Using an iTouch to Increase Sight Word Accuracy Mary Beth Pummel, William R. Jenson, Daniel Olympia, Lora Tuesday Heathfield, Kristi Hunziker Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring with Curriculum Based Measurement Tracey Hall CAST Oral Reading Fluency.
Advertisements

RTI RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION Creating Tier I/PIPs Cleaning the Windshield.
Project VIABLE: Behavioral Specificity and Wording Impact on DBR Accuracy Teresa J. LeBel 1, Amy M. Briesch 1, Stephen P. Kilgus 1, T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Acquisition and Retention of Math Facts in Students with ADHD Introduction Overview of ADHD Common childhood disorder impairing children across behavioral,
Writing Interventions: Implementing evidence-based practice for students with EBD in applied settings Carlos J. Panahon, Ph.D. Alexandra Hilt-Panahon,
Amber Zank, M.S.E. Michael Axelrod, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire NASP Conference 2011 Training Individuals to Implement a Brief Experimental.
RtI Response to Intervention
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Irregular Word Reading
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Intervention in a Flash
Achievement Tests Designed to measure the skills and abilities acquired through direct instruction or intervention. Can measure both lower order and high.
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Project MORE Project Mentoring in Ohio for Reading Excellence.
Have you been using AR to its full capacity?
Fluency This publication is based on the First and Second Grade Teacher Reading Academies, ©2002 University of Texas System and the Texas Education Agency,
Maine Department of Education 2006 Maine Reading First Course Session #11 Fluency Research and Assessment.
Wise et al. 2010—Fluency and Comprehension Fluency and Comprehension Wise et al. (2010). The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency.
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
Grade 2: Fluency The material in this Institute has been modified from the Florida version of the original reading academies that were developed by the.
This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of My Breakfast Reading Program in reducing the number of children at-risk for reading difficulty. 1st grade.
Effective Intervention Using Data from the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI-5) Developed by the authors of the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI) -5,
Using the PMER &PMBR Overview of Progress Monitoring and the assessments available 1
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Benefits from Formal and Informal Assessments
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Adrian Parry and Steven Bookhart “ Mathematics is a participant sport. Children must play it frequently to become good at it.” National Research Council.
Response to Intervention (RtI) practices in educational settings aim to identify students who are at risk for academic struggles. Typically, RtI tries.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Center for Reading Research 175 Peik Hall 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN Contacts: Kathrin Maki:
Working with Students with Learning Disabilities By: Amanda Baker.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Printed by INTRODUCTION PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Ann F. Filer, M/Ed., BCBA John Ward-Horner, Ph.D., BCBA-D Robert K Ross, EdD., BCBA-D.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
Fluency in the Foundation Skills ACADEMY OF READING®
Maine Department of Education 2006 Maine Reading First Course Session #12 Fluency Instruction.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Method Participants and Setting Three second grade students from two different elementary schools in Eau Claire, WI participated in this study. Teachers.
Designing and using assessment systems to prevent reading difficulties in young children Dr. Joseph Torgesen Florida State University and Florida Center.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Department of Educational Psychology School Psychology 250 Education Sciences Building 56 E. River Road, Minneapolis, MN
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Learning to Read Sight words: Learning to read Student behavior: Manage student’s behavior an Important part to student learning.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Training Individuals to Implement a Brief Experimental Analysis of Oral Reading Fluency Amber Zank, M.S.E & Michael Axelrod, Ph.D. Human Development Center.
Method Participants. Approximately 64 second (43.8%) and third (56.3%) grade students. 51.6% female and 48.6% male Measures Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)
2006 OSEP Project Directors Meeting 1 Screening and Progress Monitoring for Identification of Reading Disabilities within an RTI Model Screening and Progress.
Introduction The authors of this research would like to thank the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire’s Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for financial.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
A Primer on Reading Terminology. AUTOMATICITY Readers construct meaning through recognition of words and passages (strings of words). Proficient readers.
A Look at Repeated Readings. Agenda What is repeated readings? Why is repeated readings effective? What does the supporting research for repeated readings.
San Diego Quick Assessment
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency Presented by Chinwe Okenyi EDSP 5311 Dr. Fontenot Houston Baptist University, Spring 2016.
Early Literacy Screening: Comparing PALS-K with AIMSweb and STAR
DIBELS.
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
Fluency Key Points.
