Analyzing Economic Problems Chapter One. Chapter One Overview 1.Defining Microeconomics 2.Who Should Study Microeconomics? 3.Microeconomic Modeling Elements.
Economics 2301 Lecture 37 Constrained Optimization.
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick Topic 1: Lecture 5 Demand Analysis: Constraints We said that our understanding of Consumer Choice rests.
Section 15.3 Constrained Optimization: Lagrange Multipliers.
Chapter 3 - Percents. per cent Percents - Definition percent 100 out of for every.
COST OF PRODUCTION Microeconomics Made Easy by William Yacovissi Mansfield University © William Yacovissi All Rights Reserved.
© 1999 Prentice-Hall Canada Inc. Slide 31 Optimal Use of Limited Resources when something constrains or limits operations (labour hours, machine hours,
AD SPEND. ANNUAL SHARE OF UK ADSPEND 2014 (AA/WARC) Source: Advertising Association/Warc Expenditure Report Note: Data for newsbrands and magazine brands.
The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the monopoly model (I): standard pricing ………….1optimal production ………….2 optimal.
Utility Maximization Module KRUGMAN'S MICROECONOMICS for AP* Micro: 15
CHAPTER 1 Analyzing Economic Problems.
Why Advertise with us ? The Phone Company.
Microeconomics 3070 Prof. Barham
Calculus-Based Solutions Procedures MT 235.
Microeconomics Chapter 6 Consumer Behavior
Mr. Bernstein Module 51: Utility Maximization September 2017
Mr. Bernstein Module 51: Utility Maximization September 2016
(Estimation and Allocation)
Goal Programming How do you find optimal solutions to the following?
Profit-Maximizing Level for Mini-Z
Profit Maximizing Level for Mini-Z
Optimizing an Advertising Campaign
Presentation transcript:

Intermediate Microeconomics Ch 1 Example: TV and radio ads Katherine M. Sauer, Ph.D. Besanko & Braeutigam’s Microeconomics 4 th ed

You are a product manager at a microbrewery and have $1 million advertising budget to allocate between TV and radio ads for the next year. Table 1.1: Advertising and New Beer Sales Generated (in barrels per year) Total Spent Sales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads $000 $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 If you spent $200,000 on TV ads, you’d expect to get 9,000 new sales. If you spent $200,000 on radio ads, you’d expect to get 1,800 new sales.

Total Spent Sales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads $000 $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 Suppose you spend $400,000 on TV ads and the rest on radio ads. Your total new sales would be: 16, ,200 20,200 barrels

If your goal is to maximize new sales, how should you allocate the advertising budget? Total Spent Sales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads $000 $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 The “obvious” answer is to spend all $1,000,000 on TV ads and get 25,000 new sales. But, this is not the optimal allocation!

Total Spent Sales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads $000 $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 If you spent $900,000 on TV ads you would generate 24,750 new sales from TV and the $100,000 you spend on radio would generate 950 new sales for a grand total of 25,700 new sales.

Total Spent Sales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads $000 $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 If you spent $800,000 on TV ads you would generate 24,000 new sales from TV and the $200,000 you spend on radio would generate 1,800 new sales for a grand total of 25,800 new sales.

Total Spent Sales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads $000 $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 If you spent $700,000 on TV ads you would generate 22,750 new sales from TV and the $300,000 you spend on radio would generate 2,550 new sales for a grand total of 25,300 new sales.

We can arrive at the same answer using marginal analysis. Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000 $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 Calculate the marginal impact of an additional $100,000 of spending. = change in sales / change in spending

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $ $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 Marginal Impact = change in sales / change in spending

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $ $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005,000 Marginal Impact = change in sales / change in spending Suppose you are spending $900,000 on TV. Should you spend the remaining $100,000 on TV or radio?

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005, Marginal Impact = change in sales / change in spending Suppose you are spending $900,000 on TV. Should you spend the remaining $100,000 on TV or radio?

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005, Marginal Impact = change in sales / change in spending Suppose you are spending $900,000 on TV. Should you spend the remaining $100,000 on TV or radio? radio

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504,950 $1,000,00025,0005, Suppose you are spending $800,000 on TV and $100,000 on radio. Should you spend the next $100,000 on TV or radio?

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001,800 $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504, $1,000,00025,0005, Suppose you are spending $800,000 on TV and $100,000 on radio. Should you spend the next $100,000 on TV or radio?

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001, $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504, $1,000,00025,0005, Suppose you are spending $800,000 on TV and $100,000 on radio. Should you spend the next $100,000 on TV or radio? radio

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001, $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004,800 $900,00024,7504, $1,000,00025,0005, Suppose you are spending $700,000 on TV and $200,000 on radio. Should you spend the next $100,000 on TV or radio?

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001, $300,00012,7502,550 $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004, $900,00024,7504, $1,000,00025,0005, Suppose you are spending $700,000 on TV and $200,000 on radio. Should you spend the next $100,000 on TV or radio?

Total SpentSales from TV ads Sales from Radio ads Marginal Impact of TV ads Marginal Impact of radio ads $000-- $100,0004, $200,0009,0001, $300,00012,7502, $400,00016,0003,200 $500,00018,7503,750 $600,00021,0004,200 $700,00022,7504,550 $800,00024,0004, $900,00024,7504, $1,000,00025,0005, Suppose you are spending $700,000 on TV and $200,000 on radio. Should you spend the next $100,000 on TV or radio? TV

We can arrive at the same answer using constrained optimization. max B = f(T, R) s.t. $1,000,000 = T + R {T, R} new beer sales need to know functional relationship constraint