Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Smarter Balanced Membership.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 22, 2012 Jose Ortega Rodney Okamoto SMARTER Balanced.
Advertisements

Measuring the Common Core Standards Models for engaging postsecondary in student readiness for college and careers.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. What is the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)? The SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) is.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
Solutions for Assessing the Common Core Joe Willhoft, Ph.D. Executive Director, Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Standards for Mathematical Practices.
The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Introductory Information for Parents, Educators and Community Members Michael Hock Director of Educational Assessment,
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
October 18, 2011 Manhattan, KS Diane DeBacker Kansas Commissioner of Education Phi Delta Kappa.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Interim Assessments and Formative Assessment Practices Pete.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library Brian Huff September 3, 2014.
Smarter Balanced Digital Library Wisconsin State Network of Educators Application and Participation Information Troy Couillard, Director of the Office.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Jacqueline E. King, Ph.D. Director, Higher Education Collaboration California Community Colleges Early Assessment Program.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Statewide Assessment Update Vince Dean, Ph.D. Director, Office of Standards & Assessment January 30, 2013 SIFN.
Moving Forward and Reaching the Next Level Tony Alpert Chief Operating Officer, SBAC.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC/CDE Joint Meeting May 16, 2013 Update on Key Smarter.
Online Assessment Update Region 6 February 24, 2012.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Common Core State Standards: Changing the Game Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor June 27, 2011.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
Ohio’s New Learning Standards English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Financial Literacy Physical Education Entrepreneurship.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.
Presentation to the Michigan Assessment Consortium January 20, 2012.
Wyoming Department of Education State Assessment in 2015: Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Wyoming State Board of Education and Select Committee.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Collecting Evidence on Students’ Readiness for College and Career Gail M. Pagano Connecticut State Department of Education January 2012.
Smarter Balanced and Accountability Assessment and Accountability Evolution and Implications.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Teachers Association Summer Institute August 2,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC September 11, 2014 Pete Callas, Administrator Support.
Accessibility and Accommodations Workgroup Wendy Carver Utah Department of Education Deborah Matthews Kansas State Department of Education.
SHEEO Working Conference On College Readiness and the Common Core Assessments Joe Willhoft, Executive Director Susan Gendron, Policy Coordinator March.
Key System Features and Next Steps. Features: Computer Adaptive Testing Adaptive assessment provides measurement across the breadth of the Common Core.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Building a System to Support Improved Teaching and Learning Joe Willhoft Shelbi Cole Juan d’Brot National Conference.
Defining Alignment and Achieving College Readiness Joe Willhoft, Executive Director Susan Gendron, Policy Coordinator May 9, 2011 SHEEO/Hunt Institute.
Assessment Consortia Panel Tom Foster Kansas State Dept. of Education National Forum on Education Statistics Washington D.C. July 25, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Enhanced Assessment Grant: English Language Proficiency Assessment.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Overview of the Smarter Balanced Assessment System CTA Pre-Good.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.
29 States $176,000,000 for development Includes formative, interim & summative Governed and controlled by states Co-chairs, Judy Park, Utah; Tony Alpert,
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
Preparing All Students for College and Career Readiness CCSS and Smarter Balanced Assessments 101.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Transitioning to the Common Core State Standards and New Assessments.
What about the Assessment System?
Language Arts Assessment Update
Summative: Formative resources: Interim Assessments:
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards
Presentation transcript:

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium

Smarter Balanced Membership

The Assessment Challenge How do we get from here......to here? All students leave high school college and career ready Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness...and what can an assessment system do to help?

Concerns with Today's Statewide Assessments Each state bears the burden of test development; no economies of scale Each state pays for its own assessments Students in many states leave high school unprepared for college or career Based on state standards Inadequate measures of complex skills and deep understanding Heavy use of multiple choice Tests cannot be used to inform instruction or affect program decisions Results delivered long after tests are given Difficult to interpret meaning of scores; concerns about access and fairness Accommodations for special education and ELL students vary Costly, time consuming, and challenging to maintain security Most administered on paper

Next Generation Assessments Rigorous assessment of progress toward “ college and career readiness” Common cut scores across all Consortium states Provide both achievement and growth information Valid, reliable, and fair for all students, except those with “significant cognitive disabilities” Administer online Use multiple measures Operational in school year Source: Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 68 / Friday, April 9, 2010 pp The U.S. Department of Education has funded two consortia of states with development grants for new assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards

Smarter Balanced Background

The Purpose of the Consortium To develop a comprehensive and innovative assessment system for grades 3-8 and high school in English language arts and mathematics aligned to the Common Core State Standards, so that... [The assessments shall be operational across Consortium states in the school year]

State Led Committed to Transparency

State-Led Governance States Join Consortium as Governing or Advisory State Governors Education Chiefs State Legislatures State Boards of Education State Representatives Serve on Executive Committee 2 elected co-chairs 4 representatives elected by governing states Lead procurement state (WA) Higher education representatives Smarter Balanced Staff WestEd, Project Management Partner Advisory Committees