TE
Using BEA to Modify Packaged Reading Interventions for
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Presentation transcript:

Using an iTouch to Increase Sight Word Accuracy Mary Beth Pummel, William R. Jenson, Daniel Olympia, Lora Tuesday Heathfield, Kristi Hunziker Department of Educational Psychology Abstract The current study utilized a time-delay taped-words intervention to increase sight word fluency of second grade students at risk for reading difficulties. An iTouch delivered the taped-words intervention at three different time-delays and provided participants with immediate and corrective feedback. Participants were encouraged to beat the iTouch by reading the list of words faster than the iTouch. Baseline and intervention data are reported based on percentage of words read correctly within two seconds, which demonstrates mastery. Review of the Literature Reading is an essential skill that students must acquire to be successful in school and beyond. Beginning readers rely on letter-by-letter decoding. Repeated association with a words pronunciation and visual representation leads the reader to process letter clusters and entire words as units that eventually become automatically recognized as sight words. Proficient reading requires decoding, fluency and comprehension (Rathvon, 2008). Fluency, the ability to accurately and quickly recognize frequently used words, is an important skill for early readers to accomplish and is critical for reading comprehension (The University of Texas, 2004; Shapiro, 2004.) To achieve success in fluency students must have repeated opportunities to practice while receiving corrective feedback (Shapiro, 2004; Nist & Joseph, 2008; Burns, VanDerHeyden, & Boice 2008). Research has consistently shown that time-delay taped-words procedures increase reading fluency and sight word recognition (e.g. Sterling, Robinson, & Skinner, 1997; Bliss, Skinner, & Adams, 2006; Belfiore, Skinner, & Ferkis, 1995). In addition, these procedures minimize student errors because correct feedback is immediately provided (Stevens & Schuster, 1999). However, time-delay taped-words research has primarily focused on the use of the intervention for students with learning disabilities, behavior disorders, and intellectual disability. It has neglected to research its utility with students who are at risk for learning deficits. Therefore, the current intervention is targeted towards students who are in need of academic support at the Tier 2 and Tier 3 levels of a response to intervention model. Furthermore, the use of an iTouch utilizes the most current technology to deliver the intervention efficiently and effectively. Method Participants Participants were recruited during the school year from an elementary school in Utah. The entire second grade was screened using AIMSweb® oral reading fluency probes. General education students who scored in the bottom 25 th percentile were recruited to participate. Students who received permission to participate and who scored 50% or below on an initial list of 32 sight words were eligible to participate. Four students (3 boys) met criteria and participated in the study. Materials Sight words were obtained from the New Instant Word List (Fry, 1980). Three worksheets (A, B, C) were constructed for each of the 20 lists. The order of the words was randomized on each worksheet. An iTouch with prerecorded tracts was used to deliver the time-delay taped-words intervention. Each version (A, B, C) was recorded at one of three differing time-delays (1s, 4s, 2s). Dependent Measures Percentage of words correct served as the dependent variable. To be scored as correct the participant must have read the word aloud within the 2s time-delay before the word was presented by the iTouch. By reading the word aloud within 2s the participant demonstrated automaticity of the written word. Procedures Design The study was conducted in a multiple baseline design yoked across participants. During baseline, students were given a worksheet with 15 sight words and the number of correct responses was recorded. During each intervention session participants were given one list of words presented at three different time- delays. Participants were instructed to read the words aloud with the goal of reading the word before they heard it on the iTouch. Version A, presented with a 1s time-delay, was intended to prevent errors by providing the participant with the correct pronunciation of the word almost immediately. Version B, presented with a 4s time-delay, was intended to allow the subject more time to respond and promote independence. Lastly, the participant completed version C, presented at a 2s time-delay and intended to increase automaticity. Participants were required to demonstrate mastery by obtaining 80% accuracy on version C before continuing onto a new word list at the next intervention session. Data Collection and Analysis Participants collected their own data by marking responses on the corresponding worksheet. Although the intervention was self-administered, the experimenter was present at each session to ensure reliability of the data. Words read correctly were converted into percent correct and compared to the percent correct obtained at baseline. Prior to the start of the intervention and at the conclusion of the intervention participants were screened using oral reading fluency probes to assess the generalizability of results. Summary of Findings Summary of Results Time-delay taped-words interventions have been shown to effectively increase reading fluency and sight word recognition. The current study examined the effectiveness of using an iTouch to deliver the intervention to students who were at risk for reading difficulties. Second grade students (N=4) completed the intervention which consisted of baseline, intervention, and generalization data. During each intervention session, participants completed one list of words at each of three different time-delays. The iTouch provided immediate and corrective feedback by presenting the words at the corresponding time-delay. Percentage of words read correctly was recorded for each time-delay. Participants were required to demonstrate mastery on version C before continuing onto the next word list. Results indicated that all participants increased their sight word fluency from baseline to intervention. At baseline, Participant 1 scored an average of 51% of the words read correctly. Participant 1 obtained an average of 94% words read correctly during the intervention phase. Participant 2 scored an average of 40% correct during baseline. She scored an average of 81% words read correctly across the intervention phase. Participant 3 scored an average of 38% at baseline and an average of 56% words read correctly during the intervention. Participant 4 read 33% of words correctly at baseline and increased to 75% words read correctly at intervention. Participants 1, 2, and 4 increased their sight word fluency by 43%, 41%, and 42% respectively. Participant 3 increased his sight word fluency by 18%. Oral reading fluency probes were also administered at baseline and at the end of the intervention to show generalization across oral reading fluency measures. Results showed that all participants increased their oral reading fluency. This intervention used the most current technology to effectively and efficiently provide participants with immediate and corrective feedback. Results indicated the time-delay taped-problems intervention using an iTouch was effective at increasing participants sight word fluency. Moreover, increases generalized to other oral reading fluency probes. This suggests that the intervention may also be effective at increasing a subjects ability to read connected text and thus increase comprehension.