Waukegan Public Schools NASP Conference 2010 Implementing RTI at a District Level: What Psychologists Should Know.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
The Role of the Literacy Coach In a Primary School: A Collaborative Model International Reading Association Annual Conference Atlanta, 2008 Presenters.
What to Expect During Your First Year of Implementation Giancarlo Anselmo School Psychologist/RTI Coordinator Cleveland County Schools Carolinas Innovations.
Understanding Response to Intervention
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION _______District Presentation ______, 2008.
Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
Collaborative Leadership: One Districts Story David Hehl, Executive Director of Student Services Teresa Polson, District Coordinator Erica Ekstrom, District.
Overview Activities Handout ASPIRE North. By the end of the modules... Each building team will create a PowerPoint presentation (15-20 minutes) that includes:
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Keeping Tiered Instruction Vital Russell Johnston, PhD West Springfield Public Schools None of Us is as Smart as All of Us --Japanese Proverb.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) PART I: PHILOSOPHY & PROCESS MODEL PART II: DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM The School District of Philadelphia
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
PBIS Implementation in CA: An Early Look at State-wide Implementation Dr. Josh Harrower California State University, Monterey Bay.
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
BEST PRACTICES in RtI to Theresa M. Janczak, Ph.D.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
Safe Schools, Fair Schools Summit November 12, 2010.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
MAISA Annual Conference June 21, 2012  Leadership and vision  Focused and intentional action  Knowledge and capacity building  Accountable for student.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Recognition Process Materials available on
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
RTI: Response To Instruction
Response To Instruction
Presentation transcript:

Waukegan Public Schools NASP Conference 2010 Implementing RTI at a District Level: What Psychologists Should Know

Contact Information Dr. Christina Conolly-Wilson Crisis Intervention Coordinator Kate Cavanaugh Coordinator of School Psychology Laurie Lee Coordinator for Response to Intervention Contact Address: Waukegan Public Schools 1201 North Sheridan Road Waukegan, IL 60085

Session Objectives The presentation will demonstrate four main elements for the implementation of RTI: Implementing and sustaining an RTI structure in a school district Budgetary considerations Professional development requirements for school district staff The role of the school psychologist in the change process

16,963 Students Student Population –72.3% Hispanic –17.5% African American –6.2% White –1.5% Asian/Pacific Is. –1% Native American –2.4%Multi-racial 72.8% Low income 31.9% ELL Student Demographics

District Configuration 4 At-risk Pre-Kindergarten sites 15 Elementary Schools 5 Middle Schools 1 High School - 2 sites organized into 9 Small Learning Communities Alternative Educational Programs

Where We Started I-ASPIRE Grant provided training and support at two demonstration buildings PBIS universal supports were already in place at selected buildings PBIS Tertiary Grant provided additional training and support for secondary and tertiary systems for nine demonstration buildings

Re-organization of the district District focus –High expectations, quality instruction, quality interventions Shared ownership of I-ASPIRE and PBIS Combining resources Collaboration on funding Working with stakeholders including teachers union Establishment of RtI Department Working with System Change

What Our Data Told Us Academic data indicated low overall performance across grade levels in reading Behavior data indicated high loss of instructional time due to suspensions Data indicated over-identification of students for special education eligibility

Waukegans RtI Model Model has been defined over the past 4 years with special education entitlement being defined during this current year. –Universal – Supports for all students and all teachers –Targeted – Supports for students below the 25 th percentile for grade level –Intensive – Supports for students below the 10 th percentile for grade level –Multi-tiered service delivery focused on: Building quality systems of support for students and staff Improving academic outcomes for all students Pre-K through 12 Addressing over-identification of students requiring special education services Reducing loss of instructional time due to problem behaviors through implementation of Positive Behavior Supports Improving graduation rate

Academics Behavior Benchmark assessment three times per year Get it Got it Go for Pre-K Early Literacy for Kindergarten Early Literacy and Oral Reading Fluency for first grade Oral Reading Fluency for second through eighth grades NWEA MAP is used at grades second through tenth Office Discipline Referrals Systematic Screener for Behavior Disorders (SSBD) at selected elementary and middle schools Signs of Suicide (SOS) at Middle School and High School Universal Screening For All Students Note: The district currently does not conduct universal screening at the high school.

Academics Behavior Early Literacy Measures at Kindergarten Oral Reading Fluency grades one through eight Keeping an eye on behavior data as well Twice a month for students at tier II Weekly for students at tier III Office Discipline Referral data Check in/Check Out data Data generated by behavior intervention plan Academic data Wraparound data Progress Monitoring Tier II and Tier III

Core IPS IPS Identifies students below the 10 th percentile, monitors progress in intensive interventions Uses response to intervention data to identify and problem solve systems issues Analyzes data and determines next steps for students not making adequate progress Identifies students who require individual problem solving including wraparound Designs individualized interventions and progress monitoring for students not responding to tier III interventions Coordinates needed services including services from the community Reviews and responds to parental requests for evaluation or 504 plans Makes determinations regarding the need for special education services Individual Problem Solving (IPS) Tier III

