Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing and Managing Risk
Advertisements

Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
1 TP/EMD European State of the Art for AEBS systems Stuttgart, May 2008 Dr. Jürgen Trost AEBS/LDWS
Warning Timing for AEBS AEBS/LDWS Proposal of Warning Timing 1) Warning has two functions; to induce the driver to take an avoiding maneuver.
Chapter 10: Negotiating Intersections
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY REAR ENDERS – HOW CAN WE PREVENT THEM? A collision occurs when two vehicles occupy the same space!
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 61 Transmitted by IWG QRTV for UN Regulation Informal document GRB (61st GRB, January 2015, agenda item 11)
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
1 Measure against Quietness Problem of HV, etc. October 12, 2010 MLIT Japan.
Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
Field evaluation of an advanced brake warning system David Shinar Human Factors 1995 Presented by: Derrick Smets.
AFS Main Beam (Driving Beam) Improvements Presentation to WP th Session November 2008 Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
Sensors Cassandra, Gayathri, Rohan, Patrick. -Many distractions while driving -Want to dramatically reduce accidents that occur -Try to figure out ways.
General Safety Regulation ACEA discussion paper Renzo Cicilloni Director Safety Paris, June 2009 AEBS/LDWS
1 Surveys for Standardization of AVAS in Japan Results of questionnaires investigating in which situations quietness of HV/EV works against people JASIC.
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection Benjamin Schiereck, Sales Manger Traficon Germany Improving road and tunnel safety via incident management: implementing.
Transportation Active Safety Institute TASI: Our Focus on the Human Machine Interface 25 January 2007 Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, IUPUI.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
© Siemens AG, 2002 s CP RS Agenda The Role of IT for Accident-free Driving Interaction with driver’s physical condition Interaction with the roadside environment.
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 62 Transmitted by IWG QRTV for UN Regulation Informal document GRB (62nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda item 11)
Is Transportation Sustainable?. Objectives By the end of this unit, students will be able to: 1.Examine and prioritize transportation project impacts.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Integrating Trust and Driver’s Safety By Robin Mitchell.
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
 Since 2008, approximately 150 pedestrians have been killed annually in traffic related crashes on New Jersey roadways.  Vehicle-pedestrian collisions.
1 A Study on Approach Warning Systems for hybrid vehicle in motor mode JASIC, JAPAN Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009, agenda.
NHTSA Rulemaking Activities for Quiet Vehicles Alert Sound Standard 7 th Meeting of the Quiet Road Transport Work Group Osaka, Japan QRTV
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
© 2006 PSEN Unit - #4 Let’s Go Driving Identification Evaluation Control Monitor.
Cycle of Vehicle Safety Measures in Japan - Study process before & after rulemaking procedure Issue of safety regulations Enforcement (type approval &
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
On-board Technologies
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
Sight Distances.
GRBP subjects Meeting 31st October, 2018 Brussels
John Lenkeit, Terry Smith
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N- Vehicles
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
Main subjects: priority 1, 2, 3
Safety Distance to the front
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 61.
Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Task-force on reverse warning signal CURRENT STATUS in United nations C-WGN 16th – Wuhan – December 11, 2018.
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
Do Roads Connect or Divide? The Other Side of the Road
Proposed Definition of the Pause Function
Status of discussion after 7th meeting
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
©2018 Graphical Research. All rights reserved. Europe Automotive Camera Market to witness gains upto $5bn by 2025: Graphical.
Presentation transcript:

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet Road Vehicles & Pedestrian Safety Activities in Germany (VDA) Report to IG QRTV Washington 2010/05/04

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 2Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Forecast of Effect of Future Noise Regulations in Real Traffic Future technologies like Hybrids and EV will have nearly no propulsion sound emission. What will be the consequences for detectability of vehicles in traffic? Report /2010 E.N.G. Verheijen | J. Jabben Effect of electric cars on traffic noise and safety NETHERLANDS 2009

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 3Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Reasons to start Investigations Typical traffic situation create a background noise that could mask the sound emitted by a particular vehicle such that observers will not be able to determine this vehicle properly. This could cause problems to pedestrians when traveling in that traffic.

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 4Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Research of the Technical University Munich ( )  Research on Accidents between pedestrians and vehicles.  Assessment of the sound perception of vehicles in traffic.  Find a descriptor to assess whether vehicles could be too quiet or not.