Who We Are Executive Committee Co-Chairs: Deb Sigman, Ph.D. (CA), Joseph Martineau, Ph.D. (MI) Committee: Deb Sigman (CA); Dan Hupp (ME); Michael Hock, Ph.D. (VT); Mike Middleton (WA); Lynette Russell, Ph.D. (WI); Charles Lenth, Ph.D. (SHEEO-Higher Education Representative); Beverly Young, Ph.D. (CA-Higher Education Representative) Staff Executive Director: Joe Willhoft, Ph.D. Chief Operating Officer: Tony Alpert Director of Strategic Communications and PIO: Eddie Arnold, APR Lead Psychometrician: Marty McCall, Ph.D. Director of Higher Education Collaboration: Jacqueline King, Ph.D. Director of English Language Arts / Literacy: Barbara Kapinus, Ph.D. Director of Mathematics: Shelbi Cole, Ph.D. Director of Support for Under-Represented Students: Magda Chia, Ph.D. Advisors Policy Coordinator: Sue Gendron, Ph.D. (former Maine Education Commissioner) Senior Research Advisor: Linda Darling-Hammond, Ph.D. (Stanford University)

Technical Advisory Committee Jamal Abedi, Ph.D. UC Davis/CRESST Randy Bennett, Ph.D. ETS Derek C. Briggs, Ph.D. University of Colorado Gregory J. Cizek, Ph.D. University of North Carolina David T. Conley, Ph.D. University of Oregon Linda Darling-Hammond, Ph.D. Stanford University Brian Gong, Ph.D. The Center for Assessment Edward Haertel, Ph.D. Stanford University Joan Herman, Ph.D. UCLA/CRESST James W. Pellegrino, Ph.D. University of Illinois, Chicago W. James Popham, Ph.D. UCLA, Emeritus Joseph Ryan, Ph.D. Arizona State University Martha Thurlow, Ph.D. University of Minnesota/NCEO

Smarter Balanced Approach

A Balanced Assessment System Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness All students leave high school college and career ready Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning Interim assessments Flexible, open, used for actionable feedback Summative assessments Benchmarked to college and career readiness Teacher resources for formative assessment practices to improve instruction

A Balanced Assessment System School Year Last 12 weeks of the year* DIGITAL LIBRARY of formative tools, processes and exemplars; released items and tasks; model curriculum units; educator training; professional development tools and resources; scorer training modules; and teacher collaboration tools. ELA/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3-8 and High School Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks Scope, sequence, number and timing of interim assessments locally determined *Time windows may be adjusted based on results from the research agenda and final implementation decisions. Performance Tasks ELA/literacy Mathematics Computer Adaptive Assessment ELA/literacy Mathematics Optional Interim Assessment Optional Interim Assessment Re-take option available Summative Assessment for Accountability

Using Computer Adaptive Technology for Summative and Interim Assessments Provides accurate measurements of student growth over time Increased precision Item difficulty based on student responses Tailored for Each Student Larger item banks mean that not all students receive the same questions Increased Security Fewer questions compared to fixed form tests Shorter Test Length Turnaround time is significantly reduced Faster Results GMAT, GRE, COMPASS (ACT), Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Mature Technology

K-12 Teacher Involvement Write and review items/tasks for the pilot test ( ) and field test ( ) Develop formative assessment practices and curriculum tools for inclusion in digital library ( ) Data Review of the Pilot test items Develop scoring criteria for performance tasks

Smarter Balanced Digital Library Your state is part of the Smarter Balanced Consortium, which is designing new summative and interim assessments for member states. Smarter Balanced is guided by the belief that the effective use of a balanced assessment system can improve teaching and learning. Smarter Balanced is designing a Digital Library to provide resources, tools and professional learning support for educators in your state. Your instructional expertise will be a valuable contribution in the development of this powerful resource. Page 17

State Network of Educators (SNE) Smarter Balanced and Wisconsin are seeking the expertise of a highly selective group of educators to: Review and contribute resources for the Digital Library Get early access to resources Take advantage of new collaboration functionality We invite you to apply between May 1 – May 30, Page 18

Who should apply for the SNE? The State Network of Educators will be comprised of qualified educators in K-12 and higher education with expertise in: Formative Assessment (e.g., collecting evidence of student learning as you teach and using it to adjust instruction) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts (ELA) and/or Mathematics General Education Gifted and Talented students English Language Learners (ELL) Students With Disabilities (SWD) Note: A few positions for science and social science educators are available. Page 19 We invite you to be part of this opportunity, where you will connect with colleagues in common grade levels and content areas throughout the Smarter Balanced states.