Building Consensus and Support –All district staff should be involved in conversations regarding the initiative –Staff must be willing to do things differently –Staff must practice patience – 5 years for change to occur –Staff must be willing to work together to support the initiative Supporting the RTI Initiative includes: budgetary, changes in job descriptions and functions, curriculum changes, etc. This includes working with the teachers union on possible contract and job description changes! Establishing Demonstration Sites Implementing and Sustaining an RTI Initiative

Cross Departmental Collaboration –Departments (Curriculum, ELL, Special Education) need to work together to provide funding and curriculum changes –Although the Psychology Department is under special education, the school psychologists work in collaboration more with the RTI coaches and social workers than any other staff member. –Training across departments must occur Implementing and Sustaining an RTI Initiative

Strategic Planning –Needs Assessment Survey –PBIS school-wide surveys –Team Planning Days Universal Teams (BLT) Secondary Teams –Coaching Support –Tier 3 Training Sequence Planning Implementing and Sustaining an RTI Initiative

Implementing Multi-tiered service Delivery for both Academic and Behavior –See attached handout with Academic and Behavior Interventions at each tier Job Descriptions –See attached School Psychologist job description –RtI External and Internal Coaches Implementing and Sustaining an RTI Initiative

Staff Development Designed to Build Capacity –Training in teams to build capacity –Training across departments –Training from the foundation upward –Building capacity at each level Coaching an Integral Element of Implementation –Training coaches at each level –Everyone receives coaching –Coaching both academic and behavior systems and practices –Training psychologists and social workers to coach tier III and entitlement process Designing Staff Development

Open Court Trainings via curriculum specialists Core Leadership Walk-Thru Trainings (w/coaches and Curriculum Specialists) School Psychologists trainings on curriculum Three day training in Coaching Skills and Strategies Instructional Planning Form Professional Development for Psychologists Tier I

Progress Monitoring Training CICO and other Behavior Interventions Coaching Strategies Counseling Professional Development for Psychologists Tier II

May 2009 – Tier III Training Needs Assessment –Completed by all school psychologists, social workers, external RtI coaches, special education specialists and special education coordinators –Identified staff for scheduled tier III trainings based on needs All building and district administrators were invited to attend the Tier III trainings WPS Tier III Training Sequence –See handout Fidelity Trainings for school psychologists from CORE Professional Development for Psychologists Tier III

Yearly Training Progression –Spring Mark Shinn and Madi Philips came to present to the psychologists about what RTI entails – Mark Shinn and Madi Philips had monthly trainings with the psychologists about the RTI model and Tier I structure – Psychologists attended bimonthly trainings with the department and Tier I and II level trainings in their building(s) and the Illinois PBIS Network – Tier III training sequence and continued refreshers and coaching on Tier I and II structure and Bi-Monthly Training Meetings for School Psychologists Professional Development Psychology Department Timeline

Coaching Structure: –9 District RTI Coaches, 2 Internal Coaches/building, 18 School Psychologists, 2 Psychology Interns, 40 Social Workers, 9 Curriculum Specialists, Coaching Professional Development: -3 Day training in Coaching Skills and Strategies -Training by Grant Partners for External Coaches, Psychologists and Social Workers -Internal RtI Coach Meetings -Coaching for psychologists and social workers in around WRAP and IPS -Psychologists and social workers trained to coach tier III and special education entitlement process. Coaching Model

Cross Departmental Funding –Title I and Title III funds support staff salaries, professional development and tiered curriculum –Full utilization of 15% of IDEA funds for staff salaries, stipends for internal coaches, professional development and tiered curriculum –Local funds (Psychology and RtI Departments) –Mental Heath Grant (Social Work Department) –PBIS Grant –I-ASPIRE Grant Budgetary Considerations

Reallocation of Funds –$40K in the psychology department used to pay for testing kits and supplies – used the $30K to pay for RTI resources and textbooks for training – $30K in the psychology department to pay for community psychiatrists to provide psychiatric diagnoses for students – Transferred the $30K to a professional development account to either send the psychologists to training or provide training in district on behavioral interventions/counseling and NASP/ISPA Christina retrained the psychologists on how to give common diagnoses to children with her consultation and coaching Psychology Department Budget

RtI structure fully defined Coaching staff identified across three tiers District leadership team focus to improve implementation and accountability Goal to evaluate implementation and district wide resource management Continuing struggles –Climate and culture –Implementation of academic and behavior programs across three tiers –Training of special education staff –Coaching support for social emotional instruction groups –Integrating positive behavior supports into discipline structure Where We Are Now

Continue supporting implementation at elementary and middle schools Waukegan High School –PBIS at Universal Level (PRIDE) –Planning Targeted Level Behavior Interventions such as CICO –SWIS System –Train Special Education Teachers on Progress Monitoring –Develop Curriculum and Common Formative Assessments Preschool –Data System –Universal PBIS and CHAMPs –BLT District Discipline Code Next Steps

Getting Started Build a foundation for change –Spend time building consensus –Promote conversations around district data –Focus on staff belief systems –Build support systems in the beginning –Support cross-departmental collaboration Create a funding plan –Set priorities –Reallocate funds Create a professional development plan –Train teams whenever possible –Provide tools for staff –Coach what is trained

Questions