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 5Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Cars in Traffic - Reasons for Pedestrian Accidents

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 6Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Detectability of Cars in Traffic Results of a Study of the Technical University Munich on the pedestrian safety (Germany ) Result:  Detectability of vehicles in traffic  is dependent on background noise (40 dB to 70 dB Leq)  is very different for individual vehicles  Reaction time of observers (pedestrians) is very different.  Vehicles with a clear signature are more easy to be detected. high background noiselow background noise

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 7Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Detectability of Cars in Traffic Results of a Study of the Technical University Munich on the pedestrian safety (Germany ) The TUM developed an algorithm to predict the detectability of a vehicle using passby measurements according to the actual ECE R51

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 8Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Detectability of Cars in Traffic Results of a Study of the Technical University Munich on the pedestrian safety (Germany ) 5,6 m/s8,3 m/s13,9 m/s black dots: result of the prediction model of the TUM figures in red: mean driver reaction time of 1second red line: Stop distance in meter as a result of reaction time and braking time.

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 9Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Difficulties to Balance Sound Requirements  For Safety Purposes:  Sound shall have a clear signature and a sound level high enough to enable detection even at higher background noise condition.  For Environment Purposes:  Sound shall have a decent character, be not annoying and shall have a sound level low as possible.  Practically:  In most cases the warning device is not needed, because no pedestrians at all or no visual impaired persons are present, or a clear separation between road and sidewalk exists.  System should be disabled in such cases. But allowing the driver to do this manually seems to be unacceptable...

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 10Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Research programs based on EU Regulations on SAFETY  Europe is working on an “accident prevention” program for pedestrians with the goal to have no collisions between pedestrians and cars in the future.  The EU-Directive 78/2009/EC is inviting vehicle manufacturers to come forward with proposals for collision prevention systems in general.  The vehicle industry is working on active solutions, as  pedestrian recognition in traffic, specially for those who intend to cross roads  pedestrians car communication to provide information to both.  Traffic safety is on highest priority for vehicle manufacturers.

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 11Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Actual activated Research Capacities in Germany (1)  FAT (Research Body of the VDA) study about „Road/traffic-safety of pedestrians in the context with the low noise level of vehicles with alternative propulsion“ - scheduled for 2009/2010  Scope  Typical configurations of accidents with visually and hearing impaired pedestrians.  Examination and classification for warning systems - existing and possible in the future.  Beside acoustical warning signals other possibilities of warning shall be examined and compared.  Requirements on the perceptibility of possible warning signals based on vehicle, infrastructure or pedestrian.  Relations between other research activities with similar objectives.

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 12Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Actual activated Research Capacities in Germany (2)  vFSS – Advanced Forward-Looking Safety Systems (started 2009) Chairmanship:Frank Leimbach Coordination:Jens König

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 13Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Actual activated Research Capacities in Germany (2)  vFSS – Advanced Forward-Looking Safety Systems  Scope  Development of ways for driver assistance systems (in particular advanced emergency braking systems).  Assessment of the technical feasibility (of the test procedure) and the definition of possible implementation strategies.  Consideration of test procedures with respect to other assessments for both primary and secondary safety.  Agreement on defined evaluation criteria (e.g. faulty activation rates, level of vehicle autonomous reaction,…).

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 14Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Actual activated Research Capacities in Germany (2)  vFSS – Advanced Forward-Looking Safety Systems Radar detection of pedestrians. Emergency braking when pedestrian do cross the road.

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 15Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars C2X Communication  Scope  Increase the safety of pedestrians in traffic by means of micro system technical technologies.  Detect pedestrians even not visible to the driver, so that warning of the driver is possible to avoid a collision or at least reduce the severity of an accident.  Focus  Pedestrian shows up between two cars.  Pedestrian are close to a vehicle that is maneuvering for parking (e.g. reverse driving) and driver cannot see pedestrian.

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 16Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Conclusions  Sound as the warning signal seems to be the most appropriate approach.  Alternatives lack of general acceptance and experience, means people are used to have sound.  However advanced forward looking safety features for pedestrian recognition will enable a satisfying compromise between safety requirements and environmental needs:  Recognition of pedestrians is done automatically.  Activation of warning sound only when needed.  Warning sound can be more loud and more penetrating.  Can be combined with other measures, e.g. braking or disabling of the acceleration control unit.