Higher Education Collaboration Involved 175 public and 13 private systems/institutions of higher education in application Two higher education representatives on the Executive Committee Higher education lead in each state and higher education faculty participating in work groups Goal: The high school assessment qualifies students for entry-level, credit- bearing coursework in college or university

Assessment System Components Summative Assessment (Computer Adaptive) Assesses the full range of Common Core in English language arts and mathematics for students in grades 3–8 and 11 (interim assessments can be used in grades 9 and 10) Measures current student achievement and growth across time, showing progress toward college and career readiness Includes a variety of question types: selected response, short constructed response, extended constructed response, technology enhanced, and performance tasks

Assessment System Components Interim Assessment (Computer Adaptive) Optional comprehensive and content-cluster assessment to help identify specific needs of each student Can be administered throughout the year Provides clear examples of expected performance on Common Core standards Includes a variety of question types: selected response, short constructed response, extended constructed response, technology enhanced, and performance tasks Aligned to and reported on the same scale as the summative assessments Fully accessible for instruction and professional development

Assessment System Components Extended projects demonstrate real-world writing and analytical skills May include online research, group projects, presentations Require 1-2 class periods to complete Included in both interim and summative assessments Applicable in all grades being assessed Evaluated by teachers using consistent scoring rubrics The use of performance measures has been found to increase the intellectual challenge in classrooms and to support higher- quality teaching. - Linda Darling-Hammond and Frank Adamson, Stanford University “ ” Performance Tasks

Assessment System Components Few initiatives are backed by evidence that they raise achievement. Formative assessment is one of the few approaches proven to make a difference. - Stephanie Hirsh, Learning Forward Formative Assessment Practices Research-based, on- demand tools and resources for teachers Aligned to Common Core, focused on increasing student learning and enabling differentiation of instruction Professional development materials include model units of instruction and publicly released assessment items, formative strategies “ ”

Assessment System Components Data are only useful if people are able to access, understand and use them… For information to be useful, it must be timely, readily available, and easy to understand. -Data Quality Campaign Online Reporting Static and dynamic reports, secure and public views Individual states retain jurisdiction over access and appearance of online reports Dashboard gives parents, students, practitioners, and policymakers access to assessment information Graphical display of learning progression status (interim assessment) Feedback and evaluation mechanism provides surveys, open feedback, and vetting of materials “ ”

Support for Special Populations Accurate measures of progress for students with disabilities and English Language Learners Accessibility and Accommodations Work Group engaged throughout development Outreach and collaboration with relevant associations Common- Core Tests to Have Built-in Accommodations - June 8, 2011 “ ”

Technology Guidelines for New Purchases Minimum for New Hardware Processor Speed RAM Available Memory/Storage Resolution Display Size 1.0 GHz1 GB 1024x768 10” Class Desktops, laptops, netbooks (Windows, Mac, Chrome, Linux), virtual desktops, thin client, tablets (iPad, Windows, and Android), and hybrid laptop/tablets will be compatible devices provided they are configured to meet the established hardware, operating system, and networking specifications—and are able to be “locked down.” Operating Systems Windows 7 Mac 10.7 Linux (Ubuntu 11.10; Fedora 16) Chrome Apple iOS 6 Android 4.0 (June 2012) Minimum specifications for legacy systems and network requirements will be informed by the Technology Readiness Tool and will be available in August The most recent version of the document can be found at

Timeline Formative Processes, Tools, and Practices Development Begins Writing and Review of Pilot Items/Tasks (including Cognitive Labs and Small-Scale Trials) Field Testing of Summative and Interim Items/Tasks Conducted Content and Item Specifications Development Pilot Testing of Summative and Interim Items/Tasks Conducted Preliminary Achievement Standards (Summative) Proposed and Other Policy Definitions Adopted Operational Summative Assessment Administered Procurement Plan Developed Writing and Review of Field Test Items/Tasks (throughout the school year) Writing and Review of Field Test Items/Tasks (throughout the school year) Final Achievement Standards (Summative) Verified and Adopted Summative Master Work Plan Developed and Work Groups Launched

Sample Items Illustrate rigor and complexity of ELA/literacy and mathematics items on Smarter Balanced assessments Signal to educators the shifts in instruction that will be required to help students meet the demands of the Common Core and new assessments Showcase variety of item types: Selected response Constructed response Technology enhanced Performance tasks Sample items are available at performance-tasks/ performance-tasks/

Exploring the Sample Items Accessed online through a simulated test platform Viewable by: –Grade band (3-5, 6-8, and high school) –Content claim –Select types (technology enhanced and performance tasks) –Themes illustrating learning progressions across grades and difficulty progressions Item metadata includes: –Grade level –Content claim –Assessment target –Brief descriptions –Selected scoring rubrics Selected response and technology enhanced items are machine scorable Online feedback and phone support available

Accessibility and Accommodations Sample items have some accessibility and accommodations features Full range of accessibility tools and accommodations options under development guided by: –Magda Chia, Ph.D., Director of Support for Under- Represented Students –Accessibility and Accommodations Work Group –Students with Disabilities Advisory Committee Chair: Martha Thurlow (NCEO) –English Language Learners Advisory Committee Co-Chairs: Jamal Abedi (UC Davis); Kenji Hakuta (Stanford) –Accessibility & Accommodations Framework

Find Out More Smarter Balanced can be found online at: SmarterBalanced